what is the reason? the basic principle is how the government acquires information matters, not the sensitivity of the information, i have to disagree that medical information is given heightened protection under the fourth amendment. quite the ferguson case that we -- a urine test that the court assumed was given without informed consent so that governments urged by government hospital personnel the required law enforcement purposes, that is the government search -- i think it's also answer the question about acquiring gps forrmation under e 911 handset, the government reaches into the phone, pose at information, that i would concede is a search, what we are doing here is not going to the individual and extracting information from him, we are information from a third party provider, relying on the line of cases that the justice referred to that allow us -- >> that line of cases was developed in a. in which third parties did not have this kind of information. justice stewart one that you are getting incr

there is reason to think they do. there were all these commercials, can you hear me now, our company has lots of towers everywhere, what do they think that is about? a standard metro pcs contract seems to say, i guess we do not have the actual contract in the record, but they seem to advise the customer that we can disclose this information to the government if we get a court order. i do not know whether that will hold up. even if it were to hold up today, what would happen in the future if everybody began to realize this is provided, if you have enough police tv shows with -- shows were this is shown and they will know about it just like they know about csi information. >> three points. in a scholar's brief runs through the result of a survey that shows a strong majority of americans do not understand this information is acceptable to much less retained by the service providers. second, i agree that the metro pcs contract in 2010 and the other companies privacy policies today do disclose the location information. i t

no other rational reason? are you aware that the role of alivia was played by helen not carter and michelle pfeiffer? no other rational reason? [laughter] >> visit so on for a royal -- is it so odd for a royal to fall in love with a foreign actor? [laughter] [applause] prince harry may have an issue about this. >> fair enough. here is what i would say about that. to the point about sebastian not having a different reason for marrying her other than the fact that he needed to claim citizenship, i think that is exactly what was going on. you have a situation where olivia fell in love with someone completely different. someone who wooed her and won her with beautiful words, yada yada yada. the only thing sebastian said to her. the first thing he said was, "i will." this is not the person that she thought. it is very clear what his thought process was. he washes ashore, sees olivia, she proposes marriage to him, and he says i am not throwing away my shot. i am not throwing away my shot. i swam to this country. i'm

the second reason -- >> before we get to the second reason, you began by saying that this is -- this proclamation continues the practice of a banned proxy by nationality. but this is different in the sense that at least on the face of it, the proclamation began with an assessments not just of muslim majority nations, but all 200 plus nations and then sort of twin -- -- why doesn't that make a difference in the sense it did not begin as a proxy by nationality ban? >> your honor, i think the government actually conceded just now that we should not be surprised that we ended up with five of the six countries that were banned once again banned under the proclamation. that's because even though the president directed this worldwide review of each country, what he did in section 2 e of the eo2 was to say give me the list of your countries. and your honor, in the design of the study -- >> is it your view that he ordained the necessity of a list? he was not going to be satisfied that the department would come back and say you can't find anything? >> that's right, your honor. we know that not

the second reason. >> the second reason is he began by saying this proclamation continues the practiceof habana proxy by nationality but this is different in the sense at least on the face of the proclamation not just of the muslim majority nation but all 200 plus nations that winnowed its way down to the fairly similar result with respect to these other executive orders. why is there no difference in the sense that it not begin the proxy by nationality than? >> your honor i think the government conceded just now but we should not be surprised that we ended up with five of the six countries that were banned under e02 once again banned under the proclamation and that's because your honor even though the president directed this worldwide review of each country what he did in section 2e of the e02 is to say give me the list of your countries and your honor if the design of the study --. >> is the necessity of google is not going to be satisfied? >> that's right your honor and we know that not just through the proclamation itself which is complete with references coming up with a list of c

i don't read any of these reasons you are giving. you are sort of saying the president can exercise legitimate foreign policy if he does this but he can't exercise legitimate policy if he does this, if he treats the nationals just in the top government, it's okay but if he treats the whole country because the countries antagonistic it's not okay. in other words, you are making judgments about form policy which you personally are making for some other ulterior purpose. >> respectfully, i am not making those limitations. congress is. >> your honor, i'm pointing to congress limitations, duly enacted statutes. >> player not recognizing that while 1182 a provides criteria for admissibility so does 1182f and 1182f, they said the president himself has broad discretion we will give him discretion to act as our representative for the sovereignty of the nation, not as a domestic matter. >> subject to the requirement that he make a finding which is reviewable by the federal court courts. >> where did you get that? >> we get the right to review

>> it does violate the ina and constitution for similar reaso reasons. >> really catches the? >> were not limited because of the same reason this court we passed through the mandel hurdle in the record shows the proclamation make it easier to is not bona fide. the internal logic and being underinclusive to not having a nationality ban against venezuela and including somalia even though failed the baseline not including countries like belgium or the philippines that have been widely known. >> that goes to judgment rather than authority. >> but. >> on the establishment clause the proclamation suffers from the same fatal flaws we get past the mandel hurdle because on its face and taken in light of the statements the president made that he sticking with his original purpose to use nationality as a proxy for religion, we do not know that is not bona fide. there's also evidence of the proclamation evidence to its four corners the because of the internal logic even the president send the whole premise of this is a nation has a problem that makes anyone from that threat, this is not l

all stop battle this week when the house of commons reasserted itself and said hang on a minute to reason why you can't just go ahead with this in your way alone we're going to control you to a certain extent i think some of the reaction is a slightly overdone it was always going to be a rocky ride to this was never going to be a celebration this summit in brussels and so it's made to reason that makes life a little bit more difficult but i think what paul meant to this week was ultimately a good thing you think was a good thing i mean we've had people say it's parliamentary democracy at work we've also had people say that it is a prime minister who has been humiliated and put in her place well to a certain extent but the thing is that she knew this was going to be coming this sort of pressure this rebellion has been mounting been mounting for months in palm and she's already put off these votes won so they're meant to take place already back in and about terrible you can use it this is her own fault the one thing so she doesn't she ultimately has to try to keep a fractious party together

the reason why we see a retre h retrenchment on putting our money where our mouth is.ou toll us the work force in the 21st century looks different. they are more black and brown. to those that says that's why tl there is a retrenchment. that explains to those who connect those dots. do you accept that or reject it? >> look, i think there is a lot of value in that argument. another thing that changed is the nature of work have changed. so we now have a problem not just for young people being educated to get a good job and to lead a good life for a college education, the vast majority of adults in this country needs the same level of talents of young people do. in the recession what we learn is that those people got knocked out of jobs and those jobs are not coming back. let me tell you one statistic. when the recession ended in 2010 between then and the middle of 2016, there were 11.6 million johns created in the u.s. economy and of those 11.6 million jobs created, 11.5 millions got a college degree. that tells you that people who have a college degree and advantages an

rosemary: so, there are some good reasons to quit, some worthwhile reasons to quit. tracey: absolutely, i have changed careers five times in my life. who knows, with as long as we're living, how long that's going to be with the next ones. but if you, as you're going through your career advancement, you're going to find out other things that you're good at. as you become more self-aware, you're going to develop new talents you didn't know. also, if a better opportunity comes your way, by all means take it. third, if you don't trust your boss, you may not like them, you may not even understand them, that's neither here nor there. but if you don't have a boss that you can trust, and you've talked to them and you suspect they don't have your back, it may be time to start looking elsewhere. and the fourth reason i tell people, if you have really flatlined, and there's no other opportunity for career advancement, and you want to keep growing your experience bag, and climbing up, and raising the bar on life, then, by all means, that is a completely acceptable reason to star

then can we go back to reasonable service and answer the question.i understand what you said what the supreme court has said. >> if you go past the fact that the supreme court said rational basis under mccleary the question is whether the objective observer would determine the primary purpose was religious and i would submit that when you have a multiagency review where you've got numerous numerous. >> is classified and that's all we know. there has been one. >> the report you are talking about is not in this record. >> reports on the record. >> we do have in the record statements and notwithstanding how you may press that we can take notice of statements that are made that allows us to do that. we have that is direct purpose. >> again your honor their regional -- reasonable object of observer would look at the proclamation we don't have the underlying report that we did of the proclamation and we don't ignore what it says. >> are you saying that the court for the proclamation is in the report? is the report for the proclamation rational and not a mu

keep your majority's reasonable. that requires some mechanical devices. >> i think that concludes our time. thank you to the panel. [applause] >> all this week, washington journal is featuring authors of key books published during the year. join us for conversations with authors about their popular books. coming up this morning, author henry olson. tuesday, ken stern with "republican like me." on wednesday, angela j davis with her book "policing the black man." thursday, cliff stearns with his book, "life in the marble palace." war,iday, digital world islamist extremists, and the fight for cyber supremacy. on saturday, jessica bruder with her book, surviving america in the 21st century. sunday, "the gatekeepers." washington journal's authors series all this week at 8:00 a.m. eastern on c-span, c-span.org, and c-span radio. time at the white house looking at this year's holiday decorations and the lighting of the national christma

with comey and asked him for his loyalty that means the president had reason to know -- reason to believe on that night that the national security adviser had committed a crime. this tweet also suggests that on february 14th when i comey says the president asked him to drop the fbi investigation into flynn the president knew or had reason to believe that flynn had lied to comey's agents committing crime. now we have new cnn reporting that says the president was in fact advised to that effect. how did the white house come to know that flynn had lied? well remember sally yats, the acting attorney general at the time on the 26th january yats made an urgent appointment to bereave don mcgann about what she knew of flynn's kwakt certifyingia are sergei kizlyak. she spoke about it exclusively with me though declined to give specifics. >> when were you first made aware that general flynn was lying aboutis had interactions with the russian ambassador? >> well, first let me say i know that this may seem artificial to folks. i can't really talk about what general flynn's underlying contact was becau

the european union it britain is leaving the european union in two thousand and nineteen but the reason may just lost a key vote in her parliament so will the brakes that negotiations end up being just a rehearsal. brix it at some point in the future may need to be refilled. again. or we begin the day with the biggest trump over trump that the world have seen voters in the u.s. state of alabama last night elected a democrat as their new u.s. senator his name is doug jones now this was a political earthquake alabama is a republican stronghold and it hasn't sent a democrat to the u.s. senate in twenty five years voters rejected the republican candidate roy moore who was accused of sexually molesting teenage girls decades ago most republicans in congress had joined democrats in denouncing moore's candidacy but not us president donald trump he gave a full throated endorsement of moore and his advisors steve bannon went to alabama and declared the election another clash of the people against the establishment it didn't work the stunning loss plus trump's recent double entendre tweet attackin

reason. we are going to separate this from senator mccarthy immediately. on sound reason, we are on the same side. >> owen lattimore, is he a danger as a friend of mao zedong? the army that is fighting our own. for 15 years, he has been mao zedong's friend. don't you think that constitutes a danger to the thinking of our state department? heard of not think he has done, that owen lattimore has done. frank: personalities are very interesting, but senator mccarthy's methods, which are the things you most oppose. it is your position that his methods have not been justified? >> it is. >> a great many americans believe that the one reality of our time is the soviet power and that soviet power is aided in the united states by people who are willing to lend aid to that soviet power. >> the soviet power in russia is one thing. a soviet power in the united states i do not think exists. >> you do admit that there are americans who want to make russia more powerful. there have been such americans in our

all stop battle this week when the house of commons reasserted itself and said hang on a minute to reason why you can't just go ahead with this in your way. we're going to control you to a certain extent i think some of the reaction is a slightly overdone it was always going to be a rocky ride to this was never going to be a celebration this summit in brussels and so it's made to reason that makes life a little bit more difficult but i think what paul meant to this week was ultimately a good thing you think was a good thing i mean we've had people say it's parliamentary democracy at work we've also had people say that it is a prime minister who has been humiliated and put in her place well to a certain extent but the thing is that she knew this was going to be coming this sort of pressure this rebellion has been mounting been mounting for months in palm and she's already put off these votes won so they're meant to take place already back you know and of all terrible you can use it this is her own fault the one thing so she doesn't she ultimately has to try to keep a fractious party togeth

tv.on katherine mangu-ward is editor of reason. ofek chibber is professor yorklogy at new university. activeson with a very fan base, and the editor of journal of, his latest and is post colonial theory capital.f bhaskar sunkara is the founder jacobin. publisher of [applause] we're going to begin by trying to define our terms. the first question, which is going to start with reason, what capitalism? >> thank you very much michelle. jacobin jayb debate.nizing this let's get it out the way. capitalism is a system that doesn't have any answers. it does not seek to impose answers to the question which should we produce, how should we produce it, who gets the stuff we produce. that kind of sounds like garbage. i will try to get little more nitty-gritty also in my answer. what that means in practice is that property is largely privately owned. means that profit provides incentive for production, it will.employment is at the government role in the economy should be limited and forces of supply and demand in a free market are the most effi

this is a major reason why we have cyber attacks. if you don't have an ability to throttle or block it's one of the reasons why we had the major iot where they could take baby monitors and operators over. you can see that on the system where you are in the stack. you might be the isp. now they can see and have to let it wash over them. . . . . a lot of the great things we are seeing with 5g one of the reasons why self-driving cars will work is because the information flow will be seamless. the information flow to be seen seen -- seamlessly may need to prioritize the information that comes from the automobile to the downloading of netflix. it won't interfere with your downloading of video and i think there's a lot of misunderstanding if you put something at first it automatically queues everything less. there've been several papers i can point you to on the item. those are the three bright lines and issues that have a reason for occasionally doing something then blocking. a lot of it is to protect the internet which we haven't heard a

liberalism is of course the most important reason reigning corruption and could not cure it because she thinks that liberalism is to cure liberalism is the poison. in some american cities the police built themselves cling to refutation of people who walk on the streets of the united states who are at risk from the very people who are supposed to protect that poor people are no more afraid of police than of criminals. who can see something happening and this is like i don't want to call the cops let that happen rather than call the cops in those young black men lose their lives chasing the same goods on the trigger you never know better safe than sorry i don't know that someone else is going to pull a gun so. unfortunately around around here we end up killing our guns are stolen from such precautions true. spiritual people have been saying about redacted a night with the fact that it's full on awesome the only show i go out of my way to launch you know what it is that really packs a punch. yeah mr john oliver of harvey america is doing the same thing we are apparently better than two

for the reason stated in our appeal responses and statements made at the hearing. the determination complies with the requirements of class 1 categorical exemption is the appropriate environmental review determination. the appellant has not provided substantial evidence to refute the conclusion of the department. therefore i urge you to uphold the department's exemption and deny the appeal. this concludes my presentation and planning and staff will welcome any questions you may have. thank you. >> supervisor breed: seeing no names on the roster we'll have up to ten minutes for the mta to do a presentation about the project. if you would like. if not, that's no problem. >> we can do a short presentation. i'm tallia lang the project manager at the sfmta. just to give you a quick overview of the project this is the hairball area. we're working on different segments. it's being worked on by public works and the subject of the appeal is the portion of gerald avenue between barnville and bayshore and bayshore boulevard between gerald and marrin. this is the project area

nick gillespie editor in chief of reason and reason tv. sorry, editor of reason.com and reason tv.atherine mangu-ward is editor in chief of reason. vivek chibber is professor of sociology at new york university. [cheers and applause] wax and a person with a very active fan base, and the editor of catalyst journal of, his latest book is post colonial theory and specter of capital. bhaskar sunkara is the founder editor of publisher of jacobin. >> [applause] >> we're going to begin by trying to define our terms. the first question, which is going to start with reason, what is capitalism? >> thank you very much, michelle. thank you very much to jacobin for organizing this debate. let's get it out the way. capitalism is a system that doesn't have any answers. it does not seek to impose answers to the question which -- what should we produce, how should we produce it, who gets the stuff we produce. that kind of sounds like garbage. i will try to get little more nitty-gritty also in my answer. what that means in practice is that property is largely privately owned. it means that profit pr

i'm running a reasonably conventional portfolio. equities doing reasonably well.ill come under pressure. how am i balancing this worry out of my portfolio? rupert: the outlook for bonds is not good, although for many investors, particularly pension fund investors, they hold bonds for the purpose of protecting the value of the liabilities rather than from what they will return on their own right. the outlook for equities is ok. the global economy is growing strongly. corporate profits are growing strongly. we will begin in the kicker in the u.s. by the tax changes. i think that is likely to be a tail wind for equities this year. obviously, next year. and the year after. i am worried about bonds and a little bit worried about valuations in the u.s. as well. and if bonds were to selloff because of strong growth, but i don't think that matters enormously. a flight withas of higher inflation, and i'm not expecting high inflation, i'm just expecting inflation returns to target. i would expect some kind of wobble at some point next year. guy: if i'm thinking about my pen

that's the reason the white house said they fired flynn. now a source familiar with the matter tells us that don mcgahn after speaking with yates briefed the president telling him that based on his conversation with yates he believed flynn had not told the truth in his interview with the fbi. we don't know the precise date but we do know that it happened and it happened in january. again, this means that when the president allegedly asked james comey to go easy on flynn, he may have known or at least had reason to believe that flynn had committed a felony. that means this tweet on saturday could provide additional evidence he obstructed justice which may explain why the white house, especially the president's personal attorney, john dowd, has been doing damage control regarding that individual tweet. dowd first saying that the part in the tweet referring to lying to the fbi wasn't a new admission but instead merely paraphrasing what was in white house attorney ty cobb's statement about general flynn's guilty plea. there was another explanat

equal. >> we are equal in reason, but in our fallible reason. that is good. you know the story of jefferson's death? do you know when he died? jefferson died with john adams on july 4, 1826. the 50th anniversary of the declaration of independence. --ferson obviously rights writes the rough draft of the, the main draft of the declaration of independence. adams was the founder most responsible for getting the colonists to move towards independence. you could argue that they are the two founders most responsible for the declaration of independence, and they die on july 4, 1826, a poetic ring to it. there's a big party in philadelphia to celebrate the 50th anniversary of the declaration of independence, and folks write to jefferson and say, please come to philadelphia, we want you to be part of this celebration. jefferson is about to die. he writes this letter back, and i should have had you read this, but i have a passage for you. it is written at the end of june 1826. i think this might be jefferson's best statement of his own understanding of the

of practical and theoretical reason. in other words, politics is in the realm of practical reason and prudence. science establishes how to practice politics. the end of philosophy, the end of politics is the beginning of rational rule. that is clear already in some places. ok, john and i have a difference. we agreed that a substantial part of the american population is dissatisfied with the current order. what i would add to that is that i think it is growing. there is a lot of anecdotal evidence out there that the very young people in their teens and 20's are turning against the contemporary consensus. i keep running across pieces of evidence on this on the internet and an interesting study by hispanic heritage on this. it is quite contrary about the views of young people. what's happening is, the elites have become more a more aggressive talking about how white people are worthless and need to go way and vanish. younger people, younger white people are saying i don't want to die. i'm going to stick up for myself and my

therefore, uplifting reason, not passion. refining their opinion as it was a refinement of the people's. this is, i think from the ,erspective of the federalists a republican aware of its own weaknesses, with checks from other regime types, something we have lost in the discussion of the mixed regime. that does not mean that we have a mixed regime. but understanding what comes from those other types. so what is the situation? very different. a series of popular votes with the electoral college rubberstamping those votes. you could argue that the political parties took that role over, the work of julius caesar. the party would choose the two candidates that would be voted on by the electoral college. and by the people. martin van buren, that being his great innovation and contribution lasting , contribution to american politics. this would allow for the same kind of refinement, or at least by the i would say, founders' perspective, inferior. that is not true now. party conventions are beauty pageants. where is it decided? wher

there must be a reason for them to want to get information they want to get.on't think we should get all hot and bothered that something's happening next week or by christmas. >> i get hot and bothered whenever they do. greg, thank you, really appreciate. thank you. much more ahead, stay with us. y. y. except for one of us. i write them a poem instead! and one for each of you too! that's actually yours. that, that one. yeah. regardless, we're stuck with the bill. to many, words are the most valuable currency. last i checked, stores don't take "words." some do. not everyone can be the poetic voice of a generation. i know, right? such a burden. the bank of america mobile banking app. the fast, secure and simple way to send money. you for four years. you named it brad. you loved brad. and then you totaled him. you two had been through everything together. two boyfriends, three jobs... you're like nothing can replace brad. then liberty mutual calls... and you break into your happy dance. if you sign up for better car replacement™, we'll pay for a car that's a mode

reason. and the story goes on and all the neighborhood. does for nothing goes walking down the street. in my lifetime let's say maybe. six or seven times so there's a whole lot of i'll be all about foley's i'm not the light i get pulled over for you know what have i done wrong. i can't even tell you no it's not stopped that's more than i can i can count but it's you mean it ten times. maybe. ten eleven twelve i don't count i don't know i don't keep track pretty in the us the police is allowed to stop any passes by if it suspects a risk or criminal threats according to the agents this practice is a way to prevent crime but from professor james brown's point of view it increases the risk of making huge blunders the idea was you want to increase the contact between the police and only certain public you know not everybody is mostly folks in high crime or poor urban communities any time you increase the contact between police and citizens even. the likelihood that something can go. in two thousan

for a number of reasons. at exactly the moment when more black women are able to qualify for afdc, agencies are not allowed to take the children of black mothers and put them into foster care. there is a lot of threats to do that. sorry, let me go back. they are not allowed to really punish black women for applying fdc in the first place, but what they can do is use afdc funds to take their children and place them in foster care. as a safeguard against that -- i said i was not going to go down into the weeds and now i have too much. one of the things that happens with this federal money for foster care that is linked to afdc is you have to have a court order to place kids in foster care and it is to prevent agencies from punishing black women for even applying for afdc in the first place. it is an end -- a real scaling back of families seeking foster care voluntarily. the only way you can get the federal funds to pay for foster care is if there is a court commitment. it makes the whole system more contentious

but that's the reason. that's the reason. because you couldn't reach compromise. now, very frankly, a lot of the bills have come out of committee. you know why they came out of committee? ecause they were bipartisan. but they haven't been brought to the floor by mr. mcconnell and they haven't been sent to the president of the united states. so, crocodile tears. and yes, you passed those 12 bills. just like you can pass the c.r.'s. on your own. without any help from us. and if the government schutz down, it is because you can't get -- shuts down, it is because you can't get the majority of your party to pass bills. you're in charge. mr. mccarthy: i ask the gentleman to yield. mr. hoyer: i still have the time. i'm going to yield to you. there is no doubt when we were in charge and you didn't support us, we passed every piece of legislation we wanted to pass on this floor with 218 democrats. we were united as a party. we lost some. but never enough to make it that we didn't get 218. you lost 90. you could say it was on the debt. you could say it was on national secur

two reasons the recent selloff may not be what you think. bloomberg. ♪ vonnie: live from new york, i am vonnie quinn. mark: from bloomberg's new european headquarters in the city of london, i am a mark barton, and this is "bloomberg markets." investors are wondering how long the distaste for technology stocks will last, might be asking the wrong question. selling text, piling into names that will benefit from u.s. tax cuts. our next guest will throw cold water on the idea that it is rotation. stocks reporter, and as you say in your great piece, --ny qamar ask danny, are investors asking the wrong question? little contrarian view. you have to look at the contours of the selloff stop it is not just about tech, it is not just about banks. -y is all about factors, quant way of looking at stocks. you break down stocks by now cheap or expensive they are, how fast they been moving up or moving down. if you break it up by the characteristics of the stock, no matter what sector it is in, you can predict how it has moved to the past week, which would

i think that fails for two reasons.hey have not made the findings this court called for under 1182. second, the findings they make are not detrimental to the united states. let me walk you through that. the last two arguments are the 1152 violation, and the fourth is the first amendment and religious discrimination. to answer your question posed to my colleague, here is the problem. here is what you said in your hawaii decision page 77. "although the order explains ,ecisions in the six country the order avoids any finding that the current screening processes are inadequate. as the law stands, an applicant bears the burden of showing the applicant is eligible to receive a visa. the order offers no further reason explaining how these individualized adjudications process is flawed, such that permitting entry of an entire class of naturals is injurious to the united states." that was your clear holding. he then had his vaunted seven agency worldwide review. find whatthey ever you called for, which is that the individualized

i can't understand the reasoning. all you're going to get, with hedge funds and we can out perform in any other market. now the new claim to fame, protection in a down market. your hedge funds manager said that, not one of you asked him what his definition of protection in the down markets is. so let me -- >> 30 seconds. >> i'd like to ask that question, what his definition is of protection in a down market. you're not going to get it. you're going to spend hundreds of millions of dollars in management performance fees. >> are there any other members of the public? i have your card, do you want to go last? any other members who would like to address who haven't submitted a card? mr. ferland, you're up. >> can you tell me when i have a minute left? so you did 0.1% access return over the past five years, that's a lot of salary and fees and asset for 0.1%. it's very, very, very difficult to out perform a raging bull market. okay? you're going to out perform the indexes, which i think you should do, index in a bare market

it's reasonable for the area. there are a number of houses and apartment buildings that are of similar scale in the neighborhood. it meets zoning. went through design and review. scaled back by planning commission and if we will stop that from existing neighborhoods, we will just cause the lack of housing. if those projects can't get approved, we'll exacerbate the issue. as neighbors and was mentioned about the west side, we have to come together and take our fair share. at the end of the day to demolish a single home to put in three units of family housing, given the conditions that were approved at the planning department and planning commission, to me, this is something that i think we should move forward with. what i would like to do a make a motion to approve items 31 and 35 and table 30, 32, 33, 34, 36 and 37. >> councillor breed: seconded by supervisor tang. seeing no other names on the roster, madam clerk, please call the roll. >> councillor farrell: aye. >> councillor peskin: aye. >> councillor ronen: aye

and with good reason it was a classy finish. a short breda and then shall go back at it in the forty seventh minute bergdahl reacted quickest to notice header. sunil to the home side. but after a defensive showing alex book woke up. cut you'd be rising high for his fourth goal of the ses and two one. and outs book one a penalty ten minutes from time. corage stepping up. to two. but shell code words of a tonight curry turning a fell from marvin hits. daniel caligiuri doing the rest. three to the final score shell can now guarantee to go into the winter break with their best points tally in six a zens. and that's your news rep for now to join us at the top of the next hour if you can a rita will be with you then for another full bulletin or you can always check us out on our web site that's at t w dot com find us on twitter too thanks for watching. stories that people the world over information the provide the pennines they want to express g.w. .

what are the reasons you care for your heart?10 with 3x better absorption has the #1 cardiologist recommended form of coq10 to support heart health. qunol, the better coq10. stuff happens. when you have a cold... [ sneeze ] shut down cold symptoms fast with maximum strength alka seltzer plus liquid gels. ♪ tired of sore throat lozenges that only last a short time? try new alka-seltzer plus sore throat relief. the melts dissolve quickly. plus, the powerful pain reliever provides long-lasting relief for up to six hours. try new alka-seltzer plus. >>> a whole bunch of people turned up outside republican representative barbara comstock's office in sterling, virginia today. a whole bunch of people and a large chicken. that is a trump chicken, if we're going to be precise. this was outside comstock's district office in virginia. while simultaneously across the river in washington, d.c., this was outside barbara comstock's office on capitol hill. >> i have spinal muscular atrophy. >> have i spinal muscular atrophy. >> i cannot go to the

includes firing the director of the fbi for whatever reason or no reason. and he goes on to say, so, until and unless there is proof that trump has committed an independent criminal act, something else other than firing, beyond acts within his constitutional prerogative, it would be unconstitutional to charge him with obstruction of justice. because the constitution gives the president enumerated power the president has limitless discretion however he wants or she wants to use the power, corruptly or noncorruptly to use at that power. and you need some other crime. and there's an exchange that highlights that argument. another argument that andy graywall was involved in a debate about this and someone challenged him and said i understand your theory of legal analysis, does it-- is it, even in acceptance of a bribe? >> acceptance of a bribe is not an official act. the other commentator says if the bribe is conveyed by an official act. you don't have to pay a bribe to commit bribery, it's the agreement to do so. and without a side deal i don't see why would b

i didn't even get the reasons for using g.p.s. for. purpose. ordered the gadget online from china because the calf would run loose it what it is about is that illegal was obliged to pay for it there is an article in the russian criminal code under which people can be charged if they. didn't even know that such a lower existed i'll definitely look into that article in the cases with those individuals it's the first time i'm hearing about problems with attaching such things to cat was i know the trackers are even put on cats to make sure they don't get lost what's the problem with couse this needs to be sorted out i'll handle it there's years of that i didn't think my problem would get publicity i hope this means that they reconsider the law because lots of people have suffered because of this when i was watching the t.v. i was nervous i hope the case is resolved in my favor and maybe we can breathe freely by new year. so there's mr terre waste to be less of a troublemaker without any laws being broken he'll have a train go our t. . now a bit lat