we see article after article about how globalization has hurt workers in youngstown, dayton and detroit, even as economists strongly agree that globalization and free trade spur economic growth. those who rail against globalization are often beneficiaries of globalization as they wear gap jeans made in mexico or wal-mart shirts made in bangladesh or neiman marcus apparel made in italy while using mobile phones assembled in china. for the big show. we have an excellent panel of experts to discuss globalization tonight. steven chunk is president of the world trade center los angeles. he previously served as the los angeles secretary general of foreign affairs and trade under mayor eric garcetti and director of international trade for port of los angeles. catherine stone is an expert on labor and employment law at the ucla school of law. she was awarded a fwug enhypothetice guggenheim award. jury railway nichols burg focuses on asian economies. he works on the and aer son school's economic modelling and forecasting of the california and u.s. economies. kati zuwaman is founder and ceo of ne

why is youngstown involved? >> no. it is safing where the president is acting at the borders to protect our nation's security because he's operating at the height of his power, constitutional and statutory, what the constitution requires is lower than what it requires in other contexts. it requires as mandel says facial legitimacy and a bona fide reason but the court goes on to say but you don't look behind and can't meant you inquirely of subjective motivation. what it has to mean by that is what this court has said. it's rational basis review and when counsel says, look, other presidents could have done this, i think he's conceding that it survives rational basis review. and then we're all down to the statements and it's all a question of the statements and even if you disagree with all of our arguments why as a matter of law you can't consider them, there's not enough here to overcome a judgment of the president. >> you're about to answer my earlier question. >> i was, judge. the three john does or one, three and ja

this is youngstown one. it doesn't get anything more. >> but dividing the president and congress, i thought the through line in youngstown, it is neither the president nor congress that can do it because of some negative part of the constitution like the it is not first amendment. a youngstown question at all. i don't understand what it means to say that word. no one is arguing about whether this is congress versus the president. mr. wall: what we are saying is the president is acting at the borders to protect our nation's security, because he is acting at the height of his power, what the constitution requires is lower than what it requires in other contexts. it requires as mandel says, facial legitimacy and a bona fide reason, but the court goes on to say, you don't look behind. so you can't admit when you inquire into subjective motivation that the chief justice would be right. you have to look at the basis review. when counsel says other presidents could have done this, i think he is conceding that it su

viscerally to the white working class voters of materially decimated places across america outside of youngstown ohio. why am? the man's worldview is formed in the 1980s and 1990s new york and it is done at the hands of some other and it turns out that story is exported across the country. so he went to ohio and wisconsin and said you are experiencing a decline. we are going to bring you back to greatness and if those people are causing the decline in this case it was the sort of prime villain in the story. but in some ways today as we are speaking they are announcing their new website that will show crimes committed which is just this official project of the government published to essentially create in the public's mind the criminality with unauthorized immigration. and that is the project that was sort of carried out. so it's not an action that rudy giuliani carried out and that jeff sessions said we would talk about police departments being hamstrung by these% decrease. it's like the worst impulses. it embodies this idea and the border wall to be is the literal manifestation. broken windows

is: from youngstown, ohio for garrett graff area kate is on the democratic line. collects i'm so glad -- caller: i'm so glad i'm coming on after what you said. understand why the series of events you just mentioned are not enough. why is he still just like out there with no kind of official restraint? there are a lot of us are very uncomfortable with what he may do overseas, considering what he's done in the white house. why is what he has done already not enough? he showed himself to be a liar over the whole birther thing, so why this? guest: this is the big question we are going to face in the the first 24s in firing,ter jim comey's you saw the white house saying this was entirely because of the deputy attorney general's memo recommending that jim comey be hadoncluding that jim comey lost and squandered the credibility and integrity of the fbi, although it did stop short of actually recommending his dismissal. and then very quickly, you had donald trump himself come out and say no, of course i was going to fire jim comey, even before i got the memo, and then pre

. >> you know, youngstown is not exactly on our course. >> in a lot of ways, television was showing slices "route 66" was an innovative show because it was actually filmed on location, so the audience was being exposed to things that weren't part of their local orbit. >> space, the final frontier. >> you know, there is a little bit of the mayberry aspect to the world of "star trek" and that's going to sound like an odd analogy, but follow me here. people want to believe that such people can exist. the idea of a future in which a lot of the biases and the fears of the past has evolved out of us. >> where i come from, signs, shape or color, it makes no difference. >> there is one episode where some of the members of the crew were taken over by these mental giants. >> this psychokinetic power of yours, how long have you had it? >> they forced captain kirk and lieutenant hura to kiss. tchls the first interracial kiss on television. >> nbc asked me if i would do my own special, and i had always adored harry bellefonte. i did one duet called "the path of glory." it's an anti-war song and we both

i was in youngstown, a woman said i am 63 years out -- old, i have three jobs, no insurance. my goal is to live i am 65 and i have medicare. that was her goal, not to see her grandchildren, not to see the world. that is what the system has done to her. the secretary of hhs, your colleague talked about raising the disability age to 67. mark: we are exiting this now. question and answer by steve mnuchin for the senate finance committee. mark: we will go back to brussels with president trump slamming fellow nato members for not paying their fair share, just a few moments ago. he said 2% is the bare minimum for confronting today's threats. nato must contribute their fair share. he also led a moments silence for the manchester attack. the official photo is taking place between nato members. we will go back to brussels. this is bloomberg. ♪ . . vonnie: european close on bloomberg markets. mark: here are the top stories we are covering at bloomberg around the world. president trump takes the opportunity get his first nato meeting to slam member countries were not paying their fair s

it is not a youngstown question at all. i don't understand what it means to say that word. no one is arguing about this. >> it is saying that where the president is acting at the border to protect -- to protect our nation's security, because he is acting at the height of his power, what the constitution requires is lower than what it requires in other contexts. the court goes on to say that you don't look behind when you inquire into subjective motivation. you look at why the ag kept him out. what it had to mean by that is this rational basis review. when counsel says other presidents could have done this, i think he is conceding it survive rational basis review. reasonable government access could have done this. we are all down to the statements and it is a question of the statement. even if you disagree with all of our arguments, they're just not formalhere to overcome a national security judgment of the president. >> the earlier question. doe 1 andthe john three and two are seeking a german visas. immigrant visas. has a liveoe 1 claim. he does not have article freestandi

hiram is between cleveland, akron and youngstown, ohio.ive us a snapshot of what life is like there. caller: this is what life is like as far as if you want a good job. i have had to leave this area and travel to michigan, illinois , actually now i am working for a company out of new jersey. in order to get a decent paying job in this area. and i contribute a lot of that to what is ruining the job market in rural america and beyond are companies like aerotech, manpower, kelly services. these are contracting companies that a lot of these bigger companies such as general motors, ford, caterpillar, other manufacturing companies rely on for their cheap labor. contracting companies were originally put through to help smooth out the spikes in the needed labor market. companies abuse these contracting positions. i knew people when i worked at caterpillar that were doing the exact same job for 10 years straight and were never offered direct positions in caterpillar but were contracted employees. when people are contract, they have very low benefit

. >> i felt the through line in youngstown is neither the president nor congress can do that because of some negative part of the constitution like the first amendment purity is not a youngstown question at all anymore. no one is arguing about whether this is congress versus the president. saying where the president is acting at the borders to protect our nation security, because he is hiding -- acting whate height of his power, the constitution requires is lower than what it requires in other contact -- context. facial legitimacy and a bona fide reason. youcannot look behind, so cannot admit that. you look at what the age he kept them out beard would have to -- kept him out. when counsel says other presidents could have done this, i think he's conceding that it survives rational basis review feared reasonable government actors could of done the security we are down to statements and it is a question of the statements. even if you disagree with all of our arguments, there is just not enough here to overcome a judgment of the president. >> you are about to answer my earlier question.

the republicans moved that cap so now you can charge a senior in youngstown, ohio five times what you could charge somebody young and healthy. so this is a direct are assault on working class people. and it tells them if you have a pre-existing condition, you're the back of the line. if you're older, get in the back the line. there will be a lot of healthier people ahead of you in the line. >> on the question of pre-existing conditions, fred upton and others who were nos and moved over to yes said they changed their vote because adding money to the high risk pool would take care of people with pre-existing conditions. the $8 billion. we've seen high risk pools before, before obamacare, they were around in 35 states. do you believe that money added to the high risk pools is enough to cover are people with pre-existing conditions? >> not even close. $8 billion over five years which i think is where it ended up being. in a country ever 313 million people, it will be a high cost pool and basically it's an insurance plan. it's amaze abouting to on me that republicans lack the basic underst

it is not a youngstown question at all. i don't understand what it means to say that word. no one is arguing about this. >> it is saying that where the president is acting at the border to protect -- to protect our nation's security, because he is acting at the height of his power, what the constitution requires is lower than what it requires in other contexts. it requires facial legitimacy and a bona fide reason. the court goes on to say that you don't look behind. when counsel says what other president could have done this, i think he's conceding that it survives rational basis review. them are all bound to the statements, and even if you ,isagree with all the arguments they are just not enough your to overcome a former national security judgment of the president. >> you were about to answer my earlier question. does areree john seeking immigrant pieces. paul harrison was seeking a nonimmigrant visa but only john claim. still has a live >> the individual seeking the nonimmigrant visa, with that one of the for the district court found had standing? court did nott rely on t

it is not a youngstown question at all. i don't understand what it means to say that word. no one is arguing about this. >> it is saying that where the president is acting at the border to protect -- to protect our nation's security, because he is acting at the height of his power, what the constitution requires is lower than what it requires in other contexts. it requires facial legitimacy and a bona fide reason. the court goes on to say that you don't look behind when you inquire into subjective motivation. you look at why the ag kept him out. what it had to mean by that is this rational basis review. when counsel says other presidents could have done this, i think he is conceding it survive rational basis review. reasonable government access could have done this. we are all down to the statements and it is a question of the statement. even if you disagree with all of our arguments, they're just not enough here to overcome a formal national security judgment of the president. >> the earlier question. >> the john doe one and three and two are seeking immigrant visas. only

citizens, gets exported to the border where the president is excluding aliens and what can only be a youngstown one case. everything under article two and congress can give him under 1182 aft. if you think all of those cases equally travel to the border and it is not mandel, which is what has govern constitutional challenges to the denial of injury, then yes, you're looking at -- that is the use of discretion, claiming a legal error to apply lemon instead of mandel? yes, we think there were a handful of legal errors, but that is certainly one. >> that is the primary one? mr. well: that's right. >> the mandel cases the -- case? mr. well: that's right. i want to take the question on its own terms. weyou disagree with us and are just and domestic establishment clause -- >> what justice kennedy meant when he spoke in the plurality of opinion and said absence of affirmative showing bad faith, that seems to be expansion beyond simply saying just give us a reason. mr. well: now i think, you put two questions on the table. what does the bad faith exception due under mandel? and what is the purpose and

am looking to people like bernie sanders, i am looking to people like congressman tim ryan from youngstownaren't afraid of thinking big, thinking bold, outside the box. frankly, i don't want anyone who is pulling down six-figures for wall street speeches to be the future of the democratic party. of course we will love barack obama. of course he will have a role, reelected, first african-american president, health care reform, banking reform, but we have got to look to the future into new voices. >> martha: i want to put up a quote from tom perez. this has become an issue for the democratic party. whether or not they should include people who are pro-life. a lot of catholics fall into that group. he said every democrat, like every american, should support a woman's right to make her own choice about her body and her health. that is not negotiable and should not change city by city or state by state. mercedes, now you have nancy pelosi speaking out about this, and saying that she does and she is a catholic, believe that there ought to be room in the democratic party for people who are pro-li

viscerally to ewhite working class voters of materialally decimated places acrossmer america, outside youngstown ohio. why him? the man's world view is formed in 1980s and 1990s new york which is an experience of material decline, the place is going to hell, and it's done at the hand of some other. and it turns out that story is end all rightly exploited in the country. he want to iowa and ohio and wisconsin and said you're experiencing your material decline. we'll bring you back to greatness and those people over there that are causing the decline. in this case it was i think the sort of prime villain in the story was immigrants rather than black people but they're married -- in some ways interchangeable. today at we're speaking the doj is announcing new webs that shows crimes committed by undocumented immigrants. the official project of the government create in the public's mind an association withcriminallity with unauthorized immigration. and that is the project that was sort of carried out over a course of self decades through law and order rhetoric and willie horton to associate blackness

i was in youngstown one day and a woman stood up and said i'm 63 years old i hold two jobs i don't have insurance i just want to my goal is to live until i'm 65 until i have medicare. not to see her grandchildren not to see the world that is what the system has done to her. i hear your secretary. and you are talking about raising the eligibility age. let's meet -- let me go to tax reform. it came out with a very short and descriptive. tax or farmville. the story about tax reform. on the op ed page. the godfather in and the real thinker behind. what he said. i will just read the poll out. gradually increase the eligibility age can offset revenue. despite what the administration said. you will grow out of these deficits from tax cuts. they have said it really won't work that way. we should pay for it with social security cuts. i want to ask you a series of questions about that. i'm worried about you paying for this tax cut. no economic theory really says we will grow our economy to the point that we will remake all of the revenue. i just want to ask and want to clear this up. i'm worried

i was in youngstown and a woman stood up &-and-sign 63-years-old and i hold two jobs. i don't have insurance. i just want to -- my goal is to livwas tolive until i'm 65 whene medicare. that was her goal, not to see what her -- talking about raising the system to 67 let me go to the tax reform. on page 17 was an article by martin feldstein on the tax cuts pay for themselves. you will grow out of the deficit tax cuts. martin feldstein of the supply-side economics is that it won't work that way and we should pay for it with socialy security cuts. so i want to ask a series of questions about that. i'm worried about this tax cut because no economic theories say we will grow our economy to the point we will remake all the revenue. can you give us your word the administration will live up to the promise and will not cut, alter or privatize social security. even though already in your plan you are cutting $72 billion frog disability insurance which is in fact a part of social security. >> anybody who is eligible. the president intends to make pe sure that those that have disab

multinational corporations, not ordinary american workers, not people in youngstown and warren and steubenville and columbus, terry branstad makes is clear that multinational corporations will have his ear, not workers. in all these trade agreements you can see corporate fingerprints on these trade agreements. rarely do you see workers at the table advocating for worker rights. you only see trade policy that reflects the interests of large corporations. those corporations that then use these trade policies to outsource jobs around the world. it's not just worker rights where china falls woefully short and where we need to take a tough stand. china's record on human rights and religious freedom is unacceptable. our ambassador needs to make that clear. when u.s. officials represent us to the world, they must not only be advocates for our business interests, they should be that to be sure. they must also be credible advocates on behalf of workers and our nation's values, values like freedoms of speech and freedom to organize and the freedom to challenge powerful special interests. these are values

i was in youngstown one day and a woman stood up and said, i'm 63 years old, i hold two jobs, i don't have insurance, i just want -- my goal is to live until i'm 65, until i have medicare. that was her goal. not to see her grandchildren, not to see the world. i mean, that's what this system has done to her. i hear your secretary of h.h.s., your cabinet colleague, talk about raising the eligibility age for medicare to 67. let me go to tax reform. the day you came out, the day your administration came out with its very short, not very dedescriptive tax reform bill, the next day, front page of the "wall street journal," was the story about tax reform. on page a-17, on their -- on the op-ed page, was an article by martin feldstein who was by and large the god father, the real thinker behind the arthur laugher kind of tax cuts, pay for themselves. well, what he said is, i'll just read the pullout. gradually increasing the social security eligibility age can offset revenue loss from trump's tax cuts. so in spite of what the administration's saying, you're going to grow, will you grow out of

and last, but certainly not least, happy 102nd birthday to virginia conine, a baseball fan from youngstowneather. i )m ... ==topvo== attorneys today continue their closing me >>> a good wednesday morning. at 8:56, i'm sam brock. attorneys today continuing their closing arguments in the high-profile criminal trial tied to the sierra lamar murder case. the trial is supposed to resume any moment as the court is opening up at 9:00 this morning. that's when prosecutors are expected to resume their closing arguments and then rest their case. they argued for hours yesterday. at that point the defense will begin its closing arguments. now, it's likely that attorneys will be focusing on how the dna evidence in this case was handled and arguing that sierra lamar's body has not been found because they believe she's still alive. >>> happening right now, we have a crew at the courthouse and will have the very latest in a live report coming up in our midday newscast. we are also posting trial updates throughout the morning in our twitter feed. >>> facebook plans to hire 3,000 workers specifically to rev

yesterday i was talking to police chief richard beale of dayton and youngstown police chief robert lees about what more we should do to support police officers and their families. this week we unanimously passed several pieces of bipartisan legislation that will provide new support to the officers who protect us and the families who sacrifice alongside them. public safety officers benefits improvement act which senator grassley introduced will put pressure on the bureau of justice assistance and d.o.j. to speed up claims processing so families of disabled officers or fallen officers get their benefits more quickly. we passed the law enforcement mental health and wellness act introduced by indiana senators donnelly and young to help law enforcement agencies establish or enhance mental health services. like peer-monitoring pilot programs and crisis outlines for their officers. i learned about this bill from my friend jay mcdonald whose add voa cassie -- advocacy for police officers and their families makes a huge difference for the law enforcement community. and we approve senator cornyn'