mr. bolden: that's a good question. mr. kamen: i think that what you said was some of the most fundamental presumptions of we have made. throughout time. back to 1816, you can go back to technology before that. a few hundred years before that it was called the dark ages. nobody in their own time ever realized. i doubt that some monk in the dark ages said that i've got a great idea, but this is the dark ages. i think that today cancer -- as an example, my brother is an oncologist and he would say that it isn't the cells. we shouldn't be treating the disease, we should be treating the patient. and by the way, it's the immune system. it took us 100 years to get there and now we are starting to get somewhere, but what you said i think was the fundamental perception of what we know and how we know what we know and how we are going to use that to move forward being more critical than ever because the world is moving faster than ever and those other jobs that you could have, you could make a living as a farmer. you could make a li

mr. bolden: that's a good question. mr. kamen: i think that what you said was some of the most fundamental presumptions of we have made. throughout time. back to 1816, you can go back to technology before that. a few hundred years before that it was called the dark ages. nobody in their own time ever realized. i doubt that some monk in the dark ages said that i've got a great idea, but this is the dark ages. cancer -- astoday an example, my brother is an oncologist and he would say that it isn't the cells. we shouldn't be treating the disease, we should be treating the patient. and by the way, it's the immune system. getook us 100 years to there and now we are starting to get somewhere, but what you said i think was the fundamental perception of what we know and how we know what we know and how we are going to use that to move forward being more critical than ever because the world is moving faster than ever and those other jobs that you could have, you could make a living as a farmer. you could make a living on a productio

mr. bolden: that was several regionals. they are everywhere. mr. allen: so, this march madness really is madness. there is a lady all the way in the back. hand her the microphone, please. joanne: think you very much. i got a question about the projects you're talking about. for example, the mars project, this is an age in which students have relatively short attention spans according to your research. perhaps mars fatigue to be setting in. but also some other interesting projects. one dr., as you know has , pioneered a project where these stars are the object and 100 years is the goal. of course there are public forums and a lot of research being done as to how to get there. how can we stimulate people going towards that goal? >> you are absolutely right. going to mars in the 2030's is a long time from now.

mr. bolden, two days ago where i made the comment that no post-conflict society or developing society couldver achieve its full potential without bringing women fully into the mainstream and fully empowering women within society. how can we incentivize the environment in this developed society to bring women more fully into s.t.e.m. and to empower them not just to study but to get them into industry? >> we tell them if you won't survive if you leave half the population behind for one thing. and people sometimes understand that. but, again, i think the best thing is to have concrete examples for them to see. we selected the class of 2013, the astronaut class of 2013, had 6,800 applicants. we selected 8 out of 6,800. half of them were women. half of them were men. those four women in that group have already become superstars. they were superstars in their own right before selection. but that's now four more women who can go into any place in the world and talk about how they became astronauts and they're from all kind of backgrounds. one spent her last year before becoming an astronaut in the

mr. bolden: i think i've said enough. i want you to remember that your space agency is on a journey to mars. we have lots of things that we do that are not just in spaceflight. we have an incredible science program. we look at planets. we look at our own planet earth. we look at the sun and we look at what we call astrophysics. how did we get here? is there life elsewhere? is the number one product. we spend $19.3 billion on it every single year. mr. kamen: we have to engage our enemies, otherwise they will just become a bigger enemy. two of the phrases used all the time throughout the first community are gracious professionalism. you heard charlie point out that these robots are fiercely competing in their two-minute rounds. and then in the pits the teams help each other if they have a broken axle. gracious professionalism, along with what we call cooperati tion. cooperate as they compete so we wind up with the best of the best. i started with this and i will end by saying this. there is culture, and no culture for your

mr. trump has said, but i'll be honest with you, this is not the way to get your point across and it only em boldens the american people to know that we have a real issue that they deserve to be here and that we should just give them everything they want. our economy cannot pay for it any more. we are $19 trillion in debt. we need to turn off the spigot. >> pam larks we're not doing dog whistle any more. i condemn the protests, but when all of a sudden, we start saying that, you know, that the real issue is it shows how unlawful illegals are, that's dangerous demagogue stuff that reflects the rhetoric, and that's where it gets tricky and difficult, and something we need to confront directly. >> let me ask you something too. consistent theme, the conspiracy th theories, talking about it with the clintons as well in an ad he had on social media we've heard this before, but millennials are new to this fight. do you think clinton needs to come out and answer to this point? >> i don't think so. i think what trump is doing is just looking for -- what he does best. creates media narratives. bringing things

perhaps em bolden kim jong-un to reach beyond his grasp yet further because he's getting the sort of attention that he's been seeking. so it would likely cause some concerns, yes. >> and mrassador, i'd like you to listen to something donald trump said about kim jong-un back in january. listen. >> you've got to give him credit. how many young guys, he was like 26 or 25 when his father died, take over these tough generals and all of a sudden it's pretty amazing when you think of it, how does he do that? even though it is a culture, he goes in and takes over and he's the boss. incredible, he wiped out the uncle and this one and that one. >> just to reminds our viewers, kim executed his uncle and also executed his military chief and his vice premiere. how do you take mr. trump's comments? >> well, they are very irresponsible. here he's taking -- giving credit to north korean leader for executing people, for taking them out. you know, he's -- he's so naive about foreign policy. it's all rhetoric. he has no substance to what he's saying. ease also wrong about china. china has the leverage over north korea because they give them food and fuel. we have to get china to get north