so twelve months earlier you told us that you're completely uninterested in politics. what's going on that's when they told us well yes that's changed. by two thousand and sixteen they said that they had a reason to become politically engaged and they wanted to do something about the anti foreigner movement and they wanted to organize counterdemonstrations that's what the major parties are we can almost see the former major parties need to pick up on. that's where they can get. young people involved we have to be able to give them a purpose and show where they can take action and there's plenty of room for that that's why i believe we need a national civil service program for young people for what it is for lower the voting age to get them involved. in a force that's very important we have students who come to my lectures they're seventeen and they can't vote to be honest i think that's very odd. and in the it's a quick and him. you called your study a legacy study. so that's why i want to conclude our interview by asking about your personal legacy and complete the sen

investors were uninterested. we had conversations, when do you know that it's time to quit?realization over the course of that conversation that although over the last year we had been working really hard, we had been a little bit distracted, too. we had side projects going on. at the time i was in boston, and they were in san francisco. we weren't together as a team completely focused. we said let's give it three more months where we will live together and have nothing else in our lives except for this. we will work six to seven days a week. if it doesn't work, we will quit. >> talking about distraction, you bought dozens of dozens of cereal boxes, and you converted them, something to do with obama o's and mccain. what happened? >> we had to be creative with publicity. frankly, we were thinking, how can we make ourselves relevant and get the word out? at the time, it was leading up to the election. we got this idea to create a presidentially themed breakfast cereal. today we are airbnb, but then we were air bed and breakfast. we said, ok, let's do a play on the breakfast id

project that was repaid in local currency but that was useless on the international market so uninteresting thing talking to the ncaa about how the cia funded this because who could generate the counterpart fund? it withdrew a peace program so anyway the officer at the time was my father. [laughter] but your book goes after the korean war but almost 70 years later this has come back around. what bess through out mao role to give the go-ahead? or how that played out?. >> the period or was basically a civil war after world war to the united states occupies south korea and soviet troops withdrew 1948 bin u.s. troops withdrew from south korea and then the civil war was on again at least with the rhetoric to pay lip service to reunification to resolve the conflict to be unified so that driving force that he rode along to launch the invasion they really wanted the war. they have so much going on in europe they said as much in speeches in the early '50s to make it clear there were not interested in south korea but mao just thought this civil war at home he could stay in taiwan and consolidate the

we had credit card debt at that investors were uninterested. point.nversations, when do you know that it's time to quit? we had a realization over the course of that conversation that although over the last year we had been working really hard, we had actually been a little bit distracted, too. we had side projects going on. actually at the time i was in boston, and they were in san francisco. we weren't together as a team completely focused. so we made a commitment to each other and said, let's give it three more months where we will live together and not have anything else in our lives except for this. we will work six to seven days a week. if in three months we are not in a better place, we will quit. hasalinda: talking about distraction, you bought dozens of dozens of cereal boxes and converted them, something to do mccain.ma and what happened? nathan: we had to be creative with publicity. frankly, we were thinking, how can we make ourselves relevant and get the word out? and at the time, it was leading up to the election. we got this idea to crea

[laughter] investors were uninterested.hen do you know that it's time to quit? we had a realization that although over the last year we had been working really hard, we had been a little bit distracted, to. we had side projects going on -- distracted, too. we had side projects going on, as a team we weren't focused. we said let's give it 3-4 months where we live together, and have nothing in their lives except for this. we will work six-devon -- 6-7 days a week. if it doesn't work, we will quit. haslinda: but dozens of dozens of cereal boxes, something to do with -- you bought dozens of dozens of cereal boxes, something to do with mccain. what happened? we had to get >> creative to gener publicit >> we had to be creative with publicity. at the time, it was leading up to the election. we have the idea of breakfast cereal with the president. back then, we were called air bed and breakfast. we said, ok, let's do a play on the breakfast idea, president themed. , andme up with obama-o's captain mccains. we put serial together th

>> oh i would never imply that they're uninterested in the private sector. >> thanks for joining us.ll be right back. >> closed captioning for this newscast is sponsored by living spaces. >>> take a look at the bay bridge. it is in hiding right now. i flip to the golden gate and you can see it. isn't that cool? >> the 49ers today? >> we have our game forecast today. the cowboys are coming to town. it will be sunny and 76. it's looking like a very comfortable day for football. it should be nice in santa clara levi stadium. >> do you have the temperature in that hot spot in santa clara. >> on the stadium. >> thanks for joining us. >> face the nation is next here on kpix5. have a great sunday. who are these people? the energy conscious people among us say small actions can add up to something... humongous. a little thing here. a little thing there. starts to feel like a badge maybe millions can wear. who are all these caretakers, advocates too? turns out, it's californians it's me and it's you. don't stop now, it's easy to add to the routine. join energy upgrade california and do your t

and there is no information about the clinton team also, which is not uninteresting. it isn't new.has to do with the funding of the dossier, the steele investigative report. incident was a lawyer for the democratic party and hillary clinton's campaign that paid for this research. and cnn reporting overnight that campaign chair podesta and deb bey wass debbie wasserman schule asked. and they said no. >> i think this has been poorly handled by what's left of the clinton campaign. there's nothing wrong with funding opposition research. this is what campaigns do. this gps investigation was funded first by republican opponents of trump. then picked up by the clinton campaign. they is simply should have said yes, or above it was who approved it, should have said, yes, we paid for it. >> it has been denied by the clinton camp and that creates hypocrisy. this appears to have been paid for by two. first an anti-trump republican. maybe a campaign during the primary. maybe donors associated with the campaign. then picked up by the democrats. the idea that this is a revelation is false. and th

[laughter] investors were uninterested.hen do you know that it's time to quit? we had a realization that although over the last year we had been working really hard, we had been a little bit distracted, too. we had side projects going on. at the time, i was in boston. they were in san francisco. we work together as a team, completely focused. we made a commitment. we said, let's give it three to four months where we live together and have nothing in our lives except for this. we will work six to seven days a week. if we are not in a better place, we will quit. haslinda: you bought dozens of dozens of serial boxes and converted them. something to do with obama and mccain. what happened? nathan: we had to get creative to generate publicity for our company. we were thinking, had we make ourselves relevant and get the word out? at the time, it was leading up to the election. we got this idea to create a presidentially themed breakfast cereal. back then, we were called air bed and breakfast. we said, ok, let's do a play on the b

. >> the deficit is an uninteresting and unimportant number that is the difference between two very interesting and important numbers. how much the government spends is the dead weight cost of government. and whether they borrow it or steal it to make that number, total depending that's the dead weight cost of government that comes out of the productive economy and goes to the government. how much the government takes in taxes and how they do it, that's important, too. the how can be more destructive, less destructive and part of tax reform is being less destructive of economic growth and jobs and opportunity while still raising revenue so when people focus on the deficit, it's because republicans back in the 50s said, we're against deficit spending. that was -- they said deficit spending because they think anyone would care about spending. all the methodist oppose it. and say debt, debt, debt. it is the total spending that's the problem. my professor at harvard said this deficit spending is a stupid concept. just those conservatives getting in the way of spending. okay? he saw the use of defic

foreign power interfering in your election and the president of the united states who seems utterly uninterestedtting to the bottom of what happened and the fact that his family and people in his campaign and people in his business organization have had dealings with the russians that need to be examined. if there's nothing there, he should welcome it. he should say there's nothing there, i'm going to go talk to the special prosecutor. i'm going to have my family talk to them. let's all get this cleaned up now as quickly as we can and as expeditiously and in terms of the best attainable version of the truth, and mr. mueller, we'll help you do that. that's not what we're seeing. the remarkable thing is the republicans on capitol hill who have continued to encourage this smoke screen about hillary clinton. they know of course that hillary clinton is a lightning rod for the, quote, so-called base of the president and the republican party, and in a certain time though t it may wear out and it reckless and irresponsible not to be looking for the truth and rather to be looking for clinton's scapegoats

trying to shift away from donald trump, i agree, donald trump is so disconnected with policy, so uninterested in policy. the way that he basically has done this is to say, the opioid issue won me new hampshire, look how many votes i got, and therefore you go through the motions. the virtual motions. but you're absolutely right, he's not tweeting about it. he's not tweeting about a lot of things that are actually affecting people's lives. like the wildfires in the state of california. but this one, and i do think you raise the question, where is the outrage? in congress? where is the outrage about a crisis that is killing this many americans, and no one is doing anything about it? >> but i think it's really complicated for this president, because he is also trying to get rid of medicaid. and medicaid is the system that is actually helping a lot of people get off of this -- >> it's covering a lot of people. although the capacity is though where near what's needed. >> nowhere near what's needed but he's trying to strip it to nothing. no mental health services, no physical health services. this i

they are uninterested when outsiders come into their area. when we bring the government of afghanistan, there is going to be resistance. that day, we fight to that ambush, we get to the village and inside the village, the district chief who is empowered district,der of that nobody shows up and that's not ok. that doesn't give you a lot of confidence. .e round up the police are rounding up people in order to have this meeting. he understood bureaucracy and not necessarily governance, he understood how to interact with people. he said your ambush didn't stop me. the government of afghanistan is here. that wrote the ice. -- broke the ice. it wasn't super successful. ofre was 30 or 40 minutes discussion. that was the first time we had made it to that village. we leave. we get ambushed again because that's how it works. we say in a week we are going to go back. touch points. it's integrating ourselves into there. we didn't have much money to throw at them. what would we build? they don't need anything. they use faith in their government. guys aren

they are very uninterested when outsiders come into their area. so when he bring the government of afghanistan which is seen as an outsider in a lot of ways into these places of course there will be some resistance. that day we fight through that ambush, just a few people, just trying to hairs us, we get to the village and inside the village we say this is asura. the person being empowered as the leader of that district nobody shows you will to asura. that's not ago. that doesn't really give you a lot of confidence in your ability to govern. so we go all around and we round up all the houses, knocking on doors, the afghan police are going out and talking to people, not mean like in this case but bringing them in in order to have the asura. they're quiet for a while. kiyoom being who he was, an afghan man who understood not necessarily bureaucracy or governance but understood how to interact with people and build that personal relationship. he taunts them, says, hey, your ambush, that didn't stop me, i'm here. the government of afghanistan is here.

uninterested in the input and expertise of our most seasoned professionals. taken together, america's credibility around the world is wobbling. our global leadership seems to be wayning and most importantly without a strong functional state department with a clear foreign policy vision, increasingly at risk. and let me be clear i support modernizing the state department. i want to see it leaning american foreign policy. civilian leadership that center of national security policy is integral to our democracy at home and our leadership abroad. for years congress has sat on the sidelines when it comes to the state department and what do we have to show for it? personnel shortages make it harder to address crisis or allow for professional development. traditional responsibilities of a department moving to other agencies like the pentagon distracting from its core diplomatic mission. i'm glad that the president sees the necessity for more funds for dod. but we don't want it at the expense of the state department. the expense of diplomacy, the expense of making sur

my colleagues have unfortunately seemed largely uninterested. door remains open. we're willing and able to codify protections and establish a federal framework in statute for providing certainty to all. i don't think we need title 2 to do that. we have the same end goal. preserving the internet as a free, open, dynamic environment to unleash innovation and drive our economy while doing everything we can to extend its benefits to every american. we should be able to work together and clear that issue off our plates. we're glad to see you fully constituted and confirmed. we have a lot of issues to hear from you on . >> anyone seeking a remainder of the chairman's time? he yields back. >> thank you for holding this hearing today and i appreciate you're maintaining oversight of the fcc. know some people prefer you wouldn't. the fcc is on a path to take up a number of controversial issues in the next few months. it's curious this is schedule for today, just one day before chairman piis expected to make public at least one proposal that enriches a single company above o

in discussions toward that end, my colleagues in the minority have unfortunately seemed largely uninterested in this point. i'd love to see that change. the door remains open. we're willing to codify -- for providing certainty to all participants in the internet ecosystem. i don't think we need title 2 to do that. we have the same end goal. preserving the internet as a free, open, dynamic environment while also doing everything we can to extend its benefits to every american. we should be able to work together to clear this issue off our plates. with that again i thank the commission for being here today. we're glad to see you fully constituted and confirmed and as you can imagine, we have a lot of issues to hear from you on and to have good discourse back and forth. thanks again and with that i yield back. >> gentleman yields back. anyone seeking the remainder of the chairman's time? no one else. the gentleman yields back. at this time you're recognized. >> thank you, madame chairman and ranking member doyle for holding this hearing today. i appreciate that you're maintaining the subcommitt

campaign it was easy to see that trump celebrity and permit attracted voters who would normally be uninterestedn politics and post election autopsy seemed to prove a good number of voters were swayed by fake news story that one would think a little critical thinking would easily be bunked. entire books would be written about trump's popularity with working-class whites specially those who grown disillusion in a society, multiculturalism of having robbed him of livelihoods and seed of power. the movement as leader referred to, more with the sum of its parts and the narrative that trump had use today bind it all together. to fully grasp what happened in 2016, it's necessary to glance back at the world shaking upset in 2008 but first term senator from illinois named barack obama. it's easy to forget now after eight years of his administration exactly how it felt to elect him, figure who effortlessly blended a keen intellect and undeniable charisma, obama's promise of hope and change both concept that is invited as much projection as trump's call to make america great again which was a long exhale.

campaign it was easy to see that trump celebrity and permit attracted voters who would normally be uninterestedn politics and post election autopsy seemed to prove a good number of voters were swayed by fake news story that one would think a little critical thinking would easily be bunked. entire books would be written about trump's popularity with working-class whites specially those who grown disillusion in a society, multiculturalism of having robbed him of livelihoods and seed of power. the movement as leader referred to, more with the sum of its parts and the narrative that trump had use today bind it all together. to fully grasp what happened in 2016, it's necessary to glance back at the world shaking upset in 2008 but first term senator from illinois named barack obama. it's easy to forget now after eight years of his administration exactly how it felt to elect him, figure who effortlessly blended a keen intellect and undeniable charisma, obama's promise of hope and change both concept that is invited as much projection as trump's call to make america great again which was a long exhale.