example, u.s. tractors might go to brazil.he brazilian coffee to england, and english textiles to the u.s.. for exchange, representing money, goes the other way, and the balance of trade is accomplished on a triangular base. sometimes the balance is disrupted when governments impose trade restrictions, as when certain industries request wall.tions via a tarriff and do u.s. workers lose their jobs when goods are imported? people in foreign lands are labor competitions, but they are also customers. for example, the selectric traveling crane. british workers may produce competitive goods, but parts of the crane were made in the u.s.. other countries by from the u.s. more than one third of our machine tools, more than one third of our baled cotton, and a good share of our milk, wheat, petroleum. other countries by these things from oz, making jobs for u.s. workers. -- -- us, making jobs for u.s. workers. industry,ation of workers, and resources tends to make trade necessary. run materials, goods, and services move from nation to n

some demonstrable need and here is one example. automobiles with hurricanes on a regular basis and so they have an interest in protecting consumers against fly-by-night contractors who will come into the state and have dangerous work. so they will be able to contact or know where these people are how can i access them. so the registration accomplishes that feed and meet meets that nd without full licensing. so there may be examples of the need to be met and we can match up regulation short of occupational licensing. >> i look at this in a general way most of us need a license to drive an automobile. it comes from requiring us to have insurance, liability insurance or some other kind of an ability if we do damage to be compensated so my general question is why don't we simply require that there be insurance in providing insurance and forget about the regulation allowing the insurance company to decide whether that person is qualified? >> that is one of our options. what is the need to be met, going back to what i just said. think of

think about facebook, for example. most people think of facebook as a terrific innovation by a brilliant computer scientist named mark zuckerberg. when i think about facebook and when i think about mark surgerierberg i think about somebody who has as much expertise in behavioral psychology as computer science. and it was that combination of behavioral psychology and computer science that produced facebook. >> host: so, alec ross, what does donald trump mean to silicon valley in your view? >> guest: i think that silicon valley is worried. donald trump doesn't seem to have much in way of intuition about silicon valley. you think about the industries where he focus kid his career, building buildings, think about his activity prior to inauguration, focuses on things like boeing and carrier, the sort of industrial factory jobs. i don't think he really gets silicon valley. i think when he thinks of silicon valley he thinks of like twitter and google ump don't think he much understands it beyond that and i also think there ar

there is no better example than here in georgia. in recent years adopted its own music therapy license bill. classic bottleneckers. upon introduction they would to make committee, had a hearing, the lead people to testify on behalf in support were music therapist from national and state organization. legislators received a packet of informations consumers, a professor as a faculty member but at no time did anyone testify against the bill. or was any empirical evidence introduced demonstrating a significant threat to public health and safety or did this single legislator or anyone else asked challenging question or express skepticism about the bill now to work as a music therapist you will earn a bachelor's degree or higher from an approved program it has to be approved by the music therapist association the same people who lobbied for the bill, pass a national examination offered only by the music therapist who pay more than $300 for that privilege and 1200 hours of clinical internship, 18 years of age or older, paid the fees to the

for example, this electric, traveling crane. british workers may produce competitive goods, but parts of the crane were made in the u.s. other countries buy from the u.s. more than one third of our machine tools, more than one third of our cotton, in a good share of our milk, wheat, petroleum. other countries buy these things from us, making jobs for u.s. workers. the combination of industry, workers, and resources tends to make trade necessary. materials, goods, and services move from nation to nation, meeting demands and raising the standard of living of everyone. from other countries come such things as asphalt for our roads, fertilizer for our crops, letter -- leather for our shoes. we may regard this tractor as coming from the united states, but several parts came from other countries. investigate for yourself. where would it be without foreign trade? without tin and rubber? look around you. you will find many things that go through other countries, that come from other countries. yes, look around you, and you will find the

in a simple example, u.s. tractors might go to brazil.he brazilian coffee to england, and english textiles to the u.s. foreign exchange, representing money, goes the other way, and the balance of trade is accomplished on a triangular base. sometimes the balance is disrupted when governments impose trade restrictions, as when certain industries request protections via a tarriff wall. what about competition of foreign labor? do u.s. workers lose their jobs when goods are imported? well, these people in foreign lands are labor competitions, but they are also customers. electricle, with this traveling crane. british workers may produce competitive goods, but parts of the crane were made in the u.s. other countries by from the u.s. more than one third of our machine tools, more than one third of our baled cotton, and a good share of our milk, wheat, petroleum. other countries buy these things from us, making jobs for u.s. workers. in today's world there are many trade.ctions on foreigh distribution makes foreign trade essential. the combinatio

let me give you an example. the ceo of microsoft has called his company and ia, intelligence augmentation company. he wants to use he says ai technology extent humans rather than replace them. what's interesting about the way ai has accelerated into our lives is that it comes and atkinson price points now and we don't even notice it. going back to 2010-2011, steve jobs put syria at the very heart of the iphone and the hundreds of millions of people use it. hundreds of millions of people use google holder and submits a people use borton. hundreds of people use amazon echo. it just slipped in and so that's one example. ai is underneath the fact that machines can listen to us and understand. there is software that google offers for free called google translate which allows you to give it a document in any number of languages and microsoft has a similar service, and it will give you back a pretty good translation. not perfect but good enough, which is really quite remarkable. remarkable. if you get in a modern car,

one example is going to hell in a hen basket. when you think about it, it could just be well be going to hell in a hand basket. the basket i suppose is to carry eggs. who knew. has been discovered by lipping wises -- linguists and it's called an egg corn. [laughter] the linguist discovered these because he said my neighbor keeps saying egg corn, what do you think about that? acorn is shaped like an egg if you take off the cap so it might as well be an acorn. there are abundant and there are all sorts of fans of egg corns that collected these things. that was sort of the heart of the book but there are a lot of malapopism. i'm excited about this program and i'm ready to cut to the cheese. [laughter] >> let's have a few of these that i also happen to be and i lust rater -- illustrator was having fun. this one is a grain of salt. [laughter] >> if you take it from a grain of salt, we can move on if there. this is an example. one that makes perfect sense. double axel. an axel goes around, the jump and they go around and they jump but

for example, your neighbor to the south. several years ago the legislature considered when to repeal a licensing bill for interior designers. that bill received enormous attention. interior designers from florida and even from outside the state deluged the state legislature. hours of testimony during which interior designers talked about the importance of their license. one of them said that if you repeal this law, it will result in the deaths of 88,000 people. [laughter] per year. now, our book is somewhat backward-looking in that we're examining the creation and otec of licenses throughout various different industries. but the bottlenecking that we describe in the book is not an historical artifact. this is something that continues today. and there's no better example than the american music therapy association and the certification board for music therapists. finish these two organizes have mounted a nationwide campaign to license music therapy. ask when they make their requests in the state legislatures, their language i

this is just another example of the news totally dumbing down. give us news totally dumbing down. just give us the news from people who know what they are talking about in the studio. thank you very much. elsewhere in the report, other figures and words popped up in the nearby countryside, and there was also a strong line in finding descriptions in nature, which also applied to the economic outlook. with a little discernible brexit in fa ct, with a little discernible brexit in fact, what has been behind the sun continuing to shine on the uk's finances? —— a fact. so the economic waters at the moment are not too treacherous for philip hammond. but this will not be a budget full of the giveaways, despite the brighter economic environment. well, after hearing those lines and script and watching the graphics, another viewer, michael o'shea, rule —— recorded on camera his views on the report. it was frustrating and distracting, so much sol report. it was frustrating and distracting, so much so i cannot re call distracting, so much so i cannot recall w

why not another referendum, with brexit, for example ? referendum, with brexit, for example?ttish referendum? example? why not another scottish referendum ? that example? why not another scottish referendum? that is the nub, whether there is a british people or whether scotla nd there is a british people or whether scotland is going a different way from england, northern ireland is going a different way. to keep them m, going a different way. to keep them in, you should give them a good example. a referendum. 0n brexit? why not? and your prime minister... a strong mandate for the prime minister. i don't think! can bear it! a referendum a year. if there we re it! a referendum a year. if there were an election, and this is the issue,is were an election, and this is the issue, is it about we have a tory party who will win without any opposition or will it be an election on brexit, in which maybe by some miracle the lib dems and the part of labour for remaining miracle the lib dems and the part of labourfor remaining in miracle the lib dems and the part of labour for remaining in

on the one hand it's supporting missions in africa, for example. it's also promoting development assistance. it's also helping missions in africa, for example, in trying to stand up for their own safety and security. we continue to be in conversation. today s important for us is that we were able toalk about afghanistan and talk about what the president quite rightly said the continuing mission of germany in afghanistan. i am very glad that the united states are intending to continue to commit to the african mission as well. together we fight against islamist terrorism. germany is going to step up its work and continue its work in afghanistan and also in syria. we are going to monitor the situation closely, work on political solutions in syria but also in libya, what we talked about. i am very gratified to know that the american administration and also the president personally commit himself to the minsk process. we need to come to a solution to this problem. there has to be a safe and secure solution for ukraine. the relationship with russia has t

so that's not-just to reference the unions, if a department for example decided to use a three or 60°aluation to valuate the bonnet of anticipated credits from the municipal executives association because we've agreed with them that's not really appropriate week to use it. it should be professional growth. that was mainly the reference was talking about but i think was a broad ability of the commission to for example, very specifically listings out and you're not limited in how you elicit information to form your opinions on whether things are cheap. i hope that is little more comforting. >> well, no i think the 360 is what i think that's what they were calling it could you just 02 360s within the department within the city and county at all? >> no. >> as a department head to do his own 360 and get feedback from its own staff for their own knowledge but we wouldn't that information for any other set. >> the most of the three and 60° evaluation tools are dietary and you would hire an executive coach two, and administer it and executive coach that has a protocol of coming in and meeting

he we were go developing a concept of a usable and privately open space this was one of the bad examples of a popo and wanted to work to figure out a way they can either fee out or found on alternative shugs space in district 68 as you may know district 6 has a few it and smaultd parks in the city of san francisco and second only narrowly beating district 3 supervisor peskin and so parks and open space are incredibly important to the neighborhoods in the south of market and the tenderloin we spent the last 3 years working on a proper solution to this issue exploring a number of alleyways we can merit into open space and finally after years the community outreach realizing after speaking with the community month folks want existing open space in the in particularly at victoria manolo draves park is only multi use park in san francisco now this is the first project sponsor that is seeing out of their current popo requirement and so we spent a lot of time with the planning department and figuring out what is the probing appropriate proximate and changing the popos in the south of market the

i can give you a great example. senator schumer, when he appears at our yearly commemorations of holodomor at st. patrick's cathedral, he always mentions that this is the ukrainian holocaust. so the more this information gets out there, the more that it basically gives us, enriches us and gives us the fortitude to move forward. >> thank you. please. i want to give everyone a chance to have closing remarks too. we have a few minutes left. >> i'll give you two concrete examples about education programs that we're doing. we have a high school program, as the victims of communism memorial foundation that brings high school teachers into washington, d.c., trains them on curricula, and then sends them back out to their high schools to talk to their students. we also do college programs where we bring speakers like us and 23i78z to campfilms to camp. and film is the most important component i think. the trailer we just saw. the word holodomor was a genocide are big intimidating words that not everybody can easily access, b

the funeral industry is one example. in 25 years we have yet to find a single example of a license created protected by any means other than the "bottleneckers" but yet the myth will persist that day exist for a need for and that is not true. so to dispel the myth we want to quite a new term we wanted a word that would be descriptive and pejorative one word to name and shame so we use the word t11 to draw out of the well-known metaphor restricting the free flow or free movement to take association with a negative rate of the word you know bottleneck of traffic then we are familiar with the effect of that as a result so each industry in our book will recall the bottle making days and those of you that have been active then the legislature were recognized instantly things like coordinated letter-writing campaigns or industry day at the capitol campaign contributions in to fill testimony and the antidotes for example, your neighbor to the south several years ago the legislature considered whether to repeal the of licensing

in some cases we are going to have to set an example.in some cases where going to have to incentivize. in some cases we have to be prepared to penalize those who are not willing to fulfill these obligations. this is not a bunch of either -- idealists. this is good old-fashioned realism updated or adapted for global world where everything is so interconnected. >> host: it might be worth stepping back and just stating specifically because the primary thesis of the book you do talk about world order one point zero and the world order 2.0. go over the heart of it, the fundamental difference that you mention sovereign obligation which is a development distinct from sovereign responsibility. make the distinction so our viewership can understand the difference here. >> guest: let me go to the most basic distinction. world order 1.0 who's been around for four centuries is about sovereign rights. it's about the right of countries of nationstates to live in peace and pretty much do what they want within their own border. these orders are not to be

for example, one of the issues he brings up is the tax credit. i would agree, i think the tax credit is currently structured is not going to provide enough support to low income americans, so they'll have to make changes there. but to automatically calling it trump care, basically fearmongering i think is fundamentally inappropriate. and puts us on an incorrect path in terms of trying to find agreement and consensus on an important issue. >> is it fearmongering, carrie? >> the numbers are what the numbers are. this replaces the subsidies under the affordable care act with lower subsidies overall. it will depend on individuals how they'll be affected. if you take a 6-year-old in santa cruz currently under the affordable care act, if that person makes $40,000 a year, they'll get more than $12,000 of assistance to purchase health insurance. under this republican plan, only $4,000. there are winners and losers in southern california. health care costs less han in the northern part of the state. if you have a 27-year-old in l.a., theoretically she mak

so if, for example, and i'll take an example from them. one of their successful production lines is the fagor. f-a-g-o-r. it's fairly well-knonown in eure and around the world. it produces washingng machines, appliances like that. and the fagor washing machine company has suffered from the international crisis like eveverybody else, and so the demand for these washing machines has fallen. so they had about 2,500 workers in the town of mondragon, at this factory, and they couldn't use 600 or 700 of them that just--there wasn't a demand for it. so the question is, what do you do? and they have a two-step answer. first answer: "we are going to share the pain." in other words, if you don't need 600 or 700 workers, the other way of saying that is "you don't need as many hours of labor because there's no point in producing the machines you can't sell." but the question is, why would you want to impose the need to cut back on an all-or-nothing basis? why would a person either be employed or unemployed? because if what you want is x-hundred hours

the tech center is a great example of this. the tech sector over the last few years has taken a lot of heat for not being very diverse. it is a largely white, largely male industry especially on the engineering side of things. as a result, if you were to develop a recommendation system looking for key attributes and characteristics that might indicate who would be a good cto , those characteristics are likely to be more skewed to those people already in those positions. a majority of those people are white men. that means more white men are likely to come back. this is tricky, because the way we look at this is to sometimes think about eliminating race or gender from the equation. somehow take that out as a bias factor. the trick with that is that there are a lot of ways that race and gender and class can get double encoded into variables you would not think have anything to do with those things. for example, zip code is an indicator of race, because our cities tend to be regulated -- dividedties tend to be up on racial lines.

speaker, i hope his example will be an inspiration to all who serve today. i join in extending my condolences to bob's children, scott and bruce and robin and lori and the entire michel family. of i join the people illinois in mourning the man who was there champion for so many years. illinois, this house, and our light, butt a great one that i hope will continue to shine through its reflection by those whom bob michel inspired. i was one of those. we will miss him. ,here aren't enough bob michels and i yield back to the gentleman from illinois. >> i want to thank leader hoyer for those warm words and inspiring words and heartfelt words for leader michel. it means a lot for all of our family and his colleagues. thank you so much. i want to thank everybody that spoke your tonight from the illinois delegation that spoke so fondly about mr. michel, and when we think about the traits that he example aside, integrity, -- he exemplified, integrity and sincerity, i think it is important to remember where he came from in illinois. the congressional district that he

our adjusted for example to republicans on healthcare. if you all will just adjust reconciliation on healthcare, i think we got a chance to work together to make the affordable care act stronger. of the first things we do on the affordable care act if youcould get republicans to drop reconciliation , we say we've got to fix the individual insurance market. it's only six, seven percent of the market where we're having a problem. you can do is make the insurance pool bigger . so you can expect spread the cost and risk right down premiums and the individual insurance market and get healthy people bacin the game. this is probably a longer answer than the question you wanted but there would be an opportunity if republicans drop the partisan schemes on both taxes and health, there would be opportunity to good do good work. >> i think that the extent of what the policy started. you mentioned, your republican polys being on how unhappy with the border adjustment, is there any interest in going to a broader base lower rate proposal chairman can he

so there is no need to actually for example, half-hour news in the evening. ou can watch the single news channel all day long and get -- hear what you want to hear 24 days a week, it is not healthy. host: philip on the democratic line, hi, philip. caller: hello, good morning. c-span.ou for two quick comments, the experts are their own worst enemies some times. i could think of the two biggest the iraqs, first being war and now talking about weapons of mass destruction and had to e weapons and we get them. turns once we got out there, that wasn't true. head of the ell, intelligence committee saying we're not hacking american turns out they were. to ink it is important question expert, not deny them entirely, question them. even when writing a research credible unless have you several sources, not just one. guest: thank you. i agree completely, it is question experts. my only response, it is important not to believe that average person can replace experts on any given issue. iraq war, for the example, there were a lot of reasons the united states went and i thi

is the best example of charter pre-k. new york and california just had really great schools he wanted to visit. but d.c. is a wonderful example because it is a very, very conducive environment for charter schools to serve preschoolers. programs intary d.c., a charter school in d.c. offers preschool. d.c. also provides public funding for three and four-year-olds. at great levels compared to the rest of the country. schools, it charter does not have the barriers that we talked about previously. the public charter school board which sarah is on the board of, they have a special -- they are the other rights of charter schools in d.c. and they have a special management framework that they use to assess the quality of charter pre-k programs, which is one of the biggest barriers at this point for charter pre-k. the authors do not know what to do with them are known not to make sure they are good. so, d.c. is a really great example and i would highly encourage people to check them out. host: we are talking to ashley mitchel. she

within the ecosystem of public history, i think you'll find very different examples here today. mine is at the state department, we have a statutory program which is based in law which gives us a great deal of mass. we have about 50 historians on staff and are organized to execute primary missions which first of all is considered the publication and formulation of the united states series. the official documentary record. which occupies about 55-65% of 75%-80% of our total work capacity. beyond that, we offer policy support and education and outreach. the foreign relations series, we consider a distinct program but in itself it is extremely powerful support for policymakers when they have the awareness to use it. i use this moment in time among the volumes we publish on every administration, every subseries, we offer a management volume that tells how all the different administrations have structured the national decision-making process. second, foundations, philosophical foundations going back to johnson and foward, how they viewed the international environments, their objectiv

outside the cup and i was just outside passed a dustbin just outside the bbc and here's a classic example of a whole bunch of cops in the back of this spin that are not going to get recycled. suppose a brush companies, mighty boycott make sense? in the end, somebody has to say we've got it, we got the recyclable coffee cup and if they genuinely have and have and if they genuinely have and have a solution i would encourage people to choose them over other copy companies who have not got that. if one of the big chains now landed the fully recyclable cup, i think their sales will go up massively. companies like that, they like massive sales, that is an excellent reason for them to crack on with it. thank you. with me is edward kosior, the managing director of nextek who provide solutions to the challenges of the plastic recycling. why is it so difficult to make a recycla ble why is it so difficult to make a recyclable coffee why is it so difficult to make a recycla ble coffee cu p 7 why is it so difficult to make a recyclable coffee cup? well, we think there must be made paper and board, but

an example, pbs affiliated debut tct via cookeville tennessee is a perfect example. the situation is the only one that the majority of residents and upper cumberland county can receive within off guarantee enough so the station manager i know quote is hard for people who are sitting in washington and urban areas to comprehend that people still need an antenna to be able to receive only one station but it's a fact. she also said and i quote i really wish i could talk to president trump. i really wish he would let me show him where we live. i wish you could see the difference this station makes in the lives of the people that we serve. maybe he would see that funding differently. if we cut federal funding we are killing stations like w. cte. studies have shown alternative sources of hunting are unrealistic. 2012 companies requested the subcommittee to do an exhaustive study that did not common myths about financing of public broadcasting. the report found and i quote there is simply no substitute for the federal investment to accomplish the public service commission th

you look, for example, in taking one example, labor rights 56 cases he's dealt with, none had written. the ones he's now that says something. vast majority of the cases he's is no evidence he's trying to look at who is the favor tion let's rule in of them or have a pattern like that, it is matter of cherry to find cases that have sympathetic fact, when you look at the law, those cases out to be -- host: let's go to florida, line, charles, hello. caller: thank you for having me and letting me call in my question to the panel is, understanding that very few matters have to be reviewed by the supreme court, but one of penalty case ath and has the judge ever tried a been on alty case or panel that reviewed it or how can you be qualified for that he has not? the supreme court, one issue that would come up regularly is death penalty because everyone who is on death row will before they executed, certainly file emergency appeal, the court deals with this on regular basis. 1% of cases that come before the court generally make the the top of the road, justices will take a closer look at those

so my third example of how tax shelters would be great again is the dynasty trust. now get beyond the marie antoinette type name, and look at how the shelter works. this is a gimmick that allows the most fortunate to avoid paying estate taxes not just for a generation or two, but forever, underline forever. the obama administration came forward with a really radical idea. they said, let's limit the loophole to 90 years. 90 years. not long enough, apparently, for the trump folks and maybe some of that has to do with the fact that the point man on tax reform treasury secretary steve mnuchin has a personal interest in this type of tax shelter since he had one of them among the trust. here's where the tax shelter gets even bigger. in addition to protecting dynastic wealth, there is evidence that members want to repeal the estate tax altogether, we're talking about the really, really thin margin of taxpayers at the very peak of the income scale. we're not talking about family farmers, small business owners, we're not talking about middle income people. we're talking abou

there's plenty of examples of state supreme courts for keep example. one in particular that has a fixed camera people don't play to and just don't even know that it's fai there at would be very helpful to the general awareness in the role the supreme court plays, sohe enough about that. you participated in 2700 or so decisions?2,70 >> yes, senator, more than that. >> how many cases were you asked about here? >> a few. >> i can think of may be less than five of the decisions you rendered as a federal judge over the last ten years we are talking about less than five lat cases, and that strikes me as a little bit of cherry picking on the record overall and you haver a question about what the appellate courts have said or the supreme court has said about your work and it is pretty good. quibbling about whether it was one reversal or none, but i will leave that alone. let me ask about the case thataa was handed down. you haven't had a chance to read stathave you? >> you haven't had a chance tor, read it, so neither have we. so i look forward to reading that

where else is there a better example or examples of the heights that can be reached by virtue of having free speech where authors can work without any fear of retrobution. today's program i think is going to be a lot of fun but i have a few housekeeping details beforehand to read. first is this is the virginia festival of the book as you know which is brought to you by the virginia foundation for the humanities. please, if you would, silence your cellphone. if you would like to tweet about the event do so at #vabook2017. they have me read that every year and every year i have no idea what that means. we would like to thank the city of charlottesville for providing the venue and want to welcome all our viewers on c-span and charlottesville tv 10. at the last part of the program we will have q&a and we will ask you to wait until the microphone is brought to you so they can hear you at home. this festival is free of charge but not free of cost. please remember to go online and give back or pick up a giving envelope and support your festival so we can continue to bring it for many more year

he gives an example in 1860.science will tell you what it weights, but can't tell you what the dog is thinking about you and the special feeling with a dog. i would say he's agnostic basically. >> about the question whether it's purely nature working or whether there's some sort of divine principles inside of nature. was he concerned about that at all? >> this is way the essay, the succession of forest trees is so interesting because at times in that essay he attributes a kind of design to nature and he will say nature, there's a patent office in nature that -- that -- that's minting new plants and animals all of the time and he gives a kind of purpose to nature there. he doesn't -- he says and the managers are doing excellent work or something like that. he says, but he doesn't really describe who the -- he doesn't make the leap of saying god is a manager. intention behind that minting of new species. also, though, in that essay, you know, in the very same essay, the space of ten pages or so, he moves into what,

that is one example. ai is, underneath the fact that machines can listen and understand, there is software google offers for free called google translate that allows you to give it a document in any number of languages, will give you back a pretty good translation. not perfect but good enough which is quite remarkable. if you get in a modern car, i have a 2-year-old volvo with a camera in it with ai technology inside it, able to follow lanes and make intelligent decisions, cars like the tesla have more ai software there is a company called mobile i, an israeli company that supplies camara and ai technology to many carmaker's and over the next 5-10 years cars recently -- don't know if they will completely drive themselves but increasingly do things that will protect us from our mistakes, making cars safer. that is an example of ia use of ai technology. there is ai technology in modern cameras the correct and improve the photograph you take without you knowing about it. everywhere, even in modern weapons in

and donald trump is a perfect example for that. he went back to the basics, went back to personal, family values and people rallied. >> but it didn't work in california? >> well, you've got to remember, california, we knew we weren't going to win it. even in our county we made over, oh, gosh. a million and a half phone calls. none in california. >> you were calling to other states? >> other states, yeah. >> but still the party is still a minority. do you want to grow the party or rather sort of ideologically pure? >> no, no. we need to grow the party and compromise as part of that. we all need to work together, but i think we're going to see in '17 and '18 more people coming to the trump side in california. >> when you say you should compromise. what should be compromised over? >> well -- i don't know if kprap micomprome is the right word. we need to embrace other neem before -- our room today when we had our meeting we had a lot of former democrats in there. and historically republicans would not embrace democrats. and we are now.

percent that's big that is big when you rely on muni to get you back and forth every single day to our example work and designation one of the most important projects in the city and i can't wait until that happens because it is going to make a huge difference address isly with improvements comes sacrifice so for the next 3 years we'll have sacrifice do send me e-mails complaining when it is done you'll thank us to create something great for the future thank you all so much. >> thank you supervisor president london breed. >> one of our main partners is the community of transportation authority they lead the first phase the planning and get united states to e got us to a point they're a strong partner and we're pleased to be joined by now the chair of the transportation authority who during his first couple of terms in office sat at the transportation authority when the project was coming to light please help me welcome chair the ta commission supervisor peskin. >> (clapping.) >> thank you, ed and by way of the history didn't start during my first term in 2000 behind us this was the firebreak f

for example -- and we're going to go to the moon and do this and that, there was a curiosity.tion is whether or not you think this administration has a curiosity and i wonder at large whether or not you think the country is still as curious as we once were? does it make sense? >> no, it is a good question. i think we're finding there isn't. it is certainly clear mr. trump at least doesn't have much curiosity. he doesn't want to know how things are. he doesn't want to read, doesn't want to learn as far as i can see. there have been presidents before who have been that way as well, and i could name them but -- >> i think probably -- i think we agree on this. part of what the other end of curiosity is finding the truth and it can be scary for people. >> it can be terrifying but it also can be exciting. that's the point. if we force our beliefs conform the evidence of reality, it is scary but life is scary. in fact, i have often said that science, one of the purposes of science is to make people uncomfortable. that may not sound good, but if we're always in our comfort zone we're

just one example. virtual reality. anyone who can set up the reality is going to have a very decided advantage in politics and other areas. and so as we are looking at cyber and you are going to have a hearing and other studies of this, i would say just that we should broaden the concept of technologies that are going to technologies that are going to , andailable, coming online it would be extremely unlikely that the russians would employ those technologies. so that would maybe be something to add to the already of busy agenda that you have. thank you. thank you, senator. thank you to all our witnesses. all the questions have been asked except for mine. -- >> so let me, if i could, stend -- spend just a couple of incidents. and i agree with you, dr. godson. the ability to impersonate online is the next phase that we will go through, and i think it's safe to say we don't have our best and brightest yet focused on that. we're still trying to triage what happened to us versus to be creative and look forward and what coul

i can give a few examples. the national highway transportation, their federal moe toll vehicle standards are generally performance based. for instance, for the air bags, they are not telling you how to design your air bags. they set a force threshold, then the auto makers can decide how to meet that standard with whatever technology they want. in contrast, at the faa, there have been efforts to move away from the more prescriptive safety certification rule that is have been on the books many years. we did see in recent months small aircraft certification reform that moved in this performance base direction. unfortunately, when we are seeing things like emerging technology, especially unmanned aircraft systems, you are seeing the faa continue to turn out very honorous, prescriptive rules that restrict all sorts of operations. the way around them is to request and receive a waiver. that is a very difficult process. now, the federal railroad administration has some performance based rules, bridge inspection manage

you can all think of examples where it does match but i can come up with an example where it goes in the other direction. so blacks have not done all that well in the labor market either over the last 20 or 30 years, yet their health is doing great, just to give you one example. so does this mean rising income inequality is okay? remember, this talk is really about thinking about inequality and i want to come back to that. well, i don't think rising income inequality is okay but i think it's very important to get the story right. now, there are at least three concepts of inequality. one of them is inequality about -- which many people on the left say we should have more equality about outcomes. the other is inequality of opportunities. we hear people on the left and right talk about that. i don't really have time to go into this, but it's a much harder case to make than you might think. in particular, one of the ways in which people don't have equal opportunities is if you have talented parents, they are likely to pass some of that on to you. i can't imagine public policy doing anyth

in some cases we have to set an example.we have to be prepared to penalize those are not willing to fulfill these obligations. this is a good old-fashioned realism and updated or adapted or global world where everybody is so interconnected. >> host: they might be worth stepping back because the primary thesis of the book you do talk about world order 1.0. so what's go to the heart of it, the difference. you developed it as a thesis and you've also developed it as a solver and as responsible, responsibility. make the distinction so the viewers understand it's clearly the difference. >> guest: world order 1.0 but has been around for centuries is about sovereign rights. it's about the right of a country and nation states to live in peace and do what they want in their own borders. this was all well and good. my argument is that it is no longer adequate for a world where inside the countries, virtually any country things are going on thawere going on that e repercussions not just for them. so we don't have the luxury of simply s

an example that was given was looking at oil, for example.of oil from a abroad. for example. america imports a lot of oilfrom a abroad. it is for example. america imports a lot of oil from a abroad. it is unlikely to change, so no need to take action ifa to change, so no need to take action if a trade deficit exists there. it seems to be a more systematic approach than we were expecting, perhaps to see from donald trump, given the campaign rhetoric. thank you forjoining us. the hospitality sector has warned it faces a shortfall of 60,000 workers a year if immigration from the european union is too tightly controlled. staff from the eu make up nearly a quarter of alljobs in the sector. the british hospitality association said that thousands of businesses are facing having to drastically reduce their dependence on eu workers. ufi ibrahim is the chief executive of british hospitality association the figures show some very important figures, notjust for london and urban environment in the uk, but across the country. so the dependence of our indus

just an example. and wanting to really pay for the institution like willing to pay for a car if i value the service they provide me. if i feel that i'm overcharged for nothing, then anger starts to sweep in. and therefore, there's no willingness to pay on those things. so, a clear analysis is on what the customer thinks and what their needs are is the first thing a bank should do. and it's actually and it doesn't cost a lot. how do you proper services? it's not about slashing that, or decreasing capital. >> remember back in the day when you never had to pay a fee? because the bank was using your money essentially? >> no longer. or negative interest rates. >> things are changing. >> i know. >> head of uk banking practice. >>> the british prime minister theresa may will be meeting in scotland today as part of her uk tour to drum up support of article 50. in the speech before the meeting may is expected to say that the union is a, quote, unstoppable force, adding that the strength and stability of all fo

and radiation is a good example. it's now clear that radiation can promote the kind of changes in cells that ultimately lead to cancer. therefore those treatments have to be used at appropriate doses and minimized wherever job. -- wherever possible. it's being played out now and the observation there are fewer second malignancies. d jaffee: just related to that. this area of childhood cancer survivorship is really important. we have this great success now in our ability to street childhood cancers, even though we have a lot more to do. but what we're now beginning to see is that there are -- dr. beckerle: what we call late effects of these treatments. sometimes due to the radiation or chemo chairman. sometimes psycho social effects,er if tillities effects, seths. etc. there are many, many things where research is required and will be really helpful to address the current unmet needs of individuals who have undergone a successful treatment for childhood cancer so we can make it better going into foot ture. mrs. deming

the companies and gates foundations for example. and you have the truly malign entities like isis and al-qaeda. you don't want to bring them to the table but you have to deal with them because they have real power. >> moderator: i was struck in the third section particularly. you not only talk about your primary thesis but you dig down and go into the issue of preemption versus preemptive action. this under girths your thesis and looks at what is to be done. give examples of preventive action and preemptive action is relevant to new world order. >> i think there is a consensus that has been in place for a decade that the world ought to do whatever it can to stop the spread of nuclear weapons. you have the non proliferation treaty signed initially in the late '60s and came into force around 1970. we have limited the number of countries with nuclear weapons as best as we can tell to nine. the five original u.s., russia, china, britain and france as well as india, pakistan, israel and north korea. we don't want a world of lots of nucle

their different theories about this, and one of them was, for example, people of darker skin had been god's first draft, and that, it always was based on the idea that white people were superior, were managerial, were the cultural elite that was meant by god to be superior to these other races. that was the dominant scientific notion of race in this country in the 1850s. there were certainly quarrels about it, there was disagreement about it, but that was the most prominent and pronounced version of race by scientists in this country in the 1850s, and what darwin did is say my theory is that all species, all races, all plants, all animals and common and shared ancestors. so, in the first year of darwin's book being in this country, and that's really all i focus on, i have a very narrow window from 1859 when the book arrives until about the start of the civil war, in the first year, the most vehement and enthusiastic adopters of darwin's book were the abolitionists. they felt as though finally, a scientific theory had come along that could counter the predominant american school of eth