you know, thoef had issues with the irs and issues with sensorship.hey've got a ton, and the stock can all -- >> by the way,ing when people start panicking about the fed, what do they start running to? >> they run to the shiny things. >> also, there's this. the economic data supports stocks like this. when the business cycle rolls, when data weakens, you don't want to be in beta, and money flow knows that. you want to be -- >> let me ask you about the put then. what was your intention? dan makes a good point, which is the fed in december. >> the whole exercise here is -- i think this is an important point. when you are short more options than you're long, those are going to tend to die kay more rapidly than the one option we're long. if the stock stays right here to thanksgiving, this trade is probably going to be up money. those two wing options will educate more. this is actually -- you may not lose if it drops within 10%. if it stays here, you also win. there are three things that can happen. two are good. those are the kinds of odds i like. >> it'

accusations of sensorship or the photos of officers removing an unruly protestor who just pulled a fire alarm or attempted to assault a controversial speaker. for now this is the only kind of speaker that's allowed on campus. >> she was say nothing more hate speech on campus. what do you think here, matt? >> we have seen in the last five years there was a spike -- political correctness never died on campus. we just stopped paying attention to it. >> we thought it died? >> after -- people thought everyone is using politically incorrect. >> you are right. >> i know will but i talk to people who -- but i talk to people who do work about college free speech and including milo and whatever. they will say it is like this study. but in the last two or three years it has gone up like this. it has gone bonkers here. and it is no accident we are talking about scooter in the same context. people are using nonsense jargon to talk about talking. they are just people talking. there is no safety issue and there is no special space. you are just talking. it is the easy way out to get controversy out of

professor ross's book is "lessons in sensorship, how schools and court subvert students' first amendment rights," and it came out in 2015, under harvard university press. we had hoped to do something last spring but time passed, and in some respect the passage of time was a good thing, because this issue is not going away. and so events that play themselves out to a certain extent, yet i think it's appropriate, as we begin the academic year that we have the opportunity to examine the topic of freedom of speech, particularly in the context of a university. universities typically have been considered places for the broad exchange of ideas, including unpopular ideas. over the past year, the concept has been challenged on various university campuses. last week, a dean at the university of chicago wrote incoming students and announced that "trigger mornings" had no place at that university. the dean cautioned against intellectual safe places and also raised questions about withdrawing invitations to speakers merely because the message of the speaker could be controversial. this panel will exa

numerous icann gathering have featured chinese officials responsible for chinese government sensorshipand propaganda. icann's recently departed president and ceo fadi shihadi made china a central focus within icann, and the future of that organization. mr. shihadi is on record saying from icann's standpoint, engagement with china is not an option. if we do not engage with china at every level of our community, we frankly lose a part of our global legitimacy. it is striking that an organization we are being told we should trust with control of the internet believes legitimacy depends upon engaging in a regime that is the world's leading censor on the internet. silencing speech on the internet. and that imprisons democracy and human rights advocate and nobel laureate lu xiabo. he left after the transition plan was announced to leave for china's world internet conference. a conference that was rightly criticized for refusing to let "new york times" and "washington post" reporters cover it. as a result, reporters without borders demanded a boycott calling china an enemy of the internet. an

and they will do what they want to to put sensorship on the internet, particularly as a way of controlling their own populations within their country. if we don't act, at that is going to be something that happens and i think we can guarantee it. stopping this move by the obama administration will also assure that the united states government would maintain ownership and control over the dot-gov and dot mil domain games and that's necessary to protect our commuret. just think what would happen if a hostile power like iran would be able to get control of both -michigan. and dot l domain games. it would be much easier to hack. they would be easier able to spread around prop granda and disinformation, and unwitting people would think this is coming from the united states government. how denigrating will that be? it will be huge. i think we all know the answer to that. now, who is best able to protect a free and open internet? it's the united states of america. with the protections that we have in our bill of rights. and those are protections that has made the internet grow and flourish. i tel