realize that justices thomas and sotomayor agree about 60% of the time or that justices scalia and brier agreed even more often than that. all in the very toughest cases in our entire legal system. and here's another example about my record. over the last decade, i've participated in over 2,700 appeals. often these cases are hard too. only about 5% of all federal lawsuits make their way to decision in the court of appeals. i've served with judges appointed by president obama all the way back to president johnson. and in the tenth circuit, by hear cases from six different states covering two time soozon and 20% of the continental united states but in the west, we listen to one another. respectfully. we tolerate. we cherish different points of view and we seek consensus when we can. my law clerks tell me that 97% of those 2,700 cases i've decided were decided unanimously. and that i've been in the majority 99% of the time. that's my record and that's how we do things in the west. of course, i make my share of mistakes too. as my daughters never tire of reminding me, putting on a robe does

>> correct, justice brier. but there is not something in 1414 that says they have to provide a significant benefit. >> they do have to provide something that makes progress in the general education curriculum. >> they have to fall the checklist. there must be a statement. i think everyone agrees you don't look at outcomes. >> it is just the same as rowley. we are not saying anything different. >> if you take rowley as meaning whatever those two words were, beneficial. >> some benefit. >> some educational benefit. this is inconsistent with rowley. >> i don't think so. i think it has to be some benefit -- >> are there -- in the wake of the many years this act has been enforced and these many individual meetings, have there been documented areas of consensus and methods and systems that work and certain ones that don't? gl i think that is where the briefs are. progress that was made but there was also a lot that was given up. one of the core purposes of the ida is mainstreaming and for a fly is not a mainstream sc

. >> the tongue is 18-inches long and they use the tong to get through briers, sticky things to get theers they like. >> reporter: babies are too shy to come close but george xna's mom is all about the treats. she couldn't stay away when we had carrots to share. >> georgia loves food. >> reporter: she'll talk to anybody. >> to anybody. >> reporter: the three calves will go to any of the moms to nurse sometimes all at once and they follow their mothers around. these gals will grow up to be about 16 feet tall an and weigh 1500 pounds. in jackson, i'm nora muchanic channel6 "action news." pennsylvania means business when it comes to protecting our children. thank you pennsylvania! find out if you need to get your clearances by going to keepkidssafe.pa.gov paid for with pennsylvania taxpayer dollars. in the country have in common? many of them now call cancer treatment centers of america in philadelphia home. expert medicine works here. find out why at cancercenter.com/eastern cancer treatment centers of america. chevy ireally...t awarded car company three years in a row. let's see how quic

we do want to talk about this -- gets to replace an anthony kennedy or a ruth baird ginsburg or a brier, which in this town would be world war iii. right now we have somebody in the scalia mode. if there is a next one, and we all know the ages of these three justices, the next one would totally alter the court. wouldn't you rather have the filibuster in place for that? >> a few answers. number one, we are in this to win. i think we will win. number two, there's no lock on this seat to find a scalia clone, as neil gorsuch has been described. as i recall, that seat should have been filled by merrick garland, that enjoyed support from both democrats and republicans. in fact, it was orrin hatch republican senator from utah, that called president obama after the society became vacant by justice scag scalia's death and recommended merrick garland. so i don't necessarily see this as the scalia seat. and this is the real fight. this is the most important fight and we should not be looking down the road at who is -- who might vacate their seat. this is the seat. this is the fight at the moment.

we started with some house made pickled cabbage, corned beef, and some briere cheese, fountaina cheese and combined all that in our oven back at the pizzeria which is a wood fired oven which is 850 degrees. these pizzas were cooked in under two minutes each. >> it all starts with the crust. >> correct, correct. >> we actually old age our dough so this dough is actually three days old, and you'll taste it when you try it. >> okay. so let's, do this, we will get this one all together here. >> we will need some help from you guys to finish this one. >> what is already on it. >> again, bases pickled cabbage, corned beef and then we top it with the cheese. >> so this is different i don't see tomato sauce. >> no, this is what we would call a white pizza without the sauce. >> so what do we sprinkle on there. >> do a little bit of the chopped parsely. >> okay. >> there you go. >> very nice. >> and then this is our, again , house made dijo u.n. mustard aoli, some people do the grid or a circle. >> there you go, nice. >> all right. >> i went to school for that. >> sound good. >> last thing, you

more than a dozen craft bruers faced off to prove who could make the best briere from recycled wastewater. still no? >> no. >> all of the recipes used water that was once waste but had been purified. the whole goal of the competition is to change opinions about recycled wastewater. >> the main ingredient for a good beer is high-quality water. we're here to show we're able to produce high quality water. >>> san diego set to begin construction on a new water recycling facility that will pump out 30 million gallons of water. and that would be a whole lot of beer. >> doesn't alcohol and fermenting kind of get rid of all the germs and stuff? >> sure. sure. >> you drink enough of it, you won't even remember it. >> i guess so. or you'll p really sick afterwards. >>> we're in for some great weather over the next couple of days. if you like rain. i just got some seeds in the ground so i'm really excited about this forecast. as we get a look out there now, it's all dry. 53 degrees in the trivalley. 58 degrees in the south bay as you step out the door. and also cloudy in san francisco. it's 54 degre

i have seen justice brier n justice kagan go through it also the awareness to be a part of history to get along with eight new colleagues to a be sitting next to for decades requiring equal parts of humility, that is what justices justice kagan and justice breyer and to make up the word judge gorsuch has the ability we come from different sides of the political spectrum and disagree about many things but most importantly all people equal before the law is a judge's duty to uphold the constitution above all the judge has done that during his time on the bench and will continue to do so as a justice on the supreme court is my honor to recommend his nomination be looked at favorably before the senate to speak to have a busy schedule. thanks for being here. we will wait until you have to change what you have to do. [laughter] >> judge raise your right hand do you affirm the testimony you're about to give is the whole truth and nothing but the truth so help you god greg. >> i do. >> please be seated and tell us what you want us to hear at this point. >> mr. chairman, senator feinstein and

it's a vast overreading of the federal arbitration act of which justice brier points out of his descent in the case. when we look at judge gorsuch's record, obviously, it's a very important question of whether he will further entrench that ability of the supreme court to bend over backwards to accommodate big business or whether he will apply the law fairly for all people no matter how much money in your bakt ank account or sit in the corner office or not. cac raised some concerns. we're not opposing but we have some concerns. precisely, on this point of overreading statutory or regulatory language to favor of the business. at the expense of the working american. there's this case that's a great example which has gotten some press where gorsuch dissented from the majority ruling saying the truck ordinary, reasonable, and prudent, trucker on the side of the road. this question. my brakes failed. a load of goods in the truck. it's freezing cold. the company tells me to stay here with the goods and the back of the truck. but i'm like, literally freezing to death. i can't operate my car, my

and justice brier 87-9. -- justice breyer 87-9. note that two of the current members of the supreme court were confirmed by fewer than 60 votes, but consistent with the standard that we established in 2005, neither one was filibustered. even robert bork, whose contentious confirmation hearings are said to have been the turning point in the senate's treatment of supreme court nominations, was rejected by a simple failure to secure a majority of votes. 42 ayes, 58 nays. not by a senate filibuster. in fact, mr. president, the filibuster has been used successfully only once in modern history to block a supreme court nomination. that was an attempt to elevate justice abe fortas to be chief justice in 1968, nearly half a century ago. and in that case, justice fortas ended up withdrawing under an ethical cloud. the result of the votes on justice alito's nomination are also illuminating. in 2006, senators voted to evoke cloture by a vote of 75-25. 75-25. that's considerably more senators than those who ultimate ly voted to confirm him, whi

columbia and harvard law school, is marshall scholarship to oxford, andd operations with justice stevens brier, the result and a doctorate of philosophy degree at his corpus of work which includes outstanding service awards from the state department, from the treatment foundation, scholarly writings, some 900 opinions that lawyers have described as straightforward, learned, well reasoned. deserving special mention is the love judicial precedents. this book which judge gorsuch joined with bryan garner, and several distinguished circuit judges quite diverse backgrounds to develop a remarkable work of legal scholarship. all of these eminent judicial co-authors of different political and occupational background produce a single volume written with a single voice and no signed section. as to integrity, i've never found his integrity to be in question.. his career has subjected himself to various reviews of his public service that he served as a law clerk to two supreme court justices, the late justice byron white, highly esteemed judicial figure in the tenth circuit with the courthouse is named for