the jefferson hotel degraded as people moved from staying in downtown. that is likely why it was featured in the film "psycho." >> the shots in the movie make it feel like a cheap fleabag hotel. and people began avoiding the building. >> the beginning of that movie is a terrific snapshot of what downtown phoenix looked like, when there's some buildings under construction. some of the older buildings are right before probably getting torn down. >> and being associated with "psycho" certainly didn't help. >> when rumors get started, it does cause the building or the hotel to decline even faster. you know, now we use yelp. and we see what everybody thinks about the building. back then, it was word of mouth that this really wasn't someplace that you wanted to stay any longer. >> yet somehow, it survived. >> it was a hotel through the '70s. and then it was transformed into the barrister place office building. the interior was completely gutted. the storefront was modified. >> in 1990, the city purchased the building as an overflow space for its office. and the

monticello had become like a hotel and everyone either who knew jefferson or didn't would drop in and want to be entertained. at monticello, jefferson is almost a prisoner. he really needs poplar forest to be by himself to recharge his .ntellectual batteries it is in the peace and quite of poplar forest that he does his last great project at the university of virginia. when that is under construction he is at poplar forest sometimes. of manya complication things that jefferson loved, is most fundamental being the octagon. he loves the shape of an octagon. forest becomes the first octagon house in america. within that octagon it is a geometrical puzzle. in the middle of this house is a 20 foot to and around that to octagonal toggle -- rooms. modern marvel of architecture because it was used for one person who used it occasionally. it did not have to operate as a typical house. five years after he started living here he asked for a wing of what he called service rooms. kitchen, laundry, smokehouse. these ideas of wings attached to the house he had seen in a book from the renaissance, bu

jefferson. and if we're all born equal, and congress has power to enforce this, harlan says, congress should be able to prohibit race discrimination in public accommodations. hotels, theaters, all the rest. harlan says let's read congressional power broadly in john marshall and mccullough, reading an amendment languageally borrowed from mccullough. the word appropriate. what does the majority say in response? gee, a public accommodation, these are owned by private hotels, theaters, inns. railroads. they're not the government. no stall shall. and congress doesn't have broad to regulate a nonstate actor. but remember, harlan says, ooh, the 14th amendment says everyone is born a citizen. that sentence doesn't say, no state shall. john marshall told us to construe federal power broadly. court, 8-1, rejects that. lifetime, why, in my in the lifetime of some of you, congress in effect needed to re-pass sumner's bill that civil rights act of 1875 basically civil rights act of 1964. through,son helps push in honor of martin king and the martyr, john kennedy. and this time, the supreme court 1960's.it in the described so well how the citizen clause doesn't have requiremen

gettysburg, channeling jefferson and for all born equal and congress have power to enforce this, harlan said congress should be able to prohibit race discrimination in accommodations, hotels, theaters so he says let's read congressional power broadly in the spirit of john marshall and mcculloch, reading and amendment that actually borrowed language, the word appropriate. what does the majority say in response? a public accommodation, these are owned by private persons, hotels, theaters, railroads, not the government, it says no state shall and congress doesn't have broad power to regulate nonstate actors. remember this in 14 doesn't just say no state shall, as is everyone's born a citizen, john marshall told us to construe federal power broadly but the court, 821, rejects that and that's why in my lifetime and a lifetime of some of you, congress needed to re- path the civil rights act of 1875 basically becomes the civil rights act of 1964, lyndon johnson helps push through in honor of mark king and john kennedy and this time the supreme court upholder and the 1960s. >> they just described so well how the citizenship clause of the 14th amendment doesn't have a state action