i will introduce that change -- commissioner safia still looks it. the vice chair tang has commanded this, and it shall be. we'll go back to the programs and structure. with that, is there any general public comment? seeing none, public comment is closed. and the -- we're adjourned. (>> and so first order will be item number 4, presentation from public works about the 201 # one road repaving and street safety bond program and possible action by the committee in response to such presentation.

i will introduce that change -- commissioner safia still looks it. the vice chair tang has commanded this, and it shall be. we'll go back to the programs and structure. with that, is there any general public comment? seeing none, public comment is closed. and the -- we're adjourned. >> if you frequently travel before i van ness i might be surprised van ness will goodwill go the first transit corridor to have brt as more frequently known the goal to get conveniently van ness and geary boulevard one of the most reliable transit systems in the country van ness avenue is a major connecter between potrero hill and mission on the south side of san francisco correcting connecting us to the marina and state highway in the financial with the western edition neighborhood it is mostly residential a lot of the geography of van ness the rain that is wide it was uses is a firebreak in the 1906 san francisco earthquake a lot of building occasion that helped of hoped to stop the fire from jumping van ness had a light rail or sprash separating and along geary 0 when

i will introduce that change -- commissioner safia still looks it. the vice chair tang has commanded this, and it shall be. we'll go back to the programs and structure. with that, is there any general public comment? seeing none, public comment is closed. and the -- we're adjourned. (>> and so first order will be item number 4, presentation from public works about the 201 # one road repaving and street safety bond program and possible action by the committee in response to such presentation. >> mr. thomas, before you start, i think that my members and i have agreed that it would probably not be that meaningful for you to render your report to us today because many of us, myself included, we haven't really had access to the information. i believe based on what we have been told that the information that you were required to send to the controller's office was at least one week late. and i just wanted to give you the opportunity to let us know what circumstances that may have been out of your control to render your report that much late. and i'm also r

commission commission commission commission commission commission commissioner safia. there was one slide that showed the actual lanes there are a couple of areas on 280 north as well as on 280 south, that there would be significant bottlenecks. could you talk about that? it wasn't clearly articulated what the plan and strategy would be. if we're doing that, essentially when you're going 280 south and 101 and 280 diverge on 280, you're really talking about two lanes at that point. if it's going to carry all the way down to the county line, you have the potential to have a significant bottleneck at that point. same thing at the mariposa. it seems like this is being done for people who don't live in the city, not the people of san francisco. it would be better to clearly articulate how there's going to be benefit across the board. speaking to the equitability, those are the three things i wanted to state on the record. maybe you can respond to that? >> sure. while amy sets up to share more, commissioner, you're absolutely right. we're planning to bring that forward throu

is safia? >> a quorum. mr. clerk, could you please read the next item. [ agenda item read ] >> good morning, members of the transportation authority. i'm john larson. like yesterday, we had a very full agenda starting with item seven on your agenda. the cac recommended approval for 17 major league dollar in propagated funds. questions were asked about the subway station and strategies regarding lost time. it was indicated to the cac that although recovery did exist, it was not possible to recover all lost time. in response to the bayview transportation plan. staff reiterated that the plans specifically focused on meeting the needs of current residents and demonstrates to the community that the planning process was for existing residents and not for people who might move in in the future. the cac appreciated that. the cac also supported adopting the final study. district 4 member has worked with vice-chair tang for some time and noted the report did a good job of visualizing what was already known about the issu

is safia? >> a