he declared slavery incompatible with america's founding principles. the lower southerners, he lectured, could no more legitimate bondage than the british could convince the former colonists that their tyrannical english law was just . furthermore, the declaration of independence laid out to the war that justice and freedom with the building blocks of the republic. here he read the declaration, that all men are created equal and endowed by their creator with certain unalienable rights. life, liberty, the pursuit of happiness. those words, he concluded, served as the "language of america." he roundly rejected the efforts of jackson and smith to harmonize slavery with the new nation. at the same time, he reassured the lower southerners that he recognized their right to hold people in chains. for him, there was a wide difference between justifying slavery and the slave trade and acknowledging a claim to property in the form of bonds person. what he failed to understand was that to the lower southerners, without justifying slavery, the property claim was n

but we've learned some principles how to do it. this book is about principles. faith is about principles. you throw an apple up, 100% of the time it's going to come down because of the principle gravity. what we did is interview people who have been married years and found there were consistent principles that they all talked about that made us write the book. it's just incredible. >> it coincided with what we figured outworks for us and keeps us happy and allows us to work together, travel together, do everything together and respect each other. so that is how the book evolved. >>> how long have you and el roy been married. >> 19 years. >> when you hear stories of never arguing and how you can really talk things out in a civil way. and also what they're saying here, just like we said about your son is that this is the norm. what we see otherwise is -- what they're talking about is normal. you should, if you love, cherish, respect and honor someone, you should be able to show respect, restraint, discipline -- but yet what we see is these reality tv shows. what w

president, i don't have to prove my commitment to conservative principles. at the same time, i have a record of upholding the rule of law even when my own party goes astray. i have the scars to show for it, believe me. over my six years in the state capitol of montgomery, i assembled a nationally renowned team of prosecutors behind a common goal -- root out public corruption. this pursuit led to the conviction of several corrupt public officials in the state of alabama, including a county sheriff complicit in human trafficking, the first successful prosecution of its kind in decades. my team took on panama's -- alabama's republican speaker of the house for ethics violations and removal of him from office and a prison sentence. as you might imagine, mr. president, we didn't make many friends in the political establishment by doing so. but we shored up public trust in our representative government. for their commitment to fighting public corruption, my team has been recognized by the national association of attorneys general as a gold standard. i personally ha

i drew heavily on their examples of conservative principled leadership. in this body we are often standing for deeply held principles is incompatible with pragmatism. i learned this couldn't be further from the truth. it requires balance. i have an obligation to the people elected me to fight for those that they were counting on it also to follow the law. to defend the people of alabama against federal government overreaching in other words defending the rule i of law in e constitution and the oath we take. together with other state attorneys general i worked to protect farmers and ranchers from the rule to the further you deviate considerably regulated systems. we took the fight over illegal executive amnesty to the united states supreme court on these and others we stood for the rule of law and we one so i don't have to prove my commitment in terms of principles and at the same time i have a record of upholding the rule of law even when my own party goes astray i have the scars to show for it or relieved me over my six years in the state capitol in mont

principle, i think eric is right. if you can only have so many speakers on campus, i think it is not inappropriate to decide which ones add and which ones do not. what makes me uncomfortable is i do not trust us to do that. if you are talking about people making judgments about political values and ideas that are highly controversial amongst students, citizens and faculty come i do not trust us to do that in a neutral way. in theory, eric is right. much diversity on the panel. susan, many analysts observe a breakdown of norms in our political system. if they are falling by the wayside, how can we trust the norms will be effective in regulating hateful speech? susan: that is a tough question. they are and they are not. we have so many different real and virtual spaces and communities. each of which is regulated by a set of norms. his zuckerberg and colleagues talk about facebook's community standard, implying that all, i cannot remember how people one billion or so now on facebook, implying that they constitute a commu

so that is the basic principle. mr. rosen: thank you for putting on the table the principle. i will ask a question from the audience for you. if the speaker, without logical arguments, is disinvited because the university public or private falls into that category question mark for example, a black lives matter activist -- while others deem it a crucial voice. mr. posner: this goes back to criticism of a number of people about the notion that the university administrator should have discretion in an arbitrary way. i do not think we should assume that about the administrators. sometimes they might and we should criticize them if they are arbitrary about it. but to make a concrete, let's suppose this person is known as a provocateur who gets people angry and does it basically for self-promotion purposes. the university should make a judgment whether the presence of the person on the campus advances the mission of the university or retards the mission of the university. it will depend. it could be for some people that it is good, and in other cases it may not have any value. the

it was departing from principle. one of the principles of conservatism, adherence to the old and tried rather than the new and untried. democracy nationbuilding agenda of 2002 was a new and untried idea and it didn't work. conservatism wanted to do something else. yet, here we were in the republican party still defending it and arguing for policy that would continue it. that seemed to me to be crazy. the other thing was trade. i never felt passionately about trade. i was for it. you just are. i never got why anybody would feel so passionate about it. candidate trump had a rich vein of dissatisfaction with america trade policy on the trail, communities that had been devastated. the devastation was greatly accelerated after china entered into the wto in 2001. it did not -- all the trade deals that had been worked. the policy did not seem to be working for american communities. you can find no shortage of economists to tell you why it was working for the economy. how -- as if it was an obstruction that deserved whatever

russia's principle position remains unchanged it stipulates facilitating a long term palestinian israeli settlement within the framework of which peaceful and safe existence is guaranteed for israel with an internationally. acknowledged borders and also the hopes of the palestinian people realize for the creation of their own independent state. in this east jerusalem would become the future capital of palestine and western resulin would be the capital of the state of israel. as a permanent member of the un security council and an active participant in the middle east peace quartet russia will continue to provide energetic assistance to palestinians and israelis in reaching the corresponding agreements. we confirm with our firm position that there is no alternative to a two state solution. everybody should have an interest in resolving the palestinian israeli and arab israeli conflict. efforts to achieve this goal are worthy of support however without considering the interests of all parties the middle east peace settlement any decision would not be viable. well you you can steps to stren

>> well, it's based on the principles of america first. it's the principles that he's complained on and that he's governed based on since inception. i think what's remarkable is no president has rolled out. it's highly unusual for a president to roll out comprehensive national security strategy within the first year. so this is yet another amazing milestone for this presidency and this administration and i don't want to share with you too much about the content of the speech. but you know nothing will surprise you. he's been unbelievably consistent, and we're starting to see it really bear fruit in the war against isis and extremism around the globe in terms of our strength and our foundational relationship with those that we are competing with. from an economic perspective, if not a security perspective. so you'll hear him articulate that but it has been unbelievable strategy, and it's going to be articulated by the president, which is also unusual. normally the president himself does not share the principles of the national security stra

but you talk about, for example, principle one, reducing democracy; principle two, shaping ideology; principle three, redesigning the economy. >> well, all of those fall together, and they're part of a pretty remarkable development that's taking place in -- actually, in human history. humans, in the last 60 or 70 years, have succeeded in creating a kind of a perfect storm, literally. two -- there's a kind of a pincers movement that we've created, two major attacks on the prospects for survival: global -- global warming, nuclear weapons, the anthropocene, the nuclear age. and the third is a set of socioeconomic policies designed to undermine the possibility of dealing with the problems. the problems could be dealt with only in a functioning democracy of engaged, informed people, who could make decisions, who would be informed and could make decisions to deal with the crises. but the so-called neoliberal programs of the past generation, the sort of somewhat market-oriented programs, designed to undermine the institutions, the governmental and popular institutions, that might deal with

president, jeff sessions is a gracious statesman and a man of principle, and it's not far-fetched, in my opinion, to say that some of his temperament rubbed off on him from our state's senior senator and my dear friend, senator richard shelby. and i so appreciate his presence here in the chamber today. over 30 years ago, i was introduced to then-congressman shelby by my friend, court-martialer secretary of the senate joe stewart, a person who revered this institution. as a young lawyer, i learned from a man fast becoming a legendary legislator. he would become one of my most treasured friends, sharing many days hunting together in the fields of alabama and elsewhere and many more stories shared here in the halls of the capitol. together, jeff sessions and richard shelby represent the finest alabama has to offer to the nation. following in their footsteps here in the senate is an honor i will forever treasure. the example of these men inspired me to get involved in public service. as the attorney general of alabama, jeff sessions set an example as i think the most influential and rever

it recognizes that our strength is magnified by allies who share principles and our principles and shoulderheir fair share of responsibility for our common security. fourth and finally our strategy is to advance american influence in the world. this begins with building up our wealth and power at home. america will lead again. we do not seek to oppose our way of life on anyone but we will champion the values without apology. we want strong alliances and partnerships based on cooperation and reciprocity. we will make the partnerships with those who share our goals. we will make common interests into a common cause. we will not allow inflexible ideology to become an obsolete obstacle to peace. we will pursue the vision we have carried around the world over this past year, a vision of strong, sovereign independent nations that respect their citizens in respect their neighbors. nations that thrive in commerce in preparation rooted in their histories and branching out toward their destinations. that is the future we wish for this world and that is the future we seek in america. [applause] with t

from cooking can't beat the cowboys to principle type of smoke back in a six pack and get a store see if you could buy that over one of the principles of stuff to besmirch the floor and let me just like the road i was always i swear guess it started on the day the cold the comes on the casket where we left it going to cuddling on the crispin of pakistan bashing and let's try to get the idea. my mum has thought a sex when she died if i keep drinking not me. maija not being dead if it is that. all of the things that i need to do to the child will lengthen my life which is already cut short because i was born in poland if i make it to seventy i'll be lucky and not suffer each solid of the did. not of course because of a growing body of research people know that on employer. public health consequences instead of the former idea because it was business moms stress that led to the worst i was problems. and i have come name thank my blood pressure to aids to happen tied in. all different diseases a man. in a data book when his ability. that's what i've been. i think is what i know you know i

of net neutrality and to advance those principles. is debate is -- really about whether we want as a nation to have our most important technology advanced potentially over our lifetimes, maybe in our history with the internet governored by regulators using 1934-era rules. an era of the outhouse. not of the smart house, to guide us forward. using the idea that the internet should be treated as a public utility. i've met many internet users around this country in this work. some have great things to say about their internet usage. some have bad things to say about their internet service but i haven't met a single internet user who wants their internet service to look more like their gas company or their water company. peter: jonathan spalter, what percentage of the u.s. population does not have access to broadband? jonathan: it's a very small but meaningful and important community. about 13 million americans. most of them live in rural communities. most of those communities can put broadband to tremendous use creating jobs, connecting t

up of who always combines to purchase first you have some fundamental principles for example going to direct contact between the two parties looking for a balance of interests implementation of agreements so that you don't go back at a certain point and also the russian federation and our partners. at least seven years ago we suggested we proposed adopting a document that would list all those principles that would. make sure that all the conflicts such treated some of our western partners said this will not work that every crisis is special in its own way and this is true but you know addition to these common the universal principles that maybe it is should be guided by when resolving a certain conflict we of course. should treat every conflict. in a special a way for example year we have a process going on but it. is not just about ceasefire because basically there is no one answer there because russian peacekeepers are there we are talking about facilitating people's daily lives and what is happening in ukraine the top priority there is to enforce a ceasefire because we always see.

and our principles and shoulder their fair share of responsibility for our common security fourth and finally our strategy is to advance american influence in the world but this begins with building up our wealth and power at home. america will lead again we do not seek to impose our way of life on anyone but we will champion the values without apology we want strong alliances and partnerships based on cooperation and reciprocity we will make new partnerships with those who share our goals and make common interests into a common cause we will not allow inflexible ideology to become an obsolete an obstacle to peace we will pursue the vision we have carried around the world over this past year a vision of strong sovereign and independent nations that respect their citizens and respect their neighbors nations that thrive in commerce and cooperation rooted in their histories and branching out toward their destinies that is the future we wish for this world and that is the future we seek in america. was. with this strategy we are calling for a great reawakening of america a resurgence of c

or the you are guarded as a value the difference is if it's a principle it's freestanding and is in some sense its own justification it's held to apply in almost all if not all circumstances if on the other hand free speech is a value then it's a value in competition with or in a mix with other values and you ask other kinds of empirical questions in free speech cases what you have to do is first calculate the costs of regulating the speech in question emotional political economic course and then calculate the costs of allowing the speech to flourish add up the columns see which costs more and make your decision accordingly i would go by that balancing idea rather than any kind of principle glenn what's wrong with balancing these different values. well first of all it's an incredibly subjective assessment so again in general it's not by definition marginalized groups who and empower and making these decisions and in fact if you look at the people whose free speech rights have been attacked it hasn't overwhelmingly been racist or islamophobia or immigration extremists in the united s

is observed. principle is preserved.s of a cabinet minister or the ethics of the police? i think absolutely it is the ethics of the police and it is about the public having confidence that if they call the police in to investigate a matter and there is other material not central to that investigation, that that confidentiality will not be breached and they can rely on the integrity and professionalism of individual police officers and investigators. that was the former chief constable of greater manchester. let's take a look at some of the other stories making the news this afternoon. a 14—year—old boy has died in hospital after being found unconscious on the hard shoulder of the m67 motorway in greater manchester yesterday afternoon. he was found nearjunction three of the motorway in hyde. it's thought the teenager was involved in a collision with a car. it's feared there could be hundreds ofjob losses at toys r us, after the retailer announced it would close around a quarter of its uk stores. the move, which would see

it doesn't differ in principle from what was going on in smith. you can say the same thing about miller. somebody has to engage in banking transactions to a bank. they write a check, they give the check to the bank, they use it to carry out the banks business. >> they don't give it to a bank, they give to a person who gives it to the bank. >> i think there are many different ways to carry out financial transactions, including some that involve giving a check to a person. many involve going to the bank directly and having the bank conduct the financial transaction. anybody who writes a check understands it will be submitted to the bank. ok in the wayot we set about papers to plant a beeper in somebody's bedroom, but it is ok to get the cell phone records of someone who -- i don't but i know that most young people have the phones in the bed with them. i know people who take phones into public restrooms, they take them with them everywhere. it's an appendage for some people. if it is not ok to put a beeper some one possibility, why is that to use the

president what that means about principle and pragmatism.as and it has topped me and to spend time in the marble room with the issues that we face today is not broken it does not require that our forefathers have done itri before right across the hall. the early years in alabama outside of birmingham. and with the high quality stone. and then was widely recognized for this texture and here in the nation's capitall from the halls of the supreme court bin to create the best of abraham lincoln like the places that are in fused in history to time of thet of future. i was raised by a family that had a deep and abiding preference for history. and the west point graduate was killed in service in world war ii. and then to understand us sacrifice looking in the of the other side is to remember that sacrifice. they understood and that greatest generation grew strong. and volunteer troop leaders to the scouts and boy scouts createce the environment of selfless service. by the age of 39 was unable scout in representative government as they tell every young person that comes to see me that played

it is necessary to identify acceptable principles in the peace process and future implementing. we therefore urge israel and palestine to take complete steps in the areas that will exchange prospects for peace based on the inalienable right of the palestinians and the right of israel to its own durable long-term security. >> i think him for his statement, i shall make a statement in my capacity of japan. in the peace process remains clear. a two state solution and belief, and negotiations, with resolutions and previous agreements in parties. it is in favor of the draft resolution. and ambassador haley today. and facilitating lasting peace agreement and supported two state solution, and note the importance of the president's clear acknowledgment the final status of jerusalem including the boundaries in the city must be subject to negotiation between parties and welcome the us to play an important role in advancing the peace process. concern about the possibility of the worsening of the environment surrounding the middle east peace process or deterioration of the situation of the

this is a principled stance. we felt it was disingenuous to the movement.y failure or my desire not to attend was based on my appreciation for the legacy of those individuals who sacrifice with their lives, put themselves in harms way. and my respect for the legacy would not allow me to attend.d. amy: so you did not go to any of these ceremonies, mayor lumumba? >> i did not attend the presentation or i was not a part donaldpresentation that trump was a part of. there have been events taking place all week or this previous weekend, so i had an opportunity to celebrate the opening of the museum. and i want to be clear that we are happy that this museum is opening. we invite people to come and celebrate the history, to come and learn. we won't people both near and far to come. mississippi has been known for so much negative history. and now we want to be the authors of a new story. so it is important we recognize this history in that effort to move forward. amy: derrick johnson, you are the president of the naacp, which also boycotted the migration of the muse

when you mention the principles, qatar responded right away that those principles are acceptable for everybody and qatar is went to engage to discuss what area of concerns on both principles, and to engage in a series of dialogue, why they see those principles being violated by any of the countries, not qatar only, but any of them, which has been the normal principles for the international law, fighting terrorism, stopping a difference in other countries, et cetera. so we remain committed to any civilized way to solve this problem. for them, they prepare their statement. they impose the majority, they have collectively punished qatar as they think. we cannot change them. and for and for us, we have been the country which was subject for this aggression. they need to obey to the international law and from all legal measureshe and come to the table and discuss their concerns. that's the only thing we can provide. regarding egypt and the blockading states, for us, we see that those measures carried out by the four countries mainly came from the gcc, and we see also all the lines of fumi

. >> barry goldwater defined conservativism with the maximum amount of freedom and the principles that animated that economic freedom and individual responsibility and free-trade we look at those items to say where are we? in terms of limited government we had a campaign i would expect the democratic party not to touch entitlement spending but they say no. conservatives have to be fiscally conservative. but instead we will not touch that or leave that to future generations or other campaigns. with regard to building the party i think we went the other way to drill down on the base only 5% of the worlds population if we don't find new markets or if we don't recognize the economy we can interview part of that and harness that or be left behind. >> i do want to get to free-trade but more broadly we have a republican in the white house republican control of congress with the majority of statehouses so explain how conservativism is lost. >> i remember very well. with that conservative think tank. we knew each other than and during the 1990s. and they still talk about this in the book archer

. >> there's another line about never compromise your principles principles. he says you had that her think twice about your principles. if your principles are the same as hitler irwin and you ought to think twice. it's more important to be sure your principles are correct rather than at and a sense of blindly following principles that will lead you the wrong way. >> guest: may i read that passage? he says i'm here to tell you it's much less important how committed you are than what you are committed to. if i have to choose i will undoubtedly take the side even the lazy person knows what's right and the salad is the cause of error. he may move slower buddies headed in the right direction. movement is not necessarily progress. more important in their obligation to follow your conscious or aspire to it as your application to form your conscience correctly. remember this nobody ever proposed evil as such neither hitler nor lenin or any other deaths that you could name came forward the proposal that read let's create a really impressive an evil society. so again p

the regime is against western principles and to tall tartarian expression -- suppression. neither the united states or europe wants another type of nuclear threat on its hands nor any of our nations at ease through support for terrorist organizations, militias on the ground in iraq and syria and active ballistic missile program. at europe's intersection in the region, we know turkey cannot ignore iran because of its proximity and cultural ties but we ask turkey to prioritize the common defense of its treaty allies. iran and russia cannot offer turkish people the economic and political benefits that membership in the western community of nations can provide. we recognize the important contributions of our nato allies that have been made in afghanistan and we ask them to maintain their commitment to the mission. the end state, the united states new strategy is to destroy terrorist safe havens and deny their re-establishment while the afghan is trying to maintain security and create the conditionses for reconciliation with the taliban and inclusive government that accounts fo

these were statements of political principles. kind of like preamble of the constitution, or like the declaration of independence. all men are born equally free and independent. we talked about that already. therefore government of right originates from the people it is founded in consent. we talked about that. all men have certain natural essential and inherent rights. that is what it means to be born free and equal. when men enter into the state of society, they surrender up some of their natural resources site in order to protect others. what does that mean to surrender your rights? >> you're willing to give up some of your personal rights in order to gain protection you need from the government. prof. muoz: could be. what else? this is complicated here. you have these rights by nature, but they are insecure. they are not necessarily respected so you join a government. the purpose of government is to protect your rights. to protect from soren and claire. that is why we have government because of the soren's and claire's of the

president, i don't have to prove my commitment to conservative principles. at the same time, i have a record of upholding the rule of law even when my own party goes astray. i have the scars to show for it, believe me. over my six years in the state capitol of montgomery, i assembled a nationally renowned team of prosecutors behind a common goal -- root out public corruption. this pursuit led to the conviction of several corrupt public officials in the state of alabama, including a county sheriff complicit in human trafficking, the first successful prosecution of its kind in decades. my team took on panama's -- alabama's republican speaker of the house for ethics violations and removal of him from office and a prison sentence. as you might imagine, mr. president, we didn't make many friends in the political establishment by doing so. but we shored up public trust in our representative government. for their commitment to fighting public corruption, my team has been recognized by the national association of attorneys general as a gold standard. i personally ha

principled and i don't see any really real is a minute here go ahead mike. hi peter nice to be with you i agree with some of what brian just said i do think that there is a tone in the report that is strong and that tries to push back and that push backs pushes back strongly against china russia north korea iran i agree with all that i do think however and by the way you're aware i'm not a supporter of president trying but i never was but i know who he is and i know why he got elected and the putting america first concept if i could just begin with that in my in my first comment because that is the centerpiece of the opening page and i think the title of the reporter at least the subtitle and i think frankly the way in which that concept is described is basically ok now i share some of your and brian's concerns about the tone toward certain countries that we can come back to that but putting america first of course can be interpreted as these zero sum competition among nations or it can be interpreted as hero principles we're going to try to live by we expec

it doesn't differ in principle from what was going on in smith. you can't have the same thing about miller. check, they get it checked the bank, the bank uses it to carry out the banks fitness. they don't give its way back, they go to a person who gives its way back. are manyerehat giveaways to carry this out. many are going to the bank directly and having the bank conduct the financial transaction and anybody who writes a check understands that it will be submitted to the bank. in the wayit not ok we set about papers to plant a beeper in somebody's bedroom but it is ok to get the cell phone -- i don'tsomeone but i know that most people have the funds in the bed with them -- i know people who take funds into public restrooms, they take them with them everywhere, it is not intended for some people. beepers not ok to put a into someone's bedroom, why is thek to use the signals phone is using from that person's bedroom? made accessible to law enforcement without probable cause? >> i will answer the question iout cell phone location but think it is im

but in terms of changing the technical aspects of or to operationalize the principle and change all the technical aspects that come after that that's something you'd have to ask the state department employees that handle the technical shifting of maps in the state department it's it's a question of stages it's a question of process and you probably know very well diplomacy doesn't happen overnight and the implementation of policy doesn't happen overnight and everybody you know the jewish people have waited have waited thirty seven have waited over two thousand years for this decision and they can wait a few more years for the implementation of the american decision the state department level you know very well that this announcement didn't sit well with a lot of people. on the third tier most notably palestinian president mahmoud abbas stating that he would no longer accept the united states as a meat east me a mediator and you know you're i find your opinions on the palestinian sometimes pretty harsh but having said that do you think these kind of alley nation is really in israel's

we will give rock principles that we think should be in -- raw principles we think should be included in the farm bill. we will do a deep dive based on the facts and the data we have two support to our view over those principles. i'll give you a metaphor of what athink a bill should contain, good safety net for producers. if you think about what a safety net is, think about going to the circus and looking at a high wire act. net isnk about if the under the wire, there's not much thrill. if it's on a concrete floor, you can get hurt. the balance is to have it in the right area where there is risk in farming, farmers don't mind risk, they just don't want to cror --e farm if the if the crops or the weather comes in and destroys their equity. >> feel free to bring in and submit questions. please write legibly. her'e's one from the audience dealing with insurance -- crop insurance. usda going to do with $1.4 billion it seems to be saving for preventive planting. you are referring maybe to or the of purchase planting.preventive if you can help me find that $1.4 billion, i would like to know

on top of everything else, our leaders drifted from american principles.hey lost sight of america's destiny and they lost their belief in american greatness. lostresult, our citizens something as well. people lost confidence in their government and eventually even lost confidence in their future. began tor, all of that change. the american people rejected the failures of the past. andrediscovered your voice reclaimed ownership of this nation and its destiny. 2017, i stood on the steps of the capitol to herald the day the people became the ruler's of their nation again. [applause] pres. trump: thank you. thank you. thank you. now, less than one year later i am proud to report that the entire world has heard the news and has already seen the signs. america's coming back. and, america is coming back strong. upon my inauguration i announced that the united states would return to a simple it's a poll -- the first duty of our government is to serve its citizens, many of whom have been forgotten. forgottenre not anymore. with every decision and every action, wher

too often, all these fundamental principles have been under assault. people who some exercise their first amendment rights have themselves been assaulted. result, those who would curtail free speech have been emboldened and those who disagree with the prevailing orthodoxy have been censored. point in having a student body on campus if competing ideas are not exchanged and analyzed and respected by each other. college,g community administrators require prior approval for speech in public forums. a twofold violation of the first amendment. amazingly, students there were arrested for disturbing copies of the u.s. constitution. against thet college and its ministers in the personal capacities pending. thinktudents erroneously that speech that they consider hateful is violent, yet some students engage in acts of violence against speech that failed to punish that violence. of californiaity berkeley, to invited speakers were prevented from speaking due to mob violence. that universities should be read minded of one of the passages in the supreme court. , ithe

i'm blessed to be in a country where our founders built based on principles in this book.want to encourage others to consider this book for themselves. we want to inspire them to engage with it and consider the principles this book teaches for their own lives. judge jeanine: they say 90% of american homes have within them a bible. this generation unlike previous generations has never been more distanced from the bible. why do i think that is? >> we are probably more ignorant of this book than we were as a nation. i believe it's because we don't teach it like we once again. it was regularly taught. our founders would speak from the bible and necessity wouldn't have to give chapter and verse because everybody knew what they were talking about. today when you have a quote from a bible, common phrases come from the bible and people have no idea that's where it comes from. judge jeanine: in this museum you created technology to tell this story. technology that didn't exist. you created it and patented it. >> one specific example is there is a digital docent. a tablet smaller th

the first principle is that any measure to alter the status of jerusalem and to alter the geographic demographic and historic karst there are six of the city is deemed to be no envoy. it must be abandoned the second principle set forth in said resolutions is that all united nations member states so who established diplomatic missions in jerusalem must withdraw them from the city and this is what took place subsequent to resolution four hundred seventy eight without any exemption lastly a little under a year ago with the adoption by this council of resolution twenty three thirty four was a reminder that no medication of the one nine hundred sixty seven borders other than one agreed upon by the parties will be acknowledged by the international community including in jerusalem. it is henceforth incumbent upon the united nations the united states rather to specify how president six december announcement aligns with this common legal foundation upon which all peace efforts are based and it is in comment upon us more than ever before to reaffirm our collective commitment to international l

justice willett respects the rule of law and foundational legal principles and he will be a strong addition to the fifth circuit. his story is an inspirational one, adopted at a young age and raised by a widowed mother in a town of 32 people. he was the first person in his family to grad yate from the -- graduate from high school. as our colleague senator cornyn said at the judiciary committee committee hearing, his life will reflect the best of texas and the best of america. from these humble beginnings, justice willett has led a remarkable career. after graduating from duke law school he clerked for judge williams. he has now been nominated to the package to join. he spints a short time in private practice before entering public service and then -- and then governor george w. bush's administration as a legal policy advisor. when president bush entered the white house, justice willett joined him as a special assistant to the president. in that role he helped shape the domestic legal policy of the bush administration, especially in the president's efforts to increase charitable activities i