pauli, sean burke has been in my home. dr. matthias has been in my home. abc has been in my home. everybody can hear the music. you can come to the back of roland street at midnight and hear it. it's not like this is a mystery issue. it's there, and i'm really appreciative of everything the commission has done because it's actually gotten better since last july. things have started to get better, and if it could just get fixed, we would be in heaven. i wouldn't care what hue was doing because, you know, it's just frustrating because they've known about these issues for so many years. bennett was in my living room eight years ago. i've met with him many, marijuanmany times. this is an e-mail. we've bought our own sound meter, and this is inside our home where the sound just bounces about between 70 and # 0, the bass hits; it just goes right up. and that's what i'm hoping can get solved, and i really want to thank everybody for their help on this. thank you. >> thank you. next speaker. >> good evening, commissioners. my name is garth smith. i'm a homeowner and resident at 2 roland,

was december 5th we decided to have a small working group with inspector burke and commissioners bleiman and caminong. i'll let sean speak to that and if either commissioner wants to jump in, you can. >> good evening commissioners, acting director wiland. i'm here with a quick update. we had a quick meeting, commissioner caminong and commissioner bleiman and i sat down and talked about the good neighbor policy and what it says and maybe what we want it to say in the future and the tone that we think it should take. i think one of the major things that we had brought up was the possibility of separating the document into more of a good operator policy and sort of a neighbor bill of rights sort of document. instead of having one document that addresses everything, we have a document that speaks specifically to what it means to be a good operator and a document to speak to what you as a neighbor of a night life establishment can expect from the entertainment commission and the operator. i don't want to get into too much detail because it's very early in the process but if you have questions or either of the commission

get in, rotd rosenstein, mike rogers, sam clovis, sean schmeiser, jared kushner, stephen miller, casey mcfarlands, don mcgan, jeff sessions, reince pre burksn and on who have been. >> and the investigation is only seven months old. >> right. think about this -- >> you can't bs -- >> how bizarre, the idea that the press secretary has come out and fought said that the reason that they are not going to try too fire another fbi director, who by the way is supposed to have a ten year tenure to be longer than the successive administration possibly because of optics, not because it would be the wrong ting to do, it's an independent agency, that they are targeting anyone in the orbit of the president of the occupation, we are not going to re-visit the scandal in the error of watergate but because the press might complain. >> that says a great gehl about the priorities and the understandings, perhaps of the gravity of this particular investigation. optics is one reason perhaps not to do. so but the larger even this because if you fully want justice to prevail. remember, it's the department of justice, not the department of conviction, which means t

reince priebus, sean spicer and the legal spokesman about don junior's infamous meeting with the russians in trump tower in june of 2016. we are also learning that bannon's attorney bill burke was in direct contact with the white house during that house intel appearance. today the white house defended its coordination with bannon. >> there is a recusal put out relaying the questions he was asked by the senate in realtime to the white house. my questions are, who was he relaying the questions to? is that something the white house specifically asked his attorney to do and if so, why did the white house think that was a necessary step in handling bannon's testimony. >> that are is the process that is typically followed. sometimes they have a white house attorney present in the room. this time it was relayed via phone and following standard procedure. >> the question from ashley parker from "the washington post." >> cnbc added slightly more context according to a white house official. staffers for the white house discussionsed the parameters of bannon's testimony. the white house emerged believing it had an agreement to limit the questioning of bannon to events during the campa

sean spicer, and mark ka rolo about don jr.'s infail miscellaneous meeting with the russians in trump tower in june 2016." we're learning that bannon's attorney bill burke was in direct contact with the white house during that house intel appearance. today the white house defended its coordination with bannon. >> there's a report today that steve bannon's attorney was relaying the questions he was asked by the senate intel committee in realtime to the white house. so my questions are, who was he relaying the questions to? is that something the white house specifically asked his attorney to do? if so, why did the white house think that was a necessary step in handling bannon's testimony? >> that's the same process that is typically followed. sometimes they actually have a white house attorney present in the room. this time it was something that was relayed via phone. and again was following standard procedure. >> the question from ashley parker of "the washington post." new reporting today from our colleagues at cnbc add slightly more context to this. according to a white house official, "staffers for the house intel committee and the white house on frid

sean spicer and legal spokesman mark corallo about don junior's now infamous meeting with the russians in trump tower in june of 2016. the white house also confirming this afternoon that bannon's lawyer bill burke was in direct and real-time contact with the white house during bannon's house intel appearance yesterday. >> it's the same process that is typically followed. sometimes they actually have a white house attorney present in the room. this time it was something that was relayed via phone. and, again, was following standard procedure for an instance like this and something that will likely happen again on any other number of occasions, not just within this administration, but future administrations. >> the white house instructed bannon not to answer questions related to his time in the white house or during the transition, an unusually broad interpretation of executive privilege. but nbc has confirmed that those restrictions will not stand in bannon's way when it comes to his conversations with special counsel bob mueller. quote, he'll answer any questions mueller wants to ask. that's according to one source close to bannon. and after mueller took the rare step of issuing a subpoena to c

sean spicer and legal spokesman mark corallo about don junior's now infamous meeting with the russians in trump tower in june of 2016. the white house also confirming this afternoon that bannon's lawyer bill burkect and real-time contact with the white house during bannon's house intel appearance yesterday.