mr. becki had some questions with regarding to the temporary housing location, and how are we going about this proposal. so my understanding for your presentation that they're going to be having a temporary housing there? how is the infrastructure -- who's going to sign off on that, first, but what about the accommodation there? how to erect a temporary housing at the same time we're undergoing this infrastructure or whatever, plan, we haven't seen the plan of who's going to sign off on that. that's number one. number two, you also did mention that there will be a relocation to another site, and basically what we're doing right now, and especially mapping out all the strategies and things, based on what we know about housing, the cap, and all these things. so i want to kind of put that on there, and there also needs to be a formal agreement or understanding, a legal one, of course, that because even with good intention, we have to be extremely very careful here, you know, how we going about th

proposals that do come in for worthy causes as well as worthy enterprises, but if what you're saying, mr. beck, is that the -- because our master lease is with tidc ---cd partner, that those proposals first need to be vetted through them, is that correct? >> yeah. the -- yeah, the -- really, because those economic development rights were granted to ticd in the dda, that ise starting point for somebody that wishes to make a proposal is ticd and see if it's one that ticd would either be interested in partnering in or something that would waive their development rights. >> thank you. >> i have a question regarding the non-commercial lots. in particular, the block c2h. and you mentioned here, with the language deemed appropriate. it doesn't seem to be a timeline there, that, you know, for any kinds of action auction to take place. was that really defined in the dda? how do we treat that? -- this particular block? i know that the other blocks, the y-2 have within the five years, but that particular one, it's not -- doesn't seem to be a definite timeline why, and how do we treat that? >> yeah. and i

mr. franklin: i don't know that it would, your honor. you know, the abood case, the keller case, beck, ellis, all of them justice kennedy: then -- then it seems -- then it seems to me your argument doesn't have much weight. mr. franklin: well, first of all, we don't know what percentage of the union's activities are wrapped up with grievances. if you -- you know, we don't have a record here. we're on a motion to dismiss. but, if you look at publicly available hudson notices that do break out categories of chargeable expenses in this way, which ours in the record doesn't happen to do, you'll find that in many cases, especially in the out-years when the cba is not being renegotiated, charges for field representatives -- those are the people in -- day in and day out who are doing workplace grievance work, advising employees, et cetera -- can be three times, six times, seven times as much on the chargeable expenses line than the line for collective bargaining. so to decide this case in an evidentiary vacuum on the basis of assumptions about how that speech breaks down or how those expense

beck and call. let's do this right this week. a senator: mr. president. the presiding officer: the senator from massachusetts. ms. warren: mr. president, i want to commend senator brown for leading the fight to oppose rollbacks for wall street banks. he has been tireless in the fight on behalf of ohio families and obehalf of families all across this country, and i thank m ry much for his work. this is a tough fight. mr. president, this week nearly ten years to the day, after we first discovered that big banks crashed our economy, washington is about to take many of those same giant banks off the government watch list. i doubt that this makes any sense to any of the millions and millions of americans who experienced firsthand the economic horrors of the financial collapse. oh, but it makes perfect sense in weaker where -- washington where people can erase their memories. this would protect consumers and prevent another economic meltdown. i talked about how this scraps a lot of consumer protections for a lot of families buying homes. in addition to squeezin