they are known for being completely uncompassionate. why is that the best way? jeff: different styles work for different people and companies and situations. i think the worst thing somebody could do is try to emulate what some of they've done because of their success. and what works for steve jobs or what works for elon, and people might like that, may not work and more often than not does not work for other people who try to employ that style and people just don't follow. i think it depends. for me, personally, i find that taking the time to understand what it is you're trying to accomplish and how i can help you works better than projecting my own worldview onto you. i think that's a mistake a lot of younger, less experienced executives make. that was one i made. i expected my team, 10, 12, 14 years ago at yahoo!, i expected them to do things the way i did. that will lead to nothing but frustration. emily: your relationship with reid hoffman has been called the happiest, one of the happiest partnerships in business history. jeff: superlatives, yeah. emily: wh

non jews the book explains are uncompassionate by nature and, therefore, attacking them may, quote, curb their evil inclinations. the book permits the killing of infants and children of non jews since, quote, it is clear that they will grow up to harm us. these are things that are funded by u.s. tax exempt dollars. in the interest of time, i think i'm going to skip through some of these. these are only a few examples in a large body of evidence showing how financial transactions from tax-exempt organizations are used to fund ethnoreligious supremacy and entitlements. with its consequence, displacement, and destruction of native palestinian life. it does not include a whole other ecosystem of synagogue and church giving to israel. so i think the more appropriate question to ask today is whether specific actions, protocols, laws and political adventures bend our collective human experience toward justice, toward universal dignity and moral evolution. the forcible removal of an entire nation, a deeply rooted people in order to replace them with others from around the world, religious conver

they understood that a republican party that looked completely uncompassionate was not going to win national elections. compassionate conservatism was invented. it was actually invented back in the '90s by some serious people who were quite serious about it. bush really grasped that idea and if clinton had a third way and were trying to create a fourth way, they were very proud that they had turned the education issue into an issue that really helped bush and decreased the democrats had vanished on that issue. after that election when bush failed to win the popular vote, rhodes, who thought he was gonna win the election clean without the fight over florida went back and mapped out and did some pulling. he discovered there really wasn't a big moderate vote. so bush partly packed away from the strategy and moved toward a bay strategy. he did embrace some of the passion and conservative ideas but they had no traction with the republican congress. of course 9/11 happened which change the course of the bush presidency. if the iraq war had gone better and it turned out to be a good idea and not as

they understood that a republican party that looks completely uncompassionate was not going to win national elections. compassionate conservative and was invented. it was actually invented back in the '90s by securing people who were quite serious. dan coats was a speechwriter back in the day. bush really grasps that idea and so he and clinton had a third way. they were trying to create a fourth way. he was very proud, both bush and he were crowd that they proud that they turned it in to a way to reduce the advantage on that issue. after the election when bush failed to win the popular vote, those who thought he was going to win the election clean without the fight over florida and by winning the popular vote went back and discovered there really wasn't a moderate vote. bush partly backed away from this strategy and moved toward a bay strategy. he did raise some of the ideas but those ideas really had no traction with the republican congress. of course 9/11 happened and that changed the course of the bush presidency. i think if bush had succeeded which is to say if the iraq war had gone bet

non-jews, the book explains, are uncompassionate by nature and, therefore, attacking them may, quote:curb their evil inclinations. the book permits the killing of infants and children of nonp-jews since, quote: it is clear they will grow up to harm us. and these are things that are funded by u.s. tax-exempt dollars. in the interest of time, i think i'm going to skip through some of these. these are only a few examples in a large body of evidence showing how financial transactions from tax-exempt organizations are used to fund ethno-religious supremacy and entitlement with its consequent displacement and destruction of native palestinian life. it does not include a whole other ecosystem of synagogue and church giving to israel. so i think the more appropriate question to ask today is whether specific actions, protocols, laws and political adventures bend our collective human experience toward justice, toward universal dignity and moral evolution. the forcible removal of an entire nation, a deeply-rooted people in order to replace them with others from around the world, people who the n