in fact, it's a nationstate of thing.states and probably china, north korea, not many other options. which particular nationstate would you say? certainly north korea. they would undoubtedly be the case. how would it have been handled? how be the case. how would it have been handled 7 how would be the case. how would it have been handled? how would it have been used in an attack such as this? for vx to be lethal to kim jong in an attack such as this? for vx to be lethal to kimjong nam, it would have required about of a gram, less than one drop. it was a part of the water that was on him. vx is an oil, it would not mixed with water. that was a subterfuge, a divergent. it was a subterfuge, a divergent. it was probably in cloth that touched him. just was probably in cloth that touched him.justa was probably in cloth that touched him. just a very small amount touching his skin. over time it would go through his skin and cause the effects we have seen. without being too grisly, what would it have gone to him? he would have bee

you made an interesting point about the importance of nationstates.t donald trump is, avowedly a self—confessed american nationalists, "america first" is his message and that message, which is a nationalists message, is echoed across europe in different nationstates where politicians are winning with a nationalist message. it is not echoed. it is the opposite. it was first born in europe. nationalism has been born in europe. nationalism has not been born outside europe. more than that, i think it is a tricky thing which is happening. that is that an american president is bidding on more nationalism in europe. you know what nationalism in europe means? that's not nationalism based on values, it's nationalism in europe based on ethnicity. and what nationalism has done in the last 100 years in europe, we all know it! 20 million victims, all of this is based on nationalism. so an american president thinking, "0h, european unity is not necessary, let's go back to national identity, ideas of nationalism." that is playing with fire in europe! this is not ame

the mistake they made was this: provided nationstates are democratic, they will not fight and they will not go to war with each other. if you try to give people a false identity, a false flag, a false god if you like, they will rebel and turn against it. i think what the european union was was a prototype for bigger form of global government, had hillary clinton won, you would've become part of it. thank goodness that trump has stopped it. it >> tucker: there would've been even bigger reaction against it i think in four years. i think american nationalism is a good thing, a benign thing, i think the same of british nationalism, i think most people would agree deep down. should we be as excited about the prospect of german nationalism or japanese nationalism, are all nationalism created equal? >> that depends, if those nationalist movements gets to a position where they're able to obliterate the democratic process, then we have a problem. all the while, we have genuine democratic governments that what we should do is to trust the people. the people in all these countries are not stupid a

what the global us are trying to do is destroy the nationstate. what those two big events of 2016 it did was to reestablish the democratic nation state and that is right and proper and normal. >> tucker: the nationstate is such an obvious arrangement, people created them because they wanted them.ob a i guess the obvious question is why did so many people in power spend so much time tryinghe to obliterate them? what was their motive? >> one of the motives was france and germany every 25 years kept fighting each other. >> tucker: exactly. >> they kind of wondered how do we stop the germans from crossing the rhine and try to smash the french? they thought if they merge the two countries, but might be a way to do it. but, just as with communism, the big idea that came before this, the road to hell can be paved with good intentions. the mistake they made was this: provided nationstates are democratic, they will not fight and they will not go to war with each other. if you try to give people a false identity, a false flag, a false god if you like, they

[applause] , 2016 was the year the nationstate democracy made a comeback against the globalists of those wish to destroy everything we have ever been. [applause] of course, trump, amazing personality that he is, cannot have done it on his own. he had good people behind him. he had people like steve bannon, elian conway, and many others -- conway, and many others. he also had every single one of you and this event is your celebration. well done to all of you. night of junehe 23 was, great though the night of november the eighth, my favorite part of 2016 wasn't so much the victories. my favorite part of that evening of november the eighth was watching the faces of the cnn presenters. [applause] you know what? they haven't given up, have they? they are in deep denial. they would like to wind the clock back to 2015 to pretend that none of this had ever happened, but just as brexit becomes more popular by the day, president trump will become more popular in america by the day. [applause] up and some of their biggest cheerleaders -- i am thinking of tony blair in particular. [booing] so he is

it were failed in nationstates and then two nationstates that are spayed sponsors of terror, sudan andse are nations as a result that all seven of them where there is no real infrastructural way to tell who it is that we are allowing in the country, all, and then you've got those in the nation that are consumed with civil war, terrorism, where terrorism groups have a majority of the landmass in addition that isis through the three cities that it's taken at mosul and raqqa have a fake passport industry. tens of thousands of black passports in addition to state-based machinery to make identification papers. you have potentially thousands of individuals with fake materials, fake i.d. remember also, i ran like north korea has a state sanction counterfeit in operation. not with just american cash, which is why we keep changing the design of our money, but for identity papers. we are looking at a dynamic where until we can be absolutely sure about who is coming into this country, we have to presume that there is a problem. this is limited. this is about making sure that we have some mechanis

with failed nationstates and in two nationstates, they sponsor terror. sudan and iran.where there is no real infrastructure way to tell who we are allowing the country first of all, and then of course you've got the nations that are consumed with civil war, with terrorism. terrorist groups have been the majority of the landmass, in addition, isis -- other areas in libya. they have what is called a fake passport industry. they have tens of thousands of blank passports in addition to state-based machinery to make identification papers. you have potentially thousands of individuals with fake materials, fake i.d. remember also, they have a state counterfeiting operation. not with just american cash, but also for identity papers. we are looking at a dynamic where until we can be absolutely sure about who does coming into this country, we have to presume. this is limited. we have some mechanism. this is the hot spot where there is effectively a regional war leading to a world war and we have to have some parameters at this point. >> tucker: how confident are you that the fede

poland puts more emphasis on nationstates, with less power for brussels. >> the countries do agree thatanctions against moscow will remain, but even with that glimmer of unity, there is still a lot to sort out in warsaw. host: a lot to sort out. to help us do that, i am joined by a senior analyst at the institute for public affairs. she joins us from warsaw. thank you for taking the time to talk to us. relations between germany and poland have not always been easy. do you see signs of goodwill on both sides? >> good evening, yes, indeed, i see very clear signs, and i think the fact that angela merkel came to warsaw today and a very positive mood of the press conference show indeed that both sides really want to communicate and agree on certain issues. they both think europe is important, so we need to have compromises, we need to talk. host: that is a positive way of looking at it. we have not always heard that type of positive talk coming from, for example, the head of the law and justice party. we know the german chancellor met with him today. are we seeing a sign of relations warming

the idea that we have a border and border integrity is essential to being a country, to being a nationstate. there are some trump voters who really wanted that to be a literal campaign promise that he fulfilled and others just view it as a symbol to his commitment to enforcing the border. is the author of the book devouring freedom: can big government ever be stopped? theident trump speaking at cpac conference on friday. here is a portion. onthe gop will be from now the party also of the american worker. [applause] we haven't been as a group given credit for this. if you look at how much bigger our party has gotten during this , during the early days when we had 17 people running. millions and millions of people were joining. i want to say it was because of me but it was. [laughter] [applause] have an amazing, strong powerful party. that truly does want to see america be great again and it will see it and it's going to see it a lot sooner than you think. a lot sooner than you think. [applause] to donors ornswer lobbyists or special interests. we will serve the citizens of the united states

in fact the time yorktown britain was fighting five separate nationstates. it was overwhelms. overwhelmed. for example the battle of gibraltar observe over 60,000 spanish troops troops in a four-year siege that ultimately failed in that is a mushroom cloud. the fighting was that fierce. republic was drawn into the war for having supplies with france and battles of the north you were equally as fierce. france had aligns in india to drive the british east india company from the subcontinent. in fact, the last major battle of the war which was the battle of -- in india equally fierce happen six months after the planetary peace treaties had been signed. this is 1783 and it ended eight years of war. during that time over 200,000 french and spanish troops and sailors fought in the war. compared with an estimated at 250,000 to 380,000 americans. they were as invested in the war as we work for the war as we were. americans could have never won the war without france and france could've never fought the war without spain. what i hope all of you take away from this is the following, the

was sought bluntly in our last presidential election, where i think for the first time another nationstate figured out how to weapon eyes the internet and apparently consequential way. >> what is that big data? >> guest: big data is basically the mashup of computing power and been able to use that computing power to harvest meaning out of all of the zeros and ones that are being created by the 16 billion network devices in the world. 90% of the world state a has been created in the last two years. in fact, if you take the sum of all information created by humankind from literally the earliest recordings, paintings on cave walls to the year 2013, by 2003 which is not that long ago, we now produce that much information every two days. so, big data is our ability to look at the specific ocean worth of information that we are creating an harvest intelligence from its. >> what you mean by intelligence. >> guest: things that can help you make a more informed decision. i don't take a utopian view of big data. i'm not one of those people who believe that noise list algorithm shouldn't adjust in ev

weaponsalking about used by non-nationstates, like .ezbollah and the hothis it's the type of weapon you would see on a country's warships. it's a real threat. they have been using this. ferry, aan aluminum former u.s. navy ship, no longer used by the u.s. navy. it was being operated by a uae company. in october, it was hit by missiles and severely damaged. october, there was fire on a u.s. navy ship. for the first time, a destroyer engaged in coming surface to surface missiles it was successful. they destroyed the missile. there was another missile that wasn't going to hit anybody. they let it crash. a couple days later, there was a strike, hitting radars. if they don't have fire control, it's hard to use them. they don't hit anything. threat is ongoing. on january 30, a saudi forget patrolling in this area -- threat is ongoing. frigate patrolling in this area was attacked. it was a suicide boat attack, very small, very fast. made and iran. somehow, it was smuggled over. it's exactly the kind of threat that the american navy has been worried about for years, swarming small boat a tax --

it suggests involvement of a nationstate and that of course points to north korea. points to north korea. thirdly, the x is a banned chemical weapon under the un chemical weapons convention. -- vx. which the un chemical weapons convention. —— vx. which means if this attack was carried out by north korean agents they've not just was carried out by north korean agents they've notjust committed an assassination of foreign soil but they are responsible for releasing a banned chemical weapon inside a major international airport. in other news: a news conference by france's far—right presidential candidate marine le pen has been interrupted by a semi—naked female protester. the national front leader was outlining herforeign policy when the woman burst into the paris venue. she had "marine fictionalfeminist" scrawled on her back. she was removed by security. a leading critic of the philippine president, rodrigo duterte, has been arrested on drugs trafficking charges. senator leila de lima was detained by police after an overnight vigil at the senate. just before she was ta

the nationstate remains the best model for human happiness, and the american nation remains the greatestof liberty, freedom and justice, on the face of god's earth. and you can find more analysis of donald trump's latest speech on our website. just log on to bbc.com/news, where you will also find a look at the executive orders which the president has signed. the american woman who was at the centre of the us supreme court ruling which legalised abortion in america has died. norma mccorvey was known under the pseudonym jane roe when she took legal action to allow her to terminate a pregnancy in the 1973 roe versus wade case. she later waived her right to anonymity, and became an anti—abortion campaigner. caroline davies reports. she was known as jane roe. she wa nted she was known as jane roe. she wanted to end her pregnancy. abortion was illegal in the state where she lived, texas, so she sued. her case reached the supreme court and became one of the most well—known cases in american legal history, roe versus wade. the landmark ruling by the court meant that it was no longer legal for an

and in israel, israel is a jewish democratic state, and the meaning is that israel is the nationstatee jewish people, with integral rise to all of its citizens, because it is a democracy, and because this is also ourjewish values. there is an argument that that has been tried for decades, or at least that has been the ambition for decades, unsuccessfully, which is perhaps one reason that the israeli president talks about annexing the occupied territories, and he says that there won't be one law for israel rallies and another for non— israelis, you would grant citizenship to all residents, and it would be one gallagher and democracy. this was the idea of many members, including my parents, after 1967. the idea was that we would give equal rights to those living between the jordan give equal rights to those living between thejordan river and the mediterranean sea, but in the end, this one, can lead to a situation in israel in which it would stop being a truejewish israel in which it would stop being a true jewish democratic state. israel in which it would stop being a truejewish democra

the alliance for other nations in fact by the time that yorktown, britain was fighting separate nationstates and it was simply overwhelmed. for example they absorbed over 60,000 spanish troops but ultimately failed. the fighting was that fierce. fans had allied with the kingdom in india to drive the company from the continent and in fact the last major battle of the war was equally fierce intent and six months after the peace treaties have been signed. 1783 ended up eight years of war and during that time there were 200,000 french and spanish troops and sailors that fought in the war compared with an estimated 250,000 to 380,000 americans. they would never have fought the war without spain. what i hope all of you take away from this is the following. the united states did not achieve independence by itself. it was born as the centerpiece of an international coalition which together worked to defeat a common adversary, and it is in fact america's role as a centerpiece of international efforts for common good that continues even today to define the united states is the indispensable nation. [a

we have been attacked by other nationstates come on by other entities for a very long time.ng new. it is getting more sophisticated and we are hearing about it more in the press than we ever have before. more ways of tackling it the companies such as your own. caroline: thank you for joining us. asia'sup, turmoil at second-largest i.t. services company. mariana murphy is calling off his fight with the board. check in with our team next, this is bloomberg. ♪ caroline: travel disruptions in india have two meters facing major delays in the past four days. to continue to dispute with to ars, bring it standstill. demanding better pay and working conditions. the maids and could a revision of the minimum fares, bringing back bonuses, and producing the commission rate as well as limiting the number of cars registered on the app. mariana murphy is calling off his fight for the board. the company will deal with questions. he had raised concerns about governance and executive pay. ishas made his point, it confident the board will sort it out. joining us is peter ahlstrom. peter, begin

before the formation of european nationstates. it has only been under european hegemony that they decided to divide mankind into braces -- races and artificial constructs. here we are in the 21st century still arguing over and artificial concept. america is not racist. america is a society of nationalities and tribes. we have to remove the concept of race to define human beings and remove that concept of black-and-white to define americans. these are divisive terms. it's the 21st century and racism did its job up until the 21st century. but we have to move forward and , stoph american europeans masquerading as white people -- i'm serious. what is your question? i moneys historians that will say i don't know when i don't know. >> you know you are not a race. >> i know i am a race. >> what makes you a race? >> when i was a little boy when i grew up in segregated virginia, my parents gave me the talk about being negro and white society. >> did god make you a race or a part of a family that became a tribe? intellectually, and artifici

terror, to pursue this in order to preserve israel as the nationstate of the jewish people, israel is faced with two major threats. one from the outside, iran, a vile eminent dutch enemy which asked destabilizes, our worst onmies, want to go with us opportunity, and on the other hand, the other threat from inside is the option race recently in the white house of the possibility of a one state solution. that there will be an arab jewish state rather than presuming -- preserving the vision of zionism, the homeland of the jewish people, this is the real risk we are facing. we should reject any option of a one state solution. we should object to a jewish arab state and preserve the auction of the nationstate of the jewish people. israel's side by side with a palestinian state. despite all of this. for this, we need you, i call upon you. i tell you don't give up. all moderate forces in israel and the united states, especially the jewish community, should work proactively to pursue the option of the two state solution. .hank you very much did luck in your deliberations. >> ladies and gentle

government, and so, because of that, the number looks like it is increasing, but the attacks from other nationstatesities, it has been going on for a long time. it is nothing new. it is just getting more sophisticated, and we are hearing about it more than ever before. caroline: thank you so much, jay, with synack. up, the second-largest i.t. services company. and thecisco founder board. we will check in with our team of asia, next. this is bloomberg. ♪ now, a story we are watching. travel disruptions in india. er and another company continue to dispute with drivers, bringing things to a standstill. strike,have been on amending better pay and working conditions. at minimumoking fares and producing commission rates as well as changing the available.abs and a cofounder is having a fight with a board, saying they will deal with corporate governance. they had raised concerns about urthy says, but m they are confident they will sort it out. peter is with us, who covers asia tech. they have had a few issues. certainly, there are the hb one b's is here in the united states. visas in the united states. part

the nationstate remains the best model for human happiness, the american nation remains the greatestbol of liberty, of freedom, and justice on the face of god's earth. and now, we have spirit like we have never had before. it is now that we have our sacred duty, and we have no choice, and we want this choice to defend our country, to protect its values, and to serve its great, great citizens. [applause] erasing national borders does not make people safer or more prosperous. it undermines democracy and takes away our prosperity. the so-called global elite have done very well for themselves, but have left working families with shrinking. 18 years ago, many of you in this room made more money working one job and you're making right now working to and three jobs. we have seen wars that never end and conflicts that never seem to go away. we don't fight to win. we fight politically correct wars. we don't win anymore. we don't win at trade, we don't win in any capacity. we don't win anymore. we are going to start winning again, believe me. [applause] and we have the chance now, working toge

that means that someday, the entrepreneurs will be the superpower, not the nationstates.ans some of the biggest problems facing humanity will be solved by entrepreneurs, whether that happens to be elon musk. caroline: usually a superpower is given to those who are elected. you are just going to have that power t through great today. >> my idea is that people among themselves are starting to become accountable. we all know that just because somebody is elected does not mean they deserve to be a superpower. i am not saying a word after that. [laughter] caroline: give us a sense of your past? you grew with the .com boom. you had some companies that exploded like supernovas, if we stick with the space theme, and then lost their value. how to promise the returns to your investors? how do we know that the moon express will remain a good investment? >> the idea that in the dot come boom, he did not matter what company you invested in. companies lost value. i think it is very cyclical. , you cannotnt control the stock price, but you can build great companies. and then you build g

about, these and maybeould exist this could be a way, if not, there is a possibility to keep the nationstate. i found out these countries, obviously kept together under dictators, that has exactly happened. >> thank you. a very important question. go ahead. >> either everyone or nobody. [speaking another language] >> thank you. ok. thank you. i think you are getting the last word. >> a couple of comments. one is the russian military i believe has been the most transparent. each day, we reported possible details. when the report suddenly appears without evidence, you have to place it somewhere. you have to bring evidence to that. we've never been confronted with evidence. most of all ise that look, now when we do our utmost in order to place together the government and the most radical position and we start to succeed immediately, one after the other, there are most or four reports with terrible information, just sending a signal to these positions, don't go there, don't start any consultations with this government. you have seen the reports of how terrible it is. for me, this is a political

that, the number looks like it has been increasing, but in reality we have been attacked by other nationstates for a long time. this is nothing new. it is just getting more sophisticated and we are hearing about it in the press more than we have before. ♪ caroline: that was synack ceo jake kaplan. coming up, we will hear from the man who will help settle your debt. we will hear from bill ready on paypal's latest deal. all episodes of bloomberg technology are live streaming on twitter. check us out at @bloombergtechtv weekdays at 5:00 p.m. in new , york, 2:00 p.m. in san francisco. this is bloomberg. ♪ ♪ caroline: back now to the goldman sachs technology and internet conference in san francisco. this week, paypal announced plans to acquire tio networks, a . tio a leading bill payment processor that processed $7 billion in 2016. we caught up with the paypal coo bill ready that helped turn venmo into a payment app. bill: tio is a bill pay provider for the underserved. from the beginning, it was a democratize or of money, paypal, and we think about how we democratize the management and move money

she calls for a world based on nationstates.'s independence and the french people, there is no price too high. in this framework, it is clear the policies of france are to be decided in paris and no ally, no treaty, no alliance will decide french policies in its place. anna: advisors to the french national front leader have met to claim their economic program and plans to withdraw france from the euro. us.line connan joins is it very unusual van for bankers to be meeting with le pen's team at this point? caroline: it is not that unusual for them to meet with mainstream parties, but so far, the national front was not considered a mainstream party, so this clearly signals a change that this strategist from blackrock, ubs, barclays, our meeting with the pen officials. this signals they consider the pen as aisk -- le risk. she has promised to leave the the independence of the central bank and create money in order to finance the government spending. now, the interesting thing is pen advisers-- le confirmed they have been in contact

especially against capable nationstates. that bow wave of deferred modernization and it is compounded by a significant reduction in the modernization budget. what do you do? it is a democracy. you get the army the american people are willing to pay for. we are working very hard to not do what you said is the danger. which is allowing the money that you do have to determine what you do. as the budget gets cut and cut, you spend less money over more programs and you get less for your defense dollar as a result. we are trying to ruthlessly prioritize but we are also trying to make the case of investment in army capabilities. can you imagine if you went to them if theyasked wanted to work on any ships? to not be working on a combat vehicle when we see our friends and potential enemies fielding more advanced capabilities. we are upgrading the bradley tank but it is not the same bradley tank by any means from the 1980's. there is only so much you can do. when you talk about active protection, layering in other protective capabilit

there is no internet connected system that is safe from a ,edicated nationstate adversary or even a sophisticated criminal group, if they are determined to get in right now. that is the persistent threat. there is no technology that build that wall that is high enough for deep enough to keep them out. what have we seen? we have seen a change in approach. when i was prosecuting these cases criminally, there was a squad i worked with on the criminal side, and we were plenty busy, but there was another side that worked on the intelligence side. the whole time, they were behind a secure door and never went to the other side. it is not like i was banging to get in, because there was plenty to do. when i went to the fbi to serve as chief of staff, the door opened. we were focused on cyber threat. we were developing a new capacity to share intelligences like we did post 9/11 when it came to the terrorism threat, to share intelligence within the federal government from nsa, secret service, fbi, department of homeland security, including information only from your states. you can see a jumbotron screen la

so within the holy roman empire, there were a number of small principalities, small nationstates involvedthe work in the war but in the war but he was generally and in a direct way. does that answer the question? okay. >> i've had a fascination with this double were since i was as old as that little guy over there. recently, i learned that britain treated slaves in 1833 and the thought that came to me was if washington and all his buddies had been put in their place that we would have waited the civil war because they freed slaves not only in britain, but all their colonies. i'd like you to comment on that. they asked it to question at a park service presentation. one of the people in the audience said that part of the reason that the americans went to war was because they did a great with inking about freeing their slaves and they didn't want to be part of the british empire and that casts a whole different light on these slaveowning guys. >> nothing in the readings that i have encountered indicate in any way that in the year 1795 or 76 when all this is coming to a head, that frees slave

the threats of terror, anarchist, nationstates that have the chance to invade our privacy, challenge our liberty, create huge challenges to our economic system. we are not prepared in the 21st century the deal with cyber security issues the way that we should. all of this will require public leadership that is dramatic the different than it was just 10 to 15 years ago. what are the principles i learned? is, when running for office and when you are a public leader and you want to do things, you need to tell people what you're going to do and then show the resolve and do it. it is an interesting loop. do, and you're going to do what you say you are going to do. i know that's a crazy idea in american politics today. but if you look at the successful governors in the last 50 years, they did it. they said what they were going to do, then did what they said they were going to do. and that is novelty. it is so common in state capitals. our students are seeing video after video of people with different ideologies saying the same thing. iran on this and i thought for what i believed. and z.pl

in fact, by the time of yorktown, britain was fighting five separate nationstates.t was simply overwhelmed. for example, the battle of gibraltar absorbed over 60,000 spanish troops in a four year siege that ultimately failed and yes, that is a mushroom cloud. over the rock of gibraltar it was that fierce. the dutch republic was brought into the war were allowing supplies to go into france. can the battles in the north sea were equally fierce. france had allied with the kingdom in india to drive the british east india company from the subcontinent but this failed. and in fact, the last major battle of the war, which is the battle of -- in india, equally fierce. it happened six months after the preliminary peace treaties had been signed. the piece of 1783 had ended eight years of war. during that time, over 200,000 french and spanish troops and sailors fought in the war. compared with an estimated 250,000 to 380,000 americans. they were as invested in the work as we were. the americans could never have won the war without france and never have thought the war without

the people's republic never got the memo about the inevitable decline of the nationstate. they are absolutely obsessed with internal security and stability. in many cases, this makes them conservative. in the 1990's after the soviet union collapsed, china settled a number of border dispute with the new central asian republics on fairly generous terms. excepting considerably less than half of the disputed territory, though those new states were very weak. something that seems surprising, in sharp contrast with their aggressive stand against stronger adversaries in the south china sea and the border with india. one key reason for the difference, the central asian states, the chinese perceive potential partners in monitoring restive muslims and strengthening their control over the province. that commitment about what they call, non-interference, has other uses for the united states. while the chinese, like others have clearly hacked into the , computers of many u.s. politicians and of both political parties, they do this as a matter of espionage. they have never tried to weap

would be naÏve at best it couland could be everything m someone in a van down by the river to a nationstate i think that should be investigated and i'v and i saidh publicly, and i also think everybody should know, every member of congress should note the house intelligence committee is the only organization that is set up to do that. >> very briefly, the congressman and i over a month ago i held a bill that asked we have this investigation and the reason we did that is we didn't want it to get mired in a political battle like the kennedy -- committee did. it would be patterned after the 9/11 commission so that we would bring america's best experts to the table and it would be an equal number of democrats. they would look at this carefully and i need to explain this. they would come back with recommendations and have subpoena power. then we'd be fine with it. every single democrat in congress signed onto the bill. we felt we didn't need to move to the common ground. we needed to move to higher ground but that this was such a serious attack on the democracy. it deserves that kind of attention

benefited from this enterprise of slavery, from the crewmembers to the planter elite to even the nationstates. the other thing to think about is, why would someone serve on a slave ship? was it to gain passage to the new world? to feed their family? or was it because they thought this was more than ok and wanted to make money? when you open that book, you find that many crewmembers committed suicide and many ran away. host: you can join in on facebook.com/cspan. remember all of our programming , is available online at any time at c-span.org. our guest is mary elliott. our next caller is charlie from florida. go ahead, please. caller: thank you, miss elliott, for entertaining my phone call. my question is, why are we not having more open discussions about the democratic party's role in creating racism and segregation as a result to maintain the institution of slavery and to prevent african americans from matriculating into mainstream america? creating racism to prevent african americans from matriculating into mainstream america. mary: what i love about this museum -- and that's a great questi

-mexico border of the place for nationstates in interest me.the past several months in the united states even having a national conversation about border security. the conversation is legitimate and necessary as providing security for the american people as a primary function of our system of government. in the modern world have been a secure border is essential. i want to add however a conversation about the u.s. border also touches on another major u.s. national interest which is the commercial side. economic security is national security and plays a key role in allowing flows of legal people and legal goods in and out of the united states. the image we currently have in our minds of the border is one of the barriers but what we hope to do today is bag deeper into the functioning of the border and a dual responsibilities of the same time being secure and impermeable by thread more opening of too announced the 1 billion legal goods and people that pass through the u.s.-mexico border every day of the year. we want to have a conversation today a

tygart suggestions are r particularly with respect to wih wada's authority to hold nationstates responsible, and have you ever done so? >> i would first like to clarify that prior to 2015, wada did not have the power to investigate. that doesn't come into force into the world into jumping code was established.antido >> out of curiosity you have been in existence since 1999? >> that's correct. >> so how and why is it that you do not get investigative authority until 2015? >> at the first code came in 2003. there has been three reiteration sense. it is not wada's code.e it is stakeholders and it was an evolving system. to be honest, the reason the investigation came in was that we saw the power of the whistleblower coming forward and they needed an independent body to investigate. >> when wada was created in 1999, it was never intended to be an investigative authority when it has to do with anti- doping? >> that's correct. >> so it wasn't until 2000 through the different codes comes to beak, but then then so what is it besides educating and testing, what is it that you would attribute as bae-

it is good for any nationstate to have a military often their military, otherwise your dependent ande weaker which is what we have seen throughout europe to pay for their welfare states. that is what mike pence is saying in munich. >> we begin with a fox news alert, blatant disrespect for america protesters burning the american flag blocking traffic and tangling police in philadelphia. two cops injured after being hit by pepper spray. four people put in handcuffs and facing assault charges. upset about alleged police abuse calling for criminal justice reform. hundreds of mexicans and americans form in the human wall to protest a wall on the border of juarez, mexico and el paso, texas and outrage over president trumps's promised border wall to keep illegals out. the department of homeland security hoping to have a real border wall complete in the next two years. ford moving forward with their plan to bring two factories in mexico despite canceling plans to build a $1.6 million plant after pressure from the trump administration to keep jobs in the us. the company said the two new plant