their reactions so a lot of mixed reactions really what do you think the implications are for the s.p.c. vote with his stepping back make grassroots members back this coalition obviously that's the crucial hurdle that has to be taken in the next three weeks so if there is a result as expected on the fourth of march. s.p.d. membership all four hundred sixty thousand of them can all vote on whether or not they accept this deal for a grand coalition for a coalition between the social democrats and the conservatives and the did the discussion about that since this deal was made has been overshadowed by the personal questions by the questions of who's going to take what ministry and especially by the fact that schultz has basically given himself the foreign ministry. this discussion certainly will now it is hoped be more about the content more about the substance of this coalition agreement than about bickering about who is taking what and pushing whom is side and that sort of thing so there is i think basically a better chance that this decision will now be done on the basis of substance an

catalina tire helped establish the s.p.c. . she is now its principal and is deeply committed to this revolutionary approach. it with controlling we have to rethink schooling maybe not completely but we need to for example take away the old system that's been in place for two hundred years and think about schooling from the students perspective that's what makes a school good how do we encourage participation what do students need to know how should we teach skills what abilities will the kids need in twenty or thirty years but the day when we look at schooling from the perspective of the last century it doesn't encourage innovation that will have. a new concept of education schooling from the students perspective the kids are encouraged to show initiative . in the classroom there is student focus method plays out as an alternative to teachers centered education. students are encouraged not merely to study new subjects but to play an active role and to think for themselves learning by discovering. six times a year there's a proj

. >> we don't, s.p.c., apples and oranges to be able to -- we don't have the revenue to be able to issue bonds to build infrastructure for the power side. >> we don't have the authority. >> that's why we were looking at a charter amendment. >> exactly. >> i just want to make sure the charter authority needed is for the distribution. you know, to fund the distribution, so -- assets. barbara, you want to take a shot at -- >> sorry. >> just, i guess -- i just want to provide some more context. so, power enterprise. >> we have existing authority as an enterprise to issue bonds. that's for replacement of facilities primarily, right? and then we also have the authority that c.f.o. sandler was referring to for issue bonds for clean power facilities, for renewable facilities and conservation facilities, ok? what the bond measure associated with the charter amendment would allow us to do, so the charter amendment modifies our bonding authority to allow us to use bonding authority for new facilities. it doesn't specify what they are, so yes, it could be distribution as the general manager just men