bill mckibben said, in the same world, you would be calling for covering cuts,s, not taxax cuts.t is once again a world upside down. in a m moment like this, where governments are about to be handed a multibillion dollar cleanup bill and reconstruction bill and have already been handed that because of harvey, surely, you need more money from corporations. let's rememberer, his tax plan would give the biggest tax cut to corporations that they have had in many decades. we will see what ends up happening through the negotiations, but his original goal was to cut corporate taxes down to 15 percent. so he is bankrupting the government. how do you pay for the impacts of climate change? it is exactly the wrong approach. but what i argued in the piece you mention earlier is that it was really revealing, not just around the shock doctrine, but why the crisis of climate change is such a profound threat to the ideological right, to the people who have been advancing this radical vision of the world that joseph stiglitz has called market fundamentalism, which has at the centerpiece, privatiz