the idea being that the lottery proceeds go to promote education. every american state in 1900 prohibited gambling. some states even prohibited the publication that somebody won the lottery in other countries. it was a federal crime to transport lottery tickets across state lines. every state suppressed and put down gambling. this is the legitimate function of government, to try to remove the temptation of vice that will allow people to improve their morals. likewise, every american church condemned artificial contraception until about 1930, i think it was the episcopalian s who were the first to accept the use of contraception, for married couples anyways. it was not until the 1960's where every state had repealed laws that prohibited the dispensing and use of contraceptives. the catholic church was the only holdout. the supreme court swept away the last of those laws prohibiting the use and dispensing of contraception. congress tried to help this through various laws known as the comstock act. anthony comstock was the principal 19th-century crusad

host: does it end the idea of too big to fail, that dodd frank, was sort of a centerpiece of dodd frankguest: i think their theory of the way to tackle too big to fail is that congress needs to stand a firm line that they will never bail out big banks, and it removes the powers that were in place after the crisis to allow bear .tearns to fail if you have congress and the president commit firmly that they will never bail out the banks and thus we do not need , but theer protections part of that is i do not think george w. bush thought they wanted to bailout banks in 2006 and 2007 yet they started doing it once the crisis happened. host: the choice act was passed this week, a little under the radar because some other things were happening in washington. tell us a little bit about what that does, what specific areas of the dodd frank legislation does this act, the choice act undo? guest: one of them is a pretty massive overhaul, this -- the consumer financial protection bureau. it brings up the authority to enforce certain types of actions so they would have a much more fragmented enforcem

guest: the idea of safety is paramount here. it is the primary goal of this that it would improve safety as it improves navigation. feel u.s.people who itspace, being as large as is with the safety record as good as it is, is something you don't want to mess with. there are a lot of different opinions about that. gen, no far as next power is operating under this system. that is my understanding. for arlines have asked delay in the implementation as it is said to be rolled out, even under the faa. aircraft won't be ready for it by 2020, by the implementation deadline the faa has set. host: how long has the effort been made? guest: a long time. next jan has been underway and has been a long stretch. in faa is over budget implementing it. ohio, dave, on our line for others. caller: i heard you talk about you were not sure about staffing. i was in the marine corps air 12,hing and everyone worked 16, 18 hours a day, whatever was needed. werenly people who did not air traffic controllers. anyone ad not give break, except for air traffi

person, is the idea of the dangerous black community and i think we see how dangerous this idea is and the way it operates in the minds of police officers who when they see these so-called dangerous people or they enter into these dangerous communities, they -- they're trigger fipger is a lot closer than when they're in other communities and i think this idea is based on misleading statistics or it's based on ideas that only when we think about the most dangerous neighborhoods we only think about homicides. we don't think like other thickses like drunk driving, to give you an example. more people die of drunk driving than they do homicides. we have studies that sometimes show that white men are more likely to drink and drive and kill people than other racial groups but those communities with those high levels of drunk drivers are not considered to be dangerous, right, because our danger and blackens. and i think we should reimagine and, i think, what neighborhoods are truly the most dangerous by actually bringing in many different factors. i don't think we should just reduce it to thos

that is the best idea. outsourcing has taken over this country. as a result of that, we have to help citizens survive. katherine: almost all of the colors including jeff keep coming back to the same idea that we are experiencing some kind of shift in employment, either outsourcing or technology is changing the underlying availability of jobs. something needs to be done about that. there is not a ton of evidence that is fundamentally true. there is things to do to encourage job creation that are unrelated to universal basic income. we should not have an extremely high minimum wage. but i think this anxiety and fear that people don't have resources to raise children is printed in part --bred in part of that people have loopholes, confusion, they don't know what they will be eligible for in the future. , lot of the appeals is that all the way back to tom paine, it is the way we could simplify, say listen, they are people and have fundamental needs. they need basic resources. the trouble is in washington 2017, things getting simpler is a bit of a pipe

david: the idea, bruce, you have to pay for it with certain things. bill clinton didn't buy that, he went ahead with a dramatic cut in the capital gains tax from 28% down to 20% and look what happened. the revenue increased dramatically after the cap gains tax was cut. a major increase in revenue. you cut tax rates and you get more government revenue. >> well, i think the problem is concerned here, and donald's tax cuts would blow a hole in the deficit. i think that paul ryan gave a little bit of a forecast here when he said that, whether the president asked flynn to drop this investigation, he said something about-- this president was all new to this. i think you should go all small ball here because the president is all new to this and i don't think he can handle a big tax cut. david: well, e-mack, ronald reagan didn't go small, he went hardball and got big tax cuts in and during the period after which those tax cuts kicked in, again, you had this dramatic 54% increase in revenue. you don't have to worry, fret about all of this pay for stuff. >> righ

i love the idea of the product. you define it by your expectation.ve in it and you made me feel emotionally connected to it. a short time to make that point. you talked about the need for the money. >> give us the number. >> i love the idea. i love the way you presented it. >> thank you so much. >> all right. good from him. peter. >> i am lactose intolerant. i always been the one who suffers. it is still ice cream. i'll deal with it later. the later self hates the earlier self. i like the fact you know your numbers. i love when people have come and done their homework. you know the product and market. i'll give you a nine. a seven. i want you to work harder on presentation in terms of the things you say and how you say them. you did your homework. that is easily resolved. >> if i could add my two cents. this is amazing. it tastes so good. they are taking theirs back. congratulations. best of luck. i also love the packaging. thank you for your great advice. >> mooo! >>> all of you out there, if you love to common "your business" and pitch your product

the moon. he had some very good ideas. it is hard to guess will they appoint a new darpa director and who makes a good darpa director? the ones who have been good, roy johnson, the first one was powerful in creating agency, and the mess of vietnam, hard to guess what makes a good darpa director, someone with a broader vision, beyond science and technology, i will think about the problems of warfare and how we solve that warfare. >> the big project, has darpa anticipated the russian hacking and misinformation campaigns all over the world. >> i don't think darpa anticipated it, the irony is that the internet, the creation of darpa has led to this new way of warfare. it is part of the problem. that should be a program. that should be a problem darpa could tackle, something of that scale. i am sure darpa has little programs on the side but thinking of this as a major threat i don't see darpa doing that today. to tackle problems that are really changing warfare like that. is it connected -- [inaudible question] >> i think the na

he was not as involved in the rollout. it is his idea, but they did not treat him very well at the end. amy: how did they know each other? book onbuchanan's which unrest in 1969 to koch reprinted. they got to know each other then. charles koch joined a society, which many of your listers will familiar with, in 1970 and advertise for all of his functions and his organizations and his talent pipelines and recruitment efforts -- amy: and that is? >> in invitation-only society by what some people would call free-market fundamentalists launched in 1947. it has spread to the entire world now. it is invitation only and economists, corporate officials, many leading operatives of the koch-find a network. it is a very significant body. the society meeting setting of these ideas were discussed and strategies were developed to implement, from what i've been able to pick up in the documentary trail. koch and b can begin again to cooperate particularly in the 1970's as koch was launching the cato institute. got to know each other over the years.s. buc

the idea that those kinds of police regulation were legitimate. it was something that the government did do. this is a difference between temperance and prohibition. the victorians generally try to prohibit alcohol on together. into the 19th and early 20th they took a constitutional amendment to do it. the whole nation adopted briefly rob bishop. toh the -- regards prostitution, the victorians held to a sexual double standard. david lee that males have more of a sex drive than females did. prostitution was an outlet that you needed males to have. the thing to do about prostitution was to establish a red light district where prostitution would be limited and regulated rather than try to do away with them altogether. before world war i, every major american city used to have a district where prostitutes were available. people would tell stories that this was the case in hillsdale, michigan. you would hear but -- stories about buildings downtown where prostitution was because it was legally tolerated. the progressives held to a stricter standard than

get, because the idea thatitis uk does not get, because the idea that it is in brussels' interest toal deal, that is not something that european partners would agree with. they say the most important thing is to keep the european union together, and a way that you do that is by not giving any party special deal because then everyone will ask for it. but their trade with us will concentrate some minds. any trade deal with us would not be unique, they have two negotiate them at all countries outside the eu. indeed, and it is important to understand that there are 27 other nations here. tom is right, they agree on an awful lot of stuff but there will be times when they have to sell it to their electorate that they're giving us a very bad deal, but at the same time one of those countries that is remaining in the european union is the republic of ireland, does have a land border with us, it has a lot of trade with us, and it has to at least look as if it is getting an ok deal out of this. and the dup, of course, will have a say in the kind of brexit. they don't want a hard brexit because

it's cash flow. >> david soon came around to the idea. after all, it was more environmentally friendly, and the wine would always be fresh. >> for me, as a winemaker, it makes sense. you have the avant-garde. >> it turns out the new plan was better than the original one. >> we started putting it in stainless steel beer kegs and started tapping wine. in the beginning, it started to work. when we put it behind barrel heads and really dressed it up, all of a sudden, it started to fly. it became a home run. our wine by the glass became 70% of our wine sales, and we're, wow, the margins are way better than selling it by the barrel to bankers. let's sell it by the glass to our patrons at a much better margin. >> city winery was way ahead of the curve. the authenticity of the place with its steel fermenting tanks and oak barrels with your favorite wines just a few feet away made it so much more than your typical wine bar. and that dovetailed perfectly with their other offering, music. >> musically, what's happening is very exciting. ten years ago

the u.s. is not friendly to so many ideas that causes people to leave. ut that power of coming back and that is the idealism one of the most beautiful places on north. >> and then to prepare nothing is going on. and then with the civil rights movement. but then to stay away so on the one hand so what should be the function? and then to get involved in the social movements. but then baldwin house to come home and then he would just sit back and watch. >> then that comes back to the film why it has to be the way that it has to be. so watching in those pleasures of the complexity and that could be immensely pleasurable. >> so talk about art my favorite favorite right team is this one but it is only in his music the negro in america that is right nobody should ever say so go to new itunes and then tour take very seriously so a? thought on that?. >> but he was introduced in this gets him company the music was something with the spirit and the strength in the cultural production to say it is the american identity with the prophetic vision so with that character

king the king transitions it's because for me i love the idea of making stuff on the spot when i saw for the first time at the upright citizens brigade theater in new york i went and it was four chairs people came out with absolutely nothing nothing prepared and the fact that they could create an entire show in front of me and make an audience of it's a small it's a one hundred twenty people laugh was i thought it was beautiful and i loved it so much and the idea that you failed together or succeed together i think differentiates it from stand it was incredibly hard an incredible as well but i love that idea you've written a book about dating or you or bad it. some to learning from you still date yes of course ever going close to marriage not close to marriage but i've i've i have been with people that i cared about a great deal of the book is called things you should already know about dating and it's all it spurred from the idea of i was dating someone and i kind of realize that there's some chivalrous stuff that is lost between generations and money ols now may not know these thin

the worldview of the federal government embodies this zero-sum idea. it embodies this broken windows id. the border wall to me is the most, this little manifestation of broken windows. >> host: how so? >> guest: i think broken windows at some point at some of the appeal of broken windows is about sort of the fear, this neurotic fear about unraveling and penetration and like the jungle reclaiming the civilized spot. what is more literally a manifestation of that then you are physically the rebuild a border keep out the disorder? and not only that, sell that the people who live 1500 miles from the border. like, what do they care? think about the people that cheered that mexico would build the wall. keekeith at a rally in michigan, okay? he's 100 miles from the northern border. he is however many hundreds of miles, thousands of miles from the southern port and people cheering like they will build a wall on the southern border, like what do you care? what does that do to your life? what it does in the same kind of broken windows way, in that same sort of fe

neil: they are recoiling at the idea, a heartless one. >> this is a program rife with waste, fraud and abuse every single year. what you would do is set these programs to be successful, not to have the waste, fraud and abuse, then talk about what else needs to be done. these are not working the way they intended. you tell me i'm should be going on medicaid, no. it is a disaster. i don't have choices in terms of doctors, the outcomes are terrible. the idea we would expand the program that wasn't working in the first place doesn't make sense. >> medicaid covered 1% of the american public, 40%, even on percentage terms it is not sustainable. >> i believe 70 million people right now, a sheer impossibility. the same thing that happens through the history of government. when they start something it never ends and start growing and keeps growing, the biggest bull market in history is in our government and its programs, the problem is so much inefficiency and ineffectiveness, if you try to do anything about it. >> are republicans going to change it? just grows government more slowly but it is

that socialist idea, i've been a member of the democratic of america and for me these ideas, the moral and ethical idea and the core of the socialist project, the idea that we should live in a world without exploitation and oppression, these are ideas that should have appeal beyond the 5 or 6,000 people in discussion of the idea. even at a time of historic defeat, we are trying to evangelicallize and try to win liberals with vision and purpose . at first it was online magazine, utter failure. my first day we had 636 visitors on the site and the reason i went to print, i figured it would make it -- >> how many of them were your mother? >> my mother and my aunt. refreshers throughout the day a little bit. so my thinking was that i needed an actual revenue mechanism and that doubled down and continued to fail for a while but no one was really watching. .. and this kind of narrative that we have two more deeply understand the trump voter and the democratic party. >> so i actually have only read about half of that and it seemed to me at least from that half, again for me that's basically wh

negro in america is the story of america. and this ideaere is a cloud of witnesses and what we are doing as witnesses to this story and then also the last one i will just lay out there which i would like you to if anyone would want to take it on is this idea as baldwin is speaking in his persona he is saying we would like a black face to be blank if it is not white. when asked why is this film different is he is playing the responsibility on us. we can rushlow -- no longer watch. we must be part of the history. how would you do that? i think there are mics in the audience. please come to the microphone if you have a thought or question for these two experts. [inaudible question] >> in african-american literature in the '20s this is written. one of the basis for this animosity was his review. uncle tom's cabin put this tradition right and baldwin condemns the excessive sentiment that it is the confusion of just trying to arouse emotion. and baldwin was disconnected from the cushening and he is just talking about planes and stringing up and

rather than testing an idea on the whole country. we've learned to test ideas, good ideas or not good ideas, on the states. those interested in the single payor, that might be an approach we try in a couple of states. see how it works. maybe it's a good idea. maybe we shouldn't do it at all. >> but you're not ready to experiment on the federal left yet is what you're saying? >> states right from our creation as a country. great laboratories in democracy. let use them. >> tom carper, a frequent gang member and that's not a critique when it comes to the united states senate. thanks very much for coming on. >> thanks so much. >> we'll see you later this sunday alongside your colleague louisiana senator bill cassidy. the two of them will be on together to talk about health care. more on the fate of health care. and later the white house's obsession with attacking the press. this is a story about mail and packages. and it's also a story about people and while we make more e-commerce deliveries to homes than anyone else in the country, we n

the idea that you're sitting there literally making him a madam it objects part of a regime not just these airplanes that are run by the syrian government however you feel about that that's what it is and this is an act of aggression towards them even if they bomb the people that you're giving arms and money to. government foreign governments plain property human being so you just did if we did that or somebody did that to us we would be at war with grabbing bombs all over the country what's been the u.s. response to the incident the chairman of the joint chiefs of staff general joseph dunford stated during a speech on monday at the national press club said quote i'm confident that we're still communicating between our operation center and the russian federation operations center and i'm also confident that our forces have the capability to take care of us pentagon spokesman captain jeff davis told the washington times that we do not seek conflict with any party in syria other than isis but we do not hesitate to defend ourselves and our partners if threatened and that's the problem th

, by challenging the racist ideas that were underlying them. ou write very poignantly in the prolog to "stamped in the beginning," i somehow managed to write this book between heartbreaks of trayvon martin and boyd and michael brown and freddie gray and the charleston nine and heartbreaks that are a product of america's history of racist ideas as much as the history book of racist ideas is a product of these heartbreaks. young black males were 21 times more likely to be killed by police than their white counterparts between 2010 and 2012 according to federal statistics. d you go on to say the underrecorded, underanalyzed racial disparities of women victims of police force may be greater. federal data shows the median wealth of white household is a staggering 13 times the median wealth of black households and black people are five times more likely to be incarcerated than whites. talk more about this. ibram: amy, this is since the beginning of the united states, since the beginning of colonial america, there has been what's called racial disparit

and the republicans failed to come up with a better idea. they asked me my reaction to this news from senator o'connell it's not jubilation, it's frankly relief, relief for the 22 million americans who will not lose their health insurance because of republican plan putting -- including 1 million my state of illinois and people who face dramatic increases in the premiums for health insurance relief from my rural hospitals in downstate illinois the heart of the red section of her state that voted strongly for donald trump. these were the hospitals that were in danger according to the hospital hospital association of cutting back their services and their employees and maybe some of them even closing. i feel some relief. i don't think this party is over. think we are going to address this issue and should from this point forward. as summer -- it isn't based as senator schumer said on the bill that was introduced. this is not some fine wine that turns better with age. turn sour and the reason is people come to understand what's included in this re

colin talked about the idea of something triggering and it suddenly coming back and shaney talked about the same thing, so the idea that you can come back at that point is really important. that didn't happen with me. i came back for counselling after eight years when i then felt ready in myself and ithen when i then felt ready in myself and i then recognised i still had pdst symptoms. i have very bad memory now which i now understand comes from the fact when you have experienced trauma you can actually experience memory loss to take away what you we nt memory loss to take away what you went through, but that can also wipe out a tonne of other memories before that occasion and it was only when i started recognising other symptoms coming forward that i went back and againi coming forward that i went back and again i went to the back of the waiting listment i waited again before i got seen. i had 12 sessions and when my councillor suggested another 12 because he was no longer going to be working in that area, he was moving, he said to be honest, i think you're going to end up back again a

that's the found idea of rugged individualism. we want a country where we are free to make the key decisions about our lives. so, of course, declaration of independence, as we know very well, talks about individual rights, how the king -- how king george abused people's individual rights, and how that really that was the purpose of founding this country, was so that people could pursue, life, liberty, pursue happiness. these were the individual rights they wanted protected in this country. and the constitution, the companion document, is very much drafted toward protecting individualism. and i speak in part, of course, of the first ten amendments, the bill of rights, a list of individual rights that the drafters of the constitution thought needed to be protected mostly from the danger of their own government, but there are also parts in the main body of the constitution that are very much about protecting individual rights there are checks and balances. there are balances of power. separation odd of power, all 0 keep the government

the idea of the individual mandate. to providead coverage for their employees. the last provision was one that if you are a health care insurer and you want to stop you can't do that. that turned out to be a big part of the foundation of the affordable care act. the stuff that my republican friends are most critical of, it is their stuff. go figure. everything i do i know i can do better. the affordable care act could be better. worth of0 days hearings, roundtables, discussions. over 300 amendments were offered, half by republican colleagues that were adopted. a perfect process, but very much an open process. concerns me these days is that this process is closed. with senior democrats chairing the committee, if you see something, say something. you see something about the wese bill you don't like, don't know what the republicans are working on now. it's just not an open process. important,hat is hundreds of american people, and this is something we shouldn't do as republicans, or frankly, as democrats. go it it g go alone. if you want to go far, go together. if

at some level there is a core kernel truth in the sense that they bury an idea of a monopoly on. [inaudible] it is the case that what the state does at its most essential for existential level is to arrogate to itself the ability to arbitrate disputes and to monopolize violence. so, a place like somalia in the midst of the state is incapable of extending any rights. without a functioning state, right but it also seems like a really low bar. >> host: i thought given some of what you say in the book you would have study quality. given our values it seems like, there have been a point in american history where that has been a champion as during civil war with abraham lincoln for instance. >> guest: i guess i don't i reject the idea of what a first civil right is. i guess what i would say is the most charitable version of that argument on the other side is that equality would be impossible under conditions of warlordism, which is true. true, right, you have to essentially produce you need the basic to produce the kind of pushing. he or she committed a crime or broke the community's ar

who we don't really know what they wrote leave the country to the idea i was right listen the the idea that overthrowing dictators is is a mistake is a very sensible idea doesn't surprise i mean i'm not particularly. you know bothered by this i testified before the us senate against the war in iraq or in two thousand and three i did say that if you remove saddam hussein you get and the key civil war and not democracy i was. not only ali by the way but the second should be friends mr gates was a ganster of the attack on the daffy in libya believing the americans actually listened to the talents and the talents said that if you remove gadhafi you don't get democracy you get our hundred tribes fighting each other for ever and that's what we have in libya so in other words where we have discovered between moscow and washington we have learned something in the muslim world you either have the faith to ship or anarchy therefore i don't think there is any interest in the movie any more dictators the problem is syria is that makes it hard hard to be critical you told me back in two thousand an

but it are worries me less than-- you know, it worries me less than the idea of collusion. ng lies coming directly from the press secretary. it worries me less than the president claiming the former f.b.i. director is a liar. there are things that worry me much more. and i think it's something to be considered as a whole that we just have to make sure that we are questioning what we're accepting, and we have to just remember that it's our job to be curious citizens and just take back the power as much as we can, and to resist. ( cheers and applause ) >> stephen: revolutionary leader. congratulations. you're wonderful in the show. >> thank you so much. >> stephen: and the show is briltd and challenging. "1984" opens on broadway june 22. olivia wilde, everybody. we'll be right back with eddie izzard. doto be our next spokesperson?m seems like a good fit. but he's so boring. i'm yawning just talking about him. well it's our job to change that. uh guys. i think he can hear us. hm. sounds like you're on the fence. why don't i just leave you my resume? yes, it's laminated. no than

and we look at the int intellectual ideas. let me try this again. take off my giant watch to keep track of thierm and go back a moment in history. individualism was very much planted i would say inamerica's dna at the founding. chesterton said america was the only nation founded on part of a creed and part of the creed of america's founding was individualims. i would say if there is nothing else you remember about individualism this describes it right here. the founders of this country no longer wanted to important decisions about their lives to be made by churches or kings or queens or the social class end of which you were born but they wanted to make the key decisions of their own lives as individuals. that was the founding idea, if you will, of rugged individu individualism. we want a country where we are free to make the key decisions about our lives. so the declaration of independence talks about individual rights. how king george abused people's individual rights and that was the purpose of founding this country was so p

so, on the broad idea, they certainly were right but they were wrong in some of the details.cause of the way the law was implemented and because of the supreme court decision that allowed states to not expand medicaid. so, there were some questions about the execution of the bill that the cbo could not have foreseen. >> we're going to find out how that score affects the vote count, if at all, in the coming days ylan, we'll talk to you soon ylan mui in washington david? >>> shares of sprint up, shares of t-mobile and verizon down first reported by "the wall street journal" late yesterday or last night that charter and comcast, the two large cable companies that have their own cooperation agreement when it comes to their wireless strategy are in talks with sprint about a wireless agreement that would involve the two companies signing what we call an mvno agreement, mobile virtual network operation agreement that might be fairly generous in terms and might be fairly all encompassing in a way that is not the case currently with the deal that both those companies have in place and

but tragically, we may be growing used to the idea of terror abroad. although its root causes are different than those domestic political attacks here on our own shores, the same thing is at stake. the very principles of civilization itself. madam speaker, let me digress for a moment because this is particularly notable. after 9/11, crime all but vanished from the streets of new york city. in other words, the shock and horror caused the community to rally together above any discord in a spirit of true unity. and we glimpse that solidarity when osama bin laden was finally confronted. and just recently, a day after the terror attacks that rocked patrona few weeks ago, a in a restaurant that had been invaded, he calmly returned to pay his bill. and explaining his generosity, he told a reporter, quote, these people shouldn't win. the night before, several bartenders had risked their lives to defend patriot rons in that particular -- patrons in that particular restaurant as they tried to hack away. more lives would have been lost were it not for that bravery

the situation is a lot worse than anyone had any idea. tting on a game face like things are going fine. everyone knows that we are stalemated in the trenches, so the real action is happening at sea, and the real action was submarines sinking merchant ships. that was the action. in april, they were moving toward losing 900,000 tons. it was unsustainable. the british thought they were probably going to have to ask for terms in november 1917. why is this? the british were being typically british about their supply problem. aey had something called defensive routs theory, was went something like this. independent merchant ships should just steam independently because it would be harder for the u.s. to find them, and what was just a bloc off areas of the ocean and use destroyers and cruisers to take the fight to the u-boats. they wanted to be offenses -- offensive. they wanted to set of what we would call aviation kill boxes to coverdestroyers out them, and in that way, hopefully, knockback the u-boat threat. it was failing miserably. it was no