hey, judge. >> judge jeanine: hey, how are you? >> tucker: couldn't be better. >> judge jeanine: almost the weekend. all right. thank you. welcome to this special edition of "hannity," the trump agenda. i'm jeanine pirro in tonight for sean. for the hour tonight we will highlight the major developments surrounding president trump's agenda including the administration's big gains on immigration reform, infrastructure, jobs, and so much more.en earlier today, the president touted some of those recent achievements during his speech in ohio. take a look. >> joined by our friends here in ohio, my administration is fighting every day to protect and defend and grow american jobs and you see what's happening all over the country. it's in ohio but it's all over the country. pouring back plants and factories. pouring back into our country. we have made history byac job-killing taxes. we didn't have one democrat who voted for that. r they want to raise your taxes. and they want people to come in from the border. and they want, i guess, want,

>> this judge contreras is a judge on the fisa court.subpoenas for the wiretapping of carter page. but these two page and strzok are having conversations talking about ways they can have a social meeting with the fudge and they talk about ways they can cover it up. and they talk about the fact that the judge is close to strzok. surely knows strzok is in charge of foreign counter-intelligence at the fbi. they are talking about inviting other people for cover to make sure it doesn't like out of the ordinary. and to get close to the judge, but not so close the judge is forced to recuse himself. judge jeanine: they are recommending a dinner party so it doesn't look obvious they are talking to each other. this smells to high heaven. you have got one judge who is on the flynn case who takes himself off because he did something. he got caught in something. >> it's not clear he recused himself. he took the plea december 1 and december 7 the court announced he has been recused. judge jeanine: that's even worse, someone took him off the case a wee

judge jeanine: who?evidence the russians were emailing back and forth with trump's son-in-law, have advisors. >> the russians or a russian. that's completely different. we are talking about quliewghtd russians as in the russian government. there is zero evidence of that. adam schiff said there isn't evidence of that. if there were, we would be hearing indictments by now with the leaks that go on. we would have been told something. but there is nothing. judge jeanine: 13 people have been indicted by robert mueller. russians interest geared our election. they are all in russia. none of them will be extra dated. none of them have been arraigned, and i will bet my house none of them will be convicted. where is the collusion? >> i mean, it's going to take time. this is a big investigation. the funny thing about this whole thing judge, i know that the primary evidence what is suppose to be russia collusion, we are finding shady business when it comes to finance and economics. judge jeanine: $25 million for ura

judge jeanine is in for sean. we will see you monday. ♪ ♪ ♪ >> judge jeanine: welcome to this special edition of hannity, democratic scandals. i'm jeanine pirro in for sean tonight. liberals are reeling from a rave of calamities that could have serious consequences. republicans are calling for a second special counsel to investigate the fbi's handling of the clinton email probe. congressman devin nunes continues to expose severe fisa abuses and former obama officials are facing new scrutiny. but, first, tonight, we start with the major battle raging between the trump administration and the liberal state of california. the department of justice now looking into a possible obstruction of justice charge against the mayor of oakland. this comes after the mayor alert you had illegal immigrants in the california bay area that federal immigration authorities were preparing to conduct raids. the acting ice director is slamming that mayor of oakland. take a look. >> what she did is no better than, you know, a gang lookout

judge? >> judge: terrible, terrible story there. thanks, griff. meanwhile, today in washington, the u.s. customs and border protection acting deputy commissioner ronald votelo provided update on construction of the border wall. take a listen. >> let me be clear, without the president and the administration's leadership and a commitment to border security, the funding for construction for these projects would not be possible. in san diego, we are looking at 14 miles of new border wall, getting rid of old dilapidated landing mats in favor of a steve ballard wall. on calexico we are on schedule and on budget to build a 30-foot border wall continuing east. we are on track 20 new border walls in new mexico. in addition 40 new miles of border wall in el paso. finally we plan to replace dilapidated fencing border wall system in various locations along the southwest border. agents have been vocal about the need for effective barriers to deny the entry of illegal aliens and contra band. the truth is walls work and the data shows it and agents know it. >> j

we've got thirty four judges. thirty four us and one hundred al forty six to to show us that thirty or thirty only that is there. and as sad as it is that some of the judges. i did as who called in and i think. for example jet at nasa. it. is caught on tape taken bribes cool so you can imagine that implications are huge for the country was a jet in the sam is one of gone as most senior judges sitting in the high court and dealing with the most important cases. when an ass is on the cover team came across him he was trying four men. they were accused of stealing over a hundred and fifty thousand dollars from goners national oil company. to get access to a judge like this they first had to winnow rees clark in this case a man called gabriel. that will play the middleman. he would need us to buy jed's. of course as you can see we give him his share not match what he takes it. and that's wanted to find out whether they could pay to get one of the accused off the bone to the clark worked he got i mean to see the judge.

judge jeanine: richard, stop.ou deny that the economy is in much better shape since donald trump has been there. >> i give the president his marks on the economy. i will praise the president when he needs to be parades. but overall across the board he's unpopular with most of americans. >> he was unpopular when he won the electoral college. we are absolutely pushing an america first agenda. >> i'm glad you admitted he is unpopular. >> those are the polls. the polls are always wrong. we saw that on election day. all of hillary clinton supporters were crying because she was up by 10. >> you just admitted he's unpopular off course he's unpopular in the polls. look at methodology. let me -- final, would you admit, though, richard, that in spite of whether he act presidential or not, this man can draw crowds and has done more in one year than most of presidents especially in terms of legislation and in terms of the economy. it is totally different now. >> i think you have to parse that question. of course, he draws cro

the amount of money needed to tim seen in a judge's light this is no small a nurse says that this judge wanted around free thousand dollars more than a month's salary for a high court justice who spoke to him where the kids were given their narration and they who demanded their money be given to him so that's what you can see here is the man that has been given to give it up and give us an add on to eight thousand c.d.'s and it over but the judge wants to make sure he gets a further amount he asked me the defendant in person to sort out the paperwork. after the money is finally handed over the lucky. all three is three whole accuse will get long sentences as the oil companies state owned it's the people of ghana we've just lost out is this kind of corruption which provides ferd's how ground for campaigning journalist like crazy pratt the award winning newspaper editor crushing our folks with your list of the facts everything first of all enormous resources are being taken out of the state coffers in the was resources are being taken out to private coffers and so all of that ended up wit

judges.en the justice department will not give us transcripts or documents and why would they not want to do this. wouldn't you want to clear the air so the american people can move on. but they are fighting us on every issue. >> sean: what information are you looking for. ? >> and we are looking for fizza applications, too. we understand that the fisa court was misled. but was the process corrupted internally. and i don't know if a judge did anything wrong, but certainly enough for the court to begin the internal investigation of how the judges communicated with the fbi and were all communications appropriate and disclosed in a way that the public is assured that there was a fair administration of justice in the operation. fisa court. this corruption in the obama justice and fbi not only ruined the justice department and fbi. it splashed on to the court and what a disaster. >> sean: congressman jordan. you have to send your staff over every day. that's the only way to get the information and

judges have limited powers. for example, we had recently i judge tell one of our fine lawyers you cannot come into court and espouse a physician as this. -- to espouse a position so heartless. that just hurt my heart. [laughter] to have my fine attorney attacked in court. i did not appreciate that. he didn't say it was illegal, the position we were taking. it was in fact legal. it was not unlawful. but it was heartless he said. he said publicly that it was not his job to decide but the american people through their america people through their representatives pass laws and we try to enforce them as they are written and but that was our response. in the same judge then said, back in court, guess my lawyer said, i seem to think that courts cannot have an opinion. well, that is wrong, of course. judge should issue legal opinions that pertain to the legal questions before the end as far as the case and not to politics. or sentiment. and as attorney general, i have been shocked, really, by the actions of certain judg

judge jeanine: richard, stop.ou deny that the economy is in much better shape since donald trump has been there. >> i give the president his marks on the economy. i will praise the president when he needs to be parades. but overall across the board he's unpopular with most of americans. >> he was unpopular when he won the electoral college. we are absolutely pushing an america first agenda. >> i'm glad you admitted he is unpopular. >> those are the polls. the polls are always wrong. we saw that on election day. all of hillary clinton supporters were crying because she was up by 10. >> you just admitted he's unpopular off course he's unpopular in the polls. look at methodology. let me -- final, would you admit, though, richard, that in spite of whether he act presidential or not, this man can draw crowds and has done more in one year than most of presidents especially in terms of legislation and in terms of the economy. it is totally different now. >> i think you have to parse that question. of course, he draws cro

meeting with judge contreras could put judge contreras in a precarious situation where he would haverecuse himself. >> sean: but they're going to do it anyway. >> they are going to do it anyways. what does that tell you about them? >> it tells you that the stench in washington is overwelcoming. everybody they don't themselves perfect interest. when i would appear occasionally they would recuse hemselves but they will would explain their recusal on the record to be honest and forth right. contreras didn't do that he kept it a secret. and that invites the question if you have nothing to hide, why are you hiding? it's also curious he didn't recuse himself until after week, after flynn pled guilty. my question is did flynn know that the fbi agents who interviewed him do you think went back to comey and united stateyateshe's innocent e truth. >> sean: and comey said it. >> yes. >> what does that mean for michael flynn. >> i predict the new. demanding mueller turn over all exculpatory evidence and those interview us would be exculpatory. if it is true that flynn and his lawyer didn't full

one judge, no, nationwide. and you may have heard differently, but we believe that our actions are justified in the order they have been issued that are lawful and within the power of the cheer executive. we are eager to defend these actions the supreme court. and actually we are confident about our prospect. i don't know if you noticed this, three extraordinary opinions, by which they essentially reversed the vast majority of the injunctions on the travel ban. granted extraordinary amount, to stop the district court judges, the strain discovery for it. they were disposing my castle. and they don't need to show the policy in this case, but my council is being disposed. they need to stop it in the middle of the deposition. and so we are, we feel like in many instances, a lot of these actions are outside proper law. i'm just happy to tell you that is what we're receiving. it is hard enough. and there will be a lot on the government of the united states. under a large pass by congress, to give me a break that will

judge jeanine: richard, stop.he economy is in much better shape since donald trump has been there. >> i give the president his marks on the economy. i will praise the president when he needs to be parades. but overall across the board he's unpopular with most of americans. >> he was unpopular when he won the electoral college. we are absolutely pushing an america first agenda. >> i'm glad you admitted he is unpopular. >> those are the polls. the polls are always wrong. we saw that on election day. all of hillary clinton supporters were crying because she was up by 10. >> you just admitted he's unpopular off course he's unpopular in the polls. look at methodology. let me -- final, would you admit, though, richard, that in spite of whether he act presidential or not, this man can draw crowds and has done more in one year than most of presidents especially in terms of legislation and in terms of the economy. it is totally different now. >> i think you have to parse that question. of course, he draws crowds. he's a re

judge? >> judge: ed, thanks so much. >> good to see you. >> judge: hurt. joining us now with reaction is former press secretary for vice president pence, marc lotter and former obama economic advisor austan goolsbee. all right, good evening, gentlemen, mark, i will start with you, the president certainly has a lot to talk about, 14 months, 15 months in with all of the numbers that he talked about with unemployment and jobs and 3 million new jobs since election day. i mean, there is pretty much a very positive message. it's kind of interesting that there would be any resistance towards his effort at least to create the infrastructure effort that apparently is stalled in congress. why do you think that is? >> well, it's basically what you just said. it's results versus resistance. and, in this case. he is talking about building an even better america again. that's where his focus is. he took that message right into the heart of blue collar ohio. he is going to take it around the country for the next of the three years. that's the platform is he going to move

at one judge, no. nationwide. though you may have heard differently, we believe that our actions are justified and the orders that have been issued are lawful and within the powers of the chief executive. we are in or to defend these actions before the supreme court and are confident about our prospects. the supreme court has on the issue -- i am not sure if you are aware of this -- 40 extremely extraordinary opinions by which they have reversed a vast majority of the injunctions on the travel matter and granted extraordinary writs on judges extreme discovery. they were deposing my counsel! one of my counsel is being deposed, and we finally got -- the united states supreme court inued an order to stop it the middle of a deposition. so we are -- feel like, and many instances, a lot of these actions are outside proper law. i just have to tell you that is the way we see it. it is hard enough the colossal government of the united states, under the laws passed by congress -- give me a break. that is pretty hard. but mu

judges have limited power. we recently had a judge tell one of our fine youers and court that cannot come in to court to a spouse a position so heartless. that hurts my heart to have my find attorney attacked in court. i did not appreciate it, frankly. he did not say it was illegal, the position we were taking. and notn fact legal unlawful, but it was heartless he said. it was not his job to decide what was heartless. the american people, through their representatives, pass laws and we try to enforce them. the same judge then said, back to my lawyer that he seemed to think courts cannot have an opinion. that is wrong, of course. judges should issue legal opinions that pertained to the legal questions before them as part of the case, and not to politics or sentiment. as attorney general, i have been shocked by the actions of certain judges and courts we have dealt with, failing to respect the constitutional responsibilities of the executive and legislative branches. these branches are equal. the court is not sup

"justice with judge jeanine" is up next. remember i'm watters and this is my world. [♪] judge jeanine: marchers take to the streets in cities across the country in support of gun control. live from our nation's capital, i'm jeanine pirro. thanks for being with us. and thanks for make "justice" the most of watched show on all of cable news last weekend. and we have another fakd show for you tonight. deputy white house press second scary on today's mars, and ann coulter, david bossie and joe concha and more. the omnibus bill the republicans gave it president yesterday is a total betrayal of him and the people who elected him. it's as if they left him to swim in a sea of sharks risking our safety. remember how panicked they were when it looked like he got nomination? in spite of their back slapping, it. it was to make shire did not succeed. candidate donald trump ran on a promise to build a border wall. in 2017, january, speak per paul ryan and senate majority leadered mitch mcconnell decided to build that wall with $15 billion

judge jeanine: i am concerned.et's talk about why you are depressed. >> his being to your opening statement, i was thinking i wish i could believe that. i can't see any way to sugar coat what a disaster this is. there are 24 republicans in the senate who voted against the omnibus spending bill. half of them did it for the right reasons like tom cotton and david perdue and a few others. maybe we can run them for president. but there was only one guy who saider speech at he rally for two years that he would build the wall what he signed a bill to prohibit the building of the wall. he claims he did it, the "wall street journal" said he did it base wanted to go to mar-a-lago. judge jeanine: that's baloney. this guy is the hardest working guy who has ever been in that white house. he doesn't sleep and he works day and night. the republicans didn't care enough. >> we knew that from trump's campaign. we knew they were swine. we thought he was perhaps not the world's greatest negotiator, but a negotiator. and we got nothin

judge. >> judge jeanine: of what. >> some sort of element of truth and answers here and i'm hoping thatthe inspector general report prance it blows the doors open on some of these questions. >> special prosecutor. >> someone like andrew mccabe he was not forth right to congress about the fact that he knew who financed the dossier. not honest with congress about it. >> andrew mccabe wasn't forthcoming. christopher wray knew what was going on. comey took a walk to the white house. he wasn't going to fire mccabe. >> right now sessions sets up probes and inspector generals. he can set up a special prosecutor in march of last year he said he was open to the idea. he never did it. the fact is that we got to support everybody who is asking for the special prosecutor. all of the members of the house of representatives who are because that is the only way that we can actually have a prosecutor. >> judge jeanine: do we have a hotline email #? how do viewers say i want this to happen? i'm sick of hearing about this. >> call your member of congress to put pressure. >> the phone still works. email,

if you are a judge, and we've had to successive judges in this fisa court over a period of one year,ou don't do something about it, congress needs to look into this! i do not expect the department of justice to investigate the department of justice. i just don't. i don't expect the fbi to investigate the fbi. but i well expect federal judges serving as fisa judges to make sure that conduct wasn't committed in front of them. let me tell you something. last april, landmark legal foundation filed secretly with the fisa court because we don't have any -- nobody has standing. nobody reallyws knows how this works. we said to the court, hey, court, hey, judge, guessed what just a placek in your court roo. here's what we said. you have the inherent jurisdiction to order an investigation ofio the fbi to gt answers to this. number one, last april, half this court's order or orders been used by intelligent and law enforcement entities of the federal government, as the subterfuge to derail private citizens and at least one united states senator, we were thinking of sessions at the time, for poli

why are we hearing from pfizer judges? who are these judges? are they -- city are. steve: there's so much to dig into but let's look at one aspect. you're such an expert in this area. another thing that happened this weekend with the lawyers president said that he thought the investigation should be shut down and trey gowdy, i thought said something interesting but let's listen to trey gowdy. >> if you have an incident client, act like it. russia attacked our country, let special cancer robert mueller figure that out and if you believe that, as we found, no evidence of collusion then you should want special counsel muller to take all the time and have all the independence he needs to do his job. steve: i think that comment that if you're innocent, act like it, do you think of certain cases the lawyers are not doing the president any favors? judge jeanine: i will comment on john dowd but has they have been quiet throughout this but i think that you have to understand that at some point they say enough. we have given them everything they wanted and gone over and over

>> i think judge collyer is a very common sense judge. think what she is saying is a couple of things. remember, as you well know, and by the way, you and sarah are doing tremendous of work getting on top of this, it's only two weeks old, but what judge collyer seems to be saying, openness and transparency are the hallmarks of our justice system. the fisa court is an exception, only since 1978. judge collyer and every judge on that court cannot allow that c court to be politicized, number one, and cannot allow that court to be a forum for either misleading evidence or the omission of critically important evidence in their decision-making process because, as bad as that kind of thing is, and our regular judicial process, and a secret court like fisa where we don't see the light of day, we don't have public access to it, it is a much greater danger. >> sean: go ahead. >> i'm just about finished. judge collyer cannot allow that to happen. she sang after all, the justice department, the executive branch, made the application. we've told you,

and this is why judge collyer, she is a no nonsense judge. wants to make it very clear that they don't object to the fact that the doj can share these documents with the committee. and not only that, sean, there is an essential fourth amendment issue at stake here. it is our right, our right under the fourth amendment. and they are saying if those rights were violated, this should be thoroughly investigated. so, call a special counsel. call a prosecutor. but, investigate this. because this really is the biggest story. >> sean: gregg? >> perjury, abuse of power, obstruction of justice, fraud, and conspiracy to commit fraud and false and misleading statements. those are six felony statutes that appear to have been violated by officials at the department of justice and the fbi. it demands a second special counsel to prosecute if the evidence is there. >> sean: is, david, the biggest abuse of power corruption case have you seen in your lifetime? i certainly believe in mine. >> we don't know yet because all of the facts are not in. it's very scary

there seems to be idiosyncrasies with a lot of judges, certain judges lean to the defense, certain judges compelling arbitration. there is a lot of factors that go into whether or not you would contest this. most of that will be a determination based on who the judge is. >> michael avenatti has claimed that there are six additional women who have come forward. he said he hasn't fully vetted what their stories are. he says he believes two have ndas. is it possible they could all use the same legal argument to try to get out of them, or would that all sort of ride on how similar the contracts were to the one that stormy daniels signed, if they're similar at all? >> it's the latter. what he is trying to do is get the claim of stormy daniels to the court of public opinion. that can work if you are following the news but not as much to a judge. if a judge is looking at the central issue here, number one, can stormy daniels, not the other six women who haven't been fully vetted and two of which may or may not have similar non-disclosure agreements, is there anything that allows stormy daniels t

now, do you know what the judge said in response to us, the fisa court judge? this. april 25, 2017. this is rosemary collier, the presiding judge, keep in mind, the judges on the fisa court are picked by the chief justice of the supreme court. she wrote in this little order, the has received a pleading titled motion for leave to appear as a me can you say curiae on and on. >> explain that. >> five days later she says although presented as a request to appear, there is no matter pending before the court with respect to which such an appearance would be proper this warrant extended three times. this matter was still appearing before this court. that's number one, number two, the court has ongoing jurisdiction to supervise the conduct of attorneys, the fbi, the justice department, before the court. contempt may reach backwards. even after a case has been concluded. in other words, this fisa judge and quite frankly, was misdirecting when she said the matter is not before us anymore when it was still before them and this court, like any federal court, still has the

>> then i think they would call the head judge, your honor, and there would be ahead election judge and decision being made. in the teen time there would be a disruption going on in the polling place because apparel is being policed. >> i'm sorry. who selects the head election judge at any particular place? >> i'm sorry, your honor, i don't know the answer to that question. >> i guess i'll ask the state. these people are all chosen to be the reasonable observer? do they test them to see if they are the reasonable observer? do we know? >> i don't know. i know that they try to train them, your honor, and this is how the election day policy in this case came up. the election officials attempted to train the officials, polling officials to apply this very broadly to material that, names and organizations, advocacy material, party material, and not limit to that. so there is some effort to train them, but the effort in this case confirmed that the statute sweeped so broadly there is virtually nothing political can't take in. i'll reserve my remaining time. >> thank you, counsel. >> mr. rogan

a california judge issues a landmark ruling today against starbucks... and other c >>> it is a cancer warning coming to an unlikely place, a coffeehouse near you.>> this california judge issued a landmark ruling against starbucks and other coffee makers over this chemical produced in the roasting process. the decision puts an end to a years long court battle. >> reporter: the coffee companies have been battling the lawsuit for the past eight years and it came down to this, the judge wanted to know over the lifetime of drinking coffee the level of this chemical in your body. would it stay at an acceptable range? these company does neck these coffee companies could not prove that so they lost.>> reporter: the lawsuit that has been grinding on for years is over. coffeemakers are steamed. a chemical engineer teaches the science of coffee at uc davis. he testified acrylamide forms naturally as foods cooked at high temperatures turn brown.>> it's the same reason you get that brown stuff on the side of your stake when you chart it. >> reporter: acrylamide has b

a democratic judge intervenes and then you have an argument between these two judges? >> your honor, what would happen in that instance is either the person would cover it up or there could be a discussion to say, this isn't political, and i want to talk to the head election judge and then it would be resolved. >> and who's the head election judge? >> the head election judge is a judge who's select bid ted by ty clerk because they have more training and usually they've been an election judge for a long period of time so they're familiar with all the processes and i think one of the things that i think is important to understand is election judges have discretion to make a lot of different decisions in polling places. in minnesota, we have same-day registration. they make decisions about whether or not somebody's qualified, has met the requirements to register. we also have challenge voters. when somebody is challenged because for -- they're a felon or are they somehow not eligible to vote, the election judge puts them under oath and asks them questions and makes a dete

>> the democratic judge intervenes and then you have an argument between these two judges? >> what would happen in net instance is either the person would cover it up, or there could be a discussion to say this is not political and i want to talk to the head election judge, then it would be a result. -- would be resolved. it is a judge elected by the city clerk because they have more training and usually have been an election judge for a long time so they are familiar with all the processes. that i one of the things think is important to understand is election judges have discretion to make a lot of to some -- lot of different decisions. they make decisions about whether or not someone is qualified to register. they also have challenge voters. if someone is challenged, are they a felon or some well not -- somehow not eligible to vote, the judge makes a determination about whether they are eligible to vote. a decisionat making about whether or not something is political or not is well within the understanding of an election judge in minnesota. and i think that the important

e hell did he leave maybe got complacent. 145 federal judges, 17 court of appeals judges, but

you can't judge sugar looking at the cane, you can't judge a woman looking at her man.you can't judge a daughter by looking at the mother. you can't judge a book by looking at the cover. taking one look. try to read me like a book but i leave 'em all shook 'cuz you can't judge a book by its cover. you can't judge a book by looking at the cover [x2] ♪...nausea, heartburn,♪ indigestion, upset stomach, diarrhea!♪ ♪nausea, heartburn, indigestion, upset stomach, diarrhea!♪ here's pepto bismol! ah. ♪nausea, heartburn, indigestion, upset stomach, diarrhea!♪ internet providers promise business owners a lot. let's see who delivers more. comcast business offers fast gig-speeds across our network. at&t doesn't. we offer more complete reliability with up to 8 hours of 4g wireless network backup. at&t, no way. we offer 35 voice features and solutions that grow with your business. at&t, not so much. we give you 75 mbps for $59.95. that's more speed than at&t's comparable bundle, for less. call today. >>> this morning new details in the russia investigation, court documents show that

as a state court judge has.ably have more time. and also federal courts are notorious on deciding things on what's called the leadings the papers, without having to have all the hearings, if which is clear-cut case they can decide it without having to be in a lot of hearings. >> we have heard from the attorney. i think he is flying right now. we will try to get him in the next hour. is this something he would agree to or would there be a reason why he would want to keep it in the state court? >> i think michael will probably -- once you remove it, the defendant has a right to remove it. then it's up to the plaintiff or the opposite side, i should say, to come in and contest that. my guess -- my inclination would be is that he would probably contest it. but he's going to wait and see who he draws in the central district. in fact we may already know that i'll take a look when you go to the next break. when i say draw, know who the federal judge is. a lot of times that's how the decision is made. >> whether an atto

is unacceptable to them and i agree with them because i'm not judging the met it's the case and the boston the mutual history of the two countries but the actual declaration of independence in my opinion was a volley of international law and i do not see why member countries will do you know puny and from said be all the way to my best friend slovakia. romania etc why they should accept. that volleys of international can take place in one part of europe and would be to let it sit and so it would be condemned in other parts of. example in asia. the what do you think made the u.k. germany and france so enthusiastic about an independent kosovo what's in it for them. well that's a very good question but i think you should address such a question to the president that they've. found but it's and and germany. in the past of course germany. has been known to support the. but a couple for me because they've supported the independence of slovenia and croatia . maybe they do believe that. such you are not so declarations of independence is an expression of some of the principle of so does and many.

you can't judge sugar looking at the cane, you can't judge a woman looking at her man.ou can't judge a daughter by looking at the mother. you can't judge a book by looking at the cover. taking one look. try to read me like a book but i leave 'em all shook 'cuz you can't judge a book by its cover. you can't judge a book by looking at the cover [x2] let's team up to get the lady of the house back on her feet. and help her feel more strength and energy in just two weeks yaaay! the complete balanced nutrition of (great tasting) ensure with 9 grams of protein and 26 vitamins and minerals. ensure. always be you. of dry eye.of us suffer from the gritty and frustrating symptoms we need theratears®. theratears® is more than just eye drops. it's eye therapy. dry eye symptoms are caused by a salt imbalance. theratears® unique electrolyte formula, quickly restores the natural balance. so your eyes will thank you. more than eye drops, dry eye therapy. theratears®. where we're changing withs? contemporary make-overs. then, use the ultimate power handshake, the upper hander with a dou

judge james is about to rule.y: are you the technician, the master lash expert who applied the lashes to this woman's face? >> i was next to the lady that -- >> jimmy: you were next to the lady. who has become of that woman? she is dead? >> no. she couldn't make it. >> jimmy: she couldn't make it. when i was a baby, aunt chippy, did you or did you not drop me on my head? >> i think i did because otherwise you would not be damaged as you are today. i swear to god. >> jimmy: okay. you know what? i have to say, usually i would go in the back and make a ruling but i don't really have to go to the back to make a ruling in this case. >> what kind of ruling are you making? >> jimmy: i am ruling in favor of the plaintiff in the amount of $302.50. i don't even understand -- i think you may have actually committed a crime of some kind pf guillermo, arrest everybody except for these two right here. including aunt chippy. i want her in chains. >> good. i won't have to deal with you then. >> jimmy: i'll leave it to you. don't