practices that file lawsuits and we have been repeatedly, wrongfully arrested, even the united states government have even had our marriage and our divorce as a political football. so when you actually see the evidence that is going to come out, how we have been attacked by the united states government and other entities, you're going to see how this has been one of our biggest problems in oppressing people who speak out against our government or speak up for their voiceless. >> this issue of government, domestic government surveillance, is a problem that as been with us for over 100 years. as i indicated we developed a project at cato over a year ago called american big brother. it's a timeline. can you go to our website catoamericanbigbrother, years. as i google that. you'll be able to walkthrough from 190 through from 1908 all the way up to essentially to the controversy, all these different episodes. these are familiar to americans was what the fbi did in the southern christian leadership conference, it is an endemic problem, and enterprise investigation how the fbi goes about performance, a

united states citizens in mexico. the last 21 years have seen an erosion of that. accidents not feel warmly toward the united states and their government has been working closely with united states on all kinds of issues, including security. my argument is going to be if you want to really secure the homeland, you' need a positive relationship with mexico. mexico is the only great power in history that doesn't have an antagonistic neighbor on its borders. twois lucky it only has neighbors, but do we really want to alienate that from ourselves? host: good morning, bob. good morning, sir. mr. worthy, i would like to find i would like to find that where are you better find information that more an goingre leaving th in? where does that information come from, please? guest: that is a very important question. in fact, they are actually u.s. government figures and their the numbers of people that are registered in national senses said that we are actually looking at the mexican population, undocumented population of the united states at its lowest point in about a decade. that is what we are looking at, government figures that prove this. it

that was made, and it was made by the obama administration with the full backing of the united states governmentthe president in accordance with that deal to honor what had been agreed upon by the united states government, in ensuring that that vetting will take place in the same manner that we're doing it now will go forward. >> but last night president trump pumped the brakes, tweeting around 10:00 p.m. washington time, do you believe it? the obama administration agreed to take thousands of illegal immigrants from australia. why? i will study this dumb deal. joining us now from capitol hill. can you put this in perspective for us? having strained relations with our next door neighbor mexico as well as long time staunch ally australia, two weeks into this new administration, are there any press dents for this and what are the risks? >>hose are all great ons. the risks are, you know, the total astronomical, obviously when you are talking about foreign relations, you are talking about one of of our countries two neighbors in mexico, either a threat of sending troops, according to this a.p. report

david: do you think the united states government is better at cyber terrorism than other governments against us? eric: u.s. government has never acknowledged it plays an active role in cyberspace and is active offensively, although the people who might be our targets certainly claim we have been doing this. the consensus of people that do not know any of the details, which includes me, is america is very good at this, but other countries are as well. the one i worry the most about right now is actually russia. if you look at their actions, they have done a number of very publicized invasions, tax and alterations which can only be understood as cyber activity and they are not shy about it. they do not mind people knowing about it. this must be part of their strategy. david: the europeans seem to not like google as much as americans do. have you resolved those issues with europe? eric: the core issue is the european governance model is not set up to build global companies. ♪ david: a few years ago you gave up the position of ceo. you were ceo for a decade. now you are the executive cha

the united states government pushed this appeal mush earlier than would normally be done so even if the 9th circuit says we will leave this day in place it goes back to seats for further proceedings and come back to the 9th circuit and go to the supreme court. >> quickly because we are running out of time which way do you think the circuit court will rule? >> basically they will uphold what the trial judge did. they may limit its scope in different ways. but i think for the most part we are going to say the trial judge was right. >> professor, thank you for your time tonight. >>> pleasure. thanks for inviting me. >> they were tracking the rain not only here but on the east coast. tornadic activity in louisiana today. a lot of damage. numerous tornadoes and then just severe weather now from florida all the way to new york and rhode island. so travel tomorrow and tonight could be an issue to the far eastern seaboard. powerful storms especially in atlanta and florida. here is our system that will cause flight delays on thursday. sf oalways has flight delays and seattle and portland as well

the president of mexico, a country has relationship of trust and confidence with the united states governmentstates people. so i won't be surprise in mexican president is in the united states. yes within the context of the next three to four months, i hope they visit to the united states, when we talking in equal terms on things that make sense. the biggest problem -- the whole thing was setup and then president trump say something which was wrong, and the response of the president was correct. if that's going to be the way that you're going to treat us, then it doesn't make sense to go at this point in time. as you see from the comments from the result of this situation between the officials of the united states of the officials of mexico, we find common ground and be ready and can willing to go to establish kind of respect of country and people would be major and most important point. >> thank you for joining us. >> thank you. >>> obamacare. will republicans when congress listen. caught on camera, off duty police officer pulling out a gun on teenager. more on that investigation. next. with

if it you don't agree with the president and you work with the united states government, you should not be there. that's what he is saying. >> every president has a right has the write to surround himself with the team that's going to work with him and not against him. there's been a lot of grand standing in the last issue. >> civil servants swore the oath to the constitution -- >> saying oath discharge the duties. >> they -- >> they disagree with him on major issue. sean spicer said step up or step aside. it's a choice they have to make. our new secretary rex tillerson, he said today, his first day on the job, brace for big changes and he means this. this is new administration, and everybody new thaesnu what they getting with president trump -- did. >> did they sign petitions -- >> does president have a right to insist that the people who work for thefederal government agree with him? >> agree with him on what? do they agree with him personally. he is president he enact behalf of the nation. he calling for extreme vetting from seven countries that president obama identified. it's seven

think about how markets would react if the united states government declared it would not make good on its financial obligations. the stock markets would go crazy, and not in a good way. that would be terrible for the millions of people who invest their savings in the market for their retirement. the congressman also voted several times to shut down the federal government all in the name of getting his way. i cannot emphasize enough how dangerous his approach to government is. but it's one thing as a member of the house freedom caucus, as a member of the u.s. house of representatives. there are 435, and you can take positions, but it doesn't have quite the same impact as the office of management and budget does. he has put party and partisan views over some of the most fundamental and basic principles of our government -- to close the government, to stop paying our bills, to make people across the planet question the full faith and credit of the united states is beyond comprehension. it should take a real crisis to pull congress away from the negotiating table and all the challenges in

united states. i think it's reasonable to expect that other governments would take the same approach. now, we could decide that we want to ban rt in the united state states, for example. i'm not sure what that would really accomplish because you know it's not just a question of what people can get on their cable tv or actually over the air. they also broadcast over the air, but the internet. so are we going to start policing what americans can look at on the internet? i don't really see a way to address that problem other than having our own kind of robust kind of media and information environment and clash of ideas and people being responsible about checking sources of information and facebook is trying to verify in some way or certify things that people put on to facebook. there are certain things that you can do. and we should try to do those things, but i don't really see how we can close off the united states from these other sources of information or those perspectives and i don't really see it as consistent with our values. >> the discussion on different angles by the participan

sb-1070, a law that led to the unjust racial profiling of immigrants, and to say to the united states government -- the united states government would no longer defend a law that prevented lgbt americans from expressing their love for one another. and it's what led attorney general sally yates on a monday evening this month to stand up and refuse to defend a muslim ban. more than most cabinet positions, the united states attorney general enforces the principles that are the founding of our country, but i have seen no evidence in his record or testimony that senator sessions will approach this office in furtherance of these noble ideals. the gains that our country has made are not permanent, and it is incumbent on the attorney general of the united states to fight for the civil rights of all people. no one said it better than coretta scott king. freedom is never really won. you earn it and win it in every generation. and if senator sessions won't, then it is incumbent upon the rest of us to persist. i urge my colleagues to vote no. mr. president, i yield the floor. the presiding officer: the sena

united states. if you don't know what those are, those are issued to iraqis who worked with the united states government military as translators or interpreters, and you will remember, since the signing of the executive order, even people in washington who supported the merits of the executive order questioned why there was no exception issued for those people who worked with the government. so now even as the government continues to argue that this ban should be put in place, there will be this exception in the national interests, the words they use here, for those holders of the iraqi special immigrant visas, and 50 of those are given out per year. as we get more we will give it to you. a quick break and we'll be back. there's a denture adhesive that holds strong until evening. fixodent plus adhesives. just one application gives you superior hold even at the end of the day fixodent. strong more like natural teeth. and i finally found our big idaho potato truck. it's been touring the country telling folks about our heart healthy idaho potatoes, america's favorite potatoes, and donating to local chariti

you know african-americans are s system of the united states government. think about it. let's go back to james madison. what was the lesson we took away froms system of the united states government. madison's lynching of the heartland? nathan. >> [inaudible] prof. shrock: there is a tremendous amount of violence that surrounds the african-american community. what was that about? >> [inaudible] prof. shrock: the rape of mary ball, right. once again, white supremacist theared it's stoked by specter of black men raping white women and all the changes that is going on in the early 20th century. we know that in marion there was this widespread notion that law enforcement was not doing enough and the white community needed to step up and police those racial boundaries, because remember what is white supremacy like in the north and the south? we see this through madison's book. negotiate segregation even in northern states. not typically talked a bout. how difficult it is from that book we see from community to community, the standards are different. where you eat, sleep. our yo

states host: alan gomez on the cause of refugee movement from central america. guest: if we get into the united with latin ionship america and direct involve nment governments down there over the ecades, we could be here for quite a while. no denying any way the united states part of what we're seeing in a lot of country is result of the country. in i don't think folks coming over worried untry now are about our historical involve nment their country, what they is what is left. the countries are some of the the world, el honduras, rank in the top five in the world in terms of homicide rates. even travel withing government officials or with security, there is just gang members around and are always watching and are always over your shoulder to make sure understand who controls those neighborhoods and how it is. t is incredibly dangerous place. again, i have nothing but sympathy for people getting over be ablether they should to get in is another question, that is what we're grappling federal level. host: alex, st. petersburg, go ahead. caller: good morning. thank you for having me. just a few comments about the wall. wall, i think, is not going border because all

it's not clear that anybody d and give us, the united states government ought to provide more informationo we know how to judge this properly. >> david, the president essentially saying law enforcement types that he talked to told him he can't wait a week, can't wait a month. the idea that bad guys are going to run into the country in that week or in that month, it does take a long time to get a visa, no? >> yeah, it's surprising to me that this is even an issue, because of course he's going to see things in the president's daily brief that other people aren't seeing. of course he's going to see things about threats that are based on classified information. that's not any surprise. his predecessors did this, not only them but the whole range of counter terrorism intelligence and professionals have been looking at this kind of threat for many years, and that's why there are extensive vetting procedures for immigrants, for people applying for visas and refugees. that's already there. one of the things that he's said hasn't got much attention and is much more interesting. he says i've learne

the soviet government has gone out for propaganda recently we have seen they have written several letters to president ice enhowever. the letters addressed to the president of the united statesnda purposes but not for serious document from one government to another. now, the soviet government is headed by the party presid yum, a small group of people in moscow who run the 200 million people of the soviet union in their hands. there are 2 elements the government and the party machine. those are the quite separate. the government is merely a bureaucracy, the party machine has the power. they use all the means of communications and contacts with foreign people to spread their propaganda. take for example radio. the soviet government every week in some 50 foreign languages sends out 2,000. in foreign languages they say 200, $300 in one week. if you multiply that fby the number of languages it is 200 to $300 a week. they have mass publications. many of those books and publications they use in the near east and far east are in english. that's the best language to reach the public in those countries. they use films. they use exchanges. they bring large numbers of indians or egyptia

the soviet government has gone all out for propaganda, and recently we have seen they have written several letters to president eisenhower. to theters are addressed president of the united states are intended to all the world for propaganda purposes, not as a serious document from one government to another. --e the soviet government the soviet government is headed by a small group of people in moscow who run the 200 million people of the soviet union. elements -- the government and the party machine . those are quite separate. the government is merely a bureaucracy. the party machine has the power. these alternate means of communications and contacts with foreign people to spread their propaganda. , the for example, radio soviet government, every week, and some 54 languages, sends out being tos of broadcast foreign countries in foreign languages. how can they do that in one week? in each language, they do so many hours. you will buy the hours by the number of languages. they have mass books and publications that they sent abroad in various for liquid is -- four languages -- foreign languages. eastof those in the far are in english, because that is the best ways to reach the in

whatever was done with the clinton e-mail, that was not done by the united states government. have people in the united states government breaking the law and using that to really disclose information which in every respect is just wrong to do. first of all, we never want foreign governments to know whether or not we're eves dropping on them, whrorpb we're monitoring what they do. secondly, whenever an american citizen's name comes up, even in a conversation or if he himself is part of that wire tap conversation, that has to be blocked out. to protect his reputation. so this is wrong on every level. difference -- i want to make a distinction. whatever was done, whether it was the russians, wikileaks, that was not done by the u.s. government. >> melissa: which is a bigger concern in terms of our national security? the leak or the national conversation, whatever was going on, whatever the relationship is with russia? >> i would say right now it's equal. first of all the leak was wrong. who ever did it should be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law. i have a great regard f

they have gone along with the european side of the sanctions that the united states government organized against russia in 2014. but now viktor orban is looking at vladimir putin and seeing a kindred spirit thinking maybe we won't go along with those sanctions anymore. viktor orban sent his foreign minister to moscow last week and he declared the sanctions on russia may now be counterproductive. now maybe the european part of the worldwide sanctions on russia that we organized, maybe those sanctions are going to start falling apart. thank you, viktator. today russian president vladimir putin took his first foreign trip of the trump era, the trump era the russian government has been so excited about. naturally when vladimir putin decided to go abroad for the first time in the trump era, he went to go see the viktator, he went to see viktor orban in his country. part of that is nationalist right wing authoritarian strong men dissent crushing would be leaders for life. those kinds of leaders tend to like each other. but part of that is also the unraveling of this international tool that we

anymore't want to work with the united states government and he wants to resign.hat should be acceptable. if you worked at apple or general motors or another broadcasting system and all you of is run the president down the company you are working for, how long would you be working there? host: matt in arizona. independent line. go ahead. flynn was just trying to reassure russia. i think the neocons want a war with russia anti-western to -- and he was trying to reassure them. so many republicans out here cannot stand john mccain, how he got in, that is another question. host: fill in massachusetts. -- phil in massachusetts. caller: i don't care if you're a republican or democrat. this is very alarming. this guy was going to be the national security advisor to donald trump. this guy would know all the america's dealings throughout the planet. if there's one president at a time, donald trump was not even sworn in when he made the call after obama already passed those sanctions. he's going to call the ambassador and reassure him of what? what did he say to those peopl

government has gone all out for propaganda. seen how theyve have written several letters to president eisenhower. the letters are addressed on the envelope to the president of the united statesat they are really intended to all the world is for propaganda purposes, not a serious document from one government to another. government is headed by , a small presidium group of people in moscow who run the 200 million people of the soviet union. elements, the government and the party machine. those are quite separate. the government is merely a bureaucracy. the party machine really has the power. they use all their means of communication and contacts with foreign people to spread their propaganda. take, for example, radio. the soviet government, every and some 54 and line which 2300 hoursut 2000 -- of broadcast beamed towards foreign countries in four .anguages how can you do 2300 hrs in one week? in each language, they do so many hours. if you multiply the number of hours by the mother -- by the number of languages, it's 2300 a week. books andmass publications which they send abroad in various portland which. -- various foreign languages. many of those are in the near east and far

he helped lead the effort to shut down the united states government. more specifically, he helped lead the effort to shut down the government because the senate would not agree to defund planned parenthood. in his confirmation hearing, he had a chance to explain this position. our ranking member, senator mccaskill, asked him flat out do you still believe that the 2013 government shutdown was good policy? his response -- yes, ma'am. it was polite but wrong. polite isn't enough. we simply cannot have these views in the highest levels of government. this spring, on april 28, funding for the federal government expires. critical programs from child care to scientific research will halt unless there is agreement in place. it is hard to have confidence in this administration that they will come to a reasonable agreement when their nominee for the highest budget position believes, quote, good policy to shut down the federal government. this will not be the first nor last potential budgetary crisis the o.m.b. director could face. sometime this summer, the united

strongest investment in the world because it backed up at the full faith and credit of the united states government, the strongest government in the world. so any kind of u.s. debt backed by the full faith and credit is the strongest investment in the world.n congressman mulvaney has taken an alarming position advocating for sending down and defaulting on the day, all a part of a political gain to gain leverage in budget battles. anybody who takes the position that you want our government to go in default on its financial obligations, that is a prettyld extreme position. so does senator would merely say we can't have somebody in charge of our budget as the director of office management and the budget who's willing to risk a default on our government to meet a person not ideological agenda. let's look at something else now. presiding officer in one area united states, outside the u.s. yours truly absurd another part of the u.s. what near the arctic. the other year southern climes. our state and specifically south florida is ground zero for sealevel rise. i think most people are familiar with the pho

when the united states government decided to act and say to the people coming into the country and to the airport people, act as if this order had never been issued, they sealed their fate. it was over. no court is going to overturn that and create chaos. so i will bet you anything that this court is going to uphold that ip junction. how do they decide on the merits? how they decide on the merits i don't know. but no court, conservative, liberal, democrat, is going to throw it back and say chaos, chaos. that's not how they behave. >> there were a couple crucial issues. one was did washington state have the standing to go ahead with the restraining order. the other is whether muslims are being targeted or not. let me play this exchange. i believe this is what paul was referring to, between noah purcell and judge clifton. >> do you have any information as to what percentage or proportion of adherents to islam worldwide are citizens or residents of those countries? my quick penciling suggests something less than 15%. >> i have not done that math, your honor, but to be clear -- >> given a

>> to the united states government. >> to the united states government. is there a court that can order them give it to you? >> there is. the court in brooklyn can order it if she feels they're not complying. the government said they'll try to get us something by monday. we'll see. >> what rationale are they presenting as to why attorney generals from the aclu and presumably other attorney cans not speak to the people being held in this detention? >> they're not spelling it out but that's their position that people can't go back into secondary inspection areas in the airport. secondary inspection lasts for 45 minutes, so be it but what we've seen and what you have reported over the last week is people languishing back there and then getting deported. that's the danger. it's bad enough to get detained for 24 hours but what we've heard are people being coerced into giving up their right to come here and being sent back. so we'll not only be asking for the list of people detained but the peep sent back after our case was filed because we're going to try and

he speaks for the united states government. anding in a room that is the official government podium, if you will. listen here. >> when it comes to his family, i think he's been very clear how proud he is of what they do and what they've accomplished. and for someone to take out their concern with his policies on a family member of his, is just not acceptable, and the president has every right as a father to stand up for them. >> not acceptable is the interesting language. not acceptable. he speaks for the united states government. if you say something or do something critical or negative about the president's family, it's not acceptable? >> you know, i think it's clear this is an ethics violation. there seems to be little question about that. but i have to say, the dresses seem lovely. i've seen them in the store. but he's the leader of the free world. this is the white house. >> maybe better things to spend his time on? >> there are thousands of troops in afghanistan. we're not hearing about that. plenty of issues we're not hea

and the immigration, they don't realize that all the united states government wants is cheap labor. and to help ensure that the wisconsin and all of the other united states citizens are purchased as cheap labor as well. it's turning into a nation of forced servitude. host: thanks for calling, dawn. any thoughts? guest: a lot of themes packed in there. some very interesting points about economics and about wages and so on. i think to me one of the big questions about whether donald trump will flourish as a president, if i can put it that way, is what happens to some of these economic promises he made. about wages, about life getting better for workers in america. and to me that's going to be one of the big, big tests, very easy for a nationalistic, populist campaigner as he was to say, look, things are going to get better. i'm going to bring these jobs back. raise these wages. but actually some of the polls he's suggesting perhaps are not going to lead to that. that is one of the things that people are looking at. it may not play out very quickly, but one of the things that could be q

they are in $1.1 trillion of the united states' government bonds, more than anyone else in the world.ip with them. i think we are going to do more things with them on the trade front in the future, so i am quite hopeful that we might have hit the bottom and turned things around. the polish prime minister, beata szydlo, has been injured and taken to hospital after her official car hit a tree. police say it was an accident but, as bill hayton reports, it's raised concerns about security on the right, a tree, on the left, a car, and in the middle, the official limousine of the polish prime minister. she was travelling through her home town in southern poland on friday evening with a police escort. translation: it suddenly turned left while being overtaken with the car with the prime minister on board. the prime minister as well as the driver and security guard were injured due to the crash. the minister was wearing a seatbelt and suffered only minor injuries. she was treated in a local hospital, but was treated in a local hospital, but was fine to warsaw for further checks. police said t

government has gone all-out for propaganda. that is, very recently we've seen they've written several letters to president eisenhower. the letters are imaddressed on the envelope to the president of the united states but really they're intended to all the world for propaganda purposes, not a serious document from one government to another. now the soviet government is headed to a presiddium, a small group of people who run the 200 million in the soviet union. there are two elements to the government, and the party machine. those are quite separate. the government is merely a bureaucracy. the party machine really has the power. they use all the means of communications and contacts with foreign people to spread their propagand propaganda. just take, for example, radio. the soviet government every week in foreign languages sends out 250 hours of broadcast towards foreign countries in foreign languages. $2300 in one week. it means in each language they do so many hours and if you multiply the number of hours by the number of languages 2300 a week in broadcasts. they have mass books and publication which they use. many of those in southeast asia are in english because that's the best language to reach

investor being the united states government? the numbers we went over earlier $187 billion, given to freddie mac and fannie mae during the bail-out. $256 billion paid in dividends to the treasury since then. want to wler, do you add to that? guest: sure. the terms of will bailout are complicated. government got majority stake in freddie mac and fannie mae and still have that. the u.s. treasury has the shares of freddie mac and fannie mae to stake.em controlling in the time since they gave that nitial investment of $188 billion, they have gone back $256 billion dividend, whether oft is fair return is matter huge controversy and we can get the topic, if you'd like tis complicated one and subject former al lawsuits by and current fannie mae and freddie mac investors. investors.ate guest: private investors, the are traded off exchange and you can buy private shares in the companies, but the government has the majority stake. host: does that answer your question, gloria? caller: not really, that is used to, i used to work for the gov

. >> the ninth circuit panel simply found the government, the united states government did not meet the burden that they had to meet at this point which is a high burden. >> on top of that, news out this evening that a ninth circuit judge is requesting a vote as to whether or not the circuit's travel ban decision should be reheard by a larger panel of judges. so as we told you last night, this is likely just the beginning. the legal battle regarding the travel ban in the weeks ahead. >> to find the latest updates on the president's travel ban, go to our platforms. you can find that straight ahead at 5:30. >>> some mention the san francisco this evening. protesters stormed into city hall after a 100-year-old woman was evicted from her apartment. this followed a lengthy court battle. christie smith has both sides of the story. >> i have to tell you. this this is near sheriff's office on the fourth floor. demonstrators about, two dozen of them, expressing their anger. she tried speak with the court order that triggered the eviction had today but the demonstrators weren't hearing any of it

and is this the start of a regular campaign to the floors of the world in addition to the united states government, the french government and destabilize european union, the world so that will crumble? host: let's hear from roger. independent line. your thoughts on investigation by congress. caller: well, given the fact that the trump made such an situationof the email and a there was evidence -- there was evidence of russian interference of the hacking of the democrat -- her email server and democratic party and some of their internal documentation. it seems to me like the only way that trump can actually avoid looking like a complete the n,one b, --u -- buffoo hypocrite are potentially dangerous security risk for the united states would be to have an investigation. however, i do want to say something else about the previous guest that you had. there are no simple answers to the job questions. all of the answers do not work. there are answers what they will require imaginative solutions. host: we will have to leave it to there. let's go to bill. the president tweeting out about severale of inform

allegiance to the united states of america and faithfully defend the united states from any or all attacks and force any form of allegiance to the japanese emperor, to any other foreign government, power, or organization. okay. i guess i want to know how you thought people answered or maybe putting yourself in the shoes of someone else filling out this questionnaire, how do you think you would have answered in that situation? >> do i want to go fight? >> yeah. the first one is are you willing to serve in the military. >> because i'm filling it out i want to go fight. >> everyone has to fill it out. you don't have a choice. let me just ask. >> well, in my shoes then i would say -- what would happen if you filled it out and you're done with your internment, would you go back to regular life? >> let's get to that. let's first think about the whole -- let's first think about this situation at hand, right? stephanie, how do you think you would respond or how do you think people might have responded to these questions? >> i guess if you were aware of the consequences if you said no, then you would say yes. >> but people don't know what the consequences are. >> oh, well then probably

host: investor being the united states government? >> the number we went over was 780 billion dollars given to freddie and fannie during the bailout. -- billion has been paid back. joseph: the terms of this bailout were very complicated and what happened was the federal government got a majority stake in fannie and freddie, still have it. the u.s. treasury still has the controlling stake. in the kindness that they gave the initial investment of $188 billion, a have gone back -- gotten back to hundred 56 billion dollars dividends. whether that is fair is a huge matter of controversy. we can get to that topic if you would like, but it is complicated and the subject of several lawsuits by former and current investors. >> private investors. joseph: the companies are still traded off the exchange and you can still buy private shares in those companies, but the government has the majority stake. host: does that answer your question, gloria? >> not really, but that's ok. i used to work for the government and we made loans to small businesses

that post remains open, and that is a crucial figure to represent the united states government before the supreme court, if this goes that far. and i also thought it notable on the day that jeff sessions took the oath to become the attorney general, at that point the president had not spoken to jeff sessions about that matter and sessions would have various responsibilities with this kind of immigration plan, if it takes some other shape later. so my sense of his expression, his demeanor was he was very calm and very confident and very notable he called it a political decision. nicole? >> thank you, kelly. and you are going to stay with us for this. but i like to ask the professor if you could explain the legal scenarios for what happens next. >> well, there is a couple of options that the white house would have. one would be to ask the entire ninth circuit to hear the case in bank. usually that's nine or ten judges, but a larger number of judges to review what the panel did. given the make up, that's probably not a good option. the second option is to accept defeat and go back down a

united states. she hates our government so much that she portrayed the underwear christmas bomb as a cia agent and claimed the united states government basically killed its own citizens in order to blame muslims. judge jeanine: she has said some horrible things and i want my audience to read this, specifically about you. she says that she wishes she could take certain parts of your body away, that you don't deserve to be a woman. why? >> there is no words to describe how someone could be so classless. this has broken the records for how low you can go. if she calls herself a defender of women's rights. why would she attack another woman in the united states who escaped islamic terrorism who came here and expressing a different opinion. because i'm expressing i different opinion that gives her the right to say that she should take my female parts away? this is how low we have gotten in this country. judge jeanine: my concern is her fare she doesn't want to follow american law but sharia law, right? >> that is the case. >> thank you so much. politics with the panel is next. matt schlapp and chuck schumer. p

well—considered order that had gone through the normal processes of the executive branch of the united states governmenteful consideration of national security issues and diplomatic issues and others, and then had gone to the court, it might have gotten a different reception. but when you put those two things together, it's no surprise at all that the courts reacted the way they have done. and in fact you'll notice that the administration did not even tried to take this order up to the supreme court. and i think that tells you a lot. but one thing i am really intrigued by, and i'd like your perspective as a recently former solicitor general, is the response that donald trump, as chief executive, as president, gave on twitter about the process, and in particular about the courts and the judges involved. for example, one tweet, early on in this farrago, "the opinion of this so—called judge, which essentially takes law enforcement away from our country, is ridiculous. it will be overturned." "i just cannot believe a judge would put our country in such peril. "if something happens, blame him and the court s