b tthere gng t coin dngt lgs eyee isnhentes an t cseens ees anheenithaar ocrrg. >>ndow dyo bie wre pour tcotecthe erio tthere rtipin i t tef foatn cpan anom caondinfmaon caaisha w s add vontrs ar w i silosio a as hinhe cabit i nessyooit >>nar, ihihaou foatn oraon cabityavttte sce th cdarnd tnkhaof tehe hee gwi regnioofow iorntt . tnkhaecnion i deto ith ptannd erar fusevw ou okg o ceroly a enhas nusit inrmio erio. l m are tsueio ai tr.raan mkam, an tn'las t qst tos. b so ohi spe a i thkouusct tos t ov pergizio tt emo amntitnhe pame tnng t pames,hola cuty dertntf er,t cera ds a rul ion tnk 'vompit iegte pl. heec,ut ty' vy dire araend. is tt fr a me poany,owou toeait tt aak i core? nar,ie is ir d bie ttha hee regn b de ierf tt nds unrsndgllhe pye dtaho tir reecve res reonbiti,utries roues tnhaar t th ho w poriz a h e wve tmheo ke f a gd sf pics d tis. >>heyohihaev ooinioasoe? cae,agn,t'no jt do is teptmt o engyit teptmtf ndseri. ihiltatyhehi us h a vy iornt hangoln eatna seriouil aheshld b coditi,eangnfft toom uit des rgizlhaesnd rsne ameatnsr momes mes ttfa? ielveh

in many pararts of the world, tthere's been a vicicious cycle. continuous use of the land has leded to subsistence agrriculture.. and generation byby generation, this has further degraded ththe soils. the vital question we have to ask is, can this destctive prococs be reversed? [indiststinct announcncements] 15 years ago, chinese and internanational experts were confidenent it could be. they decided that to prevent further erosion, it was necessary to cease farming on certain key areas to allow the treeees and shrubs to grow back. but this could not happen without the consent of the farmers themselves. >> [speaking in chininese] >> they took some persuading. what eventually convivinced the local people was the assurance that they would have tenure of their land, that they would directly benefit from the effort they invested in the new project. >> [speaking in chinese] the goal was to give a hat to the hilltops, give a belt to the hills, as well as shoes at the base. the hatat meant thatat the top of these hills had to be replanted with trees. the

he says, tthere are differences and that is why you negotiate.s, behind that reassuring presentation, those questions about money, the role of the european court ofjustice remain. he did not have the level of detail today. is it still the case that in terms of timescale, that is almost a stumbling block before lots of other issues can be discussed. the matter of the bill or whatever we are going to call it plus this continuing debate about the right of eu citizens living in this country and brits in other european countries, all that has to be settled before anything else can be moved onto. all of that has to be settled and new arrangements on the irish border. that'll be complicated. doesn't have to be settled. the european union has to pronounce itself "satisfied" that enough progress has been made on those issues before you start talking about trade deals. that means that the initiative is with the european side. when will they decide that enough progress has been made? what is enough progress? willa concrete figure have to be agreed in terms