but if you read catherine newton's report, it isa read catherine newton's report, it is a holistic viewh interest on one aspect between dan ashworth and i would like to ask rachel to add comments to that. we will come on to other members of the panel, but i think, you know, i think you've spoken about this and you're the one that wrote to the committee about the process. catherine newton was clear in her statement, as far as she is concerned there is no grievance for players in that this position and that's what eniola aluko said. when someone that's what eniola aluko said. when someone who is co leading an internal review is supplying evidence to that review as well. that's a very poor example of due process and that's why i asked you again whether you feel it is not just lessons to be learnt, but an apology should be given for the process which was not fit for purpose. one of the reasons we asked an independent barrister in was to give us the benefit of a fresh pair of eyes on the process and i think that was right. we took the concerns and the complaints seriously. we followed them i