. >> the gentleman that owns the house near the 18th green, he owns sarkis world, and in the last day of the tournament, he brought this element -- elephant on site and was giving his friends and his rides. pat: only a 30 year veteran would river that. he is among helpers taking part in the pga volunteer to her talent -- tour challenged. >> i' m getting my company involved, which is a worldwide company, international company, getting more votes. it would be an honor to present pat: imagine that free cigarettes and elephant rides at bay hill. jason davis the first-round leader out here. he is second as well, but he has company. highly coming up we see you at 6:00. stewart: all right, interesting. coming up, a central florida city decides to decriminalize pot. angela: plus, speaking out. the performer who was injured in an accidental explosion yesterday during a south florida pep rally. stewart: and a scary situation for some travelers. their plane was struck by lightning. wesh 2 news at 5:30 will be this one goes out to all the allergy muddlers. you know who you are. you've lost your g

. >> commissioner sarkis >> you mentioned-i have a question. the outset you said you have a number of amendments you were considering. could you please explain what these amendment are? >> sure. one of them is putting the window afterwards. they have to come back to work for at least 90 days in order not to have to give back the benefits. an in other words, there are some clarifying-i have your list here am i believe . this is from the chamber. excuse me. so, that's one amendment we're making. >> the worker has to come back to work? >> for 90 days. yes. again that's another >> if the worker does and what happened? >> the employer can recoup the benefit from the employee. so, presumably and again when talking with the chamber and others, employers are not going to go around suing the workers what is frankly not a massive benefits back, but if there were accrued vacation there being cast out something like that they could credit it against that. but that was a request of the business community made and so we had to put that in there. again, we ar

. >> commissioner sarkis >> you mentioned-i have a question. the outset you said you have a number of amendments you were considering. could you please explain what these amendment are? >> sure. one of them is putting the window afterwards. they have to come back to work for at least 90 days in order not to have to give back the benefits. an in other words, there are some clarifying-i have your list here am i believe . this is from the chamber. excuse me. so, that's one amendment we're making. >> the worker has to come back to work? >> for 90 days. yes. again that's another >> if the worker does and what happened? >> the employer can recoup the benefit from the employee. so, presumably and again when talking with the chamber and others, employers are not going to go around suing the workers what is frankly not a massive benefits back, but if there were accrued vacation there being cast out something like that they could credit it against that. but that was a request of the business community made and so we had to put that in there. again, we ar

. >> commissioner sarkis >> you mentioned-i have a question. the outset you said you have a number of amendments you were considering. could you please explain what these amendment are? >> sure. one of them is putting the window afterwards. they have to come back to work for at least 90 days in order not to have to give back the benefits. an in other words, there are some clarifying-i have your list here am i believe . this is from the chamber. excuse me. so, that's one amendment we're making. >> the worker has to come back to work? >> for 90 days. yes. again that's another >> if the worker does and what happened? >> the employer can recoup the benefit from the employee. so, presumably and again when talking with the chamber and others, employers are not going to go around suing the workers what is frankly not a massive benefits back, but if there were accrued vacation there being cast out something like that they could credit it against that. but that was a request of the business community made and so we had to put that in there. again, we ar

. >> commissioner sarkis >> you mentioned-i have a question. the outset you said you have a number of amendments you were considering. could you please explain what these amendment are? >> sure. one of them is putting the window afterwards. they have to come back to work for at least 90 days in order not to have to give back the benefits. an in other words, there are some clarifying-i have your list here am i believe . this is from the chamber. excuse me. so, that's one amendment we're making. >> the worker has to come back to work? >> for 90 days. yes. again that's another >> if the worker does and what happened? >> the employer can recoup the benefit from the employee. so, presumably and again when talking with the chamber and others, employers are not going to go around suing the workers what is frankly not a massive benefits back, but if there were accrued vacation there being cast out something like that they could credit it against that. but that was a request of the business community made and so we had to put that in there. again, we ar