seeing no further comments, public comment is now closed. there's no action for the commission to take on this matter. madam clerk, can you please call item number six. >> item six is the interim administrative officer's report. >> supervisor fewer: miss calvillo, do you have anything to report? >> thank you, madam chair, members of the commission, angela calvillo, interim officer. i wanted to provide just a brief introduction to what i've done with the lafco's budget without permission from lafco, but i think it's a good thing. essentially because the budget process for lafco is not on the same timeline as the budget process for the board of supervisors and the city in general, what used to happen is the executive officer would provide me a ballpark figure from lafco that wouldn't be confirmed by lafco until june, so while we are, a city department, submitting our budgets to the mayor and controller as of yesterday, february -- yeah, thank you, 22nd, i asked the budget committee, and the committee has provided me permission to put in the st

it began hello, i would like to comment on internet freedom. she went on to ask the agency asked it to repeal its net neutrality calling them and exploitation of the open internet and this stunning this stunning because she died more than 12 years ago. those are three brief tales and those stories are not unique because people from across the country from every political persuasion have found their names and addresses and identities stolen and used to file fake comments in the fcc net neutrality. they include senator jeff merkley, usa today communist edward, deceased actress patty duke, 13 -year-old in northern new york and a 96 -year-old world war ii veteran in southern california. at last count, 2 million individuals have been the victims of theft with filings in our record that they never wrote, sent or authorized. these comments are not the only odd and unnerving thing in the fcc record. nearly half a million come from russian e-mail addresses just under 8 million comments were submitted from a male to mains attributed to fakemailgenerator.

further public comment. seeing none, public comment is now closed.haw, may i have the next line item please. >> item seven is public comment on all matters pertaining to item 9 below, closed session, including public comment on vote whether to hold item nine in closed session. >> secretary, for my own edification, will we be asserting the attorney-client privilege in closed session? i don't believe so. >> not tonight. >> members of the public, we are about to go into closed session to consider some personnel matters. to do that, we are going to take a vote to whether or not we should do so. and we ask for your comment with regard to whether or not we should go into closed session. so any public comments on the fact we are about to go into a closed session? seeing none, public comment is now closed. next line item. >> item eight, vote on whether to hold item nine in closed session. san francisco administrative code section 67.10, action. >> i move that we hold the item in closed session. >> second. >> moved by commissioner melara. seconded by commissi

with the comments at the fcc, how long did it take you, since the comments were coming in for a very long time, for you to figure out that when you are getting 9000 comments from our squash, something is wrong? com. rosenworcel: this is a great question. the honest truth is i gave you what i understand it to be today. but what we found, in my office was just a handful of people and was limited to our research capabilities. when it more experts on the outside combing through that record and identifying problems. i have made very clear, along with the help of folks like the new york attorney general, that we have 2 million individuals whose identities were stolen. you can do some easy counting to figure out how much is from foreign addresses like i described. we need many other outside experts to look at this record and help us identify the problem that we should focus on, because i think there is more here than even what i have described to you today. i think it is incumbent on us to get to the bottom of it. >> thank you so much. com. rosenworcel: thank you, tim. [applause] [captions

public comment is public comment. it is not mr. heppner representing the comments of aaron peskin. aaron peskin is my supervisor, and he's a shady character. i don't trust him any further than i can see him. the bottom line is you're going along with this in such a way that i can't see any rain that this makes this valid in any credible function where you can go to the public and say that was not unduly influenced by the people who appoint you to those seats. >> mr. chairman? >> commissioner kopp? >> for the record, aaron peskin is not a shady character. aaron peskin is a trustworthy person. thank you, mr. chairman. >> thank you, commissioner kopp. also, for the record, the discussion that mr. heppner was asking is part of the record that was circulated to the public, and the public knew that was an area of comment. it's not something that just came up by mr. heppner. >> i would like to second commissioner renne's observation. everything that we've been discussing so far has to do with the particular literal amendments that are stated in the attachments that have gone out to the pu

should not be during public comment unless they're his personal public comment. now as far as the actual agenda item, i agree with commissioner keane, telling them that i have to sign this form that i'm not violating cpro, as 99.99% of the citizens in this city wouldn't have an idea if that was the case or not. they wouldn't have the faintest idea because they wouldn't know what those things were. so to put that on them before making a political contribution that they're in violation of some law they're not even familiar with is the ultimate absurdity. and the reality is, the only thing this will do if you require people to certify assist turn this public contribution issue into the same thing we have approximate publapproximate -- with public finance of elections is only the big people with money can afford to go into the paperwork garbage that you force them to put in, and the only people that seem to get caught in the machinery are the small candidates who get small donations and a few hundred people who sign them to get to run for office, and thousand they ge

public comment? seeing none, public comment is closed. is there a motion to approve the resolution in support of sb-760 and opposition to ab-1756? motion by commissioner safai seconded by commissioner kim. same house same call, approved. and next item please. >> clerk: item eight internal accounting and investment report for the six months ending -- >> supervisor peskin: sorry. >> clerk: information item. >> supervisor peskin: i know we want to wrap up quickly. if you can give a quick presentation and if there questions put your name on the roster. >> no problem. as of december 31st, assets 294.1 million, liabilities at 357.8 million. collected for the first six months 66 million and on target. we're way under budget for expenditures. and reporting on the first sales tax revenue bond. we issued that back in november, we have three years to spend those proceeds. to date, as of december 31st we have now spent 32 million of the proceeds and we have approximately 172 million left to spend over the next two years and 10 months. >> supervisor p

we'll open up for public comment. speakers will have two minutes to comment on the item. thank you. >> good evening supervisors. i'm chris kelton, my wife and i have lived in south beach for nearly 30 years and recently closed a business on townsend. we witnessed tremendous change, empty fields, cyclone fencing, condo apartments and mission bay. despite all the development, we are missing the sense of a neighborhood. people drive through on their way to the 280 freeway, the bay bridge or another neighborhood seeking energy and liveliness. i'm a the glass is half full kind of person and believe in a better tomorrow. where you see a 28 acre asphalt parking lot, i see a blank canvas waiting for the broad stroke of the artist's paint brush creating a master piece. you see a wind swept eyesore, i see potential for a better life for all, construction workers building mission rock, shops, restaurants, cafes, the neighbors of mission bay and south beach who will have a place to congregate, make new friends and explore new interests in an inclusive atmosphere and a better life for

public comment is closed. did you wish to make -- >> [inaudible]. >> sorry. >> you'll have to actually step up to the -- >> we'll re-open public comments and you can come to the mic, please. >> i live on the 200 block of page street and the neighbours have been asking questions about what this mural is going to look like, especially since it's a historical building, which is the jewel of our neighbourhood. i've been here 30 years and a beautiful house. and i realise that the lily street side is not the facade, but people kind of would like to see what this mural is going to look like. especially since the last mural that was put up in our neighbourhood on octavia boulevard, it's the page street at octavia boulevard, theres a huge sign, the letters are taller than i am and it says "great adventure" in giant block letters. hideous colours. and it is peeling. it's not maintained. so, i'm just trying to talk for the people in the neighbourhood. we can't see what it looks like. it's on the most beautiful building i

any other comments? >> chair kopp, i would just like to say please extend my thanks to professor wood and to law students who did stellar work on the analysis because i think that the preemption question was a large one and a significant one that needed answering and for them to be able to prepare such a detailed and thorough analysis in the time frame that they were working under is -- was -- is greatly appreciated so -- and please keep up the great work, and look forward to continuing this dialogue and engaging with the stakeholders. and i don't know if you saw, but there was an article a couple days ago that the fbi was warning that there will be more russian meddling in the 2018 elections. >> there were 13 indictments yesterday. >> yeah, so this is very much of the moment. any other public comment? okay. moving on, then, to agenda item 7, discussion on staff report including updates to the annual policy plan. >> thank you. i think i will run through this quickly fairly quickly. i think we've addresse

i will comment on those. and that is the bill, as amended, will replace height limits based on proximity to something called transit rich corridors. it would set minimum heights for projects in these areas, 85, 55, 45 feet depending on street width and that would go even higher. in addition, it eliminates many of the local controls on density, ratios and parking, as well as certain design standards. we urge you to oppose 827 for a number of reasons. there's no need for the bill, first of all, the state density bonus law can achieve the same results and require on-site construction of affordable housing, which 827 does not have any requirement for any new affordable housing. under 827, applying local inclusi inclusion area or affordable rules. that would mean those who need the transportation the most would be ineligible to be considered for the housing. finally, the definition is such that it could be managed by local agencies, simply by changing the frequency of bus intervals, which is too center diptous and

seeing none, public comment is closed. we will have up to three minutes for rebuttal from the appellant. >> thank you, supervisors. christina again on the behalf ott animal legal defense fund. i would like to repeat the points and echo some of the public comments. i'd like to emphasize that the project sponsor here has misstated the legal standards that apply. i explained in my presentation. like to emphasize that we support consumers having stronger connection to the food, as discussed earlier, just to dispel the implication there are dubious alternative motives. our appeal was limited to environmental effects alone and most of the comments you heard in support of saba today regarded the merits of the facility, which were not addressed by the animal defense fund and the merits of the facility are not at issue here. i would like to emphasize that. the scale of the facility, 146,000 animals are killed annually. i should say are transported, confined indoors and slaughtered, which breaks down to an animal per minute being sl

please limit your comments to two minutes. any further public comment? ace is not here, so hearing none, public comment is now closed. >> i'm back again. i'd like to use the overhead. i'm just bringing up about my son again. when i was asking about a venue for our children, this is the kind of venue i'm asking for: the police association put these on the bus a while back ago so we can have some recognition about or children and who's out there murdering our children, the perpetrators can see thipgs like this and signs on the buses, maybe they'll think again, and maybe some of our children's cases will be solved. i've been asking for that for some years now, and we put all of the signs in the windows when other people are being unsafely victimized and they can run into restaurants and run in and go get help, but our children have nowhere to run. we don't have signs for our children to go run that are being shot by bullets, by a community violence. they have nowhere to run. they have no place to run into, and if they do, they're going to get put out and ki

public comment on item number 29. seeing none, we'll close public comment. item 30, board member reports and comments, why don't we take those as submitted. public comment? seeing none, we will close public comment on item 30. can i just adjourn the meeting in. >> i'll make a motion. >> meeting adjourned, thank you. transportation agency. director brinkman.on agency. >> present. >> borden. >> hsu. >> present. >> ramos. >> present. >> rubke. >> present. >> torres? >> here. >> torres present. director pleasing advised director heinicke will not be with you today. please, also note we have a new sound system here but you still do need to speak into the end of yuck microphone so you be heard, recorded for all times. item 3 announcement of prohibition of sound-producing devices during the meeting. the ringing of a cellphone, pagers and sound-producing electronic devices are prohibited. any person responsible for one going off may be asked to leave the room. cellphone cause microphone interference and the board requests they be placed in the off position. approval

let me just comment, first of all, the calculator is on track. i think it's being released next week. it is being released next week. i think we're going to give the press a demonstration of this. and again, i would just emphasize, i think the rollout of the tax plan, we've had very close coordination between the irs and our team at treasury and the white house and the omv. i think there have been some articles about a memorandum of understanding that treasury has had for 30 years with omb, but again, i assure you, that mulvaney and i are working very closely together, and to the extent that makes sense to reconsider how things have been done over the last 30 years we're already doing that. reporter: the president said today, that past administrations, talking about the deficit, the debt, have let it go to hell. yet the projections are still close to trillion dollar deficits that will be racked up in the future years. the administration -- sec. mnuchin: let me comment on that because i think that's an important issue. again, as we've said, the de

you heard comments in the planning hearing. and you heard public comment here this afternoon. how will odors be mitigated? >> so as part of the condition use authorization, we do have a kind of standard conditional approval for installation of odor control unit to make sure that any odors are prevented from escaping the premises. >> supervisor cohen: thank you. i have no other questions, madame president, happy to turn it over to you. >> president breed: seeing no other names on the roster, we will allow up to 10 minutes for the project sponsor, or the project sponsor representative to present. >> good afternoon. president and members of the board, i'm dan frattin, the project sponsor. we're here today asking that you reject the appeal and clear the way for san francisco's only butcher shop. this is the only place in the city selling freshly slaughtered chicken prepared accord to islamic tradition. it's important to the community who value to see the condition of the animal they're going to eat and the conditions they're processed in. i understand this is not the kind of busin

. >> an any other public comments? seeing none, commissioners, the matter is submitted. >> who would like to start? >> i think if we keep on putting band-aids on this without clarification, then it will be a hardship for all parties. i'm sympathetic to the property owner, and i think the property owner should be able to maintain a parking lot in a paid format as they desire, but the situation will be will always be clouded and clarified and zoned correctly. i believe that it should be clarified and zoned correctly especially in consideration potential for it to be redevelop ed with the residential as the property owner intends. i would like to push it in that direction rather than trying to stick a band-aid on it. i don't know if i am confusing the issue or not, but that is the vision that i would like to see how if my fellow commissioners agree, and then figure out a way with the appropriate action to take with recommendation to the property owner. >> i am in sort of agreement with that. i approach the motion previous

any other comments? questions? public comment on this item? i need a motion on item 12. >> we need a vote on item 11. >> sorry. all in favour of item 11? >> aye. >> opposed? it carries. now moving on to item 12, doe with have a motion? >> second. >> this is on the 10-year capital plan. >> any discussion on item 12? any public comment? yes, mr. francis. >> i'm tom francis with boscan. i'll keep my comments brief. you've had an opportunity to read through your packet, i hope. again, i think you had a very robust plan and i want to thank harlan and his staff for allowing us to be part of the planning effort. again, they had five meetings with us that i thought were very helpful. again, thank you, harlan. the one comments for the request i'm going to raise to you, which may be a bit of a plea, is that we continue to have concerns that replacement of those two critical segments of pipeline, the san antonio and crystal lanes pipeline are missing from the c.i.t. i could stomach that if it was a two-year c.i.t., but this is a long-term ci. t. and if y

public comment on item number 29. seeing none, we'll close public comment. item 30, board member reports and comments, why don't we take those as submitted. public comment? seeing none, we will close public comment on item 30. can i just adjourn the meeting in. >> i'll make a motion. >> meeting adjourned, thank you. >> good morning everybody. my name is aaron peskin and it is my privilege to serve as a supervisor representing the third district. for those of you who do not know, i have long served in another capacity as the president of an environmental nonprofit that for the past 20 years has worked to negotiate the purchase of land and water rights on behalf of native american tribes in the great basin nations in the united states. for those who don't know where that is, the great states of nevada, utah, parts of arizona and oregon. and before that i worked at the trust public land. and i'm happy to lead with london breed, malia cohen, our former supervisor who first championed this issue, in favor of the full divestment from fossil fuels. i want to start

colleagues, any questions or comments? we'll me of on to public comment? anybody wishing to comment? public comment's now closed seeing none. any follow-up? >> commissioner: we instituted controls and they've been successful. i'd be more than happy to send this as a committee report tomorrow with board of supervisor. >> commissioner: we have a second by supervisor tang we can take without objection. adam clerk item 5. >> the clerk: and the western shoreline area plan and wern shoreline area plan to restore the ocean beach shoreline and make appropriate findings. >> thank you, adam clerk. we have our planning department. >> first, i would defer to supervisor tang but i'd be happy to co-sponsor this legislation. it's in supervisor tang's direct. i would like to thank staff in particular work the coastal commission in such a fashion unlike many of the coastal plan amendments that get rejected. this one -- if we approve it -- i should not put words in my colleagues' mouths but it should be approved at the february or march meeting. >> thank you. through the ch

seeing no public comment, public comment is now closed.m number two. can we please call the next item. >> item three, executive director's report. this is an information item. >> chair kim, commissioners, i'm pleased to report on some recent developments at the policy level. we've been track federal and state autonomous vehicle legislation with interest and with some concern in late last year of october. sfmta director sent a letter for the deployment of driverless vehicles in california. we are appreciative of the incorporation of several of our prior comments but remain concerned about several aspects of the proposed regulation, including training requirements being inclusive as our interactions between pedestrians and bicycles with these new driverless vehicles, we're concerned about the ability of local law enforcement and first responders to have access to crash data as well as the potential to allow the vehicles in testing to offer commercial services for higher services. in addition, in november, the u.s. house of relatives and sena

is there any public comment? being none, public comment is closed.item 14 adjournment. >> move to adjourn. all in favor. so adjourned. this is a special meeting of the budget and finance committee. i am supervisor fewer, vice chair of the committee, i'm joined by supervisor stefani. our clerk is mr. victor young. i would like to thank sf gov tv, jessie and charles for broadcasting this meeting. do you have any announcements? >> clerk: >> clerk: please make sure to silence all cell phones and electronic devices. speaker cards should be submitted to the clerk. items acted upon will appear on the february 27th board of supervisors agenda unless otherwise stated. >> mr. clerk, can you please call items 1 and 2. >> hearing on the current status of the city's leased owned portfolio within the civic center and update on the portfolio five year plan. item 2, potential three year enewly and amendment of a lease of approximately 27,826 square feet of space at 1390 market street with purchase 1390 market as landlord for use by the department of public health. >

>> i'm not going to comment on any military issues. we think the economic activities are significant and the sanctions are working. i'm not commenting one way or another. >> do you have anything? >> that's for south korea to decide. just emphasize our actions are not against the people of north korea. they are against the people of -- there against the actions of north korea -- i cannot rule that out. , withthe u.n. sanctions the consent of state flags, they are certain rights countries have and i'm not ruling anything out. --say a ship again, i'm not going to make any confident -- comments on what the military may or may not do. right with the consent of the state flag. we will actively, and we expect states that as we give them information and a deep lack of ships. i think that's also something that's very important. >> do you think the sanctions will entice north korea to have a change of heart? >> again am not going to speculate what the change of heart will or won't be. again what i said is we deeply the sanctions work. there's no

is there any public comment? being none, public comment is closed. item 14 adjournment. >> move to adjourn. all in favor. so adjourned. welcome to the san francisco board of supervisors meeting for tuesday, february 13, 2017. madame clerk, please call the roll. >> thank you, madame president. [roll call] supervisor safai >> present. president breed? here. supervisor cohen? present. supervisor fewer? present. supervisor kim?