mr. delaney. ly he had his back to the window so he may not have known what had ever hit. >> johan delaney was inside, i'm not necessarily sure he was sitting. it is possible he could have seen someone outside, it's possible he he didn't. we may never know that. the gunfire was loud. two rapid fire bursts heard by numerous witnesses living by the home along the river, itself gunman escaping into the night. in the minutes that followed no one reported seeing any boats on the river or even anyone running from the scene. those perplexing loomed large especially in the days to come. the motive is obviously the biggest thing we start to look into. it's very difficul when you're dealing with someone who has been retired for to his backyard and is also involved in the community. if the police were mystified, johan's family was stunned beyond belief. that's an understatement. we are shocked this is surreal. we don't understand. we don't have any idea who or why anyone would want to do this to johan. in onl

mr. delaney. apparently he had his back to the window so he may not have known whatever hit him.cessarily sure he was sitting it's possible he could have seen outside. it's possible he didn't. we may never know that the gunfire was loud, two rapid fire bursts heard by numerous witnesses living by the home a long the river, the gunman escaping into the night. in the minutes that followed no one reported seeing any boats on the river or anyone running from the scene. the most per question looms long, especially in the days to come. the motive is what we start to look into. it's very difficult when you're dealing with someone who has been 20 years and spends most of his time in the backyard and is also involved in the community. johan's family was stunned beyond belief. that is an understatement. we are shocked this is surreal. we don't understand. we don't have any want to do that th to johan. in only the second interview granted by the family sues i delaney said her father father-in-law had no enemies and his vicious murder has left them friented and confused that's why she agreed

mr. delaney. mr. delaney: mr. chairman, during the financial crisis 19 of the 20 largest financial institutions required a bailout or significant investment by the taxpayers. clearly reform was needed and dodd-frank was that reform. since dodd-frank, consumer protections have improved materially. the banking system is safer and more sound and our banks and markets have far outpaced their international competitors. dodd-frank is working. is it a perfect piece of legislation? of course not. any time congress does something large and transforms an entire industry, we should sign up as a body for 10 years of fixes, which is what we have not done and let the american people down. are we fixing dodd-frank today? no. we are pursuing a misguided, time consuming repeal effort. i urge my colleagues to reject the choice act and urge my republicans to work with democrats on bipartisan reforms to dodd-frank that build on its strength and solve and improve weaknesses in the legislation. i yield back. the chair: the gentleman yi

mr. delaney. mr. delaney: mr. chairman, during the financial crisis 19 of the 20 largest financial institutions required a bailout or significant investment by the taxpayers. clearly reform was needed and dodd-frank was that reform. since dodd-frank, consumer protections have improved materially. the banking system is safer and more sound and our banks and markets have far outpaced their international competitors. dodd-frank is working. is it a perfect piece of legislation? of course not. any time congress does something large and transforms an entire industry, we should sign up as a body for 10 years of fixes, which is what we have not done and let the american people down. are we fixing dodd-frank today? no. we are pursuing a misguided, time consuming repeal effort. i urge my colleagues to reject the choice act and urge my republicans to work with democrats on bipartisan reforms to dodd-frank that build on its strength and solve and improve weaknesses in the legislation. i yield back. the chair: the gentleman yi

mr. delaney is recognized for five minutes. >> thank you, mr. chairman. i want to thank you for holding this hearing on obviously a very important issue that affects all of our districts. as mr. dewine said, this is in every community in the country. and the fact that you've assembled such a terrific group of witnesses, i'm grateful for that. in particular i want to thank mr. dewine for what he's doing in holding the pharmaceutical industry accountable. you'll make them pay like other people will. and that won't solve the problem, but it's the right thing to do, and it will send a message that we're going to start thinking about these things differently. we believe in a capitalistic system in this country, i certainly do, but we want it to be just at some level. efforts like you're doing will help make that happen. it's fairly obvious what needs to happen. the witnesses have eloquently covered it here today. whether we have the conviction is another question. the steps mr. dewine is taking are obviously incredibly important. making sure we manage ourselve

mr. delaney is recognized for five minutes. >> thank you, mr. chairman. i want to thank you for holdingi this hearing unobvious every important issue that affects all of our districts. this is in every community in the country, and the fact you have a civil such a terrific group of witnesses i'm gratefulr for the period in a particular want to thank mr. dewine for what he is doing in holding the pharmaceutical industry tha accountable. peopll make them pay like other people will, and that will not solve the problem but it's the right thing to do and it will send a message that we will start thinking about these differently. we believe in a capitalist system in this country.to i do but we wanted to be just at some level that efforts like what you're doing help make that happen. it's obvious what we need to do and the witnesses have covered it here today.happen whether we have the commitment and conviction to do is a question, but the steps that mr. dewine is taking are incredibly important, making sure we manage ourselves to the situation by having the hea

mr. rosenstein would be dangerous. ken delaney, ruth marcus a columnist with the walk post, "new york times" jeremy peters and reporting from the washington post alan entess. try to figure out what the police chief bleep trump is up to. why would he put his direction in rosenstein, who is a career servant, why is he focusing the attack and anger on him? >> chris, i don't know. that tweet seems to me as a primal tweet of frustration. it may, though, have the effect of putting pressure on rosenstein to recuse, which would put this in the hand of rachel brand, the number three at the state department. chris, donald trump would have to fire all 14,000 fbi agents and even then, he'd still have congress to deal with. he kaptd fire them. so it's not clear what the strategy here is, beyond donald trump's immense frustratestration with this thing. >> second, why would he feel the need personally to recuse himself if trump keeps the heat on him? rosenstein? >> well, that wouldn't been the direct reason, that adds to pressure t. real reason