mr. wheeler, what do you think about a legislative fix for this issue? mr. r: the fascinating thing is that ms. blackburn and her republican colleagues in the house have also been flip-flopping around on their position. when i was dealing with them, the line was no blocking, no throttling, no paid prioritization. again, notice of that whole thing about paid prioritization, about that lanes and slow lanes, is off the table. they don't talk about that anymore. so the important thing is if there is any legislation, is it legislation that is moving backwards and taking things away that exists for american consumers today? or is it moving forward? the fact of the matter is that the open internet rule is today the law of the land and what's going to happen here is that the republicans are taking away the protections that now exist for american consumers. emily: we have to talk about these fake comments that appeared in the public comment section, which of the vast majority of the overall comments in favor of net neutrality. these fake comments overwhelmingly agains

but mr wheeler game sold since i was we were in a lot of games in that we were happy in our lives it's better when we win. it's simple like that. but it's not i'm thinking about i'm going to sleep thinking about it i'm going to break a record by munich time so nothing special is newcastle. and despite it being the festive season it hasn't stopped arsenal manager arsene venter taking a dig at his old rival shows a marine you know so much as a united boss who has complained that nobody can compete with the spending power of league leaders manchester city fans telling his old foe who spent over four hundred million dollars since taking over as united boss in two thousand and sixteen to just deal with it look i've been in that position for twenty one years so i would not start to complain now. team at least sometimes for will reach of when i was or three teams who were richer when i was so. learned to cope. and to deal with that i think. what is most important is about you deal with your own situation as well as you can and yes. man she's rich of an os yes she's rich of manasseh just man u

breaking eighteenth league match in a row when they travel to newcastle later on wednesday but mr wheeler game goes we win a lot of games and that's why we were happy in our lives it's better when we win. it's simple they don't. but it's not them thinking about them going to sleep thinking about it i'm going to break a record by a mini game so nothing is special you cross. manchester city midfielder yeah yeah toure a has announced his intention to return to international football he got one hundred caps for the ivory coast and won the twenty fifteen africa cup of nations before retiring in september last year the thirty four year olds confirmed his decision on twitter saying i love my country and i am available for a national team selection i want to help the next generation and use my experience to make all ivorians proud. a former senior official with peru's national football federation has been acquitted of conspiracy by a court in the united states the man while burgo was charged with taking bribes in exchange for being awarded marketing and media rights to international football matc

mr. wheeler wrong about it? >> wrong about what? >> there is no safe level for particle pollution? i don't think they were wrong. >> i didn't state they were wrong. >> you agree? >> i'm not sure what your question is. he is doing a fine job, focused on the issues as is andy. i agree with the position it's important and we need to regulate it. >> wonderful. despite this well established scientific reality, your proposed repeal of the kleen power plant, e.p.a. assumes, for the first time, there are safe levels of fine particle pollution. that's a concern of mine. did you rely on peer reviewed scientific study? >> as you know, congressman, no, we did not base that upon our withdrawal of the kleen power plant is based on the jurisdiction clean air act. i have to have a reasoned basis to withdrawal. >> what is the point of -- that's obviously a point of difference in -- >> we did not base the withdrawal upon the issues that you cited. >> okay. so, i do think the admission of the e.p.a. was charged by the people to protection the health and environment of the american people so that ever

wheeler, alison mr. speaker, we can and we must do better in this great country and do better for all those who have been taken from us. we must do better by taking action in this, the people's house. the people are watching. the people are waiting and they do serve us to do our best. and not to honor only with words of silence and prayers, important as thoser but to honor even more importantly by taking action to save future lives. again my thanks and admiration, robin to you, representative kelly for her exrired leadership and persistence. i thank you and yield back. ms. kelly: i thank you for your words and commitment and voice in making those 26 lives will never be forgot quen. we have been reading names for nearly half an hour and we have stacks and stacks of names, the names of americans that have been taken by gun violence. the list of names exow grows and grows. children are murdered in their kindergarten classroom, mothers and children are killed in cracker barrel parking lots. a smart and talen

wheeler at the time that neutrality was debated. >> i think that is a little bit of the of vision mr.. i will explain the proposal. number one broadband. it takes broadband oversight out of the fcc entirely and gives it to that ftc that does not have a strong the tools number one. number two it eliminates the rules like against at&t and comcast and allowing for the fast lane to charge those on-line providers with a better quality of service. third, it prohibits the state's from protecting competition with similar goals. so 20 years of republican and democratic chair say we don't think the fcc has the authority and we think we should do something about it. so i do disagree. >> host: why did you feel it was necessary to have title ii?. >> january 2014 and overturn the germans rules. they were pretty strong rules i did not agree with all of them in with the nonprofit to support the sec but they said i'm sorry so to have strong rules we went to title ii but even more importantly we did not apply all of title ii but in fact, to think it is then the public interest. >> host: former republican commissioner robert mcdowel

chairman wheeler said the expertise to help the public but that is not what we're seeing today. mr. president there's no need toer fix what is not broken the strong neutrality protections are in place right now since those 2015 rules went into place the economy has grown up around the principle of equal access and customers for the day before thanksgiving chairman pai released his proposal that insurers neutrality prevent states from introducing their own approach to debt neutrality. rather than listen to those millions of voices that spoke up on behalf of our real the neutrality and against this proposal allowing pay for play with the t trickle-down coic chairman pai will keep pushing pay for play and ignore the will of the public to abolish neutrality rules. the first key vote is tomorrow on december 14 and what i have been doing is spending a good chunk of my waking - hours this is enormously important. to tell the american people thisrd is the time to make your voice is heard. listen to the american people is get loud. this debate is far from over. chairman pai plays a strong ha

tom wheeler used it and that expertise to help the public. that's not what we're seeing today. now, mr. president, there is a need to fix what isn't broken. their strong net neutrality protections in place right now. since the 2015 rules went into place, our economy has grown up around thisua leading principlef equal access to information and customer. the day before thanksgiving chairman pai released his proposal to strike down the 2015 rules that ensure real net neutrality and would also prevent states from introducing their own approach to net neutrality. rather than listening to the millions of voices who spoke up on behalf of real net neutrality and against this proposal to allow pay for play by what i really call, senator franken, trickle-downun telecommunicatios policy. just let the big guys make as much money as it want and may be something eventually down to rural minnesota or rural oregon. chairman pai is going to keep pushing pay for play and is expected to ignore the will of the public and demolished net neutrality rules. the first key vote tomorrow december 14th, and what

mr. william, played a key role in developing the rules temperature the bush administration and andrew wheeler, the nominee to be the deputy administrator, handled the clear skies bill when he worked for senator inhofe. are they wrong about fine part cal pollution have nothing safe level? >> wrong about what? >> that there's no safe level for particle pollution? i don't think they were wrong. >> i don't i stated they were ongoing. >> you agree. >> i'm not entirely sure what your question is, bill warham has done a fine job, and i agree with your position, it's -- >> so despite the well-stealed scientific reality you proposed repeal of the clean power plan, epa assumes for the fir time that there are safe levels of deadly fine particle pollution. that's a concern of mine. did you rely on any new peer rehave id scientific studies to reverse the position on fine particle police. >> no, we did not base that upon -- our withdrawal is based upon the jurisdictionallal issue offices the clean air act and all have to have is a reason basis to withdrawal -- >> that's the point of the power plan -- >> ob

mr. william wayrum, played a key role in developing the rules in the bush administration, and andrew wheeler the deputy administrator, handled the clear skies bill when he worked for senator inhoff. were they wrong about fine particle pollution having no safe level? >> wrong about what? >> there's no safe level for particle pollution. i don't think they were wrong. >> i don't think i stated that they were wrong. >> great. so you agree. >> i'm not entirely sure what your question is. bill warem is doing a fine job and is focused on these issues and is his deputy. i agree it is a pollutant we need to regulate. >> wonderful. despite this well-established reality, your proposed repeal of the clean power plant epa assumes for the first time there are safe levels of deadly fine particle pollution. that's a concern of mine. >> well, that -- >> did you rely on any new pier-reviewed scientific studies to support reversing the epa's position on fine particle pollution? >> as you know, we did not base that. our withdrawal of the clean power plant is based upon the jurisdiction of the clean air act. all

tom wheeler used it and that expertise to help the public. that's not what we're seeing today. now, mr. president, there isn't any need to fix what isn't broken. there's strong net neutrality protections in place right now. since the 2015 rules went into place, our economy has grown up around this leading principle of equal access to information and customers. the day before thanksgiving, chairman pai released his proposal to strike down the 2015 rules that ensure real net neutrality. it would also prevent states from introducing their own approach to net neutrality. rather than listening to the millions of voices that spoke up on behalf of real net neutrality and against his proposal to allow pay for play, or what i really call trickle down telecommunications policy. just let the big guys make as much money as they want, and maybe something eventually trickles down to rural minnesota or rural oregon. chairman pai is going to keep pushing pay for play and is expected to ignore the will of the public and demolish net neutrality rules. the first key vote tomorrow, december 14, and what i