in austin, texas, jess tatar love, and emily jashinsky. does the hush money aspect and michael cohen getting this restraining order gets stormy daniels make it war think front-page news? emily: wet allegations first surface -- when the allegations first surfaced, people blinked. but when you are naming him in a lawsuit, then we are talking about front page news. howie: jessica let me read you another comment from my interview with michael cohen. he says where i have been mistreated is by the talking heads on the various news programs making comments on their opinion and limited knowledge of the event. but the trump white house hasn't been answering questions about this. jessica: michael cohen could help us out and make it clear what happened here. this story went through so many iterations. now we ended up at a place where trump's personal lawyer used his personal email account to do it. if this happened with president obama, the country would be on fire. because president trump was on the cover of playboy and he can talk to howard stern ab

emily jashinsky, and leslie marshall. she was contradicting herself on motivation. e says donald trump was sweet, respectful, kind, caring. ies she reveal swag was their secrets? emily: i don't have a good reason to believe he's lying but he should have pressed her more on the money. other than that i thought the interview was pretty well hand. but the big question is what -- is if anybody actually cares. howie: mcdougal says american media inc signed this $150,000 deal top bury the story and protect trump. but then she said, and i reported this before, that she wanted the story buried because she got cold feet at the end of the campaign and backed out of a interview. i was waiting for anderson to say. leslie: i thought anderson cooper should have pressed her more regarding the money and the motivation. you knew he was a married man, shame on you. but at the same time you have got to get more about the money. because we know the money at the end of the day is the motivation if you are quiet for so long, then you come out and a check is written. howie: american media

emily jashinsky, let me start with you. w they have have been sort of doing the interviews, i don't know where sheryl sandberg is, but they have made a mess of this. emily: their cleanup efforts were not effective at all. especially if you consider the keep of the scandal. when we are looking at the ongoing cambridge analytic data. the scope of the data they allowed facebook to collect, and on the second part they shall recognizing they don't think facebook is doing a good job protecting it. that's a huge problem when you see people deleting their accounts. it's creating a big hole for them to dig themselves out of. charles: it's like combining india and china's populations together. it will be tough to reel them in. but having said that, why are they important for businesses that promote businesses on the internet. is there any way to replace them? >> the font way we'll be able to replace them is through the market. like emily said, 30s has been happening for a long time. if you read facebook's terms of service, you can cli

tom bevin, washington examiner, and emily jashinsky. how likely, emily will he get his wish?of republicans want to do that but is there follow-through to do that? >> there is a lot of will in the republican caucus to and this is tough things for democrats. think of con no lamb will. this is antitax reform democrat. the republicans are saying what will happen people are motivated to come out to the polls by republicans achieving tax reform legislation. that clearly didn't happen last week. they want to start talking more what they have done for individuals and emphasize that in messaging strategy in november. neil: tom you could flip it around and say you mean the individual tax cut thing isn't permanent. >> sorry, say that again, neil? neil: a lot of folks hearing this say individual tax cut isn't permanent? that would be news to a lot of them, wouldn't it? >> it might be. by and large it is immaterial. people will get returns, file taxes on april 15 and feel good probably about the tax cuts. we've seen movement in the polls. there are two problems with it. what have you done

let's talk about from the "washington examiner," commentary writer emily jashinsky.r coming on. the administration think this is is political winner to take on california in this fashion? >> certainly i think they see it that way and when you go back to 2015, 2018, three years ago, a huge part of the early days of president trump's campaign actually was what happened with kate steinle. that gave him a really early boost. i don't think any of this is surprising. the only surprise it took the administration more than a year to actually get to this level. we've heard these sentiments coming from the department of justice since the inauguration back in 2017 but honestly it's, i'm wondering whether it was sparked by what the oakland mayor did last week. session had tough words. connell: he went after, he went after her pretty hard, the mayor of oakland. >> yeah. he had serious word for her, makes you wonder whether that was the real catalyst. all right, we're slapping entire state of california with a lawsuit. not just about them passively ignoring federal law. the about