>> chairperson d. chiu: we can, yes. >> i don't believe that's required. >> it isn't a question whether it's required. are we going to be able to vote on the proposed amendments siri anam. some i may want to vote for, some i may want to vote against. >> yeah, i think that's a question for the chair. >> yes we can vote for them sari ayam. >> this was presented to board of supervisors april 3rd. you will find them in section 3 in their letter, letter a-i. i will not run through each individually since we are limited in the amount of time we have today but staff are available to answer any questions you have about them. and then additionally section 4 in the memo, lists three amendments that staff is proposing on top of the amendments. in the technical clean-up, they don't make substantive changes, the three printed in the memo, a and b are to basically correct section cross-references. it had been their intention but in the rush at the end of the meeting, they were not able to or failed to, for whatever reaso

. >> chairperson d. chiu: thank you. >> good afternoon, i'm jan masoka, state wide alliance more than 10,000 non-profit members, commissioner chiu your earlier comment about this being a long journey certainly was the most under stated thing i've heard in a long time. i respect the fact everybody here has worked to hammer out a compromise it seems nobody is really thrilled with, but nonetheless perhaps the best compromise that could come out. what we at a state level are concern world is issue of vitality of the non-profits and how this kind of regulation could inadvertently hurt that economy. for example, my corner store was robbed recently near where i live in san francisco. i'm against armed robberies of corner stores, we could probably stop them by requiring every person entering a corner store would have to submit identification and be frisked and that would simply put all the corner stores right out of business. i'm afraid in the well-meaning efforts to do something about corporate contributions and ind