so if we were not to do the emergency declaration mr. lopez, what would that mean in terms of the project scope and how much additional time would that add to this particular location? >> good afternoon, supervisors. edgar lopez with public works. our agency would be the one who would be implementing the work doing the tenant improvements at 440 turk street. if you were to approve this resolution, it would expedite the amount of time it takes to procure contracts, implement the design. we estimate it would save any from 17 to 30 months, we would mobilize as early as january 12th to start abatement of hazardous materials while design is being completed and run lots of different things in parallel. so if -- for -- if this gets delayed, we're losing day by day, and if we were not to do it through an emergency declaration, again, it would add seven to 12 months to the construction schedule. >> supervisor safai: from when that was awarded -- so it would have to be a bidding practices. >> yeah. we would have to go through a bidding process. >> super

this project and there are more details presented to that committee and for the emergency shelters mr. lopez i think comments on the two sights looked at right now that are one at fifth and bryant and one on 13th street that are under the jurisdiction of cal trans and our public works is working on the actual defining the project scope and that the department of homelessness will return in january to the board of january 2018 on the estimates for these projects and the code itself defines an emergency is a sudden unforeseeable and unexpected occurrence which isn't the case with these two emergency declarations however they have discretion under the administrative code to declare an emergency and i will want to say and i don't believe it was mentioned in the presentations, it's a question has come up about the open-endedness of the emergency declaration for homeless shelters and my understanding is that the department would -- >> what they did? >> didn't catch that they did introduce a amendment to the legislation to sunset on february 15th. and we do consider it to be a policy matter for the

mr. sala salvador lopez barr. thank you. >> thank you, and study hard and get ready for finals. now, we have advisory committee report by the parent pac. >> good evening. >> good evening, commissioners, superintendent, and president walton. on back of the pac, we'd like to extend our condolences to the lee family and the city of san francisco. we're really sorry for their loss. we all acknowledge the works of the mayor, and he will be truly missed in our hearts. the role of the parent advisory council is to empower parent role and perspectives. this report provides an update on the pac's areas. in november and december, pac member rebecca page and elsie -- and program coordinator georgia williams bradford met with the ucsf coordinators fellow to gather feedback from the various stakeholders will school transportation opportunities and challenges to address. there in our initial meeting, the pac had the opportunity to share the concerns of families raised during our community conversations over the past two years about transportation and its impact on school choice tardiness, chr

mr. president, your focus on lake okeechobee and florida's environment will benefit businesses and residents for generations. senator lopez-contera. [ applause ] >> carlos, thank you for all you do for our great state and joining me in the fight for freedom and democracy in cuba and venezuela. i would also like to recognize attorney general pam bondi. she cannot be here today. but pam has been a true advocate for crime victims and has been a leading voice in our fight against the opioid epidemic. there's no doubt that her efforts have saved lives. let's give a big applause to the attorney general. [ applause ] >> chief financial officer jimmy petronis. [ applause ] jimmy, i was proud to appoint you to cfo. in a very short time you've done so much to help florida families. i want to thank you for all you're doing for florida firefighters. thank you, jimmy. [ applause ] >> commission of agriculture, adam putnam. [ applause ] adam, thank you for fighting for florida's critical agriculture community and everything you've done to help out the industry, especially after hurricane irma. i want to thank chief justice lebargo and

mr. president, your focus on lake okeechobee and florida's environment will benefit future generations. lieutenant governor carlos lopez-cantera. [applause] gov. scott: carlos thank you for , all you do for our great state and for joining me in the fight for freedom and democracy in cuba and venezuela. i also would like to recognize attorney general pam bondi. i spoke to her this morning. she could not be here today. she has been a true voice for crime victims and has been a leading voice in the opioid epidemic. there is no doubt her efforts have saved lives. let's give a big round of applause to the attorney general. [applause] gov. scott: chief financial officer jimmy patronis. [applause] gov. scott: jimmy, i was proud to appoint you as cfo. in a very short time you have , done so much to help florida families. i want to thank you for everything you are doing for florida firefighters. thank you. commissioner of agriculture adam putnam. [applause] gov. scott: adam, thank you for fighting for florida's critical agricultural community, and all you have done to help the citrus industry, especially after hurricane irma. i

lopez. it was structural air. -- error. second, the notion of what mr. mccoy was asking for was not that his lawyer not stand up and admit he was guilty but that he insisted on putting on an alibi defense was disputed by the record. this was during an argument six must be for the trial. the argument was all about subpoenas. mccoy's had to be enforced or not and whether mr. english should be supporting him. court, i amlls the not asking him to validate any theory. there was a dispute about whether mr. english was in fact investigating his alibi defense if there ever were a subsequent hearing about that that would be tested. this was flat out a case in which the judge was told as soon as this issue arose, twice on believe i have an ethical duty to save my client's life in the client telling the judge, i do not want my lawyer admitting i am guilty. that is structural error. number two, justice breyer. this was absolutely an admission of guilt on the charged client at opening and closing. i. english got up and said, am telling you he is guilty of second-degr