jeremy lu, the partner from lightspeed who had done the deal kind of came out and said he had done antigation. nothing to see here, the company denied it. as we learned today, behind the scene investors were poking up running of the company. for me, the takeaway is silicon valley, if you want to look at it is making progress on gender issues. the fact that hq would be subjected to scrutiny at this stage feels is something slightly new. the they were able to do deal so that is causing outrage and twitter. the other hand, if you look a bit of progress. emily: what is it that investors are so optimistic about when it comes to the future of this company? behavior aside, what is the potential behind this idea? max: the thing that is exciting to the point of view of investors is the fact these are concurrent viewers. 1.5 million may not seem like a huge number, but the thing you have to remember is when you see a you tube video that has been viewed 100 million times, that is coming over the course of weeks, months, or even years. concurrent viewers are much better for advertising. advertise

say, and looking at this prosecution or mueller investigation, is proceeding at lightspeed.not getting links for mr. mueller which is not surprising. and he's going through a following the evidence where a goes. and from my perch, without any preconceived notions. what you have seen so far from leaks and different branches of the investigation, are you saying any elements could lead to an obstruction of justice charge against the president? jeffrey: i think that's very hard. legal minds differ as to whether a president can even be indicted. but set that aside for second. i think there are data points which could lead a prosecutor to an obstruction charge. maybe not against the president, but if it was just an average individual, there might be a case. canher a sitting president be indicted is an open question but i think even an objective observer would have to look at certain things done by this administration and say, that is one point. it may not be enough because we don't know what mueller knows, but it certainly is an element of obstruction. there are individuals on the

that is lightspeed. so the first thing you have to realize what a crisis since creates but since 2009 we have taken about $400 million out of discretionary spending. and that is where the problem is because of the way those are set up. we have to protect those but this is just the reality. that is why now is the time to meet chairman greenspan a couple times and he reminded me every time the meeting in 1983 talking about the budget process during the math they knew that it wasn't sustainable in here we are. and we still talk about this. you can't just do one thing because the structure itself is so bad the appropriating and authorization will never work but no matter what you do to change it you have to have consequences real to the member. so frustration was the stupidest thing coming out of washington in a tell that to anybody. it would never happen but it did. to say i voted against it but that day is over i can go home and tell people it didn't pass but i voted for it. that is all we're doing. to acc