essentially, we are going to engineer aproblem and solution that nobody can take blame for, the statecan do what theywant without having any blame . the second question is a more lighthearted one. i'm sure you've seen the movie eagle eye. can you comment on it ? >> no. we didn't see that because it's perfect for what he's talking about. >> i think with state power it's compelling because we see during the obama administration, during bush as well how they reconfigured what a militant was in order to facilitate legal death. so if a bond people and killed 18-year-old men, even if they were affiliated with terrorist groups or people under the auspices of terrorist groups, they were seen to be military precisely because of their age and gender. as one way that patronization allows us to avoid the hard questions of who deserves death and who doesn't. in terms of algorithmic, i think there's ways that even drone pilots are forced to distance themselves. >> legal apparatus, i would think algorithmically, it is going to confound it. there are existing legal stuff, treats citizens like a terro