y. z. which will fit my narrative and all of you guys are going to see that you were wrong this whole time and you get permutations of that from every direction and it's really grotesque that we get to the point where we're so excited that we might be proven correct by an act of violence that it's going to fit our narrative that we don't even bother to say whatever just happened this was tragic people lost their lives we just jump straight to this you guys are going to finally understand i'm right and that's really grotesque. one thing that's exciting for me to think about is what we really mean when we say we you know in the united states there's a tendency to say well. you know x. y. z. is happening we have to do something and there's it's very easy to just say we think that we means you know the military of our particular state but there's a different we there's women all over the world who are dealing with the whatever they are and these women can work in solidarity with one another as

the president but he ought to have told, general, i'm going say a couple of things this morning, x, y, z and let him know what's coming. neil: pat, let me ask you, talking to former chief of staffs in the bush administration, everything passes through them. if you want to visit or see the president, everyone goes through chief of staff and that was understood not in all presidencies but in many presidencies and establishes an order that's been respected through democratic and republican administrations alike but, of course, there are some people who -- who can be deemed above that, for example, i can't imagine ivanka trump or jared kushner asking permission to see donald trump. i guess what i'm asking, will that work, that's when it breaks down when the chief of staff can't control who is take up the president's time. >> i think obviously the chief of staff cannot control ivanka and jared and i think he's going to have to sit down with them, look, we all know we have a problem here and if the president tells you have to do x, y, z you have will clear that with mcmaster and secretary of s

y-z released his new album, "444." his wife beyoncÉ named their kids sir an.and what would you do if you saw this? it is real. jonathan: that is a van pulling over in new hampshire. the police pulled it over for obvious reasons. he had everything in his house in or on the car, all strapped to the roof. can you imagine riding behind this? new hampshire state police posted this as a warning, saying please don't do this. the driver was negligent driving. today, 94time highs degrees at reagan national airport, well above average for this time of year. the heat index values were in the middle to upper 90's, and we do it all over again for the day tomorrow. outside right now, 82 at reagan national. that is just part of the story. the feels-like temperature's, middle to upper 80's across much of the area inside the capital beltway. a little cooler north and west of town. a few scattered showers this evening, not amounting to a lot. showers will end in the next hour or so. toorrow, keep a watchful eye the sky, especially north and we have ac. where slight risk of seve

that dear brother cool off, circle around and catch x, y, z the next day? >> there are critical neurons in our brain that pick up what other people do. this is the same for all of us. secondly dope mean pathways and peer pathways allow us to unconsciously copy what others are doing. moms do what other moms are doing. none of us are smoking. the norms have changed, and now we can get to a person who is about to do -- use a gun and say wait a second, what are you thinking and give him a different expectations. so added onto these processes, which are described in this book, are the effects of trauma that you mentioned. the trauma causes people to be hyperreactive and thinking everything is against them. all of these things are reversible. in the short-term we cool someone down. they're on hot. they're amygdala is on hot. we cool them down and let them listen to someone. and then we reframe this so they feel they're still positive to be able to do this. and your last question, we will stay with that person from six months to two years so he will not circle bac

, does that dear brow cool off in front of you, circling around and catch x, y, z the next day?> thank you. the first part of this is how the contagion occurs. there are cortical neurons in our brain that pick up what we see other people do. this is true for all of us. violence is especially picked because its so salient. and dope mean and pain pathaways allow to us uncon shousely copy and want to do what others are doing. mom does what other moms are doing. no one in this room is smoking. whereas we used to smoke. a third of us were spoking when i was in medical school watching angiograms but the norms have changed. the formed have changed, and now we can get to a person who is about to do -- use a gun and say, wait a second. what are you thinking and give him a different expectation. so, add on to the these processes, which are described in this book, the effects of trauma you have mentioned. the trauma causes people to be hyperreactive and think everything is against them. all of these things are reversible. in the sort team we -- short term we cool someone down, they're on h

you know, i support x, y,z and a little bit of a pause and then it's i just wish he would stop the tweets's kind of ironic, people voted -- they wanted someb what they >> he says what's on his mind. >> before we go, where is your next stop >> we're going to be in wisconsin in southwest wisconsin, we'll be there about a month >> you can follow them, there's the website on the screen, t trump.examiner.com >> think of all the cheesesteak they can celebrate >> hopefully they will not come back with cheese head fans. >>> chris christie taking the heat after spending the day at an empty beach after closed it to the public. back after this. back after this. (vo) this fourth of july at enterprise car sales... experience great customer service and get more for your trade. june twenty-ninth through july fifth. and let enterprise car sales flip your thinking about buying your next vehicle. restlessness... extreme anxiety... pacing... a constant urge to move. if someone you know is suffering from schizophrenia they may also be struggling with akathisia: a common side effect of some schizophrenia medi

or i like the president but dislike x, y, z. once we start executing the president's agenda and once we start talking clearly to the american people and we get the american people to light up congress's switchboard, to help us execute the president's agenda, that's the only way we'll drain the swamp. >> isn't the leak investigation a distraction from the agenda? isn't the big part of this leak investigation a distraction from this agenda? >> how is it a distraction? we have to clamp down the leaks. the president and i are working together with a large group of people to clamp down on the nefarious nature of these leaks. i'm talking about the stuff going on with leaking on syria, north korea. like i said, the president views the white house leaks, a lot of this stuff as small potatoes. i can't have dinner with the guy, five minutes later, journalists know i'm having dinner. is that how we should be running the white house? is that how we should be running the white house? >> i know you want integrity of purpose with the white hou

of saying to the people who are already in these gu ys-only partnerships, do you promise to do x, y, zke to see money flowing to smart women in the valley. a lot of them are in the venture business. let's go enable a few of them to create their own funds and get after it. there are new funds watching all the time. people are able to get funds raised with what i would even go as far as to say are not records you look at and say i will find that new venture. there are plenty of super qualified women out there. i would like to see more of the 's an institutional investors putting your money where their mouth is. emily: you are very focused on hiring women and making sure it is 50-50. what is your vision for the company? dick: it is a social fitness platform. in the real world the way people get healthy and live healthy lives is through social motivation and social accountability. yet online, most of the platforms are one-on-one. here is a program for you. you try to keep yourself motivated and isolation -- in isolation. we are about getting it team of people to stay motivated and doing wh

invaded the u crain and said, you have to stop doing that, they said, we are not going to share "x," "y," "z," counterterrorism information with you. they worry this is what trump is going to get convince today do, enter into some sort of partnership where it is one-sided, the u.s. giving everything and moscow not giving much. >> this meeting comes in context, the russian potential collusion with trump associates in the campaign. that investigation continues. there is the investigation into russian meddling in the election. president trump has never 100% bought into. what role do you think those will play? >> the fear is that trump will emerge from a putin meeting saying, we had a great meeting and our relationship is going to be able to go forward now against the back drop of possibly continuing revelations that there was some sort of conversation during the campaign between trump administration officials. that would put the trump administration in a compromising public position. you have to think about going into this. you have the national security officials who want to start getting on a

the kennedy assassination, you have x, y, z happened, those are undisputed. kennedy was shot. >> unless you have someone that says kennedy is still alive. >> i feel like in these, one of the rhetorically useful thing about saying it was your own experience is that no one can really deny that. >> yeah. and that is at the root of why ufo conspiracism can become so extensive, because we have talked about this, the fact that in terms of abduction evidence, that evidence is by definition personal, it is by definition subjective, and once we move away from the objective veracity of physical evidence, what do we get to? what we have been talking about the last couple of classes. >> [inaudible] >> yeah, but this kind of wider issue. we talked about it with king thompson. >> knowing that we can't ever know what happened, so we are left with how we interpret the things we can personally experience. this sounds a lot like religion. why are we so quick to discount ufos when we base everything on this word of god and these personal experiences? >> okay, so to the extent t

. >> x, y, z. >> man, it's been 30 years since i have done sign language. i'm a little slow at it.t it. >> he's killing me. i got to tell you, he's killing me. >> you slow down. >> you are killing me. >> flowers is currently charged with possession of a firearm by a felon. he's pled not guilty and is awaiting trial. but it was while serving time in prison that he got to know maxwell. the two can spend time together one hour per day. when they and other segregation inmates are released into an enclosed rec area. >> it's -- i want to say nice. i mean, it's not like the park, i guarantee you. but it's nice to be out here, it's nice to have fresh air, it's nice to be out of the little old box of a cell. >> maxwell is still recovering from his shoulder injury he suffered during his escape. >> son of a gun. that was the wrong thing to do. >> so for now, he'll have to settle for being a spectator during rec time. >> this is just like being all dressed up and nowhere to go. you know what i mean? i can't even throw the damn ball. >> jacob smith is more than 20 years younger than maxwell, bu

it allowed to be with person, for x, y, z reasons were smarter than me but all on equal playing field. out of my own desire and out of my own extra study, out of my own pursuit i was able to graduate, get my master's, et cetera, et cetera. that is small personal example of why affirmative action for me was crucial to being able to sit at this table with these gentlemen and with you all in this room. >> you -- >> keep it succinct. >> very briefly, i do want to say that when we talk about affirmative action we tend to talk about it flowing in one direction and in order for the resentment that the program sometimes generated, in order for the resentment to exist, and believe people of color are given something you have to cook the books and not look what people of color are having taken away from them. if you are a person, who arrives at a university, and through some formula, race winds up being a benefit to you, you also say at the outset this person pn was more likely to died as a result of infant mortality. this person was more likely attend ad substandard school correlated with race

are looking into the question of whether you had any contact with russians and we want you to do x-y-z or we're going to release e-mails or t n transcription that occurred. that's the definition of blackmail, so of course there is a vulnerability there, and that makes it very important that we get to the bottom of this and understand what's there. if there is more there, that gives the russians a very powerful source of leverage on people lining jared kushner, the president's son, and who knows who else. >> let's get back to christopher wray, the nominee for fbi director. he had his hearing on the hill today. he said he wouldn't take a loyalty pledge to the president. he also said he would resign if asked to do anything illegal. were you encouraged by his testimony today? i know you're not in the senate but you may have been observing or listening in. what do you make of his performance today? >> i can't judge it. by all accounts, there is a decent and competent individual, and, you know, the problems that we have had with people who have not been honest about meetings with the russian

and allow me to be with people that for x, y, z reasons were smarter than me, not smarter than me, but we were all on a level playing field. at my own desires some extra studies, pursuit, i was able to graduate, get my masters, etc., but that is a small personal example of why affirmative action for me was crucial to being able to sit at this table with these gentlemen and with you all in this room. >> very briefly, i do want to say that when we talk about affirmative action, we talk about it flowing in one direction. in order for the resentment that the program has sometimes generated, there is a limit to exist and people color being given something, you have to cook the books and not look at what people of color are having taken away from this. if you are a person who arrived at a university in through some formula wind up being a benefit to you -- it winds up being a benefit to you, this person was more likely to have died because of infant mortality. this person with more likely to have attended a substandard school correlated with race. they are more likely to be arrested, have tr

occurred in those affected -- stops you intervene and the dear brother -- mostly from going after x y z, does that do brother cool off in front of you, circle around them and xyz the next day? request thank you. the first part is how the decision occurs. there are norms in our brain that -- we see other people do. this is true for all of us. there is dopamine and pain pathways -- allow us to want to do what others are doing. monster what other moms are doing. is one third of us were smoking before when i was in medical school -- or that this change. the norms have changed and now we can get to a person who is about to use a gun and ask them -- were you thinking and get them a different expectation. processes, these described in this book, are the effects of trauma, causes people , thinkingr reactive everything is against them. all of his things are reversible. in the short term we cool someone down. down to where they can listen to someone. then we really famous so that they are still able to do this. last question -- will stay with that person for six months-two years, so they'll not c

book, the title "no, it is not enough," leads me to ask why is it so much easier to say no to x, y, or zn it is to say yes. i ask that question because it takes me back to the conversation last night about the democrats and the conundrum that they found themselves now. it is so hard to say no but so much harder to get to yes. >> so when it come to the democrats, i think it is simpler response. i think there are actual financial interest standing in the way of getting antonio the agenda in terms of who pays for campaign and straight up conflict of interests, that's part of it. more broadly it is that we have been leaving a war on the imagination, ton political imagination for the past 40 years. >> by who? >> of the idea of as bad as the policy we are living are. here i am thinking of prioritization and deregulation and low taxes paid for by slashes where you see massive investment of incarceration and repressi repression. as bad as all of that is, there is no alternatives, i think that that project, that 40 year project, the sturdiest part of it is not policies. donald trump ran against t

been very a transact n transactional thing, people doing the calculation in their head getting x, y, z benefits, i'm paying this much in dues, i have no connection to decision-making process in my union and i think that's very worrying and i think to some degree this is almost deserved, some of the downfall of american unions, so to my hope is through these rank and file struggles to democratize unions will in fact convince people they have something to gain, they have a vested interest in defending unions. even something like the fact that you might be a member of a union today, because of a vote that happened three or four decades ago. there is some truth in right wing arguments about unionization says that he fundamentally undemocratic having once and something undemocratic as a condition of your employment having to be a union member than having to have your dues deducted every month without you having any say in the matter and so on. in europe, unions don't have to rely on those mechanisms. so i think fundamentally we need a more democratic labor movement. for now this labor movem

y. and z. we need to. release assistance or free up the whole data port or come to a solution that will allow. the free flow of assistance into the inner parts of the yemen where the population is really at greatest risk. so those specific material steps were not really articulated to us did you get the sense of both sides just. a very ready to grind they sow or other open to a new diplomatic initiative. i didn't detect a real enthusiasm for a new diplomatic initiative although i would be happy to see one food on the table and know the un special envoy. has now proposed but the third party administrative element in place in her date as a way to get the two. two warring parties separated that may eat hopefully they'll find some traction but i don't know that either party. in my judgment is prepared to give up what they've claimed in terms of territorial gains recently there what role could the trump administration play him in the us position has been to broadly back the saudis hasn't added to it. could they

there are those senators who say they were elected to do x, y or z.refore they can't go back to their constituents without requiring senator cruz or ron paul certain things or certain interests in the healthcare bill. does an elected official have an obligation not just to his constituency, but to the party, to his president that might evening bigger than his individual constituents? >> the core is your constituent. when you legislate, you are legislating for the whole country. and the way i look at it is the way reagan looked at it. i want to get everything i want. if i can get 80% now i will take it. it's basically what we did in the house on the healthcare bill. i would have liked to have been more aggressive. we didn't have the votes for that sow we moved forward with what we had done. judge jeanine: mitch mcconnell said there is no way we are going to repeal first and replace later. why? >> we should have done that in january in hindsight. the democrats then may have been willing to actually work with a replacement. but as long as obamacare is st

y. and z. in that if they're going to want to to make the change and work with my generation genex there's less of us obviously than the two around us generations they're going to have to get involved in electoral politics they're going to have to vote and when i mean vote they're going to have to vote in on your elections and off year elections are going to have to vote for their county commissioners are going to vote for their mayors they can't just ignore it they're going to have to engage it is america a country that could give rise to a group like the rates up a day mouse in spain jeremy corbyn course bernie sanders was was destroyed by that didn't say even though he was the most likely to beat the republicans is there room for an alternative political party or a more grassroots party or a more representative party in america still to happen well in the room would have to be made on in the state level for the states to actually be more liberal in allowing parties to get on the ballot so in

if attorney general sessions had gone to the president and said i want to recuse myself for x, y and z reasons. that's unacceptable considering the relationship they have. howie: you are saying that to rules your word is unacceptable. katrina: the fact that this whole russia nonsense is a hoax. we still to this day have not seen the dnc server they claim was hacked and those emails were released in that way. so why are we still having these investigations? these are things that should have been discussed trier to that happening. howie: do you think donald trump, jr. and the meetings with the russian official were a hoax? katrina: the meetings weren't a hoax. it narrative around it is a hoax. you are going to have people meeting with a russian but it doesn't mean it's collusion. howie: they are gearing up for a war against robert mueller. they are investigating his prosecutors for possible bias. do you think that's overstated or is that what the situation calls for. >> i don't think it white house is preparing for war. there are if questions about this particular investigation and the w

holdings, her name natalia veselnitskaya, as you know, we'll just refer to her as "russian agent x, y, z" or something. [ laughter ] [ laughter ] prevesan is a russian company that received millions of dollars connected to crime for mr. magnitsky's uncovering. another russian american lobbyist, the "new york times" recently decried him as a master of the dark arts. these two were reportedly at a meeting with the trump family and made a pitch to get around the magnitsky act. was it a clumsy bait-and-switch effort in their unregistered propaganda campaign? hopefully we'll get answers from mr. trump and mr. manafort on that point we will pursue details about the creation and circulation of the dossier that started this whole controversy knowing exactly who was acting on behalf of the russian government is vital to get to the bottom of russian influence in our democratic system, that is why fara must be enforced consistently and even handedly. in other words, it won't be taken seriously. i look forward to discussing with the witnesses additional steps to better enforce fara and now it's my p

i am not going to go out there and defend this false charge that you've made, pick, x, y, z, because it's not true. and that will not help you. or is he going to do what sean spicer did? don't you agree that that's a big question, jason? >> well, jake, i love the two options that you gave me there. look, here's what i know about anthony scaramucci. >> because they're fact-based options. >> it's because anthony scaramucci is no shrinking violet. he will go and offer his opinions to the president. sometimes he's going to -- sometimes the president will agree with him. sometimes he won't. but anthony knows who's the president of the united states and who he works for and going back to the commentary about scaramucci just going out on the good days. look, i worked with anthony day in and day out on the campaign just like i did with sean and we had a lot of tough days on our campaign, our winning campaign, i would remind folks and both of those men went out and fought hard every single time. neither one of them shied away from the tough days or the brutal news cycles that we had and antho

let's say, we wanted to have a broader relationship with the russians based on x, y, or z.hese conversations. we had these meetings. this is how we dealt with it in the campaign. there's a way to do it. they have done the opposite. they have sought to cover it up, and this is including mr. sessions' testimonies. >> another element of the investigation, donald trump jr. and paul manafort have avoided subpoenas by cutting a deal with the senate judiciary committee. they're going to talk in private on wednesday. it's unclear if they will be under oath in those conversations. typically they're not. here's what trump junior prom e promised just last week. >> you said in a tweet you would fully cooperate with any investigation. >> of course. >> completely. >> 100%. >> turn over everything that they want and you feel you already have? >> yes. >> and you have nothing to hide. that means you'll testify under oath, all of that. >> all of it. >> manu, when donald trump jr. said he thinks he's already turned over everything, he revealed some e-mails. we don't know if it's the full e-ma

is he's not a time or a clock and it's not clear his supporters are waiting for him to achieve x, y and zs that's an example of the press imposing their expectations on voters this underscores the point that media is not capturing a certain faction of the public that voted for trump and feel he represents hope for their opinions and interests. they have not given up hope on him despite the fact the approval ratings are low it's important for all of us to remember that. >> of course >>> up next, another huge day for corporate earnings as we've been talking about we'll get you ready and we'll talk to a global market strategist who says currencies could be starting a regime change as we head to break, let's check out the dollar index we know we were sitting around 10-month lows. we have rallied just a hair from where we were sitting at the least. stay ted, orun"wldwide exchange" will be right back i love you, couch. you give us comfort. and we give you bare feet... ...backsweat and gordo's everything. i love you, but sometimes you stink. ♪ new febreze fabric refresher with odorclear technolo

on x, y or z. from which multiple treaties they've pulled out of, to cyber security. anybody you've talked to in intelligence work or counter terrorism work over the past two decades will tell you, we have never effectively cooperated with the russian security sources on islamic terrorism, because they don't give us what we need. they're not interested in al qaeda or isis. you can talk to bob bear about that, anyone else who comes on cnn. >> ellis, we have your mike hopefully worked out this time. do you believe it's clear where donald trump is coming from. he tweeted this morning, saying in his conversation with vladimir putin he vehemently denied it, i've already given my opinion. he makes it clear. is it imperative that the president find another means in which to make it clear? where is he on the russian meddling, what he said to putin, and what the conclusion was if there are more sanctions or penalties or something later? >> i don't think the president wants to. i think he's made it very clear what he thinks, he doesn't believe it, he believes putin more than he