so now here we are with the blue ribbon panel. we and justice for mario woods coalition we are not can i let another report that is so important say on the shelves in the city and county of san francisco and continue to collect dust. we cannot do that. >> ms. felicia, we will have to wrap up. finish your point >> the aclu-thank you pres. breed the aclu sent out a letter to the board of supervisors that no one in the city and county of san francisco really took any part of the blue ribbon panel to talk about it to bring people together to talk about it. as we move forward, pres. breed, i think one of the things that should happen with us in the board of supervisors is that we need it working group to look at these 81 recommendations and find out which ones are the most important that's going to continue to save black and brown lives here in san francisco i do hope that the community they would have justice for mario woods sitting in the room with you when you begin to do that. >> thank you. next speaker, please. >> supervisors, for

so now here we are with the blue ribbon panel. we and justice for mario woods coalition we are not can i let another report that is so important say on the shelves in the city and county of san francisco and continue to collect dust. we cannot do that. >> ms. felicia, we will have to wrap up. finish your point >> the aclu-thank you pres. breed the aclu sent out a letter to the board of supervisors that no one in the city and county of san francisco really took any part of the blue ribbon panel to talk about it to bring people together to talk about it. as we move forward, pres. breed, i think one of the things that should happen with us in the board of supervisors is that we need it working group to look at these 81 recommendations and find out which ones are the most important that's going to continue to save black and brown lives here in san francisco i do hope that the community they would have justice for mario woods sitting in the room with you when you begin to do that. >> thank you. next speaker, please. >> supervisors, for

so now here we are with the blue ribbon panel. we and justice for mario woods coalition we are not can i let another report that is so important say on the shelves in the city and county of san francisco and continue to collect dust. we cannot do that. >> ms. felicia, we will have to wrap up. finish your point >> the aclu-thank you pres. breed the aclu sent out a letter to the board of supervisors that no one in the city and county of san francisco really took any part of the blue ribbon panel to talk about it to bring people together to talk about it. as we move forward, pres. breed, i think one of the things that should happen with us in the board of supervisors is that we need it working group to look at these 81 recommendations and find out which ones are the most important that's going to continue to save black and brown lives here in san francisco i do hope that the community they would have justice for mario woods sitting in the room with you when you begin to do that. >> thank you. next speaker, please. >> supervisors, for

so now here we are with the blue ribbon panel. and justice for mario woods coalition we are not can i let another report that is so important say on the shelves in the city and county of san francisco and continue to collect dust. we cannot do that. >> ms. felicia, we will have to wrap up. finish your point >> the aclu-thank you pres. breed the aclu sent out a letter to the board of supervisors that no one in the city and county of san francisco really took any part of the blue ribbon panel to talk about it to bring people together to talk about it. as we move forward, pres. breed, i think one of the things that should happen with us in the board of supervisors is that we need it working group to look at these 81 recommendations and find out which ones are the most important that's going to continue to save black and brown lives here in san francisco i do hope that the community they would have justice for mario woods sitting in the room with you when you begin to do that. >> thank you. next speaker, please. >> supervisors, for th

i appreciate the panel's work to highlight the issue. doing a great job of saying what's important and steps we need to go forward. but in the context of the plan that the bpc has done or the research at kansas state that's been highlighted, i'm wondering if you could give some more context to what's needed in the direction in light of things like the national infrastructure protection plan, strategic partnership agreements that have flown out of hspd 709 that have been taking action and saying what is the coordination that's lacking that is trying to be set up in the national infrastructure protection plan. what is the intelligence or the coordination that's lacking in the strategic partnership agreements with private entities and the states. asking where are those next steps. because there are these plans that have been developed in the past 10 years. >> any of you have any -- >> i'll take a stab at it. i became skeptical to this idea that the vice president should have this biodefense committee or council. i was a little skeptical of

enough about me, i have the honor of introducing today's panel of experts who will address the importance of these records. your program has detailed biographies. i will not read them, but briefly our moderator is gregory treverton of the national intelligence council. the council supports director clapper in his role as head of the intelligence committee -- intelligence community created in 1979 to serve as a bridge between intelligence and a source of deep substantive expertise on intelligence issues, and a facilitator of intelligence community collaboration and outreach. he served as a policy analyst and director of the center for global risk and at the -- global risk and security in the rand publication. he talked about reshaping national intelligence for an age of information. our distinguished panel includes david robards, the chief historian of the central intelligence agency, publishing classified and unclassified works on the reconnaissance -- on the cia reconnaissance aircraft and intelligence in the american revolution. erin mahan is the chief historian in the office for the se

. >>> in the morning, a university panel discusses american election processes. lvia burwell will talk about the upcoming affordable care act open enrollment. watch live at 10:20 a.m. east n eastern. >>> different approaches, universities are using to deal with sexual harassment and assault on campus. from georgetown university law center, this is just under two hours. >> okay, everybody if we can get start started. i'm going to briefly introduce the folks on the panel and turn it over to them. this panel as you see in your materials is on harassment, abuse and fair process, we have nancy canalupo. we're happy to have nancy back. along with william kidder, who is associate vice president and chief of staff in the office of the president at sonoma state university. they're going to be presenting. their paper is below the surface of the water. sexual harassment by college faculty. we have brian pappas, who is -- he has a complicated title. associate director of the adr program. his paper is abuse of freedom, balancing quality and efficiency in faculty title nine pro

you, bill strong local agency formation commission i'll add respect to the hamburger report once the panel is in review they'll look at the documents and request for source data than available to us right now that it is in mr. hamburgs position the other point the director didn't talk about we have flexible also started implementing a new records retention policy with respect to all engineering letters that are tied to future and tall building construction projects and those will be kept with the projects inspection records and made more readily have youable by both dbi staff and the members of the public. >> we've discussed for sometime that it is scientifically complicate we're finding phases of objecting all the details and once the pier review folks are in place to review some of the data points and assessments that are coming forward from mr. hamburg or patrick we'll pubically be is a better position how to move forward with what is an important issue. >> mr. strong by timeframes you exterminate mr. hamburgs report to be reviewed. >> as director hui was saying getting the panel yes, m

you, bill strong local agency formation commission i'll add respect to the hamburger report once the panel is in review they'll look at the documents and request for source data than available to us right now that it is in mr. hamburgs position the other point the director didn't talk about we have flexible also started implementing a new records retention policy with respect to all engineering letters that are tied to future and tall building construction projects and those will be kept with the projects inspection records and made more readily have youable by both dbi staff and the members of the public. >> we've discussed for sometime that it is scientifically complicate we're finding phases of objecting all the details and once the pier review folks are in place to review some of the data points and assessments that are coming forward from mr. hamburg or patrick we'll pubically be is a better position how to move forward with what is an important issue. >> mr. strong by timeframes you exterminate mr. hamburgs report to be reviewed. >> as director hui was saying getting the panel yes, m

you, bill strong local agency formation commission i'll add respect to the hamburger report once the panel is in review they'll look at the documents and request for source data than available to us right now that it is in mr. hamburgs position the other point the director didn't talk about we have flexible also started implementing a new records retention policy with respect to all engineering letters that are tied to future and tall building construction projects and those will be kept with the projects inspection records and made more readily have youable by both dbi staff and the members of the public. >> we've discussed for sometime that it is scientifically complicate we're finding phases of objecting all the details and once the pier review folks are in place to review some of the data points and assessments that are coming forward from mr. hamburg or patrick we'll pubically be is a better position how to move forward with what is an important issue. >> mr. strong by timeframes you exterminate mr. hamburgs report to be reviewed. >> as director hui was saying getting the panel yes, m

but it is managed by the panel. the panel has the authority to tweak that, to make sure that it's not revictimizing. the result is a recommendation confirmed by the vice-provost. they can approve a hearing, but there will not be a hearing during that appeal. the investigation side for faculty is the same as students. if it's less than dismissal, it can go to a faculty rights board. they have to request a hearing. interestingly enough, the board can proceed without a hearing. they can say, we don't need to have a hearing on this. the appellant has the burden of proof. that is a showing by clear and convincing evidence that the administration violated procedures that impacted faculty rights. that's very interesting. there's no restriction and confrontation if they get to -- if that hearing is accepted. so you have to meet certain thresholds to get there. and the result is a recommendation that's going to be confirmed or changed by the provost or chancellor. this is the zamir babble case. he's a faculty member at kansa

by attacking the da and attacking the panel itself. when anyone who looks at the three judges that are involved, justice ran onerous kordell,--. it doesn't get better than that. that is as stellar and superb group of individuals as you can find and the involvement by these otherwise highly paid attorneys is also i think speaks to the excellent work that has gone into. so i would simply ask the police officers, the poa that we figure out how we can learn and take this not in the defense of weight but as a way of actually making san francisco and the san francisco police department and example of how to do policing because i think if anyone should be able to get this right it is san francisco. thank you >> thank you supervisor campos i appreciate it. want to give some background to everyone. the blue ribbon panel was assembled through the leadership of the dist. atty. george gascon. with that i like to regard mr.-who was the executive director who led the formulation the methodology and ultimately, the drafting of this incredibly importan

the panel is expected to announce points of contention early next year and study public opinion before compiling proposals. >>> thise this comes as japan ht it's -- he was the uncle of emperor of akihito was 100 years old, the oldest member of the imperial family. >> translator: prince mikasa passed away at 8:34 this morning at st. luke's international hospital. >> translator: i fear the prince's death brings another era to an end. >> translator: i only hope he will rest in peace. >> prince mikasa was the emperor's youngest brother. he seemed healthy in january when he appeared for a public greeting. four months later he was admitted to a hospital in tokyo and diagnosed with acute pneumonia. in july the prince started receiving treatment for his weakening heart. his condition deteriorated early thursday morning. his wife, princess yuriko, was with him when he died. emperor akihito offered condolences at the residence. imperial family members have gone into mourning for a week. they have cancelled a garden party planned for next week. prince mikasa's death brings the number of imperial

by attacking the da and attacking the panel itself. when anyone who looks at the three judges that are involved, justice ran onerous kordell,--. it doesn't get better than that. that is as stellar and superb group of individuals as you can find and the involvement by these otherwise highly paid attorneys is also i think speaks to the excellent work that has gone into. so i would simply ask the police officers, the poa that we figure out how we can learn and take this not in the defense of weight but as a way of actually making san francisco and the san francisco police department and example of how to do policing because i think if anyone should be able to get this right it is san francisco. thank you >> thank you supervisor campos i appreciate it. want to give some background to everyone. the blue ribbon panel was assembled through the leadership of the dist. atty. george gascon. with that i like to regard mr.-who was the executive director who led the formulation the methodology and ultimately, the drafting of this incredibly importan

by attacking the da and attacking the panel itself. when anyone who looks at the three judges that are involved, justice ran onerous kordell,--. it doesn't get better than that. that is as stellar and superb group of individuals as you can find and the involvement by these otherwise highly paid attorneys is also i think speaks to the excellent work that has gone into. so i would simply ask the police officers, the poa that we figure out how we can learn and take this not in the defense of weight but as a way of actually making san francisco and the san francisco police department and example of how to do policing because i think if anyone should be able to get this right it is san francisco. thank you >> thank you supervisor campos i appreciate it. want to give some background to everyone. the blue ribbon panel was assembled through the leadership of the dist. atty. george gascon. with that i like to regard mr.-who was the executive director who led the formulation the methodology and ultimately, the drafting of this incredibly importan

with the previous panel we talked about flavors, malicious and unsbingsal. regardless of the type, they could have catastrophic outcomes on an organization. the federal government, despite mandates and requirements to have these programs, it is still not being done across the board. i was curious as to some of your thoughts as to why this is the case and what can be done to change it? >> i think it is a three-pronged approach. it is people, process and technology. you have to train the people. i think it was isc squared. they did a study where they interviewed various departments across different agencies. outside the i.t. department, less than 12% of the people thought cybersecurity was important. so people in operations, hr and procurement thought it was okay. the i.t. folks, the highest they got in cybersecurity care factor was 48%. there has to be better emphasis on training people on what they should do. the second thing is the process. i get back to, you know, providing that least privilege, providing the least access. one of the issues we have at the f

the end of the last panelf it at the end of the last panel it at the end of the last panel. but there's one thing we can all agree on, and it's the idea that when it comes to making the world more peaceful and more secure, those single person, no single organization has all of the answers. it's a job for everyone requiring a range of voices from inside the government and out. and that means if cia is to perform its mission effectively, we must do everything in our power to encourage open, honest and informed debate. exactly the kind of debate that we've had today. so thank you for your contributions to our lively discussion, for fostering a lively exchange of ideas that's become the hallmark of this conference. it's been a privilege and a pleasure to be here today and to learn from all of you. have a great evening. and we look forward to seeing you all again at next year's conference. thank you. [ applause ] ♪ ♪ >>> c-span's washington journal, live everyday with policy issues that impact you. and tomorrow morning josh kraushaar, following the second debate, looking at key se

kudos to the panel. what a wonderful discussion amongst historians. i cannot let this opportunity go by and with the u.s. archivist for and everybody planning president obama's presidential library. i am curious whether agency historians have been tasked with ,he prospect of what records papers in your own agencies might be included in his library ? from my standpoint, if i were to go to a presidential library, i might be mistaken in my belief that all decisions regarding the administration may lie in that library. point in fact, during the bush taskedtration, -- was with making enormous decisions tortureg interrogation, , and other factors that influenced our foreign-policy. david? the answer is much more documentation anybody can process. isis very difficult but voluminous. >> -- two sets of laws that govern the records. on the federal side, these historians who represent agencies which are governed by the federal records tax which means that they create schedules records haveich long-term value and are going to be transferred at the appropriate time

back with the panel? steve? >> i mean, irony is abound in this exchange. rst of all, the president of the united states apparently lied about whether he knew that hillary clinton was using unsecure email. the white house will defend the president by saying well, he might have known that it was a non-state email but he didn't know necessarily that was unsecure to which the response is so the president of the united states was emailing with his secretary of defense about official business on a non-state email with the assumption that it was secure? that's probably not a good idea. but you go to the clean-up of this and the clinton people are angry with the obama white house because the president has gone out and said he learned about this on the news. which, on its face, seems to be untrue how ironic is that in the whole reason that the president of the united states is in this bind to begin with is that hillary clinton set up a private server. they are frustrated with the white house. the white house is frustrated with hillary clinton. nobody looks good in i

back with the panel? steve? >> i mean, irony is abound in this exchange. first of all, the president of the united states apparently lied about whether he knew that hillary clinton was using unsecure email. the white house will defend the president by saying well, he might have known that it was a non-state email but he didn't know necessarily that was unsecure to which the response is so the president of the united states was emailing with his secretary of defense about official business on a non-state email with the assumption that it was secure? that's probably not a good idea. but you go to the clean-up of this and the clinton people are angry with the obama white house because the president has gone out and said he learned about this on the news. which, on its face, seems to be untrue how ironic is that in the whole reason that the president of the united states is in this bind to begin with is that hillary clinton set up a private server. they are frustrated with the white house. the white house is frustrated with hillary clinton. nobody looks good in

you heard about in the blue ribbon study panel. before we get into some questions that i have, with hud take just a couple of minutes and tell the audience about your perspective on the bio aggro defense and come landscape, and i don't know if we can up the optimism from the first panel but on a scale of one to 10, 10 being the best, where would you rate the secured of our food system today from potentially deadly pathogens coming into it speak with personal it's an honor to be today so thank you very much. and honored to be your with my panelists. this is a particular passion of mine. is a bit a large part of my career and protecting the food system is just incredibly important as we sit here today the agricultural industry gives us one of the safest, most affordable and abundant food supplies in the world. so on average give you some statistics. u.s. consumers only spent about 6.4% of annual expenditures on food. if you compare that globally it's anywhere between 11-47%. we know we have a very robust agriculture production system

in the blue ribbon study panel. before we get into questions i have that, would each of you take just a couple minutes and tell the audience about your perspectives on the bio agrodefense landscape and -- i don't know if we can up the optimism from the first panel but on a scale from 1 to 10, 10 being the best, where would you rate the security of our food system today from potentially deadly pathogens coming into it? tammy, i'll start with you. >> sure. first of all, it's an honor to be here today. thank you so much. it's an honor to be here with my panelists. this is a particular passion of mine as it's been a large part of my clear from protecting the food system is just incredibly important. as we sit here today the agricultural industry gives us one of the safe zest most affordable and abundant food supplies in the world. so on average, i'll give you some statistics. u.s. consumers only spend about 6.4% of their annual expenditures on food. if you compare that globally it's irrelevant in between 11% to 47% so we

they get confrontation of questions through the panel. has to go through the panel to be asked. then you can appeal to an administrator and see the grounds. significant procedural area, sanction disproportionate. faculty however have an investigation model. this is the title 9 process. they can identify witnesses, silent adviser, preponderance determines the facts, findings, goes to an officer who makes the decisions, issues the finals, final facts and findings. you can appeal the faculty board of review but you have to meet the grounds. you see the grounds on the left. they also include the grounds on the right. but witnesses aren't called during this proceeding. there's no visiting -- revisiting the findings of fact. there's in fact very little confrontation at that phase. but the silent adviser in the process may read the party's statement. now there also can be a faculty process here. dismissal of a tenured faculty member is recommended, that would be an additional step. as you're going to see, that becomes more of an issue of how do the policies work together. if an adminis

that you heard about in the blue ribbon study panel. before we get into some questions that i have, would each of you take just a couple of minutes and tell the audience about your perspectives on the bioagra defense landscape and on a -- i don't know if we can up the optimism from the first panel but on a scale from one to ten, ten being the best, where would you rate the security of our food system today from potentially deadly pathogens coming into it? tammy, i'll start with you. >> sure, first of all, it's an honor to be here today, so thank you very much. it's an honor to be here with my panelists. this is a particular passion of mine as it's been a large part of my career and protecting the food system is just incredibly important. i mean, as we sit here today, the agricultural industry gives us one of the safest, most affordable and abundant food supplies in the world, so on average, i'll just give you some statistics. consumers only spend 6 .4% of their annual expenditures on food and if you compare that globally, it's anywhere b

the only problem with the first panel, you really set the bar for our second panel. before we start, i'd like to congratulate douglas and andre in the first row on an excellent report on a topic that i think may be overlooked by some as just a technical development in the world, but really has the potential to reshape how business is done across emerging markets, including latin america. that's really no small statement, but frankly it's true. the renminbi becoming an international reserve asset is not something to be overlooked. as our first panel said, huge changes not just in chinese markets, but global implications. we looked at the ins and outs of china's currency policy. the next panel is going to look at what this means for latin america. we have a dream team of speakers, my dream team of speakers at least, to look at that. i'm going to sit down here. the first speaker -- you have their full bios in the handout. to my left here is barbara, kotschwar, senior investment policy officer in the trade and global kpe tifs global practice at the world bank. in addition

>> the second panel ladies and gentlemen, we had a very interesting and enlightening first panel. i'm the director of the center for eurasian russian and eastern studies and i have to say that i'm very tempted before we get into the question about what happened since the collapse of the soviet union, to make two brief remarks about 1986. one of them is or maybe looking forward, the question of why the soviet union collapsed. when he came to the united states in the early 1990s after the soviet collapse he gave a talk at the library of congress and the librarian of congress said i underestimated the problem. the cause was the inability to workout an agreement and the different repub hicks of the soviet union and that is related to them but that was the thing in the end that brought the soviet union down and the other brief reminiscence about 1986 to show how gorbachev had been through a major trabs formation before he met president reagan was i arrived in the soviet union in moscow three days before the accident. i had the world economy and international relations and i had with me

amanda goodman will be on the panel, moderating the debate. the public is invited and encouraged to attend the debate. seats are on a first come, first served basis. the signs, banners, etc. will be allowed inside the building. photography and recording video, even on a cellphone, here: http: kwwl will broadcast a one- hour debate between senator of morningside college in sioux 1:07 a.m. after last call of stations of quincy media that amanda goodman will be on the panel, campus of morningside college in goodman kwwl news thanks amanda and a reminder.... tune in tonight to kwwl-- we will be broadcasting a special one-hour debate between senator charles grassley and patty judge. at 7-o'clock. the debate will be held in sioux city. our very own-- kwwl anchor a programming note-- if you are wanting to watch blindspot -- you can watch it on seven-point-one. it will air at one- oh-seven in the morning after last call with school in cedar rapids are taking a pledge against gun violence-- multiple washington students have been killed in the last seve

right to questions we have attended general bed hodges the ambassador and the just got done during the panel discussion so with that we will start chilin a so please identify yourself. >> [inaudible] [inaudible] >> and i have a follow-up question. >> it isn't pet this by itself that deters but the u.s. army with other capabilities with the allies whiff fatalistic approach. that is number one and certainly we are working hard to reestablish a lovable of capability to ensure deterrence. with that pruning back of former or pre-position of equipment or the speed of the assembly these are all aspects of deterrence. we have not lost it but we have to rebuild some of that to make it more relevant. >> [inaudible] and when do they need to do that? >> please keep that to one follow-up christina. >> renshaw in base shed of ukraine illegally at next crimea and what they have done since 2008 with the invasion of georgia they have soldiers that is contrary to what they said david do with the sighting of the agreement to end the fighting in georgia. the fighting in the eastern ukraine are all things that u

more with the panel ahead. mike pence getting good reviews for debate performance but stirred up controversy with the comment about that quote, mexican thing, and look at hurricane headed toward the u.s. tonight. if your heartburn medication's not doing its job... the food you eat during the day... music: loud mariachi band can also haunt you at night. so try nexium 24hr. just one pill each day... shuts down your stomach's active... acid pumps to stop the burn of frequent heartburn... all day and night. have we seen them before? ♪ banish the burn with nexium 24hr. in the country have in common? many of them now call cancer treatment centers of america home. expert medicine works here. find out why at cancer center.com. cancer treatment centers of america. [ crowd noisewhoa. [ gears stopping ] when your pain reliever stops working, your whole day stops. try this. but just one aleve has the strength to stop pain for 12 hours. tylenol and advil can quit after 6. so live your whole day, not part... with 12 hour alev

the hashtag itif privacy. and we have a really fantastic panel today. to get into this discussion. but before we get to that, the reason we're having this discussion here today and i mean that both in a general sense as well as a literal sense, is because we have the privilege of hearing from representative jackie speier. for those of you that don't know her, representative represents the 14th congressional district and she serves on the house armed services committee as the ranking member of the sub-committee on oversight and investigations and on the house permanent select committee on intelligence and a tireless advocate for women's rights and a champion for the safety, health and rights of ordinary americans. and this is why news week has named her two its list of 150 fearless women in the world. and one way she has demonstrated this fearlessness is through the writing and introduction of the intimate privacy protection act or ippa, the first bill in congress to really take on this issue of revenge porn. and not only does this bill outline what i think is a responsible path forw

panel. we invited the rest of the members before you today. i thank you very much for joining this panel. with the u.s. treasury announced that harriet tubman would be on the $20 bill, i had a mixed reaction. just interested in the meme's that came out and some of the funny jokes. people were trying to explain how happy they were about this. one of my favorites was in black for an accurate, now people would be saying, let me hold five dollars, they would say, can i hold a tub for a week and get back to you -- as in harry tubman. that was the funny side, the joyful side. i, like many people, and very happy that an african-american woman will be on the u.s. monetary bill rate however, i also had extreme sadness. as someone who works on enslaved women, and in maryland, in particular, i was conflicted about what this means about images of public memory, about the archive of slavery, and finally, what it means about the continued commodification of black women's bodies. specifically -- i don't mean women that we know, i mean women be don't know. what is lost when the only represent one iconic p

thoughts from the panel. let's go back to karina who did you have is the most trustworthy coming out of this? >> woman: joe heck. >> man: why did he win that for you? >> woman: i appreciated his answers more. >> reporter: and wonder who did you have and why? >> woman: joe heck because he was specific. i felt he was it was not like he was on stage of performance. he did not interrupt her, i think she drew him off he was wanting to stick to the issues so for me that says he views the subject, he gave specifics and he did it in a professional way. >> thank you for coming in here with us of course a lot of valuable insight we will send it back to you in studio. >> one final word from our analysts. >> final thoughts on who one you think it is the needle with especially with the polls showing she is ahead of him now. i think it may have had an impact. i think he came across as more trustworthy i think she came across as more rehearsed. >> reporter: same questions before we shouldn't blame her for preparing the try t

the panels will be tested on sidewalks before ( toss to weather ) a cold front passes through on friday, bringing more scattered showers and storms but mainly dropping the temperature into the 60s. the weekend is looking even colder: after any lingering shower exits on saturday morning temperatures will be thanks for joining us at 4-30. the news continues with live at five. next. a child with autism found after missing for 20 hours. what one lawmaker is doing to help solve situations like this, much faster.. live the big story at five, a 10- year-old boy with autisim has been reunited with his family after being missing for nearly 18-hours.. of course -- it's been an harrowing 18-hours for the family...andrew oonk-um ran off around four yesterday afternoon...police searched through the night... hundreds of members from the community joined in the efforts this morning... finding success... veronica macias was there for that joyful reunion.. his family says andrew has gone missing before - only just relieved he home safe and sound. yay clapping 101519andrew oonk-um's family huddles togeth

the panel gave three existing location says as options,ne ini massive disaster hit in 2011. but changinsapoval of the ioc. receptive to the findings. >> there we see a great potential of reduction with regard to the figures mentioned in this report. >> reporter: bach proposed setting up a framework for more dialogue. he suggested also including japan's organizing committee and the central government. koike agreed with the proposal but says she wants to finish her cost-cutting plans later this month before further discussions. nhk world, tokyo. >>> after the meeting with koike, bach also met with japan's minister in charge of the tokyo olympic and paralympic games. he said the government knows it's important to obtain the understanding of tokyo residents on the cost issue to ensure the olympics are celebrated by the people of japan. she also said the metropolitan government and the tokyo organizing committee are calculating the cost of the games. she said she would be grateful if the ioc helps the committee to swiftly complete its work. bach replied that the ioc shares the goa

back with the panel. we asked each panelist to choose a state that's of interest, either in the senate races or house races or presidential. steve, you're first. >> mine was north carolina which might have been a better state to pick about two weeks ago when things looked like it was potentially going to be more competitive there. right now if you look at the presidential race hillary clinton is up 2.6 points in real good politics average. things seem to be trending in her direction. you talk to people in the states after this trump tape and everything seems to be moving in her direction. the senate race there, richard burr who's the chairman of the senate intelligence committee, huge veterans community, was thought to have been a pretty safe republican seat, he led every single poll into august and then started having more competitive polling in august. his opponent, deborah ross, head of aclu in north carolina overtook him in some of those polls and although mitch mcconnell didn't mention it there, that'

the next panel was in the u.s. embassy in moscow then and spent most of his time having to fill in for vital personnel staff who had been expelled and driving a truck instead of doing his analysis on russian political and military affairs. of course, u.s. journali isist dunalof was actually arrested and imprisoned in a soviet jail. that was all that was going on. behind the scenes of reykjavik, things were quite different as we'll hear from our panel. first of all, we have to kick us off, brookings president, strob talbot who was covering reykjavik as washington bureau chief for "time" magazine. we also have our good colleague and friend marvin kalb. i believe you were the anchor for "meet the press." and we have distinguished american diplomat ken adelman who just published a new book, "reagan at reykjavik." and it's on sale outside the auditorium. already fans have come running up with books to be signed. and ken was there with president reagan behind the scenes with mikhail gorbachev. and after we heard some of

the investigator presents the report, before a panel, you can meet individually with the panel. want to highlight that, there are a lot of ways to get confrontation without it being revictimizing. the outcome's appealable also guarantees some traditional hearing form of confrontation. faculty don't have that i was able to find them on a website that says formal investigation reports are written in a report, you may meet with the investigator separately and have your adviser present. and then you have an appeal to the vice provost on paper. i'm not critical of them for not having it codified, it just wasn't easy to find. how do they work together. that human resource is requiring clear and convincing evidence the online policy doesn't reference that. does that mean they didn't reference -- hr 76 suggests a simultaneous process, we're talking about an offramp to a simultaneous process, if there's a procedural issue. sexual misconduct is governed under their policy. this is so complicated that it's not clear to me the shared governance went on in these investigations. it's hard not

back with the panel. ed each panelist to choose a state that's of interest, either in the senate races or house races or presidential. steve, you're first. >> mine was north carolina which might have been a better state to pick about two weeks ago when things looked like it was potentially going to be more competitive there. right now if you look at the presidential race hillary clinton is up 2.6 points in real good politics average. things seem to be trending in her direction. you talk to people in the states after this trump tape and everything seems to be moving in her direction. the senate race there, richard burr who's the chairman of the senate intelligence committee, huge veterans community, was thought to have been a pretty safe republican seat, he led every single poll into august and then started having more competitive polling in august. his opponent, deborah ross, head of aclu in north carolina overtook him in some of those polls and although mitch mcconnell didn't mention it there, that's a ba

i'm excited to kick off the first panel, analysis, hacking elections is easy. eem ae going to introduce them today. to my immediate right is james scott, senior fellow. to his right is jim walter, contributor and senior researcher from the silent speer team. and to his right, tony cole, a fellow and global government. thank you for taking time to be here today. i'll be identifying three major problems in the voting system and asking you and the panel to keep these in mind as we go through the next several minutes. problem one is the black box prop proprietary systems. voters and officials don't know what code is running and what vulnerabilities exist in the system. reliance on vendors is extremely worrying because it is an enormous security system. air gap defenses. state election boards believe election systems are secure because the vulnerable systems in air gap. this demonstrates how little they understand how about cybersecurity. finally, decentralization is not a defense. to point to this common belief, i'm going to go to a quote from director comey, who sa

the blue ribbon panel and others for the work we've passed that on i understand i was not present but understand the board was ongoing engage on the stand-offs of those recommendations on a future date and seller move forward we'll engage with them and let them this the process other reports colleagues. >> okay. no all right. inspector, next item. >> item one d commissions announcements and consideration for future meetings action. >> with an item i'd like to schedule sergeant for us to have joanne walker to give her a police accommodation one in washington we should know about that and give our own accommodation schedule that to make sure of the policing work she's been doing that's one thing to add commissioner dejesus. >> i'd like to add a presentation from the homicide detail go to a scene how they process and the scene and question the secretary but what do they do to secure. >> what are the protocol between the departments and the da and the medical examiners officer their scheduled in the district attorney's office are they responsible and who is responsible inform remove the b