but not just immerging it in some water, he wants to immerge it in the dead sea because of the extremely high salt content. he's going to place it in there and leave it for 24 hours. >> you know what? i would check the scientists that say it's waterproof. >> he doesn't want anyone to walk off with the iphone. so he jams it under that sort of salt growth right there and moves a rock over to the side. now, the next day he's pointing out to the people close by saying, okay, time to go see if the phone is still there. >> wait a minute, are you telling me this guy went 24 hours without his cell phone? >> without a cell phone. >> oh. >> he gets back to where he was and the phone has moved. but you can see it right there just right on the bottom of t the -- he takes it up to his hotel room. >> i think it will work. >> yes, the phone survived. >> bam, you're right. once it powers up, he tries to give it a rudimentary test, and the iphone 7 can survive 24 hours in the dead sea. but the battery can't. >>> a man is hiding behind that door. >> you can't see his hands, though. that still has police o

this executive order was designed to deal with the immerging threat. as isis is losing space the remainder have to go somewhere. everybody believes they go to the seven countries that were listed. it's not just us. the obama administration believe that. the concern is you have to have mechanisms in place that if they try to come to the western united states you're prepared to deal with that. i think what was on the mind of the incoming administration is on january 20th we own this. if something happens it it's on watch. if there's a terrorist attack on the 21st of january nobody is going to accept, well, we just did what the last guy did. my point is i think there is a sense that we own this and we need to be responsible and get our processes -- >> why not just slow it down? it's not a matter of whether they do it or don't do it. it's a matter of doing it whether everybody is in place. the list of seven nations here, the majority of muslim countries where there have been no attackers. those countries that haven't been included, they are not on the list

some have an immerging middle class. they want better nutrition, safer food.erican products. it is hugely bennificial. there is a disconnect that goes to people that they haven't seen wages increase. they have seen rising income. whether it is because of technology or globalization hay don't get to vote on globalization but they get to vote on trade agreements. >> what is the effect of these tariffs that trump is proposing? what do you think it means for the average american? >> it depends what they do. there are a lot of ideas being batted around. i think when it comes to raising tariffs you have to if we do something that is clearly illegal, contrary to our operations, it gives others the opportunity to raise tariffs on workers and farmers. and if we open the door and say hey, here's a new way of pursuing trade policy, you have to build in our market, that's the policies we've been fighting against in the world. from china, india, other countries say if you want to sell to our people, you need to move your factories from the united states to our country. you

as this movement has immerged globally. think it's knocked people off balance and there hasn't been this kind of confident -- president obama is projecting it. when we look around the globe we have to find other partners that will do that as well. it can't all rest on the shoulders of one u.s. president. there has to be from the political leadership to the young leaders that were engaging and to everybody in between a concerted effort to say no. this is what we believe to be true. this is what we believe to be right you know, it's going to take a sustained commitment to push back against it. the only way, if you're consistent and building relationships and networks on behalf of what you know to be true ultimately it is going to win out. we can't just say in the media envie vonment -- i mean the splintered media environment it could appear that the truth is not winning out. it can't cause you to give up and say well, this is a hopeless situation. you have to learn how to react and say i will and make sure it is the truth. >>

understand how important it is to be engaged in some way so that the pledge and review systems that are immerging do so in a way that is best over time. thank you very much. >> well, thank you very much. well, you know, since i was a negotiator for japan on this agreement i have to bring you a little update, why the agreement was good and why it was possible. so i'm going to do this -- okay. and then -- shall i just press it to change the page? okay. right. paris agreement. i remember the moment when it was adopted. those three people were on the podium. we were on the floor. i think it was about 3,000 people. everybody was standing and applaudsing for a very long period of time. it was a moving moment in many ways after long and lengthy consuming processes. we were finally able to achieve this. this kind of achievement was rare in the united nations. you know, we started with disaster risk reduction. we had a meeting. we have sustainable goals in new york and september and finally this one. i think united nations was very successful in the last year. this was the final portion of this. now, the

. >>> these ideas did not immerge on contestant. there is one in which buys university actions. the willingness of universities themselves and patrons in the case of public yefrt state government. one finds very similar controversies in germany. i have written with a involve tire affairs. everyone disagreeing how much were being to film those that were filming that freedom. >> i also want to mention that within the history of higher education in europe during this period, 1890 to 1914 one finds very powerful voices, what it meant for the dwrufrt as a corporation. his esz says and -- also then the desire to pull lack and sigh. we are our own persons and yet we are being paid for by the state. how does one assess those boundaries? i think certainly more than the new universities, chicago was very much -- the culture became independent. feeling itself is almost a bearer of this great journal ideas. the kind of fi-- it didn't medd. it was very easy for the fact that they freed themselves from the practice of these values and these identities over time. it is this culture that robert

obviously with these new immerging technologies there has surfaced a number of key issues, privacy among them, that are ve very worrisome. as these are coming up they are faced with state by state regulations which also present a new challenge as well. there are many benefits for senior citizens who may not want to drive. they are a way to give them back their freedom. there are pros and cons and we need to have a national dialogue about all of this. as i said, the regulations at the federal level are in their infancy. we need to work with members of the congress and all of you on this committee to make sure we are not dampening the spirit of creativity and the real deep seeded concerns as so much of our public and some of the issues these new immerging technologies bring. >> and we'll follow up on a question which the senator asked which is on the greenhouse gas issue which is related to fuel economy issues. i'm the author in 2007 of the law which required the dramatic increase in the fuel economy. senator stevens were the senate authors of that. that calls for 54.5 miles per gallon whi