it needs to be done to protect us from climate change. host: change. host: should the obama administration have pushed for ratification of the deal's away future president could not withdraw? guest: not necessarily. we are building off of a previous framework. each country is making its own commitment and those will change over time. many countries will make bigger and deeper commitments over time. host: robert calling from augusta, georgia, a democrat. caller: good morning, c-span. this is my first time on. i think c-span is doing a wonderful job. i watch it all the time. i would just like to say, this president we have, so-called president, he is trying to reverse anything that obama has done. anything obama has done or signed into law, he is trying to reverse. thing,is paris agreement america is headed down a bad road. the only thing i can say, we all need to say, god help america. that is all we can do. guest: appreciate that, robert, and we certainly agree. climate change is real, it is happening now, we have a chance to make progress in many stat

it's always changing. what's important here is what the president did on thursday is put america first and say to the united states and the world that we will remain engaged, where we are also going to make sure that we will put america first. >> chris: he pulled out of the deal largely on economic terms. curious. >> president trump: the american families will suffer the consequences in the form of lost jobs and a diminished quality of life. >> chris: the study that the president cited was funded by two groups that are dramatically opposed to environmental regulation and the study itself acknowledges -- this is a quote from the study "it does not take into account the potential benefits from emissions. the study results are not a benefit cost analysis of climate change. it's a worst-case scenario. >> administrator pruitt: if there were several studies that were actually published in response to paris. the heritage study. there were several. what we know from the paris agreement objectively is that it was a

your brain would then change, it would learn the error and change its representation of the apple so you would see the apple differently. this is -- we have a very fancy name for this in the science of psychology and neuro science. we call it learning. and then you can use it to predict better in the future. so then to maintain their or your brain can run experiments to imagine the world without any prediction error at all just as you did when you imagined the apple orare -- or are hearing the song you can't get out of your head. examples i have used here are about objects and events like apples and squares. but the important and wonderful thing is the same process happens about the senations inside your own body. you have to understand how emotions are made. i am at the wrong page. from your brain's perspective, your body is just another source of sensory input it has to make meaningful. sensations from your heart from changing temperature and so on are ambiguous and these purely physical sensations are no objective psychological meaning. if you feel an ache in your stomach while at

climate change is a fact. and when our children's children look u us the eye andnd ask ife didd all we could to leave them a safer, more stable world with new sources of energy, i want us to be able to o say yes, we did. [applause] >> as the obamama administstratn renews its s commitme t to ac the debate over climate change remains polarized. climate scientist michael mann is a central figure in that debate. he was one of the scientists behind the development of the controversial hockey stick chart, which showed how temperature in the late twentieth century was exceptionally warm compared to the previous 900 years. this triggered a tax on dr. mann and the science behind his work, all documented in his book "the hockey stick and the climate wars." michael mann, you write that in mid 1990s, scientiststs were abe to begin to connectct the dototn climate chanange. could yoyou elaborate? >> we underststood the basic science of the greenhouse effect nearly two centuries ago. joseph fourier, the same guguy who discov

in the administration the apparent change of opinions on climate change we cannot help but wonder if this is what they will care about whether this is just politics or if there is a core national security issue to drive interest in the impact of climate change. a preliminary answer to that is president trump's secretary of defense by greed the effects of bakelite changing climate with maritime impact security situations. in to conduct operations today and in the future so that is of bottom-line there will adapt to changes in the climate led dod knows what they are doing but there was a lot so we have a group of experts with the board of the visors and each a uniquely qualified talk about why dod still cares about climate change and the ability to carry out the future i would introduce everybody to call on them for some opening comments and questions and answers they can talk about any facet that they which but one starting question is the essence of politics how would dod approach this issue? and their resistance to focus on a by president john. and i will go through and introduce ev

climate change is a hoax? >> well what president trump believes is he was elected to grow the u.s. economy. >> but with all due respect you're not answering the question. >> i'm answering what the president is committed to a you're going to have to ask him you're actually going to have to ask him. >> does he believer global warming is a hoax. >> he believes a cheen environment. >> i'll ask you one more time does he believer it's a hoax. >> you'll have to ask him that. >> that brings us to the this afternoon's white house briefing. >> now it's been 48, 72 hours what does the president actually believe about climate change does he still believe it's a hoax? could you clarify that because apparently nobody else in the white house can. >> i have not had an opportunity to have that discussion. >> you're the epa a administrator shouldn't you be able to tell the american people whether or not the president still believes climate change is a hoax where does he stand. >> as i indicatesed several times through the proce

smart that global warming hoaxsters changed the name to climate change.hen he has lots and lots of dollar signs. he thought it was a hoax. he's on the record as saying it's a hoax. are you tried to convince him otherwise? >> i have said in committee that it's not a hoax but details -- you talk about agreement. the agreement says only you can accelerate. it doesn't say in the agreement that they can veto. this is an unusually bad agreement. if you read through it, it's about 20 pages, i invite you to read through it as i have done, it doesn't say voluntary for the united states. we give $3 billion up front. we lose jobs. everyone else takes a walk and it doesn't do anything at the end of the day. so i think the president was right in taking this position. if we're going to deal with climate change, let's deal with it on a fair basis and what makes sense for america. he's the president of the united states. he's not president of the world. >> so if you believe in climate change and the president thinks it's a hoax, and you feel that the u.s. should do somet

number and it will still say that it's warming. - and politics changes and politicians change, but science remains constant. the principles remain constant, the conclusions remain constant. - yes. - right. so talk to me about your origins. talk to us about the origins of your interest in this. you grew up in canada. originally when you went to university, you actually intended to be an astrophysicist, right? - [katharine] yes. - talk a little bit about how you got from one to the other. - so my dad is a science educator. he grew up with six sisters and three daughters. he used to say the only male around the house was the cat and he was really not quite male. (laughing) if you know what i mean. so i almost feel like i didn't have a choice. i went to university and science to me was the coolest thing, the most important thing, the truest thing that you could study i felt like. so, of course, i studied science. i fell in love with astrophysics because the idea that we can understand the distant reaches of the universe with nothing more than the brains and the limited instruments that we have

i didn't agree to all these changes. now you're just gonna change everything.his is gonna be a dictatorship, this ain't gonna be no partnership. i didn't agree to this [bleep]. the deal's off. >> pete, if you're not gonna put your pride away, then i'm not gonna do the deal. >> you don't need to raise your voice at me. >> well, i'm raising my voice because you keep repeating the same thing and you don't seem to understand what i'm telling you. >> are you okay? >> i just need a break. >> i came here to help you. you asked me to come help you. i gave you a very fair offer. it's $3 1/2 million from me to liquidate and clear these debts, to set up a brand-new entity, to bring in new assets and some fresh inventory. >> i will be working for free like i am now? >> just like i will be. it's a yes or a no. >> yes. >> i'm writing a check for $3 1/2 million. >> maybe for the first time i'll have a good night's sleep. >> with this check, you know that i'm 100% in charge. >> correct. >> we have a deal? >> we have a deal. >> okay. >> thank you. everybody meet in the showroom

one of the things we did is we changed the command structure. in addition to removing article 60 where commander could have overturned the decision for conviction, we've also change the process by which these cases are reviewed and a recommendation goes forward. commanders had sufficient evidence to take action against 64% of alleged offenders in sexual assault. they use the court marshal process. these indicate that they are moving forward and furthermore it's been our understanding and others who have reviewed this that it's actually higher than what is actually occurring in this civilian court. we have adopted a number of provisions with respect to this including, on a bipartisan basin, having established a risk bonds system panel that reviewed the issue for us for nearly a year. they found no evidence of removing the commander would increase prosecution. they did however recommend changes that we have undertaken, which again, this congress did and it totally revamped the process but a sexual assault claim goes forward. if it's reported they

it is not climate change, it is global warming. don't let the dollar sucking wise guys change names midstream because the first name didn't work. in november, 2012, let's continue to destroy the competitiveness of factories and manufacturing so we can fight mythical global warming. china is so happy. interestingly back in 2009, donald trump did sign a letter with dozens of business leaders calling for meanful, effective measures to combat climate change. it sounded like he is on the fence. >> i am open minded, nobody really knows. look, i'm somebody that gets it. and nobody really knows. it is not something that's so hard and fast. >> reporter: overall, his blizzard of tweets and almost allt all televised comments have the sentiment. donald trump has never been shy about expressing that, at least until now. gary tuckman, cnn, atlanta. >> gary, thank you. >>> former mayor of new york michael bloomberg is among u.s. business leaders vowing to stay the course on the paris climate agreement. >> the billionaire philanthropist knows a lo

he wants to change that.ybe he is a frustrated with the fact that the president doesn't have the same power of the chairman of the trump organization does, but i think he has handled it and he has reminded us that the president is just one part of three. host: we asked our viewers, what suggestion to washington? you joined us for that. one of the things they said it loud and clear is that the in transparency and the echo chamber that the national security adviser admitted to that we heard about during obamacare, a certain amount of your benefit.s to it is the reason why donald trump is the president-elect because he heard, he didn't lecture, and the people are trying of thinking there is a elected class that rules over the country. they are not about that. host: joe thomas, do you think the president has, in his actions and in his words, stay true to why he was elected? standpoint,that here is a guy that is getting incinerated because he tweets in .he middle of the night i am amazed at the mail -- at nfeve.lk

nothing has changed.he principles that we set out in the manifesto. understandably voters were still confused. it is your mum you're caring for? she has dementia. we don't know if she'll have to go into a home, but do i have to sell her house? they were saying in one thing, you know what i mean, you've got £100,000, you don't have to sell your house. the next day they are putting cap on it. but they are not telling us what the cap is. theresa may wanted the policy in her manifesto to make sure parliament couldn't block it. if the public vote for this, then you can get it through the house of commons and the house of lords, because politician cannot vote what the public have voted for in a manifesto. that is the way to make things happen. then came an event which would stop the campaign in its tracks. greater manchester police said they believed one man carried out the bombing at a pop concert in the city. killing 22, some of them children. when the campaign resumed four days later, it brought renewed focu

is a change. she said that the president believes it's changing. well, if it's changing at a very small problem, is at any time a problem. we know thats is changing at a much faster rate. oceans for example. >> and she also added throupollutants are a part of t equation. and the president has said that it's not manmade. >> i don't think that here say from the u.s. ambassador to the united nations is what we need to hear from the president of the united states. >> she's not giving him the credibility? >> since when does our president need somebody be else to tell us what is on his mind? he has committed to being transparent. he has ample opportunity to tell us exactly what he takes and whether he does view it a as problem. he doesn't need surrogates. >> is it your analysis then that -- or maybe i should ask what is your animalysis of this preside relying on others to convey a message on his behalf? >> let me tell you how we as historians look at it because i can't tell you what president trump is t

how could the changes effect you? we'll take a look at that with a nonpartisan not for profit organization. joining us this morning is aaron turner pfeffer. he is director of government relations and your organization monitors the quality and best practices of health care organizations. things like health care plans and farm sis a organizations. just to establish what you do. you said that it's a mistake to assume if you're not enrolled on a health exchange or on medicaid that these changes being talked about wouldn't effect you. >> correct. that's some of the questions i get from family and friends but most folks aren't aware of is the affordable care act had a number of consumer protections that apply broadly to all health plans. there's a number of different things that the plan can do to help everyone that had insurance be it through medicaid or exchanges or your employer. >> so everyone should be paying attention. >> everyone should be paying attention. >> some of the parts of the affordable care act have been me

specifications change and buildings incorporate changes as the design develops. yea rs must remember, it takes up to two years to design a building and during those processes, many different people are involved. that is self certification, that means that effectively building inspectors from local authorities no longer necessarily go out and do inspections themselves? it is difficult to say without knowing the particulars of any given incident in that. one would expect that there is a process where an inspector will go out. whether that is from the local authority or from another approved inspectorate, one would expect that checks do happen and is they are in place. the real cause of concern is whether that regulation is then enforced and whether the processes where people surf certified and the description of items that they are making are out of the ones that are finally placed on that building. let me ask you finally, briefly if you can, what do you make of the interim measures that are being taken at the moment? i think, and measures that are being taken at t

out of the landmark harris agreement on climate change. the u.s.resident notoriously once called climate change a hoax and made a promise to cancel the paris accord within his first 100 days. he has passed the 100 day mark already. links from the white house say he could carry out that promise starting today. donald trump has long been vocal about his climate change skepticism. repeatedly: global warming a made up byconcept the chinese to make u.s. manufacturing noncompetitive. tothe campaign he promised put american interests in the coal industry first and pull out of the legally binding global deal to fight climate change. the paris agreement. he wasted little time on taking office. surrounded by legislators from coal mining state. rules aimed at reducing pollution standards and signed an executive order to dismantle obama's clean power plan aimed at replacing polluting coal plants with renewable energy sources. >> my administration is putting an end to the war on coal. we are going to have clean coal. i'm taking historic steps to lift the restri

and climate change in general. i'm trained as an engineer, but one of the best classes labor took was a philosophy class. ,egarding the socratic method this question that came to my mind would be what is the earth's optimal temperature. you can't find it. anything i would say is i think people in the paris agreement are unserious, if they really were concerned about carbon in the atmosphere, they would have had a manhattan like project for nuclear energy and not the nuclear energy that we currently have, all you have to do is look in the sky and see that the sun actually has clean fusion energy and there are number of projects around the world, even here at home, look at a company like lockheed martin that has some projects trying to develop fusion. that is the ultimate solution and if they were really serious about it, they would a worldwide effort into getting towards fusion energy. host: so why not agree with the president to leave this paris accord? is nothing binding, it's an agreement, volunteering basically

has to change? election at the disarray in the uk. and they believe this chaos in british politics makes a deal harder to reach. one of the best-known champions of brexit works right here in brussels. he dismisses all the negative talk. you can't be a self—governing nation if you're part of the european union. you can't control your borders or immigration numbers. so it is the biggest constitutional change in our country since the 17th century. it is that getting that control of our laws. but will we? at the close of day one of eu— but will we? at the close of day one of eu- uk but will we? at the close of day one of eu— uk negotiations, brussels remained unclear about the kind of brexit britain was after. secretary of state, can be eu trust that what you are for today or tomorrow will be what you asked for any few days' time, given the political confusion in the uk? would deliver the single market. we will be seeking to set up a free trade arrangement. —— we believe in the single market. the circum

climate change is a hoax? >> what president trump believes is he was elected to grow the u.s. economy. >> but with all due respect, gary, you're not answering the question. >> i'm answering what the president's committed to. you're going to have to ask him. you're going to actually have to ask him. >> does he believe global warming is a hoax? >> he believes in clean air and clean water. >> i'll ask you again. >> you can ask him that. >> and then that brings us today's white house briefing. >> now it's been 48, 72 hours. what does the president actually believe climate change is a hoax? can you clarify that because apparently no one else in the white house can. >> i have not had an opportunity to have that discussion. >> you're the epa administrator. shouldn't you be able to tell the american people whether or not the president still believes that climate change is a hoax? where does he stand? >> as i indicated several times in the process, there's enough to deal with with respect to the paris agreement and mak

>> sustainable energy to climate change to global warming and the weather. people believe that something is happening to our planet and that elephant in the room is in great jeopardy. we have a panel of experts to bring to you the truth, nothing but the truth, so help me god. that's up next on the right side. >> do you take climate change seriously? >> you take everything life seriously that has element that could affect human welfare. i think one of the issues is how we debate the issue. for example we have an existing executive agreement that promiss to lower greenhouse gas emissios by 26 percent in the united states and over the next many years. but this isn't an executive agreement. we all know the obama administration has their particular perspective. this is a treaty. it's international obligation. and the way in which we ought to be debating this is through different viewpoints. the american people can watch te debates. it's not protected by executive privilege and then we can have real illumination. some deny there's any change at all and it's merely

american industry is changing.s of california, it increasingly looks like this. california was driven to embrace the power of the wind and the sun by necessity. for years, los angeles look like this. to defeat the deadly small, the state drafted the deadly small, the state drafted the toughest emission standards in america, standards now embraced by a dozen other us states. california is ona dozen other us states. california is on a different path from where president trump wants to take the country. we are not alone in this regard. most states now in the country are working hard to do things which, whether they call it climate change or not, are aimed at reducing emissions and ringing around cleaner fuels and reducing emissions and ringing around cleanerfuels and cleaner ways of moving ourselves around. and that includes china, which is now turning to california for advice on how to tackle its own pollution problem. the two up partners but also competitors in developing renewable technology. this is, i think, the

not much has changed in terms of whether we expect the fed to change or fear from its rate it down dayorybut in asia after the selloff on wall street overnight. we do have southeast asia, singapore, malaysia coming online, so let's get it over to shery ahn. did see wall street falling the most in the six weeks. we are tracking goes losses in asia as well. also, dollar weakness, a plunge did nothing,llen well mario draghi striking a hawkish town, so some pressure on asian currencies, including the yen, gaining .2%. that is pressuring equity markets, the nikkei falling .2%, the kospi falling by as much, the korean won the losing ground after four sessions of strength. one equity market that is interesting is the taiex coming back down .8%. a stellarhas had 27 yeargain of 14%, a high, but now economists at bloomberg, nine out of 11 saying the taiex could be running out of steam, so ending around this level or lower. with a weaker dollar came to boost for the metals and oil, but oil a story i will get to later. steel gaining 2.7% in asian markets. we had some optimistic comments premier li ka

several changes. one of the landmark achievements of president obama's administration was that rapprochement with cuba. it is being rolled back by the trump administration but it is definitely not completely being overruled because some of those changes would be too hard to completely repeal. david: there is a hierarchy to the events like these. marco rubio speaking to the crowd. the congressman spoke before him. kevin, you had a scoop on the bloomberg terminal, talking about the investigation of russian involvement into the u.s. election. you write about how president trump's campaign committee staff has been told to preserve a lot of the data and documents they had from the campaign. president trump tweeting that he is being investigated by authorities for firing james comey. he is calling this a witchhunt. meanwhile, rod rosenstein has also reportedly said that he may have to recuse himself from all of this, given the increasing pressure from the white house about potential conflict of interest. i

what was the purpose of the change?m was the purpose of the change? that the idea was quite sensible in that the idea was to make fire precautions more appropriate to the risk within the building. toa appropriate to the risk within the building. to a certain extent, the way the fire precautions act was applied, it was a1 size fits all. in some cases, they were not adequate and in some cases, they were over the top. the risk assessed regime is that you are fire precautions that address the risk within the building. what the fire brigade union is concerned about is that that change was used as an excuse to reduce the number of inspecting officers the fire and rescue services had. where do building materials fire safety aspects of building materials come in these new regulations? the building process, the fire safety of building process is divided into two very clear parts. the first part is the construction phase of the building. that is controlled by a building control body. when deconstruction is finished, there is an assumption that the finished buil

been climate change but there's been climate change for thousands of years.otton said today that there's no doubt that that has accelerated dramatically in the last 200 years and that man has something to do with. it look, the president has never landed in a good place hon this issue. he's clearly not comfortable with it, so i -- i'm not i've gone probing trying to predict what donald trump will say or do and i can't do it now. >> the let me go back to laura jarrett. you have an important ruling by the department of justice which potentially could affect a lot of congressional investigations. tell us more. >> that's right, wolf. this is an opinion issued from the office of legal counsel which essentially functions as the main law firm for the federal government and the president and what this directive does is it says to federal agencies all across the trump administration that they don't have to respond to inquiries from individual members of congress. oversight committees, subpoenas, that's a different ball game, but when it comes to individual inquiries or

can a story change the world? see for yourself in "viewchange, the mothers index." narrator: you've heard the term lottttery of b birth. more often t than not, children born in rich countries win it, while those in poor countries lose. a child's life expectancy, health, education and so much more hinges on where he or she happens to enter the world. but there's also a lottery of motherhood, and expectant moms in developing countries are facing the toughest odds. every year more than 350,000 women die from c complications of pregnancy and childbirth, most simply because they don't have access to basic delivery care. and the riripple effect is d dramatic. whwhen a mother dies, her children arere more likely t toe poor, more likely to dieie befoe the age of five, or to drop out of school if they survive. but private aid groups and governments are working hard to change the odds in t the lottery of motherhood. in sierra leone, a place that "s"save the children" ranks s as one of the very worst places to be a mom, a new government program is trying to turn the tide, as w

we see his statements changing. i would say there is a calculation here to read a certain kind of voter, and they will be very happy to hear what he said today. he spoke directly to them. there are people who work in places in the middle of the united states that do mining. he spoke specifically about opening mines. he really meant this a sovereignty issue. this wasn't an issue conservative republicans had brought up, they had resisted the negotiation of putting the united states in a position where it had accountability to other countries. that is how it was sold on that side of the aisle, that this agreement does not have a lot of enforcement, it was a nationally determined contribution, each individual country came up with them and was agreeing to abide by them and they can be changed. i want to note for you, you are talking about renegotiation, and there is a mechanism in the climate agreement to renegotiate. what he is leading himself in terms of options to change, to start all over or start a new agreement com

a commitment to combating climate change. push to counter president trump's recent decision to abandon the paris climate accord. what local leaders are doing. >>> in san jose, people are lining up for day two of apple's worldwide developers conference. a special guest is getting things started this morning. >>> live from the cbs bay area studios, this is kpix 5 news. >> the russians not only invaded the dnc and e-mails, the intelligence community has concluded that they wanted to elect donald trump. >> russian hackers may have tried to access voter records days before the presidential election. >> one bay area school district is poised to decide on a sex ed curriculum today. >> we need to be aware of global warming and climate change and be committed to doing something about it. >> california leaders are vowing to take the lead in the fight against climate change. >>> good morning, it's tuesday, june 6th. i'm michelle griego. >> and i'm kenny choi. >> california supervisors say they won't back down in the climate change fight

they change the pricing. they change the coverage of insurance to adapt to climate change.ifestations of climate change. make sure as supervisors that they are on top of it. in general they are very much on top of it. the fact that things roll over -- as wer makes it there will be changes in policies that have change in technology. inre will be potentially anticipation of such changes. who's going to win, who's going to lose. who's going to benefit. who's going to be penalized. if i'm allocating capital i want to have the information in order to make those judgments and i want to have some perspective soft information on who's thinking about this so i can make those qualitative judgments about management and risk management that unlocks bigger value. francine: is there a chance there's no risk? that longer-term if you don't know how to price the risk what if something is impacted but you can't actually measure it so it's very difficult for a company today to decide on how to disclose it? >> part of that goes to think -- you cannario think of various degree scenarios from a

change is a hoax. whether he believes it is real. he did not answer the question. once again, he left it to his top aides and administration officials and today it was the ea administrator scott pruitt's turn to explain what is going on inside the president's head when it comes to this question. he was struggling to provide climate cover. i tried at one point during the white house briefing earlier today press pruitt on the overwhelming scientific evidence that climate change is happening. here is what happened. >> why then is the arctic melting? why is the sea level rising? why are the temperatures in the last decade essentially the hottest temperatures we have seen on record? >> we've been in a hiatus since the late 1990s, as you know. >> when nasa says that 95% of the experts in this area around the world is what is warming and you are up there throwing out information that says well maybe this is exaggerated and so forth and you talked about climate exaggerators, it just seems to a lot of people ar

if the law is not changed.urrent law only allows for a specific preventative healthcare services and cancer screenings for tricare beneficiaries. this amendment would also cover childcare through age 17 along with women's preventative services and screenings gestational diabetes. this amendment is about providing our servicemembers with the same health services as those covered under the affordable care act and that we as members of congress enjoy today. >> unfortunately, due to sequential referral issues, i will be withdrawing this amendment by but i look forward to debating it on the floor. ideal back mister chair. >> the amendment is withdrawn, further amendments, gentle lady from california. >>. >>. >> i have an amendment to the desk. >> clerk will distribute the amendment without objection, the amendment is considered as read. >> thank you mr. chairman.. the 4.6 million women who receive healthcare through the department of defense are not second-class citizens. yes, these women are currently receiving hea

chang kai-shek. because at that time, the nationalist party that had grown basically the same party. it was the left wing and the right wing of the party. beingbeing the right, joe the left. but they were training young officers to build the new chinese army, the chinese republican army. this is how it starts straight shank i scheck has gone to military high school in japan, visited the soviet union. -- starts. kai-shek is going to military high school in japan, visited the soviet union. one of chang kai-shek's sons, will basically replace him when he dies as the head of taiwan, is sent to live in the soviet union. marry a russian lady and stay there more than a decade. he will eventually come back, not particularly friendly with his father until later. so, chang kai-shek will eventually kick the soviet advisers out because he does not appreciate the way they want to do the political training among the troops. and so, he will kick them out. and then he will bring in the germans. will promise to build

>> he could change some regulations. but obviously, to change laws, you've got to do it in congress. and the changes in the way we shop, the changes in the way we build commuting infrastructure, those are too big and they're moving already i don't think any small legislator or even regulatory changes will disrupt those types of things. amazon is a clear leader in both of those things. >> let's turn to f.a.n.g granted, over the past month or so, it's been a little bit of a rougher ride for technology investors, but outside of f.a.n.g., do you see a lot of values f.a.n.g. gets a bad rap in that it could be a crowded trade, a passive money, where else are you looking? >> we're looking against these big secular changes. i talk about them as disruptive changes or generational shifts honestly, the way we shop, the way we drive the way we communicate the way we socialize the way we use computers all of these things have changed in a massive way and the businesses today are way better they have direct connections their users, th

you are saying that change man has affected climate change. and that the discussion is about what we do with it, not whether or not we've affected it, so going forward, that's resolved. >> no, what i said was climate's changing, always has. man at this point in time is having an effect on it. how much is what's at debate here and more importantly, what is the united states going to do to affect that, are we going to sign an agreement somebody that really doesn't call anybody to making any changes? you look at what china and india are required to do and they're nothing. how many coal plants? 300 plus coal plants we built in india. so, i mean, why would we sign on to an agreement that is not holding other people to account and asking us to give $3 billion, that's the first anti. and the trump administration said that's nonsense. now, can we gree we ought to have a con ver sigs as a people, intelle intellectually engaged, not standing up in speeches saying you're a climate denier. when the fact is, i want to have a conversation about this. >> isn

welcome to on contact today we discuss the geo political ramifications of climate change with author christian parental how the people adapt to climate change how they adapt to the droughts floods very often the way as you pick up the surplus weaponry and you go after your neighbors cattle or you blame it on your neighbors ideology or ethnicity. with chris hedges. greater and greater parts of the globe are becoming uninhabitable because of soaring temperatures declining crop yields droughts and rising sea levels governments and infrastructures are collapsing into failed states millions of climate refugees are already flame the chaos and violence of the global south this exodus which is just the start has already created the greatest refugee crisis in europe since world war two there are profound political ramifications caused by climate change extremist right wing parties here and in europe conflate migrants with terrorism they twist the ecological crisis into a clash of civilizations xenophobia and hate crimes are on the rise borders are militarized walls are built police the border

all five have said they're open to changing their minds if changes are made.y they're hopeful they will be able to get the 50 votes n needed >> i share many of the but we have to deal with the art of the possible. it's not going to be something we're going to like, standing alone, but i think this is the best we've been able to with the hand we've been dealt >> a lot of republicans are also waiting to hear the congressional budget offices and analysis of the bill expected on monday and will include how much it cost and how it will impact insurance coverage and premiums inform washington, i'm garrett tenney, fox news. >>> meanwhile, president trump is set to host two more world leader from south korea and indiana in the coming days. >>> sunday, muslims world wide celebrate eaves known as the festival of breaking of the fast. observers will honor the tradition by participating in prepare rituals and giving donations to the less fortunate. president trump is set to host the prime minister of indiana at the white house. they will discuss w strengthen ties, tuesday

crisis in europe since world war two there are profound political ramifications caused by climate change extremist right wing parties here and in europe conflate migrants with terrorism they twist the ecological crisis into a clash of civilizations xenophobia and hate crimes are on the rise borders are militarized walls are built police the border police and the immigration and customs enforcement carry out reigns of terror against those who lack legal documents r t correspondent on your profile looks at how climate change is increasing tensions between the global north and the global sell. and climate change to be an issue of national security even according to our military the answer is yes of course never mind the fact the pentagon itself is actually the largest polluter in the united states that's because wherever our military and multinational corporations go environmental devastation follows what have we pushed the global underclass too far the nine hundred ninety nine protest against the world trade organization in seattle shocks the press when americans from around the country ga

we are seeing very encouraging changes but we have to change faster.rudy dornbusch, he once said things take longer to happen and you think it will and then they happen much faster than you think they could. if the paris agreement was the successful effort to send the signal, this train is leaving the station, everybody on board. the u.s. should be on board. states and cities and businesses are on board, if we had the president onboard an end good policy we could move even faster. >> chris: i will fact-checking. after your movie came out in 2006 2006 you made the following comments as part of our publicity for the movie. you said unless we took "drastic measures, the world would reach a point of no return within ten years and you called it a true planetary emergency." 11 years later, for it around? >> vice pres. gore: we have seen a decline in emissions on a global basis. for the first time they've stabilized and started to decline. some of the responses of the last ten years have helped. unfortunately, and regrettably, a lot of serious damage has been

the news people have to change. our government has to change. the people will follow. host: diane, thanks for the call this morning. mary is in gettysburg, pennsylvania. line for republicans. go ahead, mary. caller: yeah. i am on the line for republicans although i do -- at this point i don't care if you're a republican, democrat or independent. this has got to stop. this has got to stop. i've been telling friends and neighbors for months and months all this stuff, news media and the false news and different things, somebody is going to get hurt in this. why don't they calm down and do their job as democrats and republicans or whoever in congress? why don't they just do their job and stop battling with each other? democrats won't help the republicans or vice versa, whatever. it's ridiculous. this country is better than that. this country is better than that. and i don't know. i don't know what to say except this has got to stop. when people are putting hits of presidents up -- it's beyond the pale. whoever did that, whether they were republican or democrat or independe

is quote, signed of education and confronting climate change. this one-hour portion of the debate includes remarks from several leaders from the european union, including a climate change minister and european party leaders. [speaking foreign language] >> dear colleagues. the paris agreement has been a historical achievement of the international community. the first ever global commitment to address climate change and its consequences. while we regret the decision by the united states of america, administration, to withdraw from this agreement -- our long-standing commitment and determination for global action on climate change must not relent. we europeans, we will not miss the opportunity that the paris agreement represents for our citizens, our planet, our economy. taking this global challenge, working with industries for new investments and technologies and more sustainable growth and jobs. european parliament has been at the forefront of climate action within the european union. today, there is an important vote on this. our growth -- certi

that has not changed. those agreements still are valid.till have diplomatic relations and in fact, the restrictions that were lifted on how much rum and cigars americans can bring back, those restrictions were not reimposed so americans can continue bringing back as much as they did before. i remember clearly how president obama was made fun of by some for having lifted those restrictions, but president trump decided to continue that policy as well. host: as best you are able to tell, how do you think this has been received in cuba? guest: i think the cuban government, as expected, made some statements as a reaction but in the end it has been kind of moderate. they do not want to seem to overreact to what president trump said yesterday outside of what the official statements have been. in my view, they will wait a little longer to see how the implementation of this works because we are still waiting to hear or see the regulatory changes that will lead to the implementation of what the president announced yesterday with respect to travel. i

i know the climate is changing.he question is, what role does man play in that change and that's where there's disagreement, number one. and number two, what man can do about it is also even more of a challenge because most of it is -- austin talks about all of these countries that have volunteered to reduce emissions. well, of course that's not true. china is increasing their missions and is going to increase their emissions and most of the third world under this agreement is going to increase their emissions and the only one that has really agreed to, wrongly, in my opinion, to hamper their economy and hamstring their economy by dramatically reducing is the united states. bad deal. >> austin, your response? >> well, look, factually that's not correct on either count. a, as a scientist, i do not believe that senator santorum is very good. he's not describing what the scientific findings have been. it doesn't take a ph.d. to figure out if you smoke you're more likely to get lung cancer. if you emit carbon pollution

>> our expectations are little changed. projections we released today are essentially identical to those the market is aware of the , formingparticipants their own views, it is important the market take an independent look. we begin to understand how market participants are interpreting evidence on the evidence of the economy. it is not unhealthy to have such a cap. views are not set in stone but are likely to involve as well over time. >> back in 2013, when the fed first rate -- rated the possibility of trimming bond purchases, it created turbulence , the taper tantrum, caused you to reassess your communication this trimming of the bond holding, though the financial seem to be taking that . you see there is more of an adverse reaction, are you planning to make any changes, the $20 billion cap's, how do you assess how you will handle that going forward? >> we have indicated for quite some time, at least since our 2014 principles, that we wanted in aduce the balance sheet gradual and unpredictable way. we have tried systemat