barbara fierek put it like this: and paul smith added: on friday, and paul smith added: on friday, laurame in an interview with the prime minister. people are asking you again and again to be clearer about your priorities. how long can you stay on, do you believe? well, let's be very clear about this. i've set out what my vision is. i've set out and i've said to people that at every stage where we can fill in the detail, we will do so and that's exactly... but how long can you stay on? that line of questioning prompted more complaints, including this from tony webb: on tuesday night, donald trump addressed a joint session of the united states congress in his first state of the union address, just over 12 months since he took office. to say it's been a newsworthy and controversial first year

but paul smith complained of a lack of clarity. from the change from a brown to green background, some viewers detected a change in the shape of the map, with the new, longer, thinner version giving more space to scotland. others objected to the increased text shown on screen, with dennis franklin writing... well, to answer that question and others i'm joined by liz howell, the head of bbc weather. thank you for coming on newswatch. people are saying it wasn't broke, why did you change the weather? well, under eu laws we had to run a regulated procurement process when our previous contract ran out. and quite simply, meteo group was the best fit. in every respect. and so that's why they were awarded the contract. so what are some of the specific changes you've made that will notice? we're really excited about some of these. so we have realistic mapping, so we can put roads on their and urban areas on there so we can show where weather is affecting travel. we have on the app and on the website 1a days now of forecast data for each ho

who better to discuss redistricting than paul smith, who argued on behalf of the challengers in gill v. whitford and is now here georgetown as a distinguished visitor. paul: thank you, amy. happy to talk to you about the maryland case. i have the same lack of information as everybody else as to why the case was taken in december. it was a big surprise in many ways. gill v. whitford was on -- was argued in october. we are merrily going along thinking maybe we can win, maybe we can't. but if we get a ruling in january or february, we might get a new map in wisconsin. come december, they take an entirely new case out of maryland. the surprise was they didn't have to do that. they could have done what they normally do when they have a case, and hold the second case and remanded later on or decide what the appropriate disposition ould be. but they didn't. this case has been to the supreme court twice because it was up before under the name of shapiro versus mcmanus on the technical issue over whether or not it was sufficiently frivolous that the district court correctly dismissed it withou

federal congressional district from democratic election officials and who better to discuss them paul smith who argues on behalf of the challengers and is now here in georgetown. >> i am happy to talk to about the case and the lack of information i think it was a big surprise we thought maybe we could win or not but it would be nice january or february but some reason to think it might be true but come december they take an entirely new case out of maryland. the surprise was they really didn't have to do that.d they could hold the second may be re-manned that later later on or decide the appropriate disposition from the one they already heard argument but they didn't. i guess being to this a previeww court twice now it was up there before on the technical issue whether or not it was frivolous the district court corrected this without even appointing the three-judge court. the supreme court said no. you should have appointed theco three-judge court and they held the case is the barrier that is there a clear standard to apply the judges can decide the constitutional issue if there is too much

and paul smith added: on friday, laura kuenssberg pursued the same theme in an interview with the prime. i've set out and i've said to people that at every stage where we can fill in the detail, we will do so and that's exactly... but how long can you stay on? that line of questioning prompted more complaints, including this from tony webb: on tuesday night, donald trump addressed a joint session of the united states congress in his first state of the union address, just over 12 months since he took office. to say it's been a newsworthy and controversial first year

who better to discuss the redistricting of paul smith?o argued on behalf of the challengers in gill versus whitford and is now here georgetown. >> thank you amy. i'm happy to talk to about the case. i have the same lack of information as everybody else about exactly why the case was taken in december. i think it was a surprise in many ways. so this gets argued in october. and we are all merrily going along. we think if we do will be nice for them to roll in january or february. maybe we will get a new map in wisconsin. there was some reason to think it would be true but based on the way they accelerate the oral argument. then in december they take an entirely new case out of maryland. and the surprise was that they really didn't really have to do that. they could easily have done what they normally do when they have a case is hold the second case and maybe remand that later on. for decide later on with the appropriate disposition would be after they finished the one they already heard arguments in. but they didn't. i guess you know this h

who better to discuss redistricting men small -- paul smith? exactly why the case was taken. i think it was a big surprise. all merely going along thinking we can't. january february committee will get a new map. come december, they take an entirely new case out of maryland. -- the surprise was they didn't have to do that. they could have done what they normally do when they have a case, and hold the second case and remanded later on or decide what the appropriate disposition would be. but they didn't. this case has been to the supreme court twice because it was up before under the name of shapiro versus mcmanus on the technical issue over whether or not it was sufficiently frivolous that the district court correctly dismissed it without appointing a three-judge court. the supreme court said, oh, no, it is not insubstantial at all. the three-judge court held that the case is judiciable. is there a sufficiently clear standard to apply that the judges can apply -- decide the issue whether there is too much political bias or otherwise. the case proceeds along. as we are get in t

and who better to discuss redistricting and paul smith who argued on behalfth of the challengersth in gill and is now here at georgetown is the distinguished visitor. >> thanks, amy that happy talking about the maryland case. the same lack of information everybody else about why the case was taken in december. it was a big surprise in many ways. so gill gets argued in october and we are all merrily going along thinking maybe we could win, maybe we can't but if we do with the guys to rule in genuine favor and get a new map in wisconsin. there were some reasons thatfe might be true but based on the way they've set of it, december the taken entirely new case out ofwa maryland. the surprise was that they didn't have to do that. they could've done with the normal do when they have case, hold the second case and remand it later on or decide later on what the appropriate disposition would be after they decided the one they've already heard argument in. but they didn't. this case has been to the supreme court twice that because it up before under the name of shapiro versus mcmanus on the tech

according to the sacramento b michael paul smith was arrested thursday monday after the florida shooting for making and selling eight assault rifles known as ghost guns. the arrest stems from a five- month long security investigation based on several sources including the darkwave, bitcoin payments and secret meetings. the guns are legal to make but illegal to sell. a fundraiser for firefighters this weekend did not go as planned when attendees saw the rifle -- raffle prizes were guns. some people attending the event walked out in anger when they saw an ar 15 being raffled the same type of rifle used in the florida shooting. one woman said she walked out because organizers should be concerned about putting those weapons into the community. >>> there were two early- morning earthquakes in the east bay this monday morning waking people up in the middle of the night including me. it was a 2.9 earthquake at 12:49 this morning centered in danville. the epicenter was just under montevista high school and there was a magnitude 1.5 earthquake in the same area. there is no word of any damage or i

and who better to discuss redisstricting than paul smith, who argued on behalf of the challenges and is now here at georgetown as a distinguished visitor from practice. >> thanks, amy. happy to talk to you about the maryland case. i have the same lack of information as everyone else does as to why the case was taken in december. i think it was the big surprise in many cases. so it is argued in october and we are all sort of marly going along thinking maybe we can win, maybe we can't. if we do, it would be nice for them to rule in january or february. maybe a new map in wisconsin. there was some reason to think that might be true. but then come december they take an entirely new case out of maryland. and the surprise was, they didn't really have to do that. they could easily have done what they normally do when they have a case, and hold the second case and remand it later on or decide later on what the appropriate disposition would be after they decide it is one they heard argument in. but they didn't. and i guess i would stop to note this case has been to supreme court twice now bec

paul smith is the skipper. the team are all farmers.next up for them it is much, much tougher, canada, the world and olympic champions, beating team gb four yea rs champions, beating team gb four years ago in sochi to the gold medal. an update on that throughout the morning here on the bbc news channel. and there was a terrible blow for elise christie yesterday in the speed skating. terribly difficult time. four years ago she was disqualified in each of her three events. a very emotional girl. we saw her cry in sochi. another emotional interview with tea rs another emotional interview with tears down her face after crashing out of the 500 metres yesterday. she received lots of support. this is what she put on twitter after crashing out yesterday. this is interesting from instagram. 0ne this is interesting from instagram. one of her rivals, who touched elise christie before she went down and crashed into the side wall, put a picture on saying "genuine happiness", and elise christie responded with "actual heartbreak, but today is a new da

. >> smith: then, american envoy, paul bremer, handed iran another gift. >> shortly, i will issue anre meato extirpate ba'athists and ba'athism from iraq forever. >> smith: 30,000 to 40,000 members of saddam's ba'athist party-- most of them sunnis-- b werened from holding any public office. and the iraqi army was dissolved. protests broke out immediately. s moderaa leaders had warned the u.s. against de-ba'athification. >> i considered what happened as a very wrong mistake a going to be disastrous for the country. (abdul latif al humayem): (shouting) >> the way it was applied it became an instrument to intimidate people, evele not ba'athists. it became really a way to-to push people out. (siren blaring) >> smith: violence followed bremer's orders. iarst a car mb detonated outside the jordanembassy, killing 18 people. 12 days later, a second attack. (debris falling, shog) this one was on the unad quarters. >> the attack was similar to last week's bombing of the jordanian embassy in baghdad. >> smith: the attas had been planned by radical sunni extremists. their leader was a jordanianho

regular mid—term inspections, as paul has are absolutely critical, but, most of all, dialogue, and open dialogue between tenant, managing agent and or landlord. michelle smitht quality. campaigners who say that jeffrey gafoor should‘ve got a much longer sentence for the sadistic murder of lynette white say that murderers who allow innocent people to sufferfor their crimes are the most contemptible criminals of all. in sentencing jeffrey gafoor, the judge made specific reference to how he had knowingly contributed to ruining the lives of innocent men. including john actie who was originally charged with the murder and spent years in prison. jeffrey gafoor, you know he could be out ofjail any time soon, you know. we done 16 years between us. and he could be coming out and he hasn‘t even done 16 years yet. speaking to bbc wales investigates, one influential voice says changing sentencing policy to reflect miscarriages of justice could be an option. there certainly are people who believe that when jeffrey gafoor was sentenced, not enough account was taken of the fact that he had allowed innocent people to spend time in prison as a result of his actions. and of

paul: i don't know. >> used to be an old basketball coach called dean smith who perfected something called the four-cornerd of the day would have players throw ball for five minutes until the clocks run out. do they have to put some more numbers on the board? >> we also have the special elections that we have seen in recent months that have not gone the republicans' way, virginia, georgia, we had a special election in florida for state legislative, the democrats swept. all of that has got to have to the give republicans pause, enthusiasm on the democratic side that we have seen in turnout is something that has to worry republicans. >> the left will crawl across glass to vote in november. paul: broken glass. he's right to prove the seat, trump carried the district by 5 points, the republican is the son of congressman in the area, so a famous well-none political name and lost seat to a democrat. >> democrats are pumping money especially the state legislative races instead of governor's races because they want to be in charge of redistricting after 2020 which would allow them to gerri commander and basically

paul marciano, the co-founder of guess. >> sensuality. >> reporter: the iconic brand known for launching the careers of anna nicole smith and claudia schiffern tells "time" magazine that at a lingerie shoot paul marciano forcibly grabbed my breasts and starting feeling them. after i pushed him away he said, i'm making sure they're real and forcibly grabbed the back of my head so i could not move and started kissing my face and my neck. added, i had two options to do everything i could to wiggle away own punch the ceo of guess so i decided to just wiggle away. the magazine reports that upton said the next month she refused advances from the now 65-year-old telling "time" as soon as i went up to my hotel room paul started calling me asking to come up and see how my room is. i politely declined several times. after several denials i just turned off my phone and locked the door and tried to get some sleep. i was terrified. according to the article, the day after that incident upton claims she was fired. someone had called my agency to say i had gotten fat and would not be needed on set. upton is quoted as saying i was devastated. upton spoke ou

paul manafort. there's a little news today. we'll have it for you top of the hour on shepherd smith reporting. then. >> dana: let's talk about the politics of the memo. devin nunes made changes before sending it to president trump. that according to democratic congressman adam schiff. democrats say important information was left out of this gop memo. let's bring in steve hayes editor in chief for the weekly standard. he's also a fox news contributor. steve, you tweeted that you noticed on a second reed of the memo, you didn't see what the democrats were claiming. there was going to be big national security implications if this memo was released. >> right. i think if you actually look at the memo itself and what the memo itself said, the democratic attempts to prebutt it and claim this would do grave damage to u.s. national security echoed i should say by members of the intelligence community and federal law enforcement. it just isn't fair. you don't see it in the actual text of the memo itself. now, what they could have been referring to is the idea that by making things like this public, it m

year-old, she suffered sexual misconduct at the hands of paul, the co-founder of guess, the iconic brand known for launching the careers of anna nicole smithia schiffer. "he forcibly grabbed my breasts and started feeling them. after i pushed him away, he said i'm making sure they are real and grabbed my head so i could not move. he started kissing my face and my neck, adding, i had two options to do everything i could to wiggle away and avoid his pursuit or punch the founder of guess. so i decided to just wiggle away. the magazine reports that upton says the next month she refused advances, telling time as soon as i went up to my motel room, paul started calling me to see how my room is. i politely declined several times. after several denials, i turned off my phone and locked the door and tried to get some sleep. i was terrified. according to the article, the day after that incident, upton claims she was fired. someone called my agency to say i had gotten fat and would not be needed onset. upton was quoted saying, i was devastated. upton spoke out to tmz recently about the frequent abuse of power in the modelling industry. >> what do you

but paul smith complained of a lack of clarity. space to scotland.hange the weather? procurement process when our previous contract ran out. and quite simply, meteogroup was the best fit. in every respect. and so, that's why they were awarded the contract. that people will notice? we're really excited about some of these. show where weather is affecting travel. of forecast data for each hour of the day. going to be like when they step out the door. and we have a percentage chance of rain. than they ever had before. well, we have — yes, we have more high—resolution data. and we have more models to choose from. so the accuracy should go up. what we've introduced. we've got a green map and we've got a green earth in the uk. a more realistic proportion. they had got slightly bored with the brown map. it looks like a reversion to a flat earth. there are many projections of the earth. some weren't happy with that. other organisations. why are they saying it's more skinny? it's just proportional. it's more proportional to the actual landmass of the uk. they