. >> commissioner o'rielly mentioned with the hawaii preliminary report that he thinks they bear much of the responsibilities going forward to address the situation. what are your thoughts on the division between fema and the fcc going forward? >> i would refer you to the public safety bureau which obviously has been handling this issue. i think that she put it well and are entered to commissioner o'rielly that to the extent the fcc is one of the players that has historically exercise somewhat of a convening role to get all the stakeholders in one place, i think it's helpful for us to be a divide a form for conversations we can explore some issues that have arisen and try to identify if there are ways we can take action. certainly i support the efforts of the public safety pewter. they have done to conducting this investigation in a very, very short order, this won't happen 17 days ago. two and half weeks later thanks to the great work of mr. wiley and mr. king we have the facts that surrounded this event, able to target what went wrong and hopefully draw some preliminary ideas about

commissioner o'rielly. michael: everyone should be able to agree that providing agencies with the ability to pinpoint wireless emergency alerts to specific areas where there isn't a threat is an incredibly useful function. public industries are supportive of this and so am i, therefore i'm generally in favor of today's order. my concerns center on the need to mandate technologies before they are ready. the notice that led to today's item along with the commission's communications security reliability and interoperability csric, recommended it should occur 42 months after adoption of the commission order. the wireless industry said they could probably then do it faster and suggested 36 months. today's item adoptance inexplicable 22 month timeline based on new record evidence it is achieveable. jl though providers stated they'll try to meet this aggressive guideline they also stated it will be incredibly challenging. the stars must align just right to make this happen in this time. while i understand the publ

president trump had defended bill o'rielly. there's the "access hollywood" tape. the aisle are getting rocked with sexual misconduct allegations. >> that's right. this is a really sensitive time and subject for the president in general because of the fact that leading up to the election he had a number of accusers and then more recently now there have been reports emerging that the president's lawyers paid off a porn star to silence her after a number of accusations after she wanted to come speak out against the president. so obviously this is a very sensitive subject for him. he has dismissed many of these accusations, both by accusers of sexual harassment and by the porn star, stormy daniels, saying it's all just lies and people trying to get media attention. but you know, it remains to be seen whether or not he addresses this. obviously this movement is sweeping the nation. it is something that is getting a lot of momentum. and it's not just the president who had accusers. obviously a number of members of congress now have also had these accusations thrown at t