as to his security clearance, mr. kushner has done more than what is expected of him in this process. we should point out, wolf, that the "washington post" report says foreign governments, including israel, were looking at ways to manipulate kushner by taking advantage of his business dealings, a spokesperson for kushner's lawyer put out a statement saying they're not going to respond to that but as you can see, wolf, just an avalanche of negative information coming out about the president's son-in-law and his security clearance issue at the white house this evening. >> the "washington post" citing four countries that supposedly had ways they thought they could influence kushner -- israel, united arab emirates, china and mexico. we'll stay on top of this and work our sources. jim acosta at the white house, thanks very much. >>> now to the russia investigation. we're waiting to hear from members of the house intelligence committee. they've been behind closed doors now for hours trying and sometimes failing to get answe

second, this bill secures our borders with additional border security and a wall where required. it was $25 billion in the trust on tour to border security and a law system that would be spent over they next two years to provide better national security on ourur country's borders. it is policies like catch release that encourage more illegal immigration. it makes critical changes to the immigration court system to clear our backlogs, expedite court hearings and give law enforcement the resources they need to properly do their jobs. third, this bill fixes the flaws in the current immigration system that spurred this daca problem in the first place and incentivized illegal immigration. it protects the immediate family of the primary worker. 72% of americans believe immigration should include the primary worker,he their spouse d their immediate children which is exactly what this bill does. in addition, , two-thirds of americans actually believe that the solution here for illegal immigration includes the daca six and into chain migration, for security and an end to diversity lottery

your layout of the future security arrangement with europe for domestic security particular. poses the question or opens the question is there a link with that treaty if you want to negotiate all the arrangements which need to be done on the economic field so will there be. a security arrangement without the you cannot make arrangement you envision where we're going into negotiations so we will through those negotiations be looking both our economic partnership and our security partnership for the for the future what i've set out today is why i believe that security partnership is in everybody's interests and that we could be looking to be ambitious about this and to korea to have a new security treaty so that we're not just looking at a range meant that perhaps more naturally the e.u. would look at country but recognize the in twined nature of the work that we do together already on counterterrorism or on law enforcement and criminal justice work and develop that and develop that security partnership i hope we can start soon to as i said to discuss the security issue i think

. >> we are going to protect your social security and medicare. >> save your social security and your medicare. >> now, as for the press secretary, sarah sanders pointing to the fbi, while there are some staffers working without security clearances, the fbi says it is up to the white house. also, sarah sanders would not say whether donnell mcgahn knew about it last year. and she said don mcgauhcgahn's standing has not changed. they all appear to be safe in their jobs for now. >> key words, for now. let's see what happens. let's get more on the breaking news. joining us, our justice correspondent. walk us through the process. the fbi does the back ground checks for senior officials who want access. information. and then what did they do with that? >> they do the back ground check is that information. they present their findings. as to whose investigation, they are allowed to get a security clearance, it allows classified information. what sarah sanders says during the press briefing makes absolutely no sense. that's not the fbi's job to determine who gets security clearance. they could

by setting up a border security trust fund, we ensure the department of homeland security will actually have the money that it needs every single year to secure our borders while also regaining congress visibility to exercise. oversight. but unlike other plans, we also recognize that realri border security is more than just throwing money at the border. this group of senators realized that real border security means we have to close the legal loopholes in the current law that allowed dangerous criminals to enter and remain at-large within our country. so our amendment and these dangerous loopholes and makes it easier for our law enforcement to apprehend, detained and is easily removed sex offenders, drug smugglers, human traffickers, international terrorist, criminal gang members, repeat border crossers, drunk drivers and other dangerous people. second, our amendment provides a generous and permanent solution for daca and daca eligible recipients. our plan contains an earned path to citizenship for these young people. provided these young men and women have no criminal record and neithe

but to secure our homeland, we need to significantly change our approach to border security and immigration. i was just at the national targeting center with the president and we discussed the challenges and propose solutions. as you may have seen, the president outlined a generous proposal last week and a framework to secure our borders. we are committed to securing our borders and ending the factors for illegal migrations that actually make trafficking easy. to begin with, we must secure the border. we need a border wall system. walls work. when i say walls system, i do not just say that infrastructure, but also the technology and personnel, and importantly, closing the legal loopholes that prevent my agents, who put their lives on the line every day, from being able to remove those that they apprehend at the border. we have proposed both technology, the infrastructure, personnel and the closing of the legal loopholes, that exploit our system and enable traffickers and smugglers to succeed. we seek a legislative solution to end these restrictions number and we ask for the mandatory detent

national security. level.is the next higher that would result in the release of that information to the wrong individuals would create grave damage. top-secret, that information if released would result in extremely grave damage to national security. there are different levels of information that the security clearance holder has access to. in order to get a security clearance, it depends on which agency you are working for. if you're working for the military, the dod will do your security clearance background check. if you're working for the department of energy, they are responsible for your security background check. anybody out of the executive branch, white house personnel and federal judge appointments and u.s. attorney appointments, will be handled by the fbi. form thatll take the every applicant needs to fill out, a very long, detailed seekerthat the clearance needs to complete. the person needs to put down everywhere they lived within the last 10 years so that there is no break in time. they ha

security. he supports the implementation of operational programs designed to strengthen the security of the nation's critical infrastructure. we have ambassador doug lute, the senior fellow in the future of democracy project at the harvard kennedy school. a senior adviser at cambridge formeradvisors, and a career army officer and former u.s. permanent representative to nato. former career armyour moderator is jako of cambridge global advisors. he is the faculty member of chicago where he teaches cyber security policy. also, former white house liaison to the department of homeland security where he developed policies and programs chicago ro national security and cyber security. our conversation, discussion will be followed by audience q&a. with that, i would like to welcome our panelists. please join me in welcoming our panelists. [applause] >> welcome. thanks for having me. i was mentioned, i'm jake, teach cyber policy of university of chicago and ceo of cambridge global advisors. i want to tha

then we get into border security. senator ernst talked about border security. it is critically important think about border security as not theai wall, the president has said he didn't see, he does not see in his vision a wall from the pacific ocean to the gulf of mexico. there are certainly places where we need structures but we also need so many other things layered on top so we actually know who is coming to this country, what is coming to this country, and if they should try to cross the border illegally, we know where there are for no other reason but humanitarian reason. thousands of people have died crossing the border. almost 10000 people. about a thousand off them are young children. by putting into place a wall structure where it makes sense, better technology and resources at the border, we will know who is coming to this country. we will know what drugs are coming to this country. we will have to do a much better job of finding and protecting people who may be trafficked to this country for the purpose of trade. sex trade. it was developed by the ho

is just as committed to europe's security in the future as we have been in the past europe security is security and that is why i have said and i say again today that the united kingdom is conditionally committed to maintaining it. all right arisa mistaking their mission how was the british prime minister's case for a new security partnership with the e.u. greeted by the audience in munich. already what she knocked out was seen as a. if and that was one of the first things that britain signaled is that security would be off the table when it comes to renegotiating its relationship to the european union post rex it and what we really heard today is him opting out what would be lost if they couldn't be any agreement found that this close corporation is vital both for british security interests also for european security interests which raises the question why does the map or doubt if everybody is aware of it anyway while there is some kind of clue to that in a comment. was asked about this later on the european commission president said that he would certainly want to see a separation of

we've also be doing things like security communication. now at least we in washington don't get ourselves on the same page, and we're often very focused on these tangible metrics. what's the training we've given them, what's the equipment we've give enthem and a real inclination to realize. >> it's okay. there are influence and access goal but they have to be acknowledged as much. but the problems come in at the very end of the investment that people came maybe they haven't built capacity, but at least we have a good relationship, right? so that's often the final defense for a huge amount of investment that over time doesn't work out. so i'm equally cynical. i would say of the three capacity, influence and access, it's usually access that's purchased the most credibly. and it opens doors from a state diplomatic perspective even as its purchased access other ways. i think the key challenge has been sort of the going in to really analyze and be honest about what we're trying to do. >> pulling back on this thread of the new york pier competit

search for unity at the munich security conference the us national security advisor speaks of indisputable evidence that moscow interfered in america's election a claim russia's foreign minister dismiss this as blather and germany's foreign minister says berlin it no longer knows who want to make of washington's policies also coming up the turkish german journalism done as you jel says he's glad to be free after a year in a turkish prison but he expressed concern for the many other journalists still behind bars. and law from the red carpet of the berlin film festival all have all the glitz and glamour coming up for you later on the show. hello and welcome i'm marrying evanston it's good to have you with us. we begin with the munich security conference taking place at a time when alliances that can the world stable for a decade are under strain for its part germany is unsure about the direction that the united states is taking in syria the u.s. and turkey support opposing sides and in europe there is braggs it and the rise of right wing populist. or less armament fueled wars protesters want

national security threat. that's where facts matter. that's where policy has to respond and try to keep this nation secure in elections and other ways going forward. >> they testified, dan coats testified that the iran nuclear deal is working. climate change is a problem. the budget deficit is a fiscal crisis, a dire threat. none of those positions are accepted by this president. >> we had talked before about the risks of the white house politicizing but the intelligence community and the fbi and federal law enforcement. yesterday was a good day largely for national security professionals and the leadership the intelligence community and chris wray because they stood up and played their appropriate role as neutral arbitors to what they see. >> thank you. >>> coming up, red flag. fact checking the white house's claim that the chief counsel did not see fbi report on rob porter. you're watching andrea mitchell reports. machine plap butch is like an old soul that just hates my guts. (laughs) (vo) you can never have too many faithful compani

we'll hear from former nato deputydor and the assistant security at home and security, and cyber security advisor to the pentagon. from the chicago council on global affairs, this is one hour. evening our panel will examine the issue of critical importance of united states, democracy, the portal systems to external interference. our panelists will discuss the and how the threat government should respond with. midterm primaries a few weeks away in some states this is an important subject. where joint and a panel of experts, but unfortunately two beour panelists will not able to attend tonight, but nonetheless we are excited with today's discussion and are excited with the panelists joining us for the conversation. with that, we are got to be joined by our panelists. from the committee outreach coordinator, we have dick durbin, who serves as dick durbin's liaison to elected and other constituencies throughout the chicago and metro region. richard, who is from the office of cyber security with the homeland security, and he supports the development and the limitation of operational programs d

a un security council vote on a resolution calling for a ceasefire. for an hour and a half ago but has been. president. more than one hundred girls kidnapped by boko haram in the town of. a national disaster and thousands of supporters of the anti immigrant party have all the rally in the tally in city of milan in the run up to. get more now on our main story that syria the picture is emerging from eastern huta appears to show a deadly mix of weapons used by syrian government forces in one of the bloodiest assaults of the seven year war and explains. guta is just outside damascus a rebel held area that includes the eastern suburbs of the capital. making it close enough for rebels to fire mortars into central damascus and for syrian forces to deliver a devastating response. since february eighteenth government forces have targeted a series of densely populated towns in the area the u.n. says there are nearly four hundred thousand people there that includes rebel fighters but most are civilians for days in a strike some bombardments of forced families a

security intelligence specialist provides security for club hue. i'm not only the ceo, i helped design the team and the account manager for the club and meet with them no less than every two weeks on saturday nights to go through. we just had one this recent saturday. i hire, recruit, vet and participate in all the training of the personnel on staff. all that gives you context that i'm familiar with the team. in so far -- all the things, you're right. i have heard and read through all the data and where security fits in these conversations is all the data feeding into security. so bottle service, format, sound and security. sound, bottle service, format, security. so how does security feed out? the picture, while horrific was taken in july. it was a bottle of champagne and do those exceptions arise in a 70-90% capacity nightclub? yes, they do. what it doesn't show, it doesn't show the context of how quickly it was resolved. what was the behavior before the bottle and after. i'm addressing the photo. my job as security is to be absolute. i don't get

but right now -- trish: on social security? >> not for social security.alking about medicaid here. she was pushed on to medicaid. trish: well look, there are difficult ways to approach it. i have been down to chile where they have a very interesting privatized system. >> we tried that. trish: bush tried to privatize accounts. we didn't actually try it. where it has been tried in chile it has been extraordinarily successful. people have better rate of return they ever get in a bond or treasury or wherever, the security, social security is stashed. so there are things that we could attempt to do but, politically, it is pretty challenging as you can imagine. >> you need the political will to do it. we didn't see any of that from the republican team. that is what concerns me. it is the fact that really wasn't a part of the discussion t was really all spend. they were playing for the 2018 election obviously. you have to remember, i was part of the tea party movement. that was based on fiscal responsibility and right spending. how many people got elected in con

having a security clearance, it doesn't make sense to me. if president obama ran the government , [inaudible] >> host: jeff ringel, the newspaper has this headline. 100 white white house staffers are still without security clearance a year after the election, is that unusual? >> guest: i would say that's unusual. the use of interim clearances is not unusual in and of itself. when a president comes on board or people coming to the government, these background checks take two's months to nine months generally, they can take longer depending on if you are a person who has a lot of things to be investigated so they could take longer. but they should be wrapped up after about nine months . the white house are the ones who are issuing the interim clearances and then the fbi is going out vetting the information and then coming back to the white house saying everything looks good. make your decision. but to have that many people still on interim clearance, they should have their clearances by now. >> host: jeff ringel, former fbi agent, we thank you

the center for cyber and homeland security is where the homeland security chairman representative michael mccaul, republican from texas will deliver the state of national security. >> good morning. if i can ask everyone to please put their phones on silent mode and let me welcome you to the campus of george washington university. it is a real treat, a real pleasure and privilege to want to get host chairman mccaul on campus. he has been chairman of the house homeland security committee since 2013. at a time where there seems to be gridlock in washington, d.c., i can say without any exaggeration, he is arguably one of the most prolific and more importantly effective ,egislators in d.c. right now focused on a whole host of national security issues and also shares his committee a genuinely bipartisan way which is very true to the issues our country faces. i am going to be very brief, which is rare for me since i have never had a on -- unspoken thought. i will turn it over to the chairman now and afterwards, we have an amazing panel. when you think about members of congress, you don't immedia

but to secure our homeland, we need to significantly change our approach to border security and immigration. i was just at the national targeting center with the president, where we discussed the challenges that this poses, and some proposed solution. as you may have seen, the president outlined a generous proposal last week in a framework to prepare both our immigration system and to secure our borders. we're committed to securing our borders and ending the pull factors for illegal migrations that actually make trafficking easy. to begin with, we must secure the border, we need a border wall system, walls work, we talked a lot about walls, but when i say a wall system, it is not just the infrastructure, but it is also the technology and the personnel and importantly it is closing the legal loopholes that prevent my agents who put their lives on the line every day from being able to remove those they apprehend at the border. so we have proposed both technology, the infrastructure personnel and closing of the legal loopholes that exploit our system and enable the traffickers and smugglers to

is just as committed to europe security in the future as we have been in the past europe security is security and that is why i've said and i say again today that the united kingdom is unconditionally committed to maintaining it. the challenge for all of us today is finding the way to work together through a deep and special partnership between the u.k. and the e.u. to retain the cooperation that we have built and go further in meeting the evolving threats we face together. this cannot be a time when any of us allow competition between partners rigid institutional restrictions or deep seated ideology to inhibit our cooperation and jeopardize the security of our citizens we must do whatever is most practical and pragmatic in ensuring our collective security. and today i want to set out how i believe we can achieve this taking this opportunity to establish a new security partnership that can keep our people safe now and in the years ahead . so let me start with how we ensure security within europe. the threats we face do not recognize the borders of individual nations or discriminate b

national security advisor h.r. mcmaster learned that jared kushner has had contacts with foreign officials that he did not coordinate through the national security council and he did not officially report them. the issue of foreign officials talking about their meetings with kushner and their perception of his vulnerabilities was raised in mcmaster's daily white house briefin briefings. the meetings with kushner and vulnerabilities was a subject raised in mcmaster's meetings and he was naive and being tricked with officials some of whom said they wanted to deal only with jared kushner directly and not with more experienced personnel. so this is operating at a couple of levels. the personal drama here is that it's not just that jared kushner can't past the background check to get a full clearance. there is some hangup at the fbi in terms of clearing him through. that's no longer the story. the personal drama here is with this breaking news tonight in the washington post, this means that the problem is inside the hou

big a security clearance.'s code word security clearances which are much higher than that. just about everybody gets a top secret security clearance -- >> you can't have it both ways, anderson. >> well, no. my point is you should be able to pass -- >> and then turn around and say it's not that big of a deal. >> it's not that big a deal for the actual clearances. you should be able to get it. a college student in college who applies to the cia gets a top secret security clearance when you're working a summer job there. i can guarantee you that. and that, you know, takes a couple of months. you just have to confess everything you ever done. and that seems to be the problem. >> the problem is if jared can't get a top secret security clearance there's something in his background that is of huge interest to those not giving it to him and -- >> we'll know shortly effect or he can't. >> if you take a step back, i think this is a victory for general kelly and for his commitment to making sure we have a white house sta

i'm here to talk about elections security of the national security issue. i'm here to talk about things we have been doing in partnership and support of the state and local elections community to take and elevate the importance of your security of elections in the face of a national security challenge. this is something that we talked about a lot collectively over the last couple of years but let me just start with and take you backwards for a second. clearly, what we saw in the department of homeland security in the spring of 2016 what we saw working with the u.s. intelligence community, the fbi, other folks involved in national security. there was an elevated threat to your election system. in 2016 we were not fully aware of where the threat was coming from and what else was going on but we saw during that period there was an elevated threat to the election system. during the run up to the 2016 elections working with others and the intelligence community and the fbi worked hard to get out as much information as we could. that's when the partnership with t

i want to make this clear the departmental main securities role in this is security focus and security focus to support the state and local officials. it's not to tell them what to do or did to fill how to do. it's to support with our resources the subject matter expertise that we have, the tools that we have, the capabilities that we have it in fact, the state and local election official request that support. >> i want to take a question online on twitter, whatever. >> in the green room. >> yeah, right. they keep moving around. there's a question that is basically, doug, or ambassador, i'll turn to you first. what's the risk of foreign intelligence operatives compromising poll workers and election officials, and more importantly, if there is a risk, what do we do to deal with it? >> i suppose there's some risk of that but this is not, probably watch the show the americans or something. this is not russian agents somehow compromise in one of the workers and some precinct in chicago that's going too seriously undermine the election. that would be, to do that at scale would be so difficu

that's why we introduced the secure act. so i'm hopeful that as we debate a secure future for the dreamers, that we also find a way going forward to provide a secure future for those who are here under tps. it seems to me, mr. president, that the answer is in plain sight here. the answer is making sure that dreamers have a secure future, providing a long path to citizenship, so long as they meet all the requirements, and that we ensure we have border security. ire don't think there's a senatr in this body who doesn't believe that the united states has to have strong and secure borders. the debate has always been what's the smartest, most effective, most cost efficient way to provide for border security. and i hope nobody is interested in wasting taxpayer dollars on things that don't work. it seems to me we should be about the business of finding the most cost-effective way to ensuring that border security. and as weo do that, we should be listening to the experts as to what works and what does not work. and, unfortunately, w

security objectives. thank you for the opportunity to testify before you today. i look forward to your questions. >> thank you. we appreciate being here today. our next speaker is ms. tobin. she leads advocacy with congress and u.s. federal agencies and directs ntce's policy work. prior to working with ncte, ms. tobin worked with the federal rights project of the national senior sit zebs law center. ms. to be tobin holds law and social degrees. >> thank you, for the opportunity to speak to you today. ncte has been engaging with tsa for nearly a decade now, my whole time on staff. we see challenges facing trans jebd je gender travellers as part after wider spectrum that affect the traveling public, including concerns for travellers with disabilities, racial and religious minorities and survivors of sexual trauma. as long as tsa relies on body scanner units and intimate pat-downs as primary passenger screening tools we believe there will be a cost to travellers' privacy, dignity and liberty and questions ab

the security environment will evolve. but our interests won't evolve, and we hope that we can depend upon the partnership of both our current allies, and more and more sort of partners that we're investing in out there, whether it's in eastern europe, on the margins of russia, or in southeast asia, in east asia, these are our allies and partners that we've been there with, we want to have there with us, should there be a contingency. and we want to ensure that we're interoperable. and that we have the understanding of how our respective military cultures intersect. at the same time, we've got some near term threats. as you mentioned, as much as maybe the phrase gwot is a thing of the past now, the concerns around terrorism are still very real. thankfully less so in the south comaor in the most part. we need to work with our partners to ensure they have the resources they need to work by, with and through partners to deal with instability and terrorism as well. this is the challenge year in year out, how do we ensure that

we didn't get into how security feels. my sense which is what your question was, is that i think he does feel okay. he's someone who came into the office sort of trading on his honor and character. we've had reporting before that he's put that honor and character on the line, threatened to quit in the oval office. he's threatened to quit when he was secretary of the department of homeland security, when he felt he was being pushed around or not being listened to. i don't think it will be taken a lot to -- for general kelly to leave if that's what he wants to do. but we have been hearing chatter about trump talking about potential replacements for the better part of a month. we reported at the "wall street journal" several months ago that trump already figured out work-arounds to general kelly's command and control, calling staff into the residence late at night, giving them orders, telling them don't tell general kelly. his friends and outside advisers using melania trump, the first lady, as a go-between in order to avoid

team, his national security adviser. we have learned that that was a very intense time in the obama white house, trying to handle this unprecedented situation. quote, on january 5th, fbi director james comey, cia director john brennan, director of national intelligence james clapper briefed president obama and a small group of his top white house advisers on the contents of a classified intelligence report showing that russia intervened in the 2016 election to help trump. quote, that's when white house officials learned that the fbi was investigating the flynn/kislyak calls. one former u.s. official said, quote, the flynn/kislyak relationship was highlighted. the bureau, meaning the fbi, made clear that there was an actual investigation under way. an actual investigation of flynn. that was reported last year in "the washington post." now today, we found out what happened right after that briefing. they tell obama and a small group of his top white house advisers that the incoming national security adviser is the subject

we do this by improving border security and border security is so very important to make sure the problems don't repeat themselves and secondly, to make sure that we remove people that are criminal aliens that kill people like kate steinle's killer. the bill also includes other elements agreed to in a bipartisan meeting between lawmakers and the president. going forward, our proposal reforms family-based immigration focus, by focusing on the nuclear family. those who follow the rules and are waiting in line will be grandfathered. we will reallocate the controversial diversity visas to expedite the processing of this backlog, and the employment-based visa backlog. the proposal includes key pillars agreed to on a bipartisan basis last month and is both generous and compassionate. it also makes significant improvements to border security. most importantly, this bill is the only senate bill that has any chance of becoming law because of what the president has said about the four pillars that are so important to him. if our colleagues are serious about actually finding a real and permanent solu

got security interests that's russian security interest ok no just a thought we want a stable syria and we want a stable lebanon and yukon just send in planes every week to bomb the country and disrupt the political process in this way it's unacceptable. right now you are at risk so grab a pen and listen carefully to an ace scam buster attorney and professor stephen j. j. wiseman is an expert on fraud identity theft and whatever else the wise guys are doing to try to rip you off if you can only read one of the ten books he's written we recommend identity theft alert ten rules you must follow to protect yourself from america's number one crime his website updated daily is scam aside come steve welcome back to the big picture it's great to be with you you warned us that more than two hundred million people are at risk right now and i've never known you to be a fearmonger is it really that bad no it's not that bad it is far worse double the number of four hundred twenty five million people including me that are at risk well and you too so grab the armrest because steve is here with that si

you.ank president of the security , secretary-general of the united nations, excellency of the security council. may the peace be upon you. palestine's -- took place. 6 million refugees continue to suffer from the cruelty and -- they continue to wonder the world after the loss of their people and stabilize in their homelands. they are part of the 13 million palestinians whose country has yet to be recognized as a member state of the united nations. the numerous resolutions reaffirming the right to self determination. despite the resolutions reaffirming the right to state on the national level. -- thatcy's, we are the live in the land of palestine 5000 years ago. and continue remain there to this day. people. great people builtan their own cities and homeland and may contributions to humanity and the united nations. hospitals, libraries, newspapers, producing houses, banksic organizations, with wide regional and international influence. all of this exists before and in 1917. excavation -- gave to by which those who had no right. bears this responsibility for the catastrophic consequences

second, this bill secures our borders with additional border security and a wall where required. it puts $25 billion in a trust fund toward border security and a wall system that would be spent over the next few years to provide better national security on our country's borders. it ends policies like catch and release that encourage more illegal immigration. it makes critical changes to the immigration court system to clear our backlogs, expedite court hearings and give law enforcement the resources they need to properly do their jobs. third, this bill fixes the flaws in the current immigration system that spurred this daca problem in the first place and incentivized illegal immigration. it protects the immediate family of the primary worker. 72% of americans, madam president, believe immigration should include the primary worker, their spouse, and their immediate children which is exactly what this bill does. in addition, two-thirds of americans actually believe that the solution here for illegal immigration includes the daca fix and end of chain migration, border security, and

national security. i believe american strength is a pillar of global peace upon which our allies and partners depend and our enemies recoil. as i reflect on my time as chairman, i saw the rise of isis and then i saw the collapse of the caliphate. i am disturbed by the evil that has emerged over the last decade under retreating american leadership. i'm encouraged by the progress we are making in eradicating this evil that has entrenched itself around the globe. as an internal optimist, i am confident our nation is finally heading in the right direction. moving forward, it is critical that we continue to reclaim our sovereignty. this includes enhancing security along our southern border, addressing boehner abilities in our current immigration system, encouraging responsible use of cyberspace, improving aviation security and defending against malicious ideology and actions of our enemies. on the southern border, for too long, and i come from the state of texas where i was a federal prosecutor with the juri

this is also a security story that matters to all of us because this is a security story about how donald trump is running this government. white house employees don't get handed security clearances as perks, right in the fbi has to clear you for one. after this rigorous background check process. and there are all sorts of ways to fail that process. it doesn't mean you're a criminal. some of them are dramatic. you can fail the fbi background collect for security clearance because you have undisclosed foreign kaks you've been trying to cover up or lie about. those would screw up your chance for a clearance because you could be in cahoots or in who can to some foreign government or some foreign government knows something about their contacts you feel you can't be straight about and they can use that is to blackmail you. that's the stuff we worry about jared kushner not disclosing his foreign ties. it could be more pedestrian stuff. you could be in a lot of the debt being deeply indebted is not a crime. but it might prevent you from getting a security clearance because that might give some f

this means upgrading our nation's security, doing what we haven't done which our security heads honestlyitted today we have not done on a national basis inner agency. i keep emphasizing this. the bill alone just for the election security is only 3% of one aircraft carrier. why when these other countries particularly russia are engaging in cyber warfare and the trump administration wanted to put so much money into defense, why are we not putting that money, as well or taking part of it and put it into our cyber protection on both the private citizen basis and the political basis? it's not happening. i think we have basically we have 265 days to go, chris, before this election. 265. i say this, you know, hack us once, shame on them. hack us twice, shame on us. so the people who are blocking this from happening that aren't doing anything, the president is not calling on a security apparatus to protect us on the cyber warfare, they are going to be responsible for their if it happens again. >> senator amy klobuchar, thanks for being with me tonight. >> still ahead the trump budget is out and

officials, but i think in many ways cyber security and the need to focus on not just the physical security of your election system, but the digital and cyber security of your elections is something that's moving from the other duties as a signed part of the job description to an actual line tiitem or paragrh or full section of your job description going forward. that's one of those things that i know everyone in the field is incredibly committed to doing and wants to make sure they do right. the problem is, is that in many ways we're catching up to the bad guys or to sort of the advanced good guys in the field and learning about how exactly to do that. there are some very high-level things that i know are already in place and we're going to hear about those today, but there are other things that each of us and the people we work with are going to have to do a better job of, better password management, thinking about how securely we backup our information and where we secure it, knowing how to spot, respond or not, to phishing and other attempts to get at the data that we work with on a dai

security council the ones that have a veto so it's the u.s. china russia and the u.k. and france and also germany and they would like them to take over from the u.s. as the sole negotiators you're seeing the russian ambassador vasily in there talking to the u.s. ambassador nikki haley he i don't think will be convinced by the certainly that some of the things that you're going to hear from ambassador hailey he's certainly very skeptical about some of the things she said in the past i'm also seeing right now on a nother feed from just outside the security council president abbas is this moment walking into the security council chamber the president of the palestinian authority you'll see him in just a moment walking inside the chamber which means this meeting will students. darke brought to water we expect as ever by the president of the security council that's a monthly rotation interesting this meeting with president abbas is happening this month because it is the arab member of the security council who is the president this month and that is kuwait the kuwaiti ambass

to address food security.ference, so are inside the munich security conference, so many are inside the munich security conference, so many high—level people can make things happen, they are listening to this messagem has been quite remarkable to see the foreign ministers, the presidents, the prime minister is clearly understanding that food security is critical. if people don't have food, they will either fight or flee. we are addressing this very clearly. we can use food as a weapon peace, a weapon of reconciliation, a of sustainable development let isis, al qaeda, terrorist groups use it at a weapon of division, war. food is increasingly used, we have seen in yemen, syria. how can you tackle that? when you control food, you control a lot. we come in here making their innocent victims of conflicts receive the food they need to they don't have to yield to extremist and terrorist groups. the groups will deprive people of food and we haven't fed your little girl 01’ and we haven't fed your little girl ora and we

search for unity at the munich security conference the us national security advisor claims there is indisputable evidence that moscow interfered in america's election a claim russia's foreign minister dismisses as blatter and germany's foreign minister says berlin no longer knows what to make of washington's policy who's also on the program. germany's social democrats trying to rally their rank and file ahead of a party vote that will determine the country's next government. and a huge shock at the winter olympics as a snowboarder takes gold in skiing that and more of the best action from date coming up. welcome to the program i'm michel henery thanks for joining us we begin with the munich security conference taking place at a time when alliances that kept the world stable for decades are now under strain for its part germany is aren't sure about the direction that the united states is taking in syria the u.s. and turkey support opposing sides and in europe there is brics it and the rise of right wing populism. less armament fuel wars protesters want to make their message loud and clear to worl

right we're taking you back to munich now to the second day of the security conference where we're hearing from the russian foreign minister sergei lavrov let's listen in. to remember the events of the recent past as the russian historian basically cesky said history punishes those who do not learn the lesson eighty years ago in nineteen thirty eight here in munich we adopted the agreement on the of czechoslovakia which was a sort of a prelude to the second world war and later on your big process. the leaders of the third drake who were tried since you claimed that the goal was to push russia out of europe and then again kate terms you mentioned that would be. a tragedy it reflected all of the pieces of the book that is the belief in their exclusiveness the strife the mutual suspicions and their bet to create descend into a corner and send buffer zones and meddling into other states affairs and those memories are even more worrisome if we would compare them with today with their attempts to a new modern historic truth of the second world war and the preceding events that tempts to rehabili

dhs must also strengthen aviation security. no more is the threat to aviation security.e cannot afford to miss a single threat without potential results.rophic we require libel equipment and well-trained transportation security officers. our work has identified vulnerabilities. you have conducted nine covert penetration audits on passenger baggage and screening operations. i cannot provide you with result in an unclassified setting, but can characterize them as troubling and disappointing. tsa failures were caused by technology and human error. am pleased that they are moving to address those. we audited air marshals, tsa security, although the detailed results are classified, i can state some of the funding could be discontinued and reallocated to higher priority areas. finally, our primary focus at dhs is the integrity of roughly 240,000 departmental employees. dhse the vast majority of employees and contractors are hard-working public servants, much of our investigative caseload concerns allegations of corruptions on the parts of dhs law enforcement personnel and cont