meaning what watson does -- you do not say, "if this, do that."ry device you have has been programmed "if this, do that." somebody had to tell it what to do. your smart phone, you name it. watson takes data of all kinds, understands, reasons, and learns over that data. and that will help you make him and him and better decisions. this is an interesting stat i think we are sharing. in the world, we think there is a market of $2 trillion for making better business decisions. and some of it is rooted in the plain, fundamental fact that when you and i make decisions -- you may be better at this, david. david: not likely, but -- ginni: a third are right, a third are not optimal, and a third are wrong. it transcends everything. david: let's talk about the life of a ceo a large company. how much time are you on the road, traveling, now? ginni: oh, i, you know, probably 50%. david: and customers, they are mostly interested in what? when you meet with them, you try to tell them why ibm is better than somebody else? ginni: no. david: no, you don't do that?

to do.the things that we were most passionate about with our lives. and my father in particular, he, his family, his father's family, before his father had become a lawyer, they had a dry goods store. and they had run it in their family for a couple of generations. and his uncle had been pressured by his family to go work in the dry goods store. and he hated it. he did not enjoy the work. he did it because he was pressured by his family to follow this tradition and go into the family business, and it made a real impression on my father. and he said i never want to pressure my kids because i would not ever want my kids to have this life that his uncle had. david: on your own you chose to go to the business. and did your father say that if you work hard in 20 years or 30 years, you will be the ceo? or did he never promised that? abigail: no. he never, he was not a guy who made promises to anybody. david: so when you are working in a family business, and your father is the ceo, is it awkward at

but if we do not do something with the security, if we do not do something with the chain migration, we are fooling each other that we solved the problem. you know how difficult this issue is. so let's collectively, we're here at the table together. i'll be the first one to tell you, we're all going to have to give a little. i'll be the first one willing to. but let's solve the problem. but let's not tell the american public at the end that it's solved when it's not. >> well, i think a good starting point would be bob goodlatte, who has done a bill, and you're going to submit and they'll negotiate in congress and the house, and then it goes to the house. they'll negotiate, both republican and democrat. it could be a good way of starting, unless anyone has an idea different than that. i think starting in the house might be good. you're ready. i think you're ready to go. i would like to add the words meritt into any bill that's submitted because i think we should have merit-based immigration like in australia and canada, so we have people coming in who have a great track record, as opp

lemonis: and 20 years from now, what do you want to be doing? cory: 20 years from now, i want to be nationwide, possibly a worldwide c.e.o. of the brand. lemonis: and what title does your mom have? cory: she's a coo. lemonis: okay. she reports to you? cory: yes. lemonis: are you sure your mom is not the boss? cory: she signs the checks. lemonis: you know what they say, whoever signs the checks calls the shots. cory: yeah, so i guess she's the boss. lemonis: you don't believe that, do you? cory: no. we're both the boss. when i'm 18, then i'll be officially called the boss. lemonis: okay. now, i went on to your website because i wanted to order the product. cory: oh, yeah. lemonis: i couldn't buy it. cory: so that's the thing right now. you can't buy it now because they're all fresh. lisa: meaning there's no preservatives added in. lemonis: what's the shelf life? cory: two days. two days. lisa: that's one of the problems because he has, like, united airlines who wants his cookies, target, qvc, walmart, whole foods, but we can't fulfill what they w

what do you do if you are a democratic leader of russia? what do you do? how do you provide jobs for your people? where do you go? how do you build that country? unless you engage the west. i do not know how that happens. i have not given up hope, i am not naive about it -- i have been a very strident voice in the last administration about putin in russia as i am now, but that does not mean that this is how things are going to be. the last point i will make, when my dad had the expression, "never backed a man into a corner where his only way out is over top of you." take a look at russia now. where do they go, they are incredibly dangerous. the life expectancy is changing, they are expecting to be 20% smaller population by 2050, i can go on. it is really going to be a tough, tough time to get them to the place where their citizens think they have any future. the last point, this new phony nationalism and populism that is being used by charlatans all across the world, the only thing keeping putin where he is is that they can demonstrate they are powerful ag

if you do not have a wall, you do not have daca. [indiscernible] be concernedple that they could be deported on march 5? president trump: tell them not to worry. they should not be concerned. we have $25 million for a wall. immigrationst the various problems. is $180 billion. if you build a wall with $22 billion and you are spending $100 billion, that wall is a great return on investment. it is probably the best return on investment you are going to make. then we can help people with health and medical, that is the ultimate return on investment. but we are saving hundreds of billions of dollars by building that wall. >> you said we are going to do daca and have a larger immigration plan. what did you mean by that? president trump: we are going to make a replacement for the lottery system. we could bring people in based on merit and we are going to build a wall. are you going to talk to mueller? president trump: i am looking forward to it. there was no collusion whatsoever. there was no obstruction whatsoever. i do worry when i look

we can do this. i do not have an app for it, but we can do it. >> good morning. i wanted to know if you see a strategy to operationalize leadership against populism, and can we use that to return to that kind of conservatism? mr. steele: i have not given up on that train. that is a good way to look at it. look, i do not have a problem with populism. i have a concern about nationalism. i have a concern about the distortion of certain values and principles that i think are foundational. and that is why i think certainly there's are the ones that can reanchor that in a real sense. i like the idea of competing against this emergent philosophy, if you will. the canonization of american politics, which we now see as even at odds with the very person they promoted and supported. so that tells you something about where that wants to go. i think we need to be prepared for that fight. so i am asking all of you to stand your ground. you either want to fight for an america that still believes in with a lady in new york harbor stands for. you want to fight for an america that

is doing fine. and factoring in and of adjusting for his particular he addressesow diplomacy in general which is not always my preference. but now that we know how he operates, i think the basic approach of supporting the protests there's and condemning -- of supporting the protesters and conducting the government is generally fine. when you look more broadly at how we handle these situations -- and imagine 2009 with president obama in a ron or the arabs -- in iran or the arab spring and how we tried to gently push out president mubarak in egypt or how we tried to encourage protests in syria and look what happened -- we have to be aware of the ringsides of lu people into thinking that we are going to come and help when we want. that would be my only caveat of precaution. sometimes, these things take lives on of their own. no one -- to know when things get to a tipping point and when you have an emerging phenomenon of vast protest, that is hard to foresee. people did not necessarily foresee tiananmen

we do?e can't raise interest rates because the stock market is high. >> jamie dimon was here earlier and said, look, you don't see the debt levels you saw in 2006. >> yeah. >> there's nothing. >> yeah. you see big movements in asset prices you don't see the leverage and the excess growth that's associated with that unless it's hidden somewhere like it was ten years ago when we don't see it until the tide goes out. >> the ecb and the fed ex try kating themselves. if you want something to worry about where people say i'm worried because there's nothing to worry about, we assume they could do all of this stuff and, you know, juice everything up, get everything going, trillions of dollars when they unwind it's going to be, they did their work, now we unwind if i was going to worry about anything, that would probably be it. >> can i add one other thing though >> yeah. >> bank of japan, they're going to start retracing and pulling back as well we have two of the big three central banks this year b

do not. because that to me was just such an insult to back someone with the kind of credible evidence of his personal behavior and say that i have to stand with this guy, or we have to support him because of some damn vote in the senate? are you kidding me? principles nowr have become, whether or not we have a vote in the senate? so we throw all of that out? that makes no sense to me, and i think it is going to come back thiste republicans hard year. i think women in this country looked at that and went ok. thank you. we know. got you, got two. we have got you covered in november. we will show you. if you don't believe me, just look at virginia. 13 out of 16 seats were won were won by women. what people do not appreciate, what has happened in the course of the last year, folks looked at the women's march on washington the weekend after the inauguration and thought, it is a one-off. a lot of people just upset, cannot accept the election. ok. so what i did was i just stayed in touch with folks.

not do their job? they go against the will of the people. when we lose, it is not a indate for the democrats but reality, we all lose because we are all the same planet. the other thing about this wall -- i keep telling you to go back and look at what nelson mandela in power did. here andple floated indigenous people did not. there is talk in the background of making a national hispanic party. they will outnumber you. host: how do you feel that the term "fake news"? guest: i do not like being called it. [laughter] --st: i appreciate the confidence in the media. it started off as literally being news that was not real news. news articles that were not molded.nd then it was news withany time and said that someone did not like, they did legitimize -- they delegitimized it. how is that term in the focus on it changed at any how you have the new job? hast: i do not think it changed how i've done my job and i think it is fair that citizens should hold the media accountable for the job that we do. when we do

trump is doing fine. and, you know, factoring in and adjusting for his particular approach to how he addresses diplomacy in general, which is not always my preference. but now that we know how he operates, i think the basic approach of supporting the protesters and condemning the government is generally fine. but i do think when you look more broadly at how we handle these kinds of situations let's imagine 2009 with president obama in iran or the arab spring and then how we try to help gently push and then more firmly push president mubarak out in egypt or try to encourage protests in syria and look what happened. we have to be a little bit aware of the down sides of luring people into thinking we'll come help them in a way that we won't. that would be my main caveat or caution would be, not that iran today is equivalent to syria, 2011, but sometimes these things take on lives of their own. you can't really read them that well even if you are a specialist in the country. to know when things get to a tippi

. >> of course i do. i see them every day. so this is as -- i laugh. mitch mcconnell said, she shouldn't have said that. i didn't hear him say anything about the president saying anything about the foul language he used describing countries from which we receive many wonderful entrepreneurial people. you and i know being italian-americans that immigration is the constant reinvigoration of america. people come with their family values to make the future better for their families. their dreams to make the future better. that's what our founders intended, that every generation would take responsibility for the next generation to do better, and that's called the american dream. and these d.r.e.a.m.ers have inspired america. this should be so easy. if you want to talk about -- >> it's not easy, though. i mean do you think a deal is going to get done at all? >> it has to. it has to. so we'll stick with it until we can get a deal. but if they want to do conservative immigratio comprehensive immigration, let's do

they'll do this every year. they'll do a sample. so they may pick certain pieces of equipment the first year and a different set the next year. but the findings they have on one are often the same for the others. as soon as we see them it gives them a clear idea -- >> so there's only going to be a sample inventory of what we own? >> it's statistical sampling to be able to have evidence of confidence in it so they will be on site counting things and checking numbers. >> i don't know if it will tell you exactly what they counted but it will tell us the sample sizes, yes. >> thank you very much. i yield back. >> mr. kelley. >> thank you for being here. i again want to echo a thank you to chairman conaway for his efforts in getting this to come. it's a massive undertaking. long overdue. it's going to be very, very difficult. i hope we will focus on the things that improve the processes going forward. some of those, number one is oco. there's a lot of room even when people are trying to do that right, for abuses that are intentional and

i do believe that.aca done, if it's done properly with security and everything else, if it is done properly, we have taken a big chunk of comprehensive out of the negotiation and i don't think it's going to be that complicated. >> we have to be very clear. in my opinion will be back or in five years, 30 years, whatever. the chain migration is so insidious. it's the fundamental flaw in the united states. and a conversation about daca is being held without that consideration. i agree with border security as well. if we think we are going to divide one side for us the other, not not going to happen on this issue. >> chain migration is taking a very big hit over the last six months. people see what happens. for instance, the men on the west side highway that killed the people up and they're so badly wounded. it's incredible when they talk about wounded. they don't say arms are often like softer one person lost two legs. eight died, but they don't talk about the 12 people that have no legs, no arms. i'm talk

why would they do such a thing? what do they find so object-able? what do they disagree with? what is so objectional that they would hold the government hostage? was it funding for our military? was at the children's health insurance program? is it funding for the veterans administration? funding for our national parks? what is it? the answer is they have no problems with any of it. and yet, they are blocking this legislation anyway. that's right. senate democrats shut down the government over a bill that they have no issues with. they opposed a bill they do not even oppose. we do some crazy things in washington, but this is utter madness. here is the simple truth -- senate democrats refuse to fund the government unless we agree to their demands on something entirely unrelated. they want a deal on immigration, and then they will think about reopening the government. it is a shakedown strategy that senate democrats have been talked into by their base. they like to go on and on about -- i'd like to go on and on about how cynical i think this ploy is, and i do, but let me read yo

do you do. anyway, thank you. >> good morning i'm marianne dresner to speak about 248 state street and i'm speaking to embellished to what this individual said. it's another property in which santos provided false plans that enabled developers to far exceed permits. the project was presented to neighbors as an interior remodel of avenue 1912 remodelled single family building. the property owners claimed only one plan was made, to enclose two balconies in front of the building and asked for support to do that. permission was granted with no neighborhood objection. nevertheless, the building was soon put on risers and a tree on the street was removed, the house was completely gutted. in november 2014, bulldozers began carving at the foundation. tons of bedrock was hauled away and the entire foundation was removed. all street level walls were demolished, including a foundational wall next door without advanced notice to adjacent neighbors. d.b.i. was contacted and stop work order was issued in dece

and you had to do stuff people don't do anymore.sion ads did not amount to anything if you did not do retail campaigning. and i learned 75% of what i know about politics in that first race. david: at the time hillary came down to help you with the campaign. did you think she was going to stay down in arkansas and marry you? because you know, arkansas was not considered, in her world, the place that was the center of the universe exactly. [laughter] mr. clinton: i did not, no. look, i had it one step at a time. i already asked her twice to marry me and she said no both times. smart girl. [laughter] so the third time, i told her, just come down here. they liked her so much at the law school they offered her a job teaching. she didn't have anything else to do. her other job was she was working with the house judiciary committee. so when that whole thing was over, she just took the job and it worked out pretty well. david: when you got married, you said to your wife, or she said to you, i don't want to make any speeches. and you kind of

what do we have to do to tease apart the elements of the 100 goal. the first is decrease our load, get as many led's in as we can but work on the ways we build efficiency so we decrease the need to begin with. we have to get off of fossil fuels as our energy source. and finally, when i talk about the 100, we're talking about getting off all fossil fuels, fuel switching to electric sources and switching in transportation and heating systems. so that in a nutshell is the challenge of the city in the next 30 years is how we're going to achieve all of those things. luckily we're not -- whoa. there we go. that's an interesting slide. so luckily we're not doing this alone. this is supposed to show the intersection of two roads but i didn't pick it out and it's very interesting. (laughter) that's the intersection of two double-decker freeways, that is great. i was thinking pads in the forest but that works. the metaphor is we can't do it alone. there's an important intersection between the role of cities and states. and i often say that san francisco and th

colleagues, do we have a motion to convene into closed session, and we do, and do it without >> we are now back in open session for january 17, 2018, government audit and oversights, regular meeting. >> thank you, mr. clerk. >> deputy city attorney, during the closed session the committee voted unanimously to forward items 4-7 to the full board with positive recommendation. >> supervisor kim: thank you so much, mr. city attorney. do i have a motion to not disclose the proceedings of closed session today? >> so moved. >> we have a motion and second and can do that without objection. mr. clerk, is there any further business before this committee? >> there is no further business. >> we are adjourned. women's ne sustainable future . >> san francisco streets and puffs make up 25 percent of cities e city's land area more than all the parks combined they're far two wide and have large flight area the pavement to parks is to test the variants by ininexpensive changing did new open spaces the city made up of streets in you think about the potential of having this space for a purpose it is deman

what you love about use designs do you can do with what they want but what they mean. that's really really special and maybe i will remember the green card. was a nest of muslims did the issues. with the praise we do with the same the first most read oh you can do everything better that's what i think so too important why for you to express yourself you know so can we commiserate way this is special if it's just a christmas for. it's like. wow. that is a serious piece of this kid so it's a little piece of what's inside so you want to do it so. the number seventeen and your favorite number it's my. god so did you design the logo like it's ok from test you've been going to local in the past. great. so you might use to make some good as well this one must be because for the show is that when i played a long long time maybe before you were born just black football boots my dad and i thought we might be one strike or prescribes you can do whatever you want to tell us what you like when you buy my favorite color it's both because i'm so white something shiny. that's fantasti

what do you want me to do? where do you want me to go?" del: this class is in session here.idn't have an answer then but does now. that's because soon after, he started code tenderloin, a job training program for those who want to do what he did. del says in the past few years they've placed dozens in good-paying jobs. and del, once infamous in this neighborhood, is now in demand. the "mayor" of the tenderloin some call him. del says he still regrets all those years lost to drugs but what he's doing now isn't penance for that. he simply wants to improve the neighborhood, not by pushing the current residents out but by helping them up. del: that's not penance. that's reward. that's a great--if that's penance i'll do that every day. garvin: if you make a positive difference in a single child's life that's an amazing accomplishment. so what do you say about a woman who's helped a thousand? well, you can say a lot. we first introduced you to betty ewing 3 years ago and recently checked back in as she marked an impressive anniversary. garvin: in some ways it was destined that eri

i do not think it is unfair, do you? sec. nielsen: i do not. it is a huge issue and dhs companies -- continues to expand under the authority we have. i think it is worth further discussing. sen. whitehouse: election interference, does the department of homeland security have a role? at. nielsen: we are looking the cyber security of election systems upon request of states. in 11 states, we are conducting risk and vulnerability assessments. we have prepared for any other requests from the other 50 states and will make sure it occurs before the election cycle. sen. whitehouse: was there russian election interference in the 2016 elections? can we anticipate further russian and foreign election interference in the 2018 elections? sec. nielsen: i believe that russia will continue to test our systems, and where they can extract information and perhaps disrupt, they will. sen. whitehouse: so yes and yes? sec. nielsen: yes, there was interference. to my knowledge, no votes were changed. in 2018, do you expect them to come at it again? sec. nielsen: i th

do it. bush couldn't do it. there's a deal he had, if you want it bad enough we'll get it and it would be good for the country. i've never been more optimistic about the immigration reform proposal, making it to the president desk that i am right now. >> we have a good chance. tom cotton. >> thank you, mr. president. as was said there's a deal to be had. the president has made clear he wants to provide some kind of protection for those who received daca work permit at the same time with to do with the negative consequences. we have to end chain migration to prevent a future set of new chain migrants, and secure our border. we have to enforce our laws on the interior as well to decrease the illegal immigration that will inevitably encourage. the president at our group have been clear on that from the very beginning. and help democrats will stand with us and finally take yes for an answer on it. >> i think we have a good shot, i really do. tom coming to think? >> i just want to say exactly wha

you rejuvenate the bureaucracy you do not do it when you can do it which is your leadership but that's not good enough that's only a condition to make a change because you need a leadership that's willing to change the system you have to change the system and with those images the system is to shift the power structure of the company the power structure of the company gets very strong your own the financial people about the risk of those people about the control of those people that when the system will to change you have to open the system and the component to it the strategic planning the marketing the systems integration the system the innovation you have to go to components that don't exist in the company you know that to change the culture or structural changes don't just change you believe them but you know regardless of what you may think of. russia's role in the two thousand and sixteen us presidential elections i think it's clear that trump. bringing something new into the american political culture i mean he's still part and parcel of the american political system he represen

>> i've had my conversation and i can only do what i can do.eve that part of the president agrees with me that we need more oversight of this intelligence community. we have three high-ranking fbi agents that were conspiring at work to try to prevent trump from being president. that alarms me. all three of those fbi agents can search the database. if the president and i had a longer conversation i could inform him that the speaker of the house sold him a bill of goods that there really isn't a reform in this and that guess what, president trump is still at risk from rogue members of the intelligence community searching and listening to his phone conversations. >> harris: senator rand paul, a couple nose on the continuing resolution for the government and on fisa. thank you for joining us. we will be right back. >> harris: across the bottom of your screen, we where outnumbered o.t. across all platforms. love hearing from you after the show. give us your thoughts, your questions. i'm harris. thanks for watching. here's dana. >> dana: we start wit

we will do this.e will showcase the german shepherds, up front, and then we will open it up to all breeds, friday 8:00 o'clock and we will work on the streets department. if they dent let us close down we will do it on the sidewalks we will just fill the sidewalk >> fdr park to here. >> totally moving it. >> okay, all right. >> do we have enough space at fourth and market. >> yes. >> there is a dog park down the street in case people need to do. >> doggie style right there. >> come on, sponsor the whole thing. we got room. >> put your cigarette down and get on camera, lady. >> hi. >> thumbs up. >> so that is a great idea, all dogs. >> all dogs. >> so alex holley what would you say to me about a year ago , that i'm going to go experience the delaware valley , you know, i'm grateful for being here and if i have to go alone to events, restaurants i will do it alone >> i don't like the idea just because you don't have someone to go with you thaw cannot enjoy and experience something it started when i got

cannot do it. if i with president to talk to at youave to direct and the data and get the dat from you and move to the next person. a complete changed communication. has a huge set of challenges. >> and the next couple of years? >> yeah. yeah. it is am berb cious goal, obviously. different vendors want to be out there. and that is both exciting and going to be difficult for think it is a great bell labs program because there are so many things you need to solve mostly in terms of cost, performance, integration, and manage. means you need an theronment to target different problems. that is why bell labs is so so manyause you have experts in so many areas that that.gether to resolve >> now my guess is that bell labs is not the only research work?ty >> no, not at all. >> is it a competition? >> well, i mean, everything is competition otherwise it is not worth doing. everybody is working on it. it is exciting. certainly, a lot of people, a lot of smart people in the working on. i eventually, everyone's

how can they do that? article 1 section 9 of the constitution said you can't spend money without the appropriation of money. it's not an appropriation bill. they'll put in fiscal grout and retroactively fund the agencies so they're in compliance with the constitution. what que -- what we don't know is what will happen next. we saw mitch mcconnell and chuck schumer leave the floor. even if they come up with a compromise -- and we're hearing talk they could do something that's maybe a three-week interim spending bill or continuing resolution maybe through the 7th or 8th of february. the house and senate would not be in sync. the senate will have passed something but the house will have to come back and pass something as well. the only thing we know will happen tomorrow is the house democratic caucus is schedule to meet at 10:00 in the morning presumably to discuss what might be next if the government shuts down in 35 minutes. >> and chad, quickly, let me ask you, i know you reported before going to air senat

>> i do. i also understand that the president believed that it was a meeting he was having behind closed doors. it wasn't something he was doing in front of the cameras. and look, the conditions in some countries really are bad. not as a consequence of the people there but as a consequence of governance systems and really a systemic failure -- >> right. but if i called and you'll forgive me for using the language of the president, but if i called okaloosa county a shithole you would understandably be upset with that, right? >> yes. but i could prove you wrong. and i could bring you here and show you it's the home of the most beautiful beaches in america. i don't know if in haiti they can make the same claim. >> so you think it is? you agree with the president's characterization? >> i agree haiti is a place where the people have been very unfortunately disadvantaged as a consequence of long-term corrupt governments -- >> okay. >> -- and i can't say i see it's getting much better. i probably wou

if they ask you to do that, -- to not do that, i do not want to get you in trouble. but i hope that you would come to us or to the appropriators when you need more resources. mr. borland, here is a question. how does the social security administration make sure t people are prepared to sign up for medicare? and if you want to reiterate some of what you have said, it bears repeating. what initiatives or partnerships are underway right now at the social security administration to strengthen the communications you want to take and to prevent the misinformation that sometimes leads people to make decisions or failed to make a decision that can hurt them down the road? >> thank you. let me talk first about some of the efforts we currently make. i certainly talked and made a pitch for my social security accounts. for americans who do not have that account are missing out on an opportunity to learn an awful lot about the benefits that they might become entitled to in the future, including retirement benefits but also survivors benefits for their families, disability benefit

>> i do. i think it's ambitious. >> taking away a blunt instrument from the democrats in the midterms -- >> i hope that's not why he's doing it. >> of course he's not. he's doing right by them. >> we'll see if he gets it done. but in exchange for what is he doing? the reason pelosi says make america white again, i know that's inflammatory, won't help the process. >> horrible. >> when you get rid of the lottery visa, when you call something chain migration when it's really about family unification, you're messing -- >> president trump didn't invent that term. that term has been around for a very long time. >> on your side of the aisle to make it look ugly, what these people are doing. i'm saying you're change what the country is about. it's okay. you have the right to do it. you're saying, well, let these people -- we'll keep out everybody else like them. >> you want to put in my chair, i'm not in charge of cnn booking, i'll give up my seat all day long for the guests coming tonight. an incredi

what do you do about that? also the challenges in several countries, they don't have a lot of people who are trained to be mental health professionals and whatnot. so i'll give you one example are bangladesh, a country of about 160 million people were they have less than 200 people who were fully certified, you know, mental health professionals. so how do we -- do you where we partner with them on this issue? that's not to say we're going to ramp up the number of people certified to, you know, 5,000 or 10,000, it's more how do we train parents and coaches and all the people that i mentioned to deal with these issues? and, you know, the one area that we've really found a lot of fer tile ground with is working with parents, because ultimately you look at the case studies of people who have committed violent acts. ha did people around them now? and some in some occasions people knew something was off but they weren't able to connect the dots. and so by having, you know, by engaging parents, teaching them, you know

of congress. >> republicans do. >> no they do not jose, stop. they control the house of representatives and they have a majority in the united states senate and you need 60 votes to pass a budgets. so yes, trish, democrats do want to shut down because everything is a calculation. >> that is not true. >> hold on, they want to stoke the political embers of dysfunction because they think it's a great weapon for them in the 2018 midterms. >> that is lie. >> no, jose. trish: you said some members way man this. we have it on tape. we can roll it, i want the truth. i think unfortunately, what you orgnal admit the -- >> it's a lie. trish: this is what i despites about washington, there is so much politics at play. this is why we like the markets right? you can get away from that you can just focus on policy and what matters and what actually is going to change. >> a majority of americans want daca. a majority of americans want daca. >> jose? >> president trump took it away. we wouldn't be in this problem if he decided to not extend it. >> jose, no it is

why do people do what they do? and so how do people learn? what is the meaning of why we live?ctually -- it's not a theoretical thing for me, because if i have to play a performance on four hours sleep, and i have to leave my family, um, two thirds of the time that we have had children growing up, two thirds, and i know you travel like crazy, man, and crazy, but a figure of speech. that you better have a good reason why you are doing that, so you get to that existential level. you have to care. you have to have the reasons of why it is important, and as i get older and as i observe what you are doing, you are, you get more and more involved in societal issues. you think about patriotism. you think about civilization. you think about civicness. civitas. i think so too, but from my angle, from playing, you know, little notes, saying, why should that matter when other things are going on? i have to prove it to myself, let alone to the rest of society, that something is worthwhile, that my humanity or my playing three notes on the cello means something. david: so i want to thank yo

election and not doing enough to curb cyber hate. he said his company had a lot of work to do.ore on the bug that may impact every computer processor made since 1995, how should companies and consumers react? and bloomberg technology is livestreaming on twitter. 5:00 p.m. in new york and 2:00 p.m. in san francisco. ♪ micheleprint has hired cohen as president and chief financial officer, the 65 euros left a 65-year-old company as investors grew unsettled over their profit outlook and debt load with sprint shares falling 5% on the news in friday's -- the trading session on thursday and fallout continues from the intel chip saga, they say it is working with hardware makers and operating systems on the issue and will design future chips to avoid the problem. microsoft, google, and amazon say they have issued updates for their cloud and software systems but we are waiting to you from apple. we reached out for comment from apple and joining us now is .rian white and bob o'donnell has moresay this story nuanced than intel did not tell us something. >> we are talking about a future --

does it make sense to do that in the middle of a congress or do as we normally do at the beginning of the congress? >> i was for you doing at the beginning of the congress. you made that decision not to do it. >> should we make changes now? >> it's never going to be easy. both parties will participate. your speaker was concerned it was dwggoing to be done via republicans and there would be demagoguery demagoguery on my side about the action. i think there is sentiment on my si of the aisle to confirm the congressional authority under the constitution and the equal relationship between the executive and the legislative branches of government. >> i'm not trying to comment one way or the other about the substance of your testimony but get straight in my head the form and timing we would use for it. even though you would think it would be better for us to do it at the beginning of a congress, you don't think it there is anything wrong with us doing in the middle of a congress? >> no. >> people who think it is wrong will think the same at the beginning, middle or end of the congress. [laug

anytime a doctor says well, what do you do. >> what do i find in your medicine cabinet. >> what do youe. let's ask what do you have in your wallet or your vanity. >> well, i have lieutenant of things on my vanity but we're talking about anti aging. what will make you look old, quickly is if your skinnies very dry. so,. >> doctor, just real quickly. this is one of our interns chelsea. she will be playing the part of the epidermis. >> this is a great product for the body. apply it while your skinnies wet wet or damp. this will have plenty of, chemicals in it. the skin don't look old or wrinkles. >> yes. >> something bit. >> i put it up, i'm sorry, during the commercial break and it is such a light film over your hand because they are slippery and you can feel it blocks it in. >> and another thing that locks in the moisture is for your face. this is a great moisturizer full of acid. look at how white that is. i put it on my face in the morning. >>> testing. >>> now for wrinkles, wrinkles on the face, under the eye, and around the eye. >> i got this one. >> bye, chelsea. >> two products th

jesse: neither do i, kennedy. neither do i.it didn't bother me. kennedy: don't you wish you were in a movie ther theater right n? jesse: i do. kennedy: it was a great year for music. and here are the top five songs of the year. something just like that, chain smokers and cold play, humble, one of my daughter's favorite songs, "that's what i like" bruno mars. you know what i like? warmth. very much. jesse: never heard that song. kennedy: yeah. jesse: never heard it. kennedy: "shape of you" ed sheeran. coming up we're going to meet one lucky veteran who gets to ring in 2018 request an adorable furry friends. keep using #foxnews2018 stay with us jesse: we'll be right back. ♪ >>> hey, it's tucker carlson, 2017 i think we can all agree has been the wildest year in our life tiems is about an hour from ending. 2018 is going to be great. we can feel it. i hope you join us on the show for the length of it. happy new year. ♪ ♪ jesse: welcome back to the party, everybody. earlier we had a chance to meet some amazing people from pets for v

if we don't do it, and secondary education doesn't do it, they will do it themselves. they will create programs within the workforce where they will produce the skilled workers they need. my message to higher education is you better pay attention to said.s being my message to other members of congress is we have a need out there. that is why you have a government, to help meet the need. susan: that is it for our time. thank you very much for being our guest. rep. foxx: thank you for having me. you have a great panel. michael: thanks. michelle: thank you. susan: "newsmakers" is back after our interview with the chair of the educational workforce committee, virginia foxx of north carolina. michelle hackman of "wall street journal" and michael stratford of "politico." the bill that passed out of committee is the proper act, which means promoting real opportunity, success and prosperity education reform. michael stratford, you pointed out it did not pass with democrats support. what are their objections to the legislation as crafted? michael: democrats argued the bill woul

to do. i will say, in closing, that i also agree that senator heller has a great idea. when we get into this mode and we cannot actually fund the government, then why on earth should we be paid for what we're doing? i don't think any u.s. senator should be paid a dime or get health care every single day that we fail to do our job. that's something we hopefully can get unanimous consent tonight to put forth that until we solve this problem maybe we shouldn't get paid, maybe not get health care and put our money where our mouth is and then maybe we can get some things done. i yield the floor. the presiding officer: the senator from connecticut. mr. murphy: thank you, mr. president. i appreciate the senator from north carolina offering an apology for other members on this side of the body so let me return the favor. let me offer an apology for the republican majority for the governance disaster that has occurred in the united states congress over the last year. why are we here today? we are her

what do we do? over and over talking to seismologist her first responders this is what they want me to tell you now. but as a nation there is so much that we can do to outline the degree to assess a -- assess the risk. as a nation we have invested tens of millions of dollars in earthquake prediction. to put those devices down into the fault zone so far we have been mostly unsuccessful we will never predict earthquakes. but there are other things we can do. when the mexico quake occurred 2017 mexico did a couple of things. happening on the anniversary that killed thousands of people after that happened the nation instituted a national system every year on the anniversary it undertakes major drill and they practice what to do so in those hours prior to the 2017 earthquake, mexicans were practicing what to do. they knew what to do. they also instituted a detection early warning system. after the mexico quake happened people had 45 seconds to prepare. that doesn't sound like much time and i was skeptica

and do you agree with that? >> i do. if we don't, it can have a very devastating effect and force all political campaigns to essentially try to do social media manipulation. maybe not entirely authentic. >> thank you. terrorists online recruiting. my state has had its share of that recruiting, especially related, some from isis. but in past years, al shabaab, we've had dozens of prosecutions out of our u.s. attorney's office o, successful ones where people have actually been recruited to go overseas to fight on behalf of terrorist groups. what kind of recruiting activity are you able to detect on your platforms? and what can you tell us about the trends? how are they changing their strategies? i remember the fbi showing me the ads targeted at minnesota with literally airplane tickets from minnesota to somalia for terrorists. so tell me what you're doing now and what you see in terms of recruiting and what you can do about it. anyone? anyone? okay, should i call on people? >> well, i'm sure they don't want to answer as mu

you have people who do not want to do that. who say all we are going to support is defense spending. impasse. an that is not going to change until we began to have some different approaches to how we negotiate. that the repeal of sequester is being held up by some who would like to hold it hostage to get concessions on the daca issue? termat may be in the short one of the issues right now. that was not a problem two years ago or three years ago when it first kicked in. , i believe, about people thinking, wow, this is a great way we will cut the federal budget. we will reduce spending and that is what we want to do. that was not part of the original deal. the original deal was we were going to work together and figure out how we could come to some agreement around dealing with spending and budget issues. --you are in the pentagon were in the pentagon for a number of years. whatu were back there would you do to fix the problem? >> as a signatory to all four of the trump letters thoughts odds of my being back in the pentagon are v

if we're doing the same job the ive students are doing, we're doing a terrible job. our bar towas to that raise tha substantially. it turns out that in the first year just to remind you of what i said before students don't take a single subject matter course. not one. all they do are these competency based practical knowledge skills. so they haven't even started their major. for a first year student, we had 100% placement rate at the kinds of internships that typical ivy league juniors rising seniors would be getting and 90% of their managers said that our first year students exceeded their expectations of any undergraduate that they've employed before, most of them being upperclassmen. these are normal students from all over the world, from every socio economic background you can think of. the difference is the skills they were taught were ones that were useful in a work environment and it wasn't just that we thought them those skills. they learned them. one of the problems when we think about certification, because you mentioned about credentialing, accredited univ