we want to allow the addition of adus in new construction to three or less. remove requirements that have been hindrances for building adus like street tree requirements or bike parking. we believe that the city has other ways of doing this. so those are some of the main elements of the first piece of legislation. we're also going to be drafting very shortly legislation to figure out how it is that we can allow for more, what we're calling and dubbing, adu infills in corner lots, areas that we think are perfect for adus and can solve for a lot of our housing challenges. secondly, i'm introducing a legislati legislati legislation that supports sex worker immunity. it would provide protections for sex workers that want to come forward and report a crime of violence perpetrated against them during the act of prostitution. and lastly, i did want to also -- apologize -- introduce a resolution declaring march national kidney month in san francisco. and we also want to thank city attorney who had helped us write this legislation that personally had some experiences

because of our adu rules now, you can add an adu, so really, you could fit two units on that lot under our density restriction. >> vice president richards: okay. >> our height limit is -- the height limit is generally 40 feet, but for single-family homes, it's actually 35 feet. so you can build, in theory, up to 35 feet. in reality, what happens is we have design review, and so any new building proposed in an rh-1 has to meet or design guidelines, and so that involves a lot of sculpting. there's a theory envelope and what actually ends up happening. >> vice president richards: on f.a.r. 4.5, that's a 25,000 square foot building. >> if you took that same parcel, put a 25% rear yard, and then, you built eight stories up, we -- then, we estimate it sort of at an average unit size of 1,000 square feet, you could fit between ten and 16 units in that envelope. >> vice president richards: okay. but the build -- the building code minimum is what, 375 -- we have a minimum. >> yeah. i believe it's 200 something. >> vice president richards: so if we really wanted to do microunits, it could be 32

>> yes. >> so is that a motion to support the proposed project with the adu? >> yes. >> okay. on that motion. [ roll call. ] >> so moved, commissioners, that motion passes unanimously, 6-0. commissioners, that'll place us on your final discretionary review for item 14. case number 2013.0254 drp at 56 mason street. >> good afternoon, commissioners. alexander kirby with department staff. item before you is a request for discretion year review for window restoration and alterations at 56 mason street located at the southeast intersection of mason street at eddy street within an rc-4 street. the building is listed as a contributory building -- [ inaudible ] under article 11 as well as a contributor to the tenderloin district on the national register. the building is a four story mason ry apartment hotel typical to the surrounding neighbor. the legal use of the property is a residential hotel with 41 is single occupancy units and commercial spaces at the ground story. the proposed scope of work under the permit is for the restoration of 75 existing windows on the upper three floors

desaparecio e jueves fue visto cuando bajo del bus escolar pero no se presento en la escuela agentes de la aduor mentir >> ahora hablamosd de los pel o peligros de eno dno decir la bienvenidos >> bienvenverdad un agente mintio diciendo que a nacio enterevistn texas cuando m mexico el agente fue arrestado e el 22 de febrero en douglas y n enfrenta varios cargos la age agencia de aduanas y proteccion fronteriza dice que ayuda a la oficinas de arresto donde enf n enfrenta cargos de falsificacion de identidad muchos no saben lo importante que es mentir alg i gobierno >> es ippreocupante declarar q u uno es ciudadano cuando no lo es , es dificil que se quede en e estados unidos delarclarar que o no ciudadano es serio y no hay perdon >> en casos extremos el gobierno perdionaona a una persona >> hay excepciones si uno era mm menor de edad cuando lo hizo y o otro si uno de verdad pensabva k que era ciudadano >> en la pagina muestreanan l q requicitos para ser parte de las agendcias efederal antyecedent r crimilnales y pasar un poligraf >> ( musica ) >> en australia no ha parado de llover causando inun

we're prepared to moving forward with an adu and a locking door that allowed the family members to interact. so here -- okay. there we go. so right here is the entry to the accessory dwelling unit? and right here is the communicating opening that we would like your approval for. we also -- you guys mentioned that there was a lack of light and air to the bottom unit so we actually reduced the size of the deck at the second level so that there's more light over here as well as over here. we've also added open planters to allow more light and accessiblity. there's more light and air. there's elevation shot right here so you can see the planters that we've added. the other issue was with the front deck, saying that it was too large. originally, it was about 10 feet, close to 10 feet? we've reduced it significantly? you can see -- oops. sorry. where did it go 1234 yeah. we -- it went from 10 feet

aprobada para ayudar a prevenir infecciones de 13 cepas de bacterias que causan la neumonía neumocócica en adusobre prevnar 13®. vor? panda y unicornio por $8. ¡pero ahí dice $5! esa es la tarifa básica: 1 solo globo, 1 solo giro. hay que sumar... cargo por acceso de globo.nales. más el impuesto de cruce de especies. ¡no me lo puedo creer! ¿quieren otro? ¡no no no no! ¡no te conformes con las sorpresas en la factura! en t-mobile los impuestos y cargos ya están incluidos. por tiempo limitado, llévate 4 líneas por $35 cada una. Únete a t-mobile. x >>hizo su carrera corporativa abriendo restaurantes vendÍan hamburguesas y ahora no come carne. las cuenta que hace unos aÑos pedro vestÍa de y corbata y vivÍa en una gran ciudad. mente, __actualmente, vive en un campo. >> se define como un soÑador. y cree que todo cambio en la vida empieza como un sueÑo. >> yo creo que el cambio arranca en como uno aprende a cambiar. >> cuenta que como niÑo era un buen estudiante, miedoso y tÍmido. >> mi cambio mÁs grande fue una academia militar y tuve que quitarme la pena. yo soÑaba>> con estar manejando una empresa

adu in there. 16450. those are developments 5% of less of the development potential. add this up, 145,,000 units, 60,000 entitled. nobody mentions this. why are we rezoning the city? >> supervisor tang: i'm going to have to ask that you hold your applause. thank you. i'm going to call more cards. paul. victor. george, bobek, jeff and gen. >> i'm from housing rights committee of san francisco where tenants fighting to stop rising rent and eviction, mostly of low-income communities. i love apartments in diverse neighborhoods. it's why i live in san francisco and i fight for stronger rent protection and that's why i oppose this bill. we don't need more empty luxury housing owned by speculators. we need housing that is affordable to folks who live in san francisco. we welcome people who san francisco. we fight for their rights to have affordable rent and live here. why is no one demanding white wealthy cities that want to put in headquarters of high end jobs and white wealthy neighborhoods? maybe they should do their part, instead of keep asking the density city in the co

under construction. 17,000 approved entitled but not built. 30,000 approved in master plans. 16,000 adus. 31,000 soft side. 7,200 applications currently pending. 15,575 units awaiting rezoning. adds up to 143,000 units. why do we need sb827? thank you. >> thank you for your comments. next speaker, please. >> my name is james park. i'm a member of the sunset community. my neighbors and i are very concerned about sb827 and 28. it is hugely impacktive and corrosive to the sunset's livability to those of us who enjoy our community and its character. these bills allow the destruction of the single family homes we live in. it enables real estate interest to profit and the canonization of our neighborhood. it allows and forces replacement of our homes through litigious effor efforts. their rationalale is simple. it's increased cost and pricing. exchanging high rises for homes is not the solution. i support housing but not the destruction of our neighborhood. i support affordable housing, but not what sb27 proposes. i elected katie tang to preserve this for thousands of us in sunset. sb27 will d

we passed adu housing, which the senator wiener was instrumental in helping that. home sf was mentioned a lot here. we've yet to see one project come forward from project sf. my take, it's not doable. we won't see anything from home sf unless we force a developer to do it. i've heard from many that are trying to build and would like to build that it doesn't necessarily work. i think we can do better, but i think we can use this to encourage the region to do better, also, and the state to do better. we need strong tenant protection. i'm not sure -- is the language -- you said this bill was amended so that rent control units -- existing rent control units are protected -- the city's allowed to protect them or they're protected in. >> so the amendments state that any unit that is subject to rent control, that you cannot use -- that you don't get a bonus. you don't get a bonus under sb-827 if there is any existing rent control unit on that parcel. it then says if a city wants to decide to set a policy or replacing -- like, for allowing the demolition and replacement of

we can get those adus actually built. my last point is literally anything that will ensure the 42,000 homes that are needed will be built. we are not picky. put the housing anywhere in this city, but do it before all these jobs come in. we can do this. just build the housing. thank you. >> thank you. >> hi. steven bus with mission envy. i also want to say i am thrilled that we'll be getting more jobs in the city. economic growth is key to a well-functioning city and region. i also strongly agree with the soma filipinos and the somcan speakers that came before me. cultural preservation is more than just preserving buildings and putting up a plaque, as they said. it's ensuring that people in the community continue to have a place to live. if we are going to add 40,000 jobs and 7,400 homes, what realistically do you think is going to happen? the people in those new high-paying jobs are going to displace the people that currently live in soma because at least not enough new housing. it's going to spill over into the mission.

but we need at&t to sell adu-- of two things is happening.ither the call is insane or these company shoes have been broken up a decade ago. doogle h google has youtube and it is pre-installed on 2 billion android devices. so the notion that this merger needs to be restrained and these companies with five or ten times the distribution or contents don't need to be broken up seems irrational. >> final quick thought. the most powerful person in the world according to you, it is not putin, not trump, who is it and why? >> oh, hachnds down it is mark zuckerberg who has as accesem zuckerberg who has as acceseble community of 2.2 billion people and has license to take the mood up or down. he is not elected, cannot be removed from office. and last year tried to get his shareholders to agree to a three class share holder system where he could end up owning none of the company and still control it. facebook is the most successful thing in the history of mankind. it has been weaponized by foreign actors. if cnn had been weaponized by russia, my sense is

under current zoning someone would be allowed on that typical lot to build one unit or two with an adu, and that building would be allowed to go up to 5 feet in height. the actual f.a.r. would be dependent on design guidelines where we ask our guidelines to meet general design guidelines. one parking space would be required. under sb-# 27, on that same lot, we estimate between 10 and 16 units could be built in a building of up to 85 feet in height. we would likely retain the ability to ask for sculpting and massing reduction. no car parking would be required. i should note this is obviously the dramatic case, but there are many areas of our city, especially downtown and our area plans where zoning is more permissive than 827, so if those areas, the bill would essentially be no change. as i mentioned earlier, the bill doesn't mandate changes to the local approval process, so transit rich projects would still be subject to our local inclusionary irmt kwoos. they would be required to go through our standard design review and entitlement process, and including conditional use authorization

responded to both of these comments by substantially reducing the front roof deck and incorporation of an adu at the first floor. these are my comments. i'm here for additional questions. i'll hand it off to the project sponsor to provide more details. thank you. >> we typically hear from the d.r. requester first or are you both -- >> okay. hi. okay. so hi. i'm claudine. i'm speaking on behalf of the owner at 171 juddson. >> are you the -- you're the project sponsor or you're speaking on before of the project sponsor? >> i am. >> we need to hear from the d.r. requester, so the person who filed the d.r. >> so staff actually noted that the d.r. requester may not be in attendance, so unless they make themselves known. >> do you know is the d.r. requester here, the person who filed the d.r. >> no. we are just responding to it. >> go ahead. and we'll here -- is there any public testimony on this item? seeing none, okay. then let's give you -- you've got three minutes as the project sponsor. >> okay. thank you so since the family has extended members that live with them, primarily the grandmother i

terrible depression, when the unemployment rate, which today is about 8.5% officially--the numumber of adus looking for work as a percentage of o our laboror force. if you k at the comparable number in the depths of the depression, it was 3 times s that--25%. really very bad. and interestingly in the 1930s, the american people pushed back. they were not passive. they were active. let me tell you what they d did, because it's a part of our history that americans tend not to learn too well in school for reasons i will leave to your speculation. we had the biggest labor movement organization that the country ever had. something called the congress of industrial organizations organized millions of workers in the 1930s in the depths of the depression. workers who had never been in a union before. we'd never seen that in the united states. we had never seen it before, and we've never seen it since. in the midst of that misery of a depression, of that poverty, american workers decided that a labor union could maybe save them, and they were ready to join. and joining was often tough, w working agai

he does not look like a guy who would be -- lease anhe's an adu.he adult in the room don't like the tariffs. >> look at those suspenders. finally. hey ron! they're finally taking down that schwab billboard. oh, not so fast, carl. ♪ oh no. schwab, again? index investing for that low? that's three times less than fidelity... ...and four times less than vanguard. what's next, no minimums? ...no minimums. schwab has lowered the cost of investing again. introducing the lowest cost index funds in the industry with no minimums. i bet they're calling about the schwab news. schwab. a modern approach to wealth management. . >>> we'll keep talking about nafta. we don't link together the tariffs and the negotiations for nafta. just highlighting that imposition of tariffs on canada would end up hurting the u.s. almost as much as it would hurt canada >> that was canadian prime minister justin trudeau yesterday speaking to cnbc yesterday. we are joined now by an economist who is diverging a little from many of his colleagues and speaking out in favor to some exte