it's really would've gotten mine, and he could have been diverted into queenstown. he could've been diverted there which is where lusitania in the past had stopped for male runs until they realize they were just too many incidents of scraping the bottom and shall harbor there he could've been diverted there, there was a new and safer route that had just been open, the northern route which he could've been diverted. and he could've been escorted because several of them were available. in in fact lusitania and other ships had, will not the lusitania but other ships have been escorted in the past. so that's one of the really important lingering questions is why was it left so long? >> and you have not been able to join us specific conclusions on that? >> there's no smoking memo from churchill or anybody saying let's leave this ship in harm's way, there's nothing like that. but what there is is a body of evidence, bits and pieces of things that if you look at it and let's say you are in accord a lawn you tried to use use that evidence to prove beyond a shadow of a doubt

it's really would've gotten mine, and he could have been diverted into queenstown. he could've been diverted there which is where lusitania in the past had stopped for male runs until they realize they were just too many incidents of scraping the bottom and shall harbor there he could've been diverted there, there was a new and safer route that had just been open, the northern route which he could've been diverted. and he could've been escorted because several of them were available. in in fact lusitania and other ships had, will not the lusitania but other ships have been escorted in the past. so that's one of the really important lingering questions is why was it left so long? >> and you have not been able to join us specific conclusions on that? >> there's no smoking memo from churchill or anybody saying let's leave this ship in harm's way, there's nothing like that. but what there is is a body of evidence, bits and pieces of things that if you look at it and let's say you are in accord a lawn you tried to use use that evidence to prove beyond a shadow of a doubt