. >> arnold rothstein gave them a little bit of money to, supposedly, throw the series. >> "shoeless"st baseball player of all time. >> he's banned from the game... >> one weeping fan of his cried out, "say it isn't so!" >> ...and the fascination with his tale endures. >> shoeless joe's really part of pop culture. >> so why is his autograph one of the rarest in sports? >> he was virtually illiterate. >> he had a very hard time even writing an individual letter. >> he did. >> as far as we know it, there is only one known. >> one? >> just one. >> and it's this woman's strange inheritance. >> it started to dawn on me that this is a lot of money we're talking about. >> this is a biggie -- 1911 "shoeless" joe jackson signed photograph. [ door creaks ] [ wind howls ] [ thunder rumbles ] [ bird caws ] >> hi. i'm jamie colby, and i'm heading along the shores of lake erie in cleveland, ohio. today i'm meeting a woman who inherited a rare item that recalls the most notorious episode in baseball history -- an episode that's inspired books and movies and retains an air of mystery to this day. >>

a point general rothstein said earlier. this is not fundamentally about a training issue. there is no training that is not going to guarranty this problem won't occur. when you look at troops that committed these abuses some are among the best-trained troops in the world. we know that they have explicit components of sexual exploitation and abuse prevention in their training methods. so ultimately i come back to this as accountability issue. there is no troop-contributing country that is immune from these types of abuses. it is how they deal with them and how they deal with it in a fulsome way that provides prevention going forward. -- >> before we turn to the training question, since we got you, ambassador coleman, on this, how effective is naming and shaming? since a number of countries involved or implicated arere allies of ours that have troops trained and performing at highest level before we talk about those that lack operational efficiency. i think operational training becomes more effect tougher training. how effect

rothstein: good afternoon. thank you for letting me speak today. colleagues, am very deeply troubled by what brings us here today, and the things we have to discuss about these instances. among my duties at the state department, i am responsible for providing executive leadership for the global peace operations initiative. i will take a few minutes to talk about sexual exportation -- about preventing sexual exploitation and abuse. gpoi is our flagship security assistance program. it focuses on building capacity for other countries to deploy other missions. for the most part, it is a training and equipping kind of a mission, although we also focus on building self-sufficiency, to do training for themselves. an important to note, one of our key program objectives is to promote the role of women and to promote better gender integration into their operations. gpoi has been very successful at helping other countries step up to their responsibilities for security. it also allows us to focus our military and other priorities besides peacekeeping. to date,

well, i will allow general rothstein to answer the specific training question, but if you would me just to say i i want to reiterate a point general rothstein made earlier, which is this is not fundamentally about a training issue. i mean, there is no training that is going to guarantee that this problem won't occur. and when you look at the troops that have committed these abuses, some of them are among the best trained troops in the world. and we know that they have explicit components of sexual exploitation and abuse prevention in their training methods. so ultimately, i come back to this as an accountability issue. there is no troop contributing country that is immune from these types of abuses. it's how they deal with them and how they deal with it in a fulsome way that provides prevention going forward. >> before we turn to the training question, since we've got you, ambassador coleman, on this, how effective is naming and shaming since the number of countries involved and implicated are close al lays of ours who have troops that are trained and perform at the highest level? then

rothstein: good afternoon. thank you for letting me speak today.ike my colleagues, i am very deeply troubled by what brings us here today, and the things we have to discuss about these instances. among my duties at the state department, i am responsible for providing executive leadership for the global peace operations initiative. toill take a few minutes talk about sexual exportation and abuse. gpoi is our flagship security assistance program. it focuses on building capacity for other countries to deploy other missions. for the most part, it is a training mission, although we also focus on building self-sufficiency, training for themselves. an important to note, one of our key program objectives is to promote the role of women and to promote better gender integration into their operations. gpoi has been very successful at helping other countries step up to their responsibilities for security. it also allows us to focus our military and other priorities besides peacekeeping. to date, the program has facilitated the deployment of more than 200,000 p

our third way this is major general michael rothstein, deputy assistant secretary for state for plansrams, and operations, state department bureau of the political military affairs. again we thank you all for your service to our country. i think all of you know without objection your written testimony will be entered into the record. if you could summarize in about five minutes. and i would say that i know you all are very busy, to the extent you can do the testing of the second panel it might be beneficial to you but we thank you for your snow. if you could start in the order i introduce you i would appreciate it. again thank you for taking the time to be with us today. >> thank you, mr. chairman and ranking member cardin, and other distinguished those of the panel for inviting me to testify today on this urgent and shameful issue of sexual abuse and exploitation by u.n. peacekeepers. earlier this month by the opportunity to travel with ambassador power to the central african republic to witness the peaceful transfer of power to the newly elected president of that country. anyways th

if you would allow me to say i want to reiterate a point that general rothstein made which is that this is not fundamentally about a training issue. there is no training that will guarantee that this will not occur. when you look at the troops committing abuses, some of them are among the best trained. we know that they have explicit components of sexual exploitation prevention in the training methods. ultimately, it is an accountability issue. there is no contributing country that is immune from these abuses, it is how they deal with it that provides prevention. how effective is naming and shaming? a number of implicated countries are close allies of hours. -- of ours. i think accountability matters before training. how effective is naming and shaming? >> thank you. i like to avoid the phrase naming and shaming because i see naming --n accountability. it really is a watershed for us to be able to identify the countries and to be able to follow directly with them and the passivity that has existed, the sweeping under the carpet. , tolack of accountability not allowed anymore senator isa

our third witness is major general michael rothstein. it i've announce that correctly? assistant secretary for the state department of bureau and military affairs. we thank you all for the service to the country. i think all of you know that without objection your written testimony will be entered into the record. if you could summarize in five minutes, i would say that i know you all are very busy. to the extent that you can hear the testimony of the second panel, and might be beneficial to you. but we thank you here now, and if you could to start in the order that i introduce you. i would appreciate it. thanks for taking the time today. isobel: thank you, mr. chairman. ranking member cardin and distinguished members of the committee for inviting me to testify today on the urgent, and shameful, issue of sexual exploitation and abuse by un peacekeepers. earlier this month, i had the opportunity to travel with ambassador power to the central african republic to witness the peaceful transfer of power to the country's newly-elected leader, president touadera. in many ways,

rothstein. did i pronounce that correctly? >> yes. >> deputy assistant of state for plans, programs, and oermss, state department bureau political, military affairs. we thank you all for your service to our country. i think all of you know without objection your written testimony will be entered into the record. if you could summarize in about five minutes. and i would say that i know you all are very busy. to the extent you could hear the testimony of the second panel it might be beneficial to you, but we thank you for yours here now. if you could start in the order i introduced you, i'd appreciate it. thank you for taking the time to be with us today. >> thank you, mr. chairman and ranking member carden and other distinguished members of the panel for inviting me here to testify today on this urgent and shameful issue of sexual abuse and exploitation by u.n. peacekeepers. earlier this month i had the opportunity to travel with ambassador power to the central african republic to witness the peaceful transfer of power to the n

>> if you would allow me to say i want to reiterate a point that general rothstein made which is that this is not fundamentally about a training issue. there is no training that will guarantee that this will not occur. when you look at the troops committing abuses, some of them are among the best trained. we know that they have explicit components of sexual exploitation prevention in the training methods. ultimately, it is an accountability issue. there is no contributing country that is immune from these abuses, it is how they deal with it that provides prevention. >> how effective is naming and shaming? a number of implicated countries are close allies of ours. i think accountability matters before training. how effective is naming and shaming? >> thank you. i like to avoid the phrase naming and shaming because i see no shame in naming -- accountability. it really is a watershed for us to be able to identify the countries and to be able to follow directly with them and not allow the passivity that has existed, the sweeping under the carpet. the lack of accountability, to not allowed