petitioners now maintained there was probable cause to arrest because the party involved stripping and drinking and marijuana s so this activity stopped for a partygoer on unnoticed. >> there was more involved the petitioner is relying on then those things you just listed. you went through six different items that were not limited to the fact. >> there was also the fact you are correct she was at the party that is undisputed. they arrived and she has left a. they also mentioned disarray and the status of the home. i think in fact the status of the home is undisputed in terms of what was there and many things were left out some of me explain them, the bed, the chairs which were not fooled and chairs can see that from the pictures in the record. the stereo, the utilities were on, someone was paying the utility bills, there were candles, food and the refrigerators, window coverings, shower curtains so they say that it was vacant but it's certainly not under the definition of dc law, so they must mean when the people arrived the condition of the house was such they should have realized the

the fourth amendment rights are personal and here petitioner, like other unauthorized drivers simply has no connection to the car at all. he is a stranger to the relationship between budget and read. >> mr. feigin, you keep saying that, but as a matter of property law and forever, a possessor would have a right to exclude other people, but for those with better title. so someone in this position would have a right, i think you'd agree, to exclude someone who is attempting to get in the car to hijack it, carjack it. you'd also have a right to throw out a hitchhiker who had overstayed his welcome and so you're having to argue that the government has a special license that doesn't exist for any stranger to the car. >> i don't think so, your honor. >> i don't think this court has included the idea that even the illegitimate possessor of an item may be having some sort of trespass action they can bring has incorporated that particular rule into the fourth amendment. >> that's been the common law property forever, right? >> your honor, in rakeus. >> i'm not talking about thieves. we put th

to challenge the search in this case, the petitioner has the burden to prove a connection to budgets car to justify treating it as his affect for purposes of the fourth amendment. he cannot do that when he sent read into the rental office alone to rent a car she never could have rented. subject to terms that did not allow him to drive it. and he took the keys and drove off with it. >> let's assume it was not a criminal but the renters some. not the wife, because there is a -- an exception for spouses. is that some -- is that son in the same position? >> as a matter of law, he would be. the actions here were more unreasonable. with you, disagree but i am asking a question, if police can search a car when they have probable cause, correct? >> yes. >> and they are free to do that of any car even joined by a codesed driver or licensed driver on a rental agreement. really, the issue before us is, when are the police permitted to search without probable cause? that is what i see the issue as, because if we rule that canone without permission -- has no expectation of privacy, even when the

petitioners, about 1000 jobs.tire chain, 260,000 jobs. 260-1 in terms of total employment. if you will stimulate more jobs in the area, it seems he would want to do that throughout the chain. some specifically, we are an american company never subsidized by the chinese, american technology, we could be collateral damage are an american as we manufacture our panel, and we .an be collateral damage a bad thing for sun power. >> president could say hang on second, i want the manufacturing jobs elsewhere as you point out in the united states. does he have a valid argument? and one point is he actually need to short -- he has a fair argument surely. onit is great he is focused american manufacturing. it turns out there are 35 times as many manufacturing jobs through the rest of the chain as there are in the case. already getting manufacturing jobs. so i think when you look at the picture, it is not manufacturing, the mounting picture, it is electronics whee manufacturing jobs are. scarlet: is there a specific tariff lev

>> unfortunately, within the concept of the title controversy petitioners are kind of like a sign, it's a side issue but in some of the things that i read, you know, i did see them with the congress, various people in congress dealing with some of those petitions but they didn't ever deal with title specifically. >> i would say similarly that i read a prejudiced number of petitions that doesn't quite count as opposed, alongside writing about them, but i think some their way into my text and i can't fight one off the top of my head but in a mere 350 pages i had to make many very painful judgments about things that i could include not include that in and of itself there is a book there. >> sir. >> hello, i'm christopher gray. independent scholar. i would like to ask if you realize that her splendid essay, the trust lecture writes on the harvard savanna controversy that created what i would call the privilege of senatorial courtesy was circulated during the controversy over whether to filibuster judge garland's hearing or not and i found out and i know it may dismay you but i passed around

the two parts of the petiti petitioners. >> first digitization, is that happening? >> yes, it is. the johns hopkins university press has given up their electronic rights to the project. the project will now be part of rotunda, which is the university of virginia presses gold standard for editing or publishing these projects electronically and it will be with the founding fathers papers. the first federal elections are also going to be involved. it is very exciting. eventually, it will come to be. >> that's fabulous. what about the question of the petitions? did either of you deal with the petitions? >> unfortunately, within the concept of the title controversy, petitioners are kind of like a side. we are kind of like a side issue. in some of the things that i read, i did see them with the congress, various people in congress, dealing with some of those petitions. they didn't ever deal with titles specifically. >> i would say similarly i read a number of petitions. that doesn't quite count, i suppose. i think some found their way into my text. i can't site one off the top have my h

number three, petitioners shall aptly monitor the area under their control in an effort to prevent the loitering of persons on any property adjacent to the licensed premises as depicted on the most recent certified abc 253. number four, sales service and consumption of alcoholic beverages shall be permitted in or on the patio area only between the hours of 10:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. each day of the week. number five, sales and service of alcoholic beverages on said patio area shall be restricted to waiter-waitress service and only to patrons seated at tables. number six, when the said patio area premise is being utilized for service, sales and consumption of alcoholic beverages, a premise employee shall be in attendance and maintain continuous supervision at all times of the said area. it should be noted that the applicant has agreed with the above listed conditions. >> supervisor ronen: thank you very much. seeing no questions, i understand that the applicant, craig leisen, is here. >> hello. >> supervisor ronen: hi. >> so is my wife, as well, beth. just briefly, i have our letter of in

it seems to me -- petitioner says that immigration benefits are the reason. you don't speak to it in your brief. i can think of other reasons, maybe he just wanted access to her fleet of private jets and helicopters. that seems to be all the rage these days. they get you places faster than you otherwise would. >> there are other reasons. none fell in love with her at the drop of a hat. he was charming and wealthy. those are all good reasons to want to marry somebody. way beyond immigration benefits. >> this could be some error. and he went along anyway. >> so? >> it seems to me that this is more than just some error. it's a complete comedy of errors. actually, that is a little unfair. >> he clearly knew something weird was going on. this woman came to him broke up a fight, asked him to come to her home, and he is getting there trying to figure out what to do but he does not know anything at all about cesario and she says if you will marry me, but there is no fraud in that. >> you have a fallback argument? even if we find fraud but i don't catch that. it looks

the petitioner had not produced any evidence that there was a notice prior to the tax bill in april. so why is the date of return confirmation important? it goes to the plausibility of the argument. we need it look at whether additional notice was ill possible. the bill said it was at that time. so until the petitioner shows that there had been a return notice, it doesn't make sense that argue that the tax collector should have done more to provide notice. there was no opportunity for him to do so. respectfully, i urge you to delay your decision until conclusive evidence is provided in order for you to makes an informed decision rather than rush into a decision that would harm the public trust and fair

the petitioner here is arguing that if you have potential and control of this rental car then you you have a privacy interest but the government says, hold on a second, that means even car thieves would have a privacy interest. the government is essentially saying you've gonna a little bit too far here. now, all of this stems from an incident that took place in pennsylvania. man was pulled over in a rental car. he was not on the rental agreement. it was actually rent ed out to his fiance. when pennsylvania state police said that they wanted to search his car, he said he didn't agree. pennsylvania police said that since he wasn't on the rental agreement he could not give or not give that permission so they searched the car anyway. they found more than 2,000 bags of heroin in that vehicle and that man was sentenced to ten years in prison. now, the implications of this case are great because we went to go to talk to noted d.c. defense attorney david been wits today and he says this, given the growth of car sharing companies in our area like uber, like lyft , like zip car, this decision,

>> the sole cause or complaint in the petitioner's complaint was mark leno's campaign was violating the campaign ordinance by not defining what constitutes a matching donation for the purposes of the financing program. >> congratulations, andrew, and thank you for that. we had hoped to have an initial presentation about the budget today for this agenda. the budgets will be due to the mayor's office february 21st, i believe, and that does follow our next submissiocommission mo we will have a full packet of information before that was submitted to our office. we are keeping an eye of all cuts, but we will come forward with items that we know that we need to continue the work that has been started through legislation as well as operational changes at the commission over the last several years. finally, i do want to introduce you tyler field who is our newest new guy. a mantle no longer worn by the policy staff. tyler joined this office this week as our new information systems business analyst. he's working with jared flores are and steven massey to continue to develop or filing systems for

>> unfortunately, within the concept of the title controversy, petitioners are kind of like a side. we are kind of like a side issue. in some of the things that i read, i did see them with the congress, various people in congress, dealing with some of those petitions. but they didn't ever deal with titles specifically. >> yeah. i would say, similarly, i read a prediggous number of petitions. that doesn't quite count, i suppose. i think some found their way into my text. i can't cite one off the top of my head. in a mere 350 pages, i had to make many very painful judgments about things i could include and not include. in and of themselves, i think there is a book there. >> sir. >> christopher gray, independent scholar. i would like to ask, miss beckford, if she realizes her splendid essay on the harbor master of savannah controversy that created the privilege of senatorial courtesy, that was circulated during the controversy over whether to filibuster judge garland hearing or not. i mean, i found out, i know it may dismay you, i passed around -- i discovered in challenging both left

they were a wonderful and now one of the volumes of the 22, but those two parts of that petitioners, and we can talk about donald and duncan campbell outside of the room. >> and first is digitization, and that happening? >> yes. it is. the good news is that the john hopkins university press has given up the electronic rites s to -- rights to the project, and that is now going to be a part of the rotunda, the university of virginia's gold standard for publishing these electronically and with the founding father's papers. >> that is great. >> and the ratification of the constitution, and the first federal elections will be involved. so it is very exciting that eventually it will come to be. >> that is fabulous, and what about the question of the petitions? did either of you deal with the pe the tigss? >> unfortunately, within the n concept of the title controversy petitioners are kind of a side issue. in some of the things they read, you know, i did see them with the congress, various people in congress dealing with some of the pe ttitiopetitions, but the ever deal with the titles spec

petitioners under u.s.ame forward and asks for these tariffs and the procedure was followed in the administration has taken that show terror action for solar panel imports and with respect to washington -- washington -- washing machine imports. korea doesn't think we follow the wto procedures correctly. this new action will remain limited and both sides will keep calm and that the course negotiations will .eep separate what i worry about is that petitioners in the united states are watching and they are seeing that this president has agreed to embrace that petitions and to impose tariffs. i suspect many other u.s. companies are going to get in line asking for import protection. i think that is a troubling sign. >> most people have said that this is low hanging fruit, the president has picked when it comes to solar panels or washing machines. you think is more likely that we could see copper action on steel, aluminum, even intellectual property in china? >> the steel and aluminum reports have been submitted

that is why it was important for us to make a statement in this as a petitioner so we can help control: you say ending net neutrality could end the internet as we know it. why would that be such a bad thing? the internet isn't perfect. >> the internet isn't perfect, but it is -- the notion of the internet and the way it was set up is that we all had access to whatever information we want. i don't want to be alarmist, but think about a world, about politics. believed aisp certain way and they blocked all content regarding the other side of that issues and no one could get access to it? it could impact not just the way people think, but it could impact democracy, the way the global world sees the u.s. as well. this is an issue, and the internet is an issue that no one country should regulate. certainly, no private entities should determine what content you get access to. emily: how should we watch this play out? >> the litigation will continue. we have to see how that plays out. this is a longer process when you are in litigation. the have seen lots of legislation action right now. we co

there are petitioners in a number of civil society groups.will be an intervener, which makes us a party to the case, so we will have strong standing and be very involved in the litigation. emily: it's been interesting to watch how this stance on net neutrality by various tech giants have evolved. as some have come out forcefully in favor of, some opposed. then you have some like reed hastings who came out pretty strongly on the side of net neutrality, then said, well, it's important, but it's not their primary battle. why the indifference? >> i can tell you all of our members care about this. they are all very engaged. they have pushed us to be the tip of the spear for them fighting this, both in congress and at the fcc and now in the courts. it matters to all the companies, netflix included. emily: is there a sense of defeat? now we may have bigger issues to worry about? >> this is still fundamental. this is a fundamental protection for consumers that are companies care about and the future of the internet and what it looks like years from n

the petitioner here is arguing that if you have possession and control of this rental car then you haveest. the gove . that means even car thieves would have a privacy interest. the government is essentially saying you've gonna a little bit too far here. >> so what's all this about? well, it involves a pa case in which a man rented a car with his fiance. it was the fiance who was actually on the document , not the driver. in pennsylvania, pennsylvania state police pulled over the vehicle. the man behind the wheel was not on the rental agreement. so police decided that he was not in a position to deny their request for a search. they searched that vehicle, found more than 2,000 bags of heroin and he was sentenced to ten years in prison. but there is another side to this whole case and it concerns the fourth amendment. now, there are very serious concerns tonight that if this case is not sided with the plaintiff's in this case, that anybody driving any kind of vehicle, whether it be a vehicle or whether it's even a car that you own through a bang loan could be determined to not be your ca

so until the petitioner shows that there had been a return notice, it doesn't make sense that argue that the tax collector should have done more to provide notice. there was no opportunity for him to do so. respectfully, i urge you to delay your decision until conclusive evidence is provided in order for you to makes an informed decision rather than rush into a decision that would harm the public trust and fair government process of san francisco. thank you. >> councillor breed: thank you for your comments. there seems to be no other members of the public. >> clerk: please step up, sir. >> i'd like to have a moment of silence for mayor lee. i was shocked to hear that he passed away. i personally loved mayor lee, his wife, anita, and his two daughters. the last time i talked to mayor lee, it was not a very nice conversation. but i'd like to have a moment of silence for mayor lee, and for that little 8-year-old boy, gabriel, who has murdered by his father because he thought he was gay. so, moment of silence, please. >> thank you. miss canada, and i have a picture, if you can show it on the

he initiated the process to get approval for the group and is the lead petitioner in the case againstdham. he is now a law student at rutgers university. also joining us dima khalidi, , director of palestine legal . we asked fordham university to join us but they said they are not providing any statements while the case is in litigation. we welcome you both to democracy now! you did.d tell us what what you did does not sound very unusual here for a club to be on campus. unusual at all. it was a simple part of the college experience. entered into school. i had an interest from the beginning. i had friends who are older than me that were contributing to the cause at other universities, so i thought it would only be right to have a group on campus. so in fall 2015, we begin the process of getting approval to have the club status on campus. amy:y: were other universities n new york, for example, have this group? this post, many have of columbia, nyu, hunter, rutgers, montclair s state and w on and on.he listst goes there are list of over 180 chapters around this country either under the n

now, the petitioners are required to have 58,000 signatures and nbc bay area sources tell us they gathered almost double that. if enough of those signatures are qualified then the ballot measure to recall judge aaron persky would go before voters in june. supporters want persky off the bench for what they consider a lenient sentence for former stanford swimmer brock turner who was convicted of sexual assaulting an unconscious woman behind a campus dumpster at stanford in 2015. persky sentenced turner to six months in jail when prosecutors were asking for six years. opponents to this recall effort, though, say that judges have to have some amount of prosecutorial discretion. without referencing the turner case the judge submitted a 198-word statement to the registrar that reads in part, as a prosecutor i fought vigorously for victims. as a judge my role is to consider both sides. california law requires every judge to consider rehabilitation and probation for first-time offenders. it is not always popular, but it is the law and i took an oath to follow it without regard to public opinion or

here is what it said terrible, exclamation petitioner's exhibit.out that obama had my wires tapped in trump tower before the victory. nothing found. this is mccarthyism. the press jumped on that tweet. the claim was ridiculed to put it mildly. should it have been though. maybe that was true. if it is, kind of a big deal. michael flynn had his life destroyed apparently because the fbi was monitoring him. meanwhile the fbi may have used the infamous trump dossier justify a fisa warrant against the trump campaign. obama administration officials unmasked trump aides whose phone calls were then monitored. looks an awful lot like the past administration deliberately spying on its political opponent. isn't that what they got nixon for? dan bongino is former officer and secret service agent. he joins us tonight. dan, the evidence is stacking up, i don't know how had his wires tapped. i'm not sure what the president meant by that it looks like people in his orbit working for his campaign were being surveilled by the administration. why is that not a huge st

be post aid broad to perform critical preemptive operations to make sure that travelers and visa petitionersoming to our country are thoroughly screened and vetted. mr. speaker, it is imperative for d.h.s. and its law enforcement partners to do everything practical to screen and vet individuals before they arrive at our border. h.r. 4578 underscore this is imperative by authorizing c.b.p. to encounter terrorist and a minal net works' effort in way that is proved effective and adaptive. i reserve the balance of my time. the speaker pro tempore: the gentleman reserves. the gentleman is recognized. mr. estes: i have no more speakers. if the gentleman has no further speakers i'm prepared to close once the gentleman does. the speaker pro tempore: the gentleman from texas is recognized. mr. vela: i'm prepared to close. the speaker pro tempore: the gentleman is recognized. mr. vela: this is a bipartisan bill that was unanimously aprivated -- abride the committee on homeland security late last year. the partnerships that c.b.p. established to disrupt and dismantle terrorists and other criminal netwo

clear, and i thought just like a ithought, ok, this is clear, and i thoughtjust like a chinese petitionertice, and theyjust think if they get to the emperor and tell the emperor what happened the emperor will sort it out and all will be won. i wasjust will sort it out and all will be won. i was just that will sort it out and all will be won. i wasjust that innocent. i thought if i got this message to tony hall, the director—general, about what was happening to me and others that he would sort it out because it was the law. how do you feel about a public broadcasting service like the bbc not sorting out out? it is not sustainable, that is not who we are, that cannot stand, that will go down to all kinds of defeats. the first defeat is that many women will leave, many women have already left and many women are leaving now. we probably don't have time for me to read the quotes that people have been deluging me with messages of the last 48 hours, and some of them are saying, i am lining up some of them are saying, i am lining upajob and some of them are saying, i am lining up a job and i will

the clock is also ticking for petitioners, victims of opioid treatment seeking treatment. we have other issues, rural infrastructure, child care, things that democrats want to get done in this deal. we have to get a budget deal and a daca deal that can get 60 votes. 13 days before dreamers get a lot closer to deportation, 13 days to help our economy, our communities, the middle class who has been waiting for over a year for this congress to do something for them instead of just helping business interests. now, mr. president, i want to focus on one more thing that really should disturb every american, certainly disturbs me, recent events concerning the bureau of investigation. for decades the f.b.i. has been our nation's premier law enforcement agency and admired from one end of the country to another. tv shows, movies all talked about how good the f.b.i. was. we know because we trust them with protecting our country against many-faced threats, terrorism, drug trafficking, white collar crime. in 2016, the f.b.i., not politically, to keep us vigilant in our security, the f.b