if there's any doubt i ask the tjpa attorney to make a ruling on that. secondly, there is no contract here. there is a contract somewhere in ether. this does not meet any rules of public disclosure, none. you can't act on this today until you have an actual contract or an actual agreement that people can look at. no. 3, this whole arrangement of bridges, an existing contract you have with turner construction. they are the contract managers. what you are doing is either forcing an employee on turner construction -- and incidentally as a member of the cac i heard the gentleman's presentation, he took a portion of what turner construction has bpb presenting to the cac for many months. you are bridging a turner contract, how have you changed the contract of turner to diminish their scope? and i ask the tjpa attorney to rule on that. 4, this is unnecessary interference and mr. riskin you are totally incorrect in your assertion about costs. yes, i don't know where you are getting the 40 percent, it's been booted around between 25 and 35 percent, but that is ir

so in the tjpa line agent item it is anticipated these services will be covered. these are normal services expected for an organization such as this managing a facility such as the transbay transit center. and i will talk a bit about facilities renewal. examples of facilities renewal costs are, these are the costs to renew the life of systems and components of the building. so when systems and components reach their, the ends of their economic life cycle, that means when it makes more sense to replace them than it does to maintain them, these are examples of those points such as interior lighting replacements, switch gear replacements, multiplex pump system replacements. in 2053 we have a big spike in supply piping networks, park level skylights, for instance, then in 2058 we have a large spike when major systems are going to be smraited for renewal. this klus the hvac networks , the electrical networks and the drain pipe systems. the reality is these replacements aren't necessarily made on a one-time basis for the whole facility, they are typically phased in as n

if there's any doubt i ask the tjpa attorney to make a ruling on that. secondly, there is no contract here. there is a contract somewhere in ether. this does not meet any rules of public disclosure, none. you can't act on this today until you have an actual contract or an actual agreement that people can look at. no. 3, this whole arrangement of bridges, an existing contract you have with turner construction. they are the contract managers. what you are doing is either forcing an employee on turner construction -- and incidentally as a member of the cac i heard the gentleman's presentation, he took a portion of what turner construction has bpb presenting to the cac for many months. you are bridging a turner contract, how have you changed the contract of turner to diminish their scope? and i ask the tjpa attorney to rule on that. 4, this is unnecessary interference and mr. riskin you are totally incorrect in your assertion about costs. yes, i don't know where you are getting the 40 percent, it's been booted around between 25 and 35 percent, but that is ir

in, the public source revenues looks like completely segregated from the balance so that should the tjpa in the future want to finance based on the revenue streams they would have a tax exempt- >> yes. that's one of the things being worked on and talk through right now. >> last question. do you anticipate having a review panel for the review of the proposals ? >> yes we do anticipate that. we have not yet looked at with that conversation would be but we happy to take any of your suggestions. >> i mean between the peer reviewers and maybe some of the folks participated in the outreach process you may want to select folks to have some expertise or particular interest in this >> okay, thank you. >> i would suggest including the small business commission on the peer review. i think given what director reiskin said. we cannot just suggest local businesses being included having us the intentional. otherwise i think we may get into a place where we don't have a good mix and it won't be successful if we are not a little bit more prescriptive of what we would like to see. >> one of the things was

. >> all right, the tjpa board of directors meeting of march 10, 2016 is back in session and nrs no action to report. directors, that concludes your agenda for today. >> okay, we are adjourned. (meeting adjourned). >> power it's all around us in the sun and the winds and caves waves power that lights our homes while protecting our natural resources clean power will provide power to san franciscans how about works right now our power is from pg&e from non-renewable systems that comes over pg&e maintained lines with clean power your energy about think generated by caesarean more renewable sources come to our home e.r. businesses to the pg&e lines - >> well, thank you for coming this morning ladies and gentlemen, our city over the past few months had not been grammatic grappling with a crisis in far too any city's between the trust of color and law enforcement in the breakdown of this trustee can most awe kufl the shooting death of mario woods this past december and since that sdooub incident i've ordered a number of reforms to the use of force policies to prevent police officer involved shoo