and this idea that, you know that they represent -- they have iven tacit approval to a dictator and a madman, look at your phone, man. look at everything we have. we make those kinds of compromises every day. i have gone on too long. charlie: no, you haven't. [laughter] charlie: you have come to the right place. ♪ charlie: did you miss it during the campaign? jon: god, no. charlie: you didn't want to do what you just did. tell us what you thought, both with satire and with comedy and with reason. jon: no. not at all. no. wears on you. charlie: meaning you could be full of rage, but it wouldn't make any difference? jon: correct. any pursuit like this. any artistic pursuit is a relatively saffleish pursuit. and it's a way to express ideas and get them out. and feel the seduction of it, it's going to score or not going to score. that's the hit. that's the adrenalin. but what begins to wear on you is where it's taken. and i think this election could be a great lesson in that controlling the culture is not the same thing as power. and a viral video aadvice rating racists is not the same as

this is the great mercy we have loss, iven through this that our love for him and our understanding of his legacy to in ontinue to grow even death, that we grow in a new understanding of god's love hrough the words and memories of others. some of my friends have inressed this so beautifully the jewish tradition. may his memory be a blessing. source of and also a grace and an opportunity to grow in faith. can't think of any greater legacy. thank you. [applause] [captioning performed by the national captioning institute, which is responsible for its caption content and accuracy. visit ncicap.org]

well, there are press reports that russia has ,iven money to marine le pen the extreme right-wing candidaten the french elections. i would imagine that the russians are going to be involved in a number of elections. it's important for these democracies to show russia that there is a price attached to it. it's not a free good, which is why a think sanctions are important. joe: ultimately, going back to the current administration, you think that he would be a wise choice or make sense. what would a more constructive relationship look like between this government and the vladimir putin government? joseph: i think we have to maintain sanctions against russia to show that invading your neighbor and stealing territory by force is something that has a penalty attached to it. but it's also true that we have to do business with russia. there's just a lot of things, whether it is the arctic, the climate, iran, the middle east generally, where we have to be in contact with the russians. i think that his appointment means that we will have somebody who understands russia, but who will be in contact wit

. >> iven the untimely. >> this was first made if they had let dbi that was secret active from the filing of the we could have had conversation and come to you with a definitive answer rather than i think misinformation perhaps you know there is still the building permit application process associated and a an appeal process associated with that which could resolve things i'd like to have this information wrapped up before the variance is final you know - the appellant has gone about it not in a fair or proper manner they've had quite a bit of time to come up with this and failed to use the time i didn't receive a copy until just now. >> thank you mr. sanchez. >> shall we invite mr. duffy back i don't know if so more he wants to add. >> joe duffy dbi again, the having something in our brief it new evidence founded department of building inspection to be presented at the rehearing will demonstrate the aforementioned material i work at dbi why not come and see me i could look at the plans and give you guys a proper opinion on this i will say if we're talking about property line windows and

it is the best path forward iven our deadline. and mr. chairman, this should be my last time appearing before the rules committee as hairman of this committee. i wish it were under better circumstances. i wish we had 11 complete full year appropriations bills to present to you. but that is not the case. as i have said it before, and i'll say it again, governing by cr is no way to conduct our business. with a cr, we're wasting money and preventing good policies from going into place. we're creating uncertainty both in federal budgets and in the economy and our power of the purse throwing away the voice of the people that we represent. as i said, it is our best. it is is actually our only path forward. so i urge my colleagues in the house and the to pass it in short order, given that our current funding mechanism expires on friday. thank you for your great work. i've always started to say enjoyed chances to be with you. and i have enjoyed that. but i appreciate the great work that you do, mr. chairman and members of the committee. this is a

the first type of reason was .iven by my friend he said it is true the sequence of policies following the crisis in the u.s. was not great. what they did in europe -- what they did in the u.s. -- at the same time, they did it in a way with accommodating monetary policy, and they did not go back on the budget deficit. that went into a bigger recession. they invited a bigger recession. see what i mean? , theyater on they said had a project reducing deficit. in europe, the sequencing was very different. they did it right away with the banking problem. no, wery quickly said, have to deal with the budget deficit. 2011ey imposed already in the very tough budgetary rules, which caused sarkozy and friends to reach -- to increase taxes. it was already started with sarkozy. a knife to his throat and said you had to do it. the loanr with problem, with the sets of the banks -- going to europe for exactly the observation in the u.s. we will get back to that. also there are other reasons. more fixable labor on the market in france. proactivehe more microeconomic policy. .urope came later draghi cam