s ability to keep america's personal information safe. with this measure, republicans would destroy americans' right to privacy on the internet. we made that clear. and forbid any effort to keep your personal information safe. republicans are bending over backwards. think of it. think of the context of all of this. since gerald ford became -- was president, every candidate for president, every nominee of the major party, every candidate for president of the united states, democratic and republican, has had to -- has released their income tax returns out of respect for the american people, out of respect for the american people. week in and week out and sometimes day in and day out in committee as well as on the floor, the republicans have kept their president's income tax returns private when the republic has the right to know that, that the public has always known that about every president since gerald ford. in fact, since richard nixon, although in his case it wasn't voluntary. so while they're hiding president trump's tax returns, som

i would lose time with my own family to meet this person. two softball games to meet with person. for somebody to have me miss family time, which i don't have during the season, that's someone i have to respect and, i mean, i don't have enough respect for him to take time away from my kids and my wife to just shake his hand. that's not me. >> and you're ready to face the repercussions of that if people -- if fans don't agree with you? >> i mean, i never been a big name so it doesn't bug me none. honestly, i've always been the type of guy that, you know, does what i think is right and even if i happen to be wrong, which i don't think i am, i'll deal with what comes later. but, i mean, hopefully everybody will agree that women should be treated or talked to or, you know, approached like that. so i don't see where anyone could actually say that anything i'm saying is wrong just because it's not about politics. we've had bad presidents. we've had, you know, ones that made bad decisions. and i don't even know if trump is going to be a bad president. he could be a good president, for al

i wanted to be the liked person in the office. and didn't want to have problems with anybody and that got me nowhere. not that i was rude but i was assertive and i kind of stated my opinions, and i didn't care to disagree with people. i felt like things got better for myself, i started feeling have agency. i'm not just following orders from somebody, like i know what i'm talking about and that's a huge confidence boost and i wish i learned it a lot sooner. >> that is a great one. >> i would say being good at what you do isn't enough. i think that often times women believe that if you just put your head down and you just do a great job, that eventually the spoils will come your way. you have to understand that only do you need to be good at what you do, you also need be comfortable with self-promoting yourself, letting people know that you're responsible for the outcome of your work because if you're not comfortable letting people know your grit that made that happen, then it becomes easier for other people to be able to take credi

we knew that one person had lost their life.ccording to reuters, we do not have this confirmed, but they had been correct on all the other elements of the story so far, reporting a second policeman has lost their life. the nearby stations to the paris metro had been closed and we can bring in the bbc‘s christian fraser again. in terms of what is happening in and around... hi, christian. i am just what is happening in and around... hi, christian. i amjust watching the helicopter. apart from the champs—elysees itself, are people able to move around within the area quite easily? yes, but there are not a lot of people. a public announcement has gone out, urging people to stay away from the champs—elysees. that seems to have been led by people in this area. there are very few people on the pavements at the moment. the people are being directed from other areas, directed away from the champs—elysees. i can still see, down the champs—elysees, there are armed police in prominent positions up armed police in prominent positions up and do

i've met with him in person now three times.ost: what is the future of the gary-heather relationship? heather: i don't know. he is on this incredible journey that i am from time to time sign posting for him. he created this system on his own where he forced himself to interact with people of color he normally would not have. he started it in the waiting room at the v.a., where a black man sat next to him, and he created a system for himself where he thought, my assumption about this person on a scale of 1-10 is that i'm not going to like them. we would have a bad interaction. i'm afraid of him. i'm anxious. he would put that person low on the scale. he would rate them a 3. then he forced himself to say, ," orly bad traffic on i-91 whatever, some kind of opening salvo to get to talk. and after the interaction, he would rate how he felt about him afterwards. there was always a 5, 6, 7-point spread. that was his system. that is definitely not something i would've come up with and told him to do, but in some ways, it is disarmingly

i'm not sure you -- >> a nice person. >> a nice person. >> i don't -- i don't see really even datingen approached. i've never been out on a date with -- >> reporter: in two years? >> yeah. yeah. never been out. i just have a lot of friends. >> reporter: that doesn't necessarily heal loneliness. >> my life revolves around my kids. and they'll be in my life until the day i die. >> reporter: by the way, this song was written by her son, brandon jenner, and his wife leah. ♪ every time you fall i fall ♪ every time you cry i cry >> reporter: and caitlyn jenner says she has a lesson for every parent, and an irony. she writes, if god refuses to make peace with me, that will be the reason. >> there's no excuse for not being a good parent, no matter how many problems that you have. no excuse for that. >> reporter: and tonight, the jenner children have sent word they preferred to stay private. instead giving us a statement, "we love our father and have deep admiration for her bravery. every has unique milestones, but we can honestly say caitlyn's gender transition has brought our family closer.

the crime and the person that exists right now. but there's no doubt that governor hutchinson and anybody in that position is in a very complicated and difficult position. i don't criticize him. i sympathize with what he's going through. >> glor: damien, you said the state of arkansas is salivating, if your words, to carry out these executions. did you get the sense when you went back there that they were -- that the government was surprised at the reaction that this got, not just around the country but around the world? >> i think they're mildly surprised, but i also think it made them even more determined, it seems like, because, you know, i barely got any sleep last night because i was up until midnight watching the back and forth battle of whether they were going to execute don davis or not. so they may be surprised, and they may be a little uncomfortable with the scrutiny they're getting, but it hasn't lessened their blood lust. they're still pushing to see people killed. keep in mind, we're talking about this is a story that

goals as well as personal ones. it doesn't appear that much of the demand for men's career strategist. certainly -- [inaudible] this profession would look much more different i would imagine for men clients. what does the need for your profession? in other words, helping women. what does that say about sexism in a place? >> it says it is in fact, institutionalized. it is normalcy. and it has a lot to do with we talked about micro aggressions, a lot to do with the reality of unconscious bias and have that proliferate our culture. really when people think of the word leader, most people, the image they have in their mind unfortunately is a man. more specifically its typically a white male. when the talk about women being able to pierce through that pre-existing cultural paradigm and be able to assert themselves and be respected as leaders in the workplace, it takes more maneuvering and more advanced thought than what men have to put into it. it's this extra burden i would say that women bear when it comes to being abl

he could not have the finest person a more ready person, a more knowledgeable person, a more legal expert type of person then neil gorsuch. for this very, very important calling on the supreme court. it's amazing to me how some ofor my colleagues on the site have ignored all of the facts, all of the evidence, all of the experience, all of the goodness of this man. and i hope not vote against him but it looks to me as though many of them are going to vote against him. jus if you can't support neil gorsuch, who can you support?e are you just going to support people who do your bidding? are you going to support people need bidding? and do the things that this country needs. neil gorsuch is that type of person. he has that kind of ability. he asked that kind of anuman experience. he's a terrific human being, and whether you agree or disagree with them, you walk away saying well, he certainly makes a lot of good points. and you walk away saying i likey that guy, he's somebody i could work with. his somebody that really loves this country. his somebody who sets an exemplary example in every way

ev can stake your claim as being the cool woman a black person, gay person, et cetera who lapse -- who laughs along a bigoted jokes that are not even funny, or you can object which is now cultural consumption doesn't work. plenty of the books, movies and television shows i like our offense is not just a politics but did met, women, and to jewish women. it's difficult to articulate exactly how this works, and there are certain threshold of offensiveness were a novel or program will lose me entirely. the part of the cultural consumption is escape. the privilege lens also marlis rules out a certain sort of unlikable character and i don't mean those were unlikable is used to praise female characters for being feminist role models. i'm thinking of characters like basil from faulty towers can put a show from the 70s, archie bunker from all in the family, same era become actually 33 years old. or george stanza from the relatively recent show seinfeld. so straight white men who are privilege by today's understandings but convinced of their own victimhood. basil has to do with his nagging but u

in the rumor in the world and then would explain then it was the next person's turn. but he started to go one about micro credit this will solve poverty in the inner cities in my head and thinking governor we have $600,000 drug deals you think lack of capital is the main problem corrects i'll let him go on but then he says bangladesh and the united states? the date we have a different set of problems but i said that is interesting because it just got back from bangladesh i tore the bank and the villages i sat down with the number two guy and he changed the subject so fast that was right on to hunter and lock onto the i.c.e. but he had not paid attention to this subject matter but there is somebody that actually know something more than him he says we will put 40,000 new police officers on the streets. i was up all night with hunter trying to explain that was not a personal threat to laugh laugh just his turn to be talked to with the subject matter. . . the first will be some of the tea party and liberal republicans. the margins are nothing like the majority that fdr h

person was referred to, name not provided, just u.s. person. sometimes in that context, to understand the importance of the report and assess the significance it was necessary to find out request the information as to who that u.s. official was. i don't know what devin nunes reviewed at the white house, i can say there is an established process for senior national security officials that ask for identity of u.s. persons in the reports. liz: okay, if this so proper and in accordance with the law, then why deny it at first. we brought you news before, now, senate intelligence saying they will likely call in susan rice to testify under oath. bring this to the man who interrogated 9/11 mastermind, khalid sheikh mohammed, he is james mitchell, he is joining me now, thank you. first susan rice denies it, now she says she did know. what does this flip flop, behavior tell you about her truthfulness. >> best predicter of future behavior is past behavior,that s likely to try too mislead for political purposes in future, this is a lesson your viewers woul

you took out personal loans.it was a nightmare and i found myself in a position that i did not know what i was doing. i'm a landscape architect by training. i'm not a lawyer. i ended up with the help of the people we've been talking about. johnny. i have to say fran walsh, peter jackson's partner came on board in 2005. that woman would make a great defense attorney. she would make a great investigator. i can't even believe she was in the middle of making king kong, the film. she is researching for an sick -- forensic scientists, lawyers, and investigators. she sent me to go through trash. i was going through trash to find hair, picking up trash in memphis and driving to courthouses all over that region to just track down who possible suspects were. i had no idea how much. we probably raised $6 million to $7 million to get damien, jason baldwin, and -- kelly out of prison. i depended on people around me to give me the information i needed and we probably went through 10 lawyers. jeff: immediately and legally, the

just a normal person. to stumble into the street and say i am a police officer and i am going to stop that person by hooting that person. >> i think you would ask whether there was a threat the officer was responding to and i think you are pausing a situation where there wasn't a threat. but i think in this circumstance, everyone recognized there was a threat facing these officers who are going about doing their good business in faith and they see a person that appeared to point a gun at them. the court says this force was reasonable under graham but we are going to held ou liable. >> we are talking about the second question presented, right? none of this seems to involve the provocation rule in the 9th circuit. at least the question of getting a warrant. how to you understand the 9th circuit provocation rule in distinction of things like robably cause? >> it takes a reasonable use of force and deems it unreasonable because the police made an earlier constitutional mistake and we think that is flatly wrong

that for me personally was devastated. i had a personal relationship with him.eyond that one of the most difficult tasks i ever had has been part of a team that release that information to the world. i knew how i felt about him and i knew how millions of people around the world felt about it. they would write him and call him and wanted to be connected to his life. so here i was, one of his biggest fans and supporters and i was going to be part of shattering his image of being this invincible superhero to the world. i dreaded sharing that with the world. i knew they would be devastated and heartbroken. yet, i respected and admired his willingness and ability to put that out there. is very private and personal. all the hipaa laws were not even and then yet. there's something he did not have to share with the world. they could have perhaps retreated to the ranch and nobody would have known. but is not a public service does. they chose to reveal it in a very public way so other people could be helped. so many ways we know about alzheimer's today because of ronald a

but they really wanted personal whether it was on person, but in personal interaction when they needed to explain their side of the story. and that's what was a lot of frustration, both in the current state, because of the staffing i.r.s. being budget being cut, theperson, but personal interaction when they needed to explain their side of asw, being answered as often people want and they have to wait a long time. and then, in he future, just they would be able to have that kind of dialogue in the future. ost: for years, you have been pushing for simplification in he tax code for taxpayers, is that a theme you heard in your -- guest: absolutely. eople said, you go make the i.r.s. as great as possible, if you don't get simplification of sanitye and some sort of check on the provisions and the doesn't matter because that is actually very true, the i.r.s. has great deal administering this incredible document. love to hear viewer comments on that or with tax tax day approaching, nina olson is national taxpayer advocate, just stats on the cost and complexity on the tax code from your recent

stay tuned for the small business person of the year. >> we will. thanks so much. >> thank you, j.j. >>> consumers want authenticity. it's proven time and time again, people like to buy from brands they can trust. i went to the offices of make up geek to meet marlena stell. she built an entire company around herself. she is real, she is relatable and people responded by buying their products. california native, marlena stell is one of the most recognizable faces. at the forefront of the new beauty landscape. it's all about the nitty griddy of make up. >> the glossy and glam videos are followed by millions. her 6-year-old company, make up geek has more than 275 products. last year, the business brought in over $22 million in sales. marlena built her thriving beauty brand by blending her make up artistry and savvy with the educational tools she learned as a high school band teacher. >> i loved teaching, but the music wasn't where my heart was. started doing youtube videos on the side. >> that was 2008. the power of the platform was just starting to ga

and every law enforcement every military person, take an oath to uphold and defend it. the first amendment to the bill rights says congress shall pass no law with respect to five freedoms, freedom of speech, freedom of religion, freshmen the press, of assembly and freedom to file the ances, how can government enforce a law which cannot be made? the johnson nk amendment should have never been place, nted in the first bob? caller: it's unconstitutional. if the congress is prohibited legislating that, how can hey possibly be executed or judged? host: more from the "washington article, the latest on the issue from the white house, the eporter john wagner with "washington post," noting white strawspokeswoman natalie said trump supports repeal of but will not -- bundling approach as part of tax kevin brady of texas, chairman of the ways and means committee. noting ralph read, repeal of the as top amendment priorities he is not concerned with how the repeal happens as he is that trump and other keep their promise to repeal it. oday's "washington post," gop provision allow tax-

it has become so personal. it shouldn't be personal. i can disagree with you and still think you are good person. i friends who couldn't get together for thanksgiving because the families became so polarized. fall i would ask people to do is take a step back and try to think about what do you agree with people with? what is important to you? not how bad they are and all the awful things they are doing. host: your great uncle served as the governor of new york. what do you remember about nelson rockefeller personally? guest: he was a very charming man. he had a sheer force of personality and he was someone i think again who wasn't taken aback by so much of what the social issues were and what you personal sets of beliefs were. wasnicest thing about him he was really someone -- that's where the term rockefeller republican was coined. it was someone who is more fiscally conservative but more socially liberal. that is if i had to sum it up in one term. that would be it. host: dave spencer, the founder of practically republican, the member o

i am not going to be the civil person i have been up until now. >> thank you. the committee will stand recess and we will reconvene immediately following the floor vote. reconvenemittee will and i recognize mr. larson. when the chilling stops we will wreck -- chewing stops we will recognize the last word. >> i think the chairman for the dignity he brings to these aarings and this is always pleasure as a member of the -- committee to learn from your colleagues on the committee. i rise in strong some -- strong support of mr. pascrell. the gentleman from patterson has been persistent in his goal and his desire to achieve what i think is just your common sense and that americans have the right to know and sometimes on this committee things can get side is accusing the other of being on a witchhunt and the other appears to be saying no, there is a cover-up. justice who said democracy and freedom is that which leaves you not to sure. in this case, there is more than enough evidence on both sides to leave people not to sure. the american people may need a reshuffle an

it's just my personal taste.like i just had a baby son so delighted to be wearing real pants with a zipper and everything. it's fantastic. to that question though, in terms of what kind of a prince is appropriate in a workplace i feel like because this is,, genuinely enjoy dressing like i am now, i think people sometimes expect me to think that everyone should dress like that or look like that. at this stage of my life i have reached the peak of the present of my lifetime in the sense that nobody gives me any junk for what i look like, but also no longer really as sexy as it was when i was 25. i don't get any bs about that either. and so i can bring much just go unnoticed and a lot of places. what that means to me is that when i'm in a conversation where someone says i can't believe what she is wearing, they expect me to agree. it's my job not to do that. so i feel like i have put up defenses of just people wearing stilettos at a conference, and i'm just like why could do not wear stilettos at a sykes pesticides

that no person speaks for him. he is not beholding to the president who appointed him. and testimony shows that he is not beholding to us in the congress either. he would not compromise his independence to win confirmation votes.he passed the test this is a man of integrity. and this is exceptional. you know the story. columbia university bachelors. harvard law school, doctorate. oxford university, partnership at a prestigious law firm. and high-level justice department service for the people of our country. but most importantly. a decade-long record of faithfully applying the law on the federal bench on 2700 cases on the 10th circuit court of appeals limits dumb up this way. this brilliant honest humble man is a judges judge. and he will make a superb justice. i yield the floor. >> mr. president. >> majority leader. >>. [inaudible] >> without objection time is yielded back. the question occurs in the confirmation of neil gorsuch of colorado to be an associate justice of the supreme court of the united states. is there a sufficient second? there is. the clerk will call

one person noted a market shift with his personality.sually when you are with him, he is a story teller. on this this night he was just an information gatherer. he wanted to know what the staff didn't know and why they didn't know it. it's harder to figure out who's winning a caucus state, particularly in iowa because results are reported as the number of state delegate numbers that caucus locations for the numbers can come in as very small fractions. over and over, paul gave updates to the former president or more often reports that weren't meaningful updates. he remained rosie about hillary pulling it out. they felt it was important which caucus sites remained unreported in polk county. if they were in the core of des moines, hillary was crude. if crude. if they were outside the city, she would win. john looked at the state numbers and got a bad feeling. this is not getting better he said this is going to keep going down. he could overtake us. >> let me say, we are really happy to have c-span here. we really like to thank barnes & nobl

so this person says the show's not going to air. >> what is this person? >> this guy named jerry. he didn't even work here. he didn't even work here, he just happened to be in the studio and he says no. >> that's how things work. >> wow. >> a guy in the studio can schulte you down. >> you kids don't know nowadays. >> things were different back then. we would do the show and by legend those people in the studio would tell other people about the show. oral legend. it would take literally six to seven years. some people right now are just getting the first show.

so, whatever is on my mind thought a personal basis.them to know me as a person rather than just an executive. so i am very accessible to them, and i talk to everybody, from the front to my senior executives. david: a number of years ago you spoke at the economic club in washington and made a statement that, i thought, captured a lot of people's attention. one thing you said was you write letters to your senior officer'' mothers to give them a report card on how their children are doing. do you still do that, and what was the theory behind that? indra: i should take you back a few years. when i first became ceo. i went back to india to visit my mother, who was in india at that time. my father had passed away and my mother was there. i stayed at a hotel because the home was a little bit more rugged, and i wanted the comfort. so, she told me i had to dress up and show up at 7:00 a.m. in the morning, and i wondered why, but when mom gives you instructions, you follow them. when i got home and sat in the living room, a stream of visitors an

we have lost the youngest person, but also feels like the biggest person.are so strong as feels like the biggest person. when you are so strong as a feels like the biggest person. when you are so strong as a family, you don't realise what you've got until it is gone. we miss him massively. with violent crime in england and wales rising again after years of decline, she's pleading that young people should be taught more about the dangers of knife crime and that police funding should be protected. senior officers are warning that more people appear to be carrying knives. in some cities, more guns are being fired again. in recent weeks, there has been a spate of deaths. this was the scene of one of the most recent knife murders, the suburban street where 19—year—old jordan wright was stabbed to death last week. last year, police recorded a 9% increase in crimes, though much of that can be explained by changes in police record keeping. however, violent crime was up i9%. firearms offences we re crime was up i9%. firearms offences were up 13% and knife crime was

person is acting in a way that seems to present a serious threat to the innocent person in the house. there's dispute about whether it's reasonable for the police to enter as opposed to waiting for a psychological expert or they only have negotiations for a short period of time before they entire and it's argued that wasn't reasonable, that's not good police practice. they should have waited a longer period of time and you end up imposing liability and then once they good, then they're in a life-threatening situation and they use force. you end up imposing liability for what is arguably a violation of best police practices, or something that is recommended by experts in this situation. that's what is anomalous about the rule you have suggested. >> i wouldn't agree that it's anomalous but also think at least in this case, unlike in sheehan the court doesn't have to decide whether objectively and reasonable behavior alone is enough because we also happen to have an unlawful entry which wasn't present in the sheehan case. ... who jump out of unmarked car wearing plain close brandishing

i think john adams was a very ethical person, moral person, and despite his need for power and recognition, he kept it in check, because he knew that is what the republic needed. i think adams is one of those founders who really sacrificed his own advancement. yes, he becomes president, of course. but he could have been, i think in his own mind, much more than that. and yet, he feels he needs to enthusiasmown because after all, it is the common good and not a personal good that is important. when we look at this portrait i , think that is what we see. we see someone who is purposely downplaying how smart he is, how ambitious he is, in favor of what is needed by the new nation. let's take a look at somebody who didn't mind appearing to be grand, not at all. this is the first french ambassador to the united states. this is conrad alexander gerard, who was appointed as part of the 1778 alliance between america and france. without that alliance which came with money and soldiers, america could never have finished out the american revolution. the french were responsible for winping the united s

we don't often talk about what is my personal responsibility as a member of the community. what do i do? i live in a town that is not as prosperous as nashville by any means. what you might more broadly call the disability belt. there's an awful lot of struggling folks who live in my town. what's my responsibility in that context? i think that's something that we as conservatives, what we want to do is model values we proclaim. i think that involves getting in, getting involved in communities. i think this is a general rule you can rely on. you can have a lot of influence over a few people. and very little influence over many people. and we often end up spending our time thinking of the ways which we have very little influence over many rather than ways we can have a lot influence over a few. and you know, so that being said, let me just segue into politics where we will talk about a lot of input. i just today jumphad to jump on my soap box for a minute. and i will jump back on the soap box. just briefly. we cannot be afraid to talk about faith in this context. we can't be

have that person in their tea m.a small business and it would be a real wrench to lose that person is in that sense and for the business. one of the systems you propose is this work —based visa system, like sweden. how much will that cost businesses?” system, like sweden. how much will that cost businesses? i think what we need to look at really, and your previous guest said that this is the beginning of a process, a conversation. we need to look at what kind of system will work for the uk and in particular what kind of system will work for small businesses, where they will be able to get access to the workers and the skills they need without facing extra bureaucracy and red tape. so we have said yes, the system in sweden is worth looking at, but there are other things the government can look at as well. but what we need to do is make sure small businesses in this country are still able to access those skilled workers. you mentioned construction workers, farmers, it can even be office managers. particularly mid skill

david: you are a young person. you eventually decide you might want to do something else, have you ever thought about what you might want to do? james: we all have fantasies of what we would like to do, then reality steps in and says, what are you any good at it? you know? and i think you have got to be -- it is fun to dream, but you have got to be true to what your real skills are and i would certainly like to teach and i would like to spend more time -- i was more involved philanthropically than i have been in the last few years. i just have not had the time. more time doing that. but probably teaching, investing. you know, learn at the feet of the great, like david here. but it is a big world. i would love to spend more time in australia. david: so you were very low-key by wall street standards. you told me a story recently where you came back the other day and went out to pick up some pizza. now when you are the ceo of morgan stanley, can't you get somebody to deliver the pizza to you, or how come you have to g

james: i personally have not.you seen him since he was -- david have you seen him since : he was president? james: i have not. david: you have any advice that you would like to give him or he doesn't need any advice from you? james: he has a large team of advisers and people who want to be advisers. i don't think there is a shortage of advisors is a problem. somebody once said to me the office of the president of the united states, it consumes people. they have favorable to gender, but at the same time, the world is not staying static. we have in or miss geopolitical uncertainty, issues around north korea, iran, the immigration crisis in syria. there are a lot of pockets of the world that could easily and engulf and consume the time of the president, so i think it is critical that they be very focused on a small number of achievable goals and that the team is very coordinated, deliberate and cooperative and working to get those done. david: the strategy you have employed as ceo, and i think the market capitalizati

very personal to me. he attended the wharton school of business, where i will be attending next year. the message that resonated with me is that he graduated from wharton. a lot of students that go to wharton went to wall street, but he wanted to take a different path. that is how i feel. he wasn't sure what it was. i'm not quite sure what i want to do after college, but i do know i want to study economics and public policy. i think going to a great school will allow me to figure out new career paths. it is really comforting to see someone else who has such prestige with the same indecision when he was in college. brian: what impact do you think it has had on you that your parents are in the military and that you've lived in different places? where else have you lived? >> i've lived in germany for the last five years. before that i lived in italy, hawaii, korea, turkey, washington, d.c. i was born in texas. the great thing about military kids is you really get to see how the government works firsthand. my

to be nosy, i will dig a bit more into the personal.have changed an awful lot in your lifetime. frankly, if you were in your 20s or 30s now, you could, in a way that you could not have back then, you could have considered, you know, first of all, gay marriage. you could easily have had children, lots of children, whatever. you have talked about being the last of the mckellens. and there's a sense of melancholy in being the last of your line. do you think, if you had your life over, you would have liked all of that? the kids? i used to think the best thing about being gay was that you do not have to have kids. i mean, how many decent parents are there? the misery of the world comes because people had a dreadful upbringing. it seems to me. so i feel like i escaped that. also, i am extremely selfish. i can devote all my time to my career and do things around it without rushing back to change the nappies or going on holiday with all the kids are all that. oh, how ghastly it sounds! —— i can devote all my time to my career and do things arou

that to simply assume this person is on the left or right or this person is a liberal or conservative based on what they say about themselves and about their intentions, which meant that you know, a lot of conventional history really in sort of, and it's the way i look at it, basically sets off these abstractions against each other without ever taking into account this concrete human being with this next essential fear and anxiety and desires. and i think in a way, someone like gerard or russo really helped me, although i think someone like gandhi was very alert to this particular divided figure and he held the whole way of being in the world and of doing politics on the basis of this divided human being. still, i think in the way we have done history and the way we've done is national history, we haven't really taken on board the insights into this human individual and this is a book that would be inconceivable without the help it has got from novelists and poets. >> you said a couple years ago, i think as someone who has that same strong attention to the 19th century, prefiguring so

he will decide cases based not on his personal preferences, and based on a fair and objective reading of the law. today we have all three branches of government represented at this event. it is a very special thing and a and itecial happening, is worth taking just a minute to remember what it all means. dibler founders' incre wisdom, they gave each branch of government a different role in our great republic. we have a congress to write the laws on behalf of the people. we have a president to enforce those laws and defend our nation. and we had a supreme court to apply and interpret the law in a fair and impartial manner when disagreements arise. the founders separated power because they knew it was the best way to protect our citizens and keep our constitution secure. nowice gorsuch, you are entrusted with the sacred duty .f defending our constitution our country is counting on you fair,wise, impartial, and to serve under our laws, not over them, and to safeguard the rights of the people to govern their own affairs. i have no doubt you will rise to the occasion and that the decisions

james: i don't regard the ceo thing as defining you as a person.id: what is the greatest pleasure of being the ceo of morgan stanley? when you go to a restaurant you get people to give you your seat right away? you have people give you tickets to all the events you want to go to? you can go to hamilton easily? james: i saw hamilton for the first time. wow. david: did you have trouble getting tickets? james: of course. the greatest pleasure for me, and this will sound hokey but it is true, our firm has been around for a little over 80 years. werebout 65-70 years, we -- we had very few issues. you had your normal growth pains, if you will, then we had a decade where we try to become , firm we weren't, prop trading participating and markets just for our benefit. there was no obvious client on the other side of it. a lot of firms do that. hedge firm's do that, but that isn't what was our core dna, and what we have tried to do is restore morgan stanley to its core dna, which is all about serving her clients. david: so today, how do you spend your time?

a really uniquely gifted person. one of the most skilled writers i've ever encountered. and, in fact, in my career, the most skilled writer i ever encountered. but in addition to that, good at a whole lot of other things, too, as i will subsequently describe in my remarks. so as i think back, about the chiefs of staff that i fortunately have been lucky enough to have, none has been more good at so many different things than brian mcgwire. you know, i always hate to see these talented people go, but you know that the best way for each of us to operate is to do what's in our own best interests, and of course he reaches the point where he's got a big family and there are more lucrative alternatives out there. maybe not as much fun and not as meaningful as daily life around here, but important to making sure our families are taken care of. so it's hard to know really where to begin with brian. he came to my office in 2007. it was a critical time. i had just been elected senate republican leader. we were not in the majority, but i had just been elected to this position. it wa

as good questions to ascertain what happened to the person is just not a fair system. that needs to be fixed. >> host: as far as when someone is picked up, where are they detai detained and how lone the detained ander what rights e available to those persons whill they are detained? >> guest: when someone is to gain they should versatile get a hearing to be able to be released from custody. i.c.e. only just geisha probably someone is if they are a flight risk or is there a danger to the community. time after time in cases that lawyers have handled we see people like families are arriving from central america seeking asylum who were held for months and months at a not released from custody even though they pose no risk to the community. these are mothers with very young children. and this is administration wants to dramatically increase the amount of detention. he has requests be days we're going to leave this segment now and go live to capitol hill to from centimeters as they return from their weekly party caucus lunches. >> hello. good afternoon everyone. as you know

persons located outside the united states. do you agree that u.s. constitutional and privacy rights do not extend to nonu.s. persons outside the united states. >> we're talking about the bill light of rights, protects the individual rights of united states citizens and individuals in the united states, by and large. and i'm also not aware of any statutory law that extends broad privacy and protection to foreigners abroad. >> is it a controversial statement of law that the u.s. constitution and statute does not extend nonu.s. persons located outside the united states. >> i don't think that will find that controversial. >> i'll agree. >> do you think they can take into account and would be in conducting espinage. >> i agree. >> can you commit to me that you'll read the 28 classified annex regarding the operational impacts on the community once you've received your security clearance. >> yes, i look forward to doing that if i'm confirmed. >> i would like to turn my attention to section 702 now. and terrorist organizations, we utilize the whole tool kit

going to cease that person and stop myself by being injured by shooting a person? >> i think you would ask whether there really was a threat that the officer was responded to. i think you're positing a a situation where there wasn't a threat. everyone recognized was a threat facing these officers were going about doing the police business in good faith and is a person point what appeared to be a gun at them. what a night circus that is we are going to second-guess everything else you did that day, and even to this use of force was reasonable we are going to hold you liable. >> isis want to put the discussion so far this morning in the right framework. we are talking about the second question presented, right? none of this seems to me to involve the provocation goal in the ninth circuit, at least the question about did they get a warrant, did they knock, announce. how do you understand the ninth circuit provocation goal in distinction to what we've been talking about in terms of proximate cause and things like that? >> sure. the provocation goal takes under the nigh

the irs needs to know whether the person trying to access our person is legitimate. anyone who has ever gotten a call from a scammer, i suspect everyone here has had at least one. me too. knows that criminals are out there trying to steal personal financial information and more. to stop identity thieves the irs has been working to improve methods for verifying identity of all taxpayers using our online services. let me be clear, before we offer a fully functioning online account, we must have and are committed to having a strong authentication process built in to protect taxpayers from identity theft. this may mean some added time and extra steps for people, but it's worth it to keep those accounts secure. at the irs, there's no arguments about how to balance convenience and security because security is our highest priority and that's how it has to be. experience has also shown we can't take security for granted and can't let up in our efforts in our battle against the online criminals, especially criminal siyndicates we're battling everything day. our systems curren

, and that person was our chairman.it reluctantly had to allow myself to view it and the chair and ranking on senate intel. now, i want the full committees to be able to see that, and we're meeting resistance. if these documents are so damning or so vindicating of the president as he suggests, why are they opposing efforts to provide them to the full committee? i think that's a question worthy of the white house answering. >> ranking member also says he has a pretty good idea why the president keeps repeating his baseless wiretapping claims against his predecessor. >> i do think this is largely a white house effort to distract our attention and focus from that issue of collusion or coordination between the campaign, the russian intervention in our election. >> joining me now, congressman eric swalwell of california, who is a member of that house intelligence committee. as a member of the committee, congressman, would you like to see those documents? >> yes, absolutely, chris. >> what have you been -- what has been commu