mr. heppner? what is "real world". >> this has been before the commission since supervisor peskin produced it in 2017. we did not request this be deleted. rather, i think it would be appropriate for this body to conform it to the version that supervisor peskin put before this body. to your point, commissioner, the developer we thought was overbroad and vague and did not make sense. we, therefore, proposed to exclude all of that definition on page three line six to seven. i think this conforms to the version you have, but in any event, it's on page 37 on your packet. all the amendments that supervisor peskin properly noticed into the packet for this meeting. to delete the language or being the developer of that project or property. i have other comments on how to conform this properly to what supervisor peskin submitted to this body that is enforceable and makes sense and matches to the real world the way these land use decisions are contemplated. >> why don't you make your comments now, all of the