mr. rushdie: it was one-sided. mr. continetti: as a practitioner, we have heard about standards and practices from two people, how do you suss out the truth? what should reporters be doing? my day-to-day is trying to find some new bit of information and then confirming the information. it can be something very small, a panelnot have to be of papers. my background is in document digging and investigative reporting. i find that much more -- i feel like i am on firmer ground when i'm dealing with public records and investigative reporters. they confirm some sort of drama i the white house because find comfort in that factual basis for the things that i write. --i think to the degree access journalism, there is a proud tradition of that in american politics. and bernstein had their anonymous sources, obviously. but i think that grounding whatever you are writing in fact, that sounds obvious to say that, but rather the end and speculation by a apolitical staff with an ax to grind, i search for something concrete that i can