the trump factor has already been processed by our allies i think listen i think trump. he said some things when he was running larry we've talked about this which made sense which he's now backtracking like for example why are we spending trillions in the middle east we should be you know bringing it back he says he was opposed to the war in iraq not sure that's true but you know he was speaking to people who are not necessarily any war but are fed up with the endless war loop that america has been in but he's taking us back into that i wrote and we've talked about this he's created a cabinet of war you know it's a war cabinet john bolton was very happy like a cheshire cat the other day when trump and now the withdrawal so it's very hard to see where this goes but i think trump had the possibility of rejiggering u.s. engagement with the world because i'm not a big fan of where we've been i think we've used regime change as foreign policy but he was always opposed to that he was opposed to now knew him very well and we were told i thought he was a moderate republican def

so i think the difference is i don't think liberal politics are, at their core, about punishing the right simply for existing, and i don't think the reverse is true. >> you mention in the book an amazing set of thetistics in terms -- statistics in terms of policies people support when they're asked. >> i can't remember right off the top of my head. >> as soon as i said, you're like, wait, you're going to have to quote the numbers. it is quite remarkable. maybe it's the matter with kansas idea where people voted against their own interests. >> well, define own interests, and i think that's where i really disagree with thomas frank. >> okay. >> like, i think he correctly assessed that culture war politics are often a distraction in a way from economic policies in politics, so i agree with him on that. but what i disagree with is he, i think, buys into an argument that a lot of us on the left buy into which is that, therefore, culture war politics aren't real, right? that what people are getting out of the sort of racial bigotry and sexism and, you know, flag-waving nationalism or whatever k

so i think, but i guess, i don't know.on't know how to and because i think this is sort of a sad way to end on a guess maybe i will end with so talking about the title of the book, because that's come the title is taken from a james baldwin -- >> notice that try to left yourself completely out of that story. the first time i met jeanne was at an event for constitutional rights and she came up to me and didn't even introduce yourself and gravity to talk to the brother of her student, because all she could about that night was talking all these people at this big reception about the fate of her student. she had come the new in the would all these lawyers and it's like this is a tireless advocate for her students. [applause] in addition to being a great academic and writer. >> thank you. so in order to end on a happy note, or more happier, part of i chose this title, so it's from baldwin, from his talk to teachers. his quote is american history is longer, larger, more ferries, more beautiful and more charitable than anything

and i think it broke that strategy. and i think that is the impact. that sort of echos what gary said. >> diana, ai has been sort of in the forefront for decades. really advocating for robust antitrust enforcement. when you think back to the microsoft case and sort of see where we are with some of the issues around google and big tech, do you see is there a common theme or thread? >> absolutely. am i on? >> yes. >> and thank you very much for having us here today. it's a pleasure and an honor to engage in the debate. so the answer is yes. absolutely. i think all of these types of conversations benefit from going back up to the 10,000 foot level. and there is some fundamental questions, i think, that we need to ask ourselves. are our institutions, enforcement institutions capable of taking on these types of problems and concerns and questions? that's number one. and i think the answer is a re sounding yes. number two, what about our standards? what about the standards under which we evaluate harm to competition and harm to consume consumers. the prevail

i think that is too far. but i do think that they, and i agree with peter, they did meddle. i don't know what it amounted to but they were there and they will do it again if they can. i do think that they see some of what has been generated by issues here in america as opening up options for them let's say with nato. i think they will be pushing hard on putting pressure on nato based on how we are treating nato ourselves. and how well they can probably work in europe. i do think that while the things that they have not done indeed, they haven't done but there are options that are still open to them. the one i would throw out to all of us is i do not know what percentage of americans and -- believe that there is a file on the current president. i think is almost everybody. it does not matter what is in the file. at some point, it would serve the interest of vladimir putin to put something out there. that would end up in the daily mail or god knows where. it could be true or not true. it could be whatever they wanted to do to stir up trouble in washington. and they very well c

well, i think this type of use is coming. i really do. lot of interest in using it in the human germ line in the future and the question is who does it and how and how it's controlled. and at the moment it's not? at the moment it's controlled in different ways in different countries i would say. i would say in my country in the us, we're actually prohibited from using any federal government money to do research of any kind on human embryos. so it would not be possible to do it with federal money, although if somebody had access to private funds they could in principle do this kind of work. in the uk and in other countries, the regulations vary. in the uk we have kathy niakan at the crick institute doing affectively using crispr—cas9 for research on embryos under 14 days to remove genes to see what they do in development, their role in development. that is research on embryos. yep, yep. and is accessible? well, ithink, she's following guidelines that have been in place for a while, since before crispr—cas9 came along. these are regulations

i think it's just a way for people to visibly. signal to everyone else around them that they are in the spirit of the revolution and really nothing more than i was intending to ask you before about the armenian centric nature of this moment beach has been. really different from all the other transitions power transitions that we have observed in the post soviet space so far its lack of geo political component geopolitical competition has been really striking and some say it played a major role in ensuring that this power transition would be asked peaceful as it has been about a single bullet shot how do you explain that why was armenia spared the foreign meddling that more often than not i kompany. a change of power in countries of strategic geographical importance well i think you're right that this was a unique attribute it was a revolution. i guess i would. say that the lack of geopolitics was a strategic move because once you remove geopolitics from the equation then you can really start to address the domestic real issues that

i think you city caloric migrant. he does the has said in the past i was present when he said that there are three types of people coming to europe there are genuine political refugees asylum seekers there are economic migrants and there are fighters when and i'm speaking about invaders this is the world i would agree that there are muslim invaders. it depends on how you define the invasion if you defy you vision in this instance of peaceful invasion that i think is clearly the case very large numbers of people arrived in hungary without so much as by a leave in twenty fifteen march through the country this was traumatic you know what invaders means there is a connotation with the word this is hate speech if you say muslim invaders this is hate speech isn't it no i don't think it is so what is hate speak well that's the muslims the muslims generalization invaders we know how these pictures are used everybody each other allies is you generalize aijalon generalize if i speak about groups especially religious groups i'm s

i think is. well torture i think one day to five when i got home from the hospital it was when you know all the help was guarded and it was when i realized that something was off that i felt extra bad but i think what it became torture was about four months and when i had one of the symptoms which the doctors cry because hypersomnia our our all i wanted to do was sleep but i definitely i was acting like a different person and i it wasn't getting through the day that was difficult was getting through moments in the day and i think that was when it became what you called tortures because every minute was. it was difficult to get through but i want to touch on real quick three things that the doctor said that were really important one is that the difference between the baby blues and postpartum depression i think a lot of people a lot of moms told me oh yeah you know it's normal or i felt sad too and i think they were referring to the baby blues. which wasn't what i had and so i was kind of in this

i don't think that he's fit i think i mean he's at the moment just to dominant that he played since you punk is to go an absolutely amazing season look if the biggest budgets they can choose the players they want to buy they don't really just want to boost the young they want to be in the champions league that's what the aim for and that's in the next the is very difficult for the teams below the chance to get close on the other hand there is no group of five sixty below. which kind of like fighting and really scratching and biting each other for that second and third sport but the bunch it's a much you know the top players always go to but i mean you can look and even those can get to home or from dormant right so it's just one giant at the moment i guess the teams need to fight yeah and people are getting all the players from other teams they have players from shock to coming over and even a player from you know your backyard hoffenheim you know an obvious gadget to come over to so it looks like their dominance my continue now let's talk about the other opposite aid who have pressed y

i don't think russia is trying to achieve a particular elector outcome and i don't think they had any impact in a particular way on the election outcome here or in france or elsewhere. i think the elections went the way they were going to go. what they do try to do is to discredited discredit institutions. we have everybody fighting each other. it is largely about domestic politics in the u.s. and very little to do with russia, and i think that's exactly what russia would want, this is really become a domestic squabble because it discredits institutions and i think that's what they will continue to do and do it in other countries and probably again in our mid term elections, look at the discord and disarray rather than achieve any particular outcome. the question is how do you deter that? i'm not sure you can deter the behavior. russia will do what it's going to do. i think the way that you deal with it is through transparency, so that as long as people are aware this is what russia is doing, it's significantly diminished the impact of russia doing it. >> i agree, but i would call tha

that's what i think i would like to see. i'm not trying to ask for, you know, an invitation, but you would think that if folks are sort of saying these -- that this is how islam should be, then they should look at where islam has been like that in the west, again, not to be western centric and say that us as muslims are going to save the rest of the muslim world, but just sort of i think practically i think we have got a lot to show that the rest of the, quote/unquote, muslim world could learn from. >> i think that the delayed arab spring in the gulf, i mean, in the sense of without all the trappings of what it looks like in tunisia, et cetera, i think that, you know, mbs is trying to institute a slow engagement in light of two stakeholders that are in saudi arabia, you have the religious clerical establish and you also have the royal family and those two engagements require surgical sophistication in a way where you are making everyone happy. so doing that requires slow reforms that for us may be a bit slow, but it may be ti

can't exactly put my finger on it i think at the end of the day donald trump mike mike again i go back to my gut instincts my gut instincts tell me that he himself may not have been directly involved in the collision i don't think that he was but look at all of the people around him that have been indicted who are being called to testify who some who have already pled guilty i think think some of those people are going to to take the fall as they should if they were involved in anything untoward and but i think that donald trump himself i think personally democrats need to work more toward the strategy of what we can do coming toward twenty twenty rather than sticking on this so much sticking on the impeachment we need to be developing our message right now because we have a serious problem with messaging i'm concerned about it and we've got to start laying the groundwork now to tell the voters what we can do and what we can bring to the table to help shore up some of the deficiencies right now this administration thank you both genevieve reverend

he respects the institution greatly and i think the same deputy attorney general rosenstein i believe both of them are in a very tough position because they think the president. you know wants this over with and he doesn't understand you know he thinks this is my justice department why don't they do what i want and they're upholding institutional norms of some degree of insulation of just partment and trying to make decisions based on the law on the facts and i think that's very hard because the president feels like he's being unjustly accused like the media is running roughshod over him because of all these accusations and he wants somebody would just take care of it but the reality is neither sessions nor rosenstein are his lawyer they're the lawyer for the united states and that puts them in kind of a difficult position i think that both handled it well i thought sessions would do a good job at it and i think he's in an awkward position he's taken a massive beating from the president but i think he's been doing a great job on the president's campaign promises aside from this issue

and i think it was just great. i did it not to make any political statement, but to just bring home the point that government can be fun, it should be fun. and if it is fun, it can bring more people into the process, because a lot of the things that we discuss as elected officials or as policymakers are of great importance, but they tend to be dry and drawn-out conversations. there's nothing wrong with bringing a little levity to the process and making it entertaining as well as educational. >> but, lan, when you hear that people are saying, "he's not taking his job seriously," et cetera, does that make it discouraging at all? >> i do get that, but i think that i'm not taking myself too seriously. and i think we need more politicians who are able to laugh at themselves. and as long as people are laughing with me and i'm giving them the opportunity to engage, i think that's great, because for everybody who says that i'm not taking my job seriously, there are people who reach out to me to say that i'm a symbol of hope

>> so this one i don't think will make you cry. move today, stay in this one. ewz. >> i listen to this all the time now actually, every two weeks or so that's okay. i'm sticking with xerox. i think there say lot of ways to win and hopefully not too many ways to lose. >> seeburg >> i'm with facebook, buy the stock here, 20 times 19 numbers. they're growing earnings next year 22% that's light i would be a buyer here. >> grasso? >> overstock has been as low as $20, as high as $90, base at 35. overstock, buy. >> i'm melissa lee thank you for watching see you back here at 5:00 for more meantime, "mad money" with jim cramer starts now. >>> my mission is simple -- to make you money i'm here to level the playing field for all investors. there's always a bull market somewhere. i promise to help you find it. "mad money" starts now [ applause ] hey, i'm cramer. welcome to "mad money. welcome to cramerica other people want to make friends. and i actually have some with me tonight. [ applause ] i'm just trying to make you some money. my job isn'

and i really think this is a very bad spot. and the bus situation is not good. it's -- i don't think that all the traffic has been addressed properly, so i respectfully ask you to say no. thank you. >> president hillis: all right. thank you. next speaker, please. and as this gentleman comes up, if there's any other members of the public who would like to speak on this, now is your time. >> hello, commissioners. my name is bob cam, and i'm on the board of directors of 1650 jackson street, and we're right next door. we're a nine story condo, 70 units, we took a vote of our hoa. overwhelmingly in support. some people not, but the vast majority overwhelmingly in support, and i just echo what i've heard is shopping today, i have to go out of the neighborhood. all right, there is no general purpose grocery. we lost the big apple. that's where we used to go, so in my mind, i'm just trying to replace the big apple. thanks very much. >> president hillis: thank you very much. next speaker, please. >> hi. my name is tiffany, and i live on

>> that tells me -- >> there, too, i think -- >>? go ahead, david. >> i beg your pardon. >> i think there, too, i want to sound a note of caution and avoid overreading. you know, it is a routine and responsible practice for investigators to cast a wide net, as you've noted. they want to talk to everybody. they don't want to leave a stone unturned and miss something, but there's a real big difference as you pointed out between being a witness in a federal investigation and being a subject or a target of the investigation. and barrack is pretty clearly a witness. even within the realm of witnesses, you know, there's a different between someone who is approached to get sort of a general take on a topic if he introduced manafort to trump, then it would be clear why the investigators would want to talk to him, but there's a difference between that kind of an interview and a much more focused confrontational interview, you know, concerning a particular transaction that's come into focused attention for the prosecutors, so at this time, base

i think i broke it. >> okay. maybe you can switch with the commissioner. >> that's consistent for what we see for violent crime in general. the percentage reported gets higher when you talk about serious violent crime, which we define as rape, sexual assault, robbery and aggravated assault. but that is fairly consistent with what we see overall for violent crime. >> okay. then the second question is, in employment discrimination jurisprudence, there's a concept known as mixed motive. that is, someone can make out a prima fascia case that they were discriminated against or discharged on the basis of race. the employer says no, he was discharged because he burned down the warehouse. in other words, there could be two reasons, but if the employer can establish that the person would have been discharged anyway, then that doesn't amount to racial discrimination, okay? in determining whether or not there's been a hate crime, you said there was corroborative evidence. let's say a person steals a cell phone and in the pr

i think but i think things are changing and i think they're changing very rapidly we have to withdraw the u.s. were drawing from the nuclear deal we have has a ball coming out very well in lebanon we have a surprise in iraq in iraq which will we could see seeing a lot of iraq from the united states and possibly iran as well but it's a lot more complicated than the media is for it betraying it a lot of things are happening on the ground let me go to jonathan steele in london also i really like the analogy that joe lauria gave you know how who's got their hand on the driver's searing wheel because we do have it seems patently clear to me that israel and saudi arabia in tandem would really like to see trump do something a ban against iran i mean they may not do it themselves but they're certainly egging on the president to do it in the rhetoric that's coming out of his administration. it is just unbelievable i mean it it really it's two thousand and three on steroids to answer our second show and watch it and i'm not saying it's going to happen next week or next month ok but it's they're

>> well, i think he got a good price for it i mean the stocks have been on a tear i think on the desksh is the resonance act on the name. why not ring the bell? >> is he going to miss out >> i thought his answer is going to be good he's not an investment banker and being out there to try to find someone to buy it it is not what he does he got in and realized that there is limited amount that i can do with this and it is not my wheel house good for him and i guess he made some money, it sounds like he's having more fun o tn the clippes >> that brings you joy at least and at least you can watch a game we are entering the final hour of "trading" here. the dow is down 1.2% we are loclose there of the session's lows it feels weak. >> you guys are talking about how they are getting clobbered after you talked to pete, right? >> i think it is the dollars >> i think it is sun spots >> i mean if you look at the earnings have come out and they talked about, okay, things are still good but you are selling out all the news and we have to see these companies come back to see if we are still making

think? >> i think they did a really good job and congratulations for being on the committee. it is a very complex question and a lot of issues around it. trying to centralize those in those areas where they can look to have some substantive change i think was positive. >> john, you are in the commission. do you feel you all did a good job, did you draft everything want to? >> not everything. i think we slowly started to turn the ship in the right direction. there is a lot that was not addressed. a lot that has to be hashed out even more. i think coming out of it, the understanding and the cohesiveness between the ncaa, the nba, the players association with the understanding that we are talking about is a window from roughly 12 years old she 233 years old if you have a great career. it is important those entities work together instead of separate. understanding that the one and done role in the players association does affect intercollegiate athletics. you have to work together. i think we are mov

i didn't think, you know, i'm a boringly heterosexual southern white man so i didn't think that barack obama was going to win until -- what was -- what was the 800 point day e september 20th, 2008. because i believed that i didn't think that america was ready for someone named barack hussein obama should be president, and it's remarkable isn't it how quickly our popular historic market even in all of our very attentive minds to politics discount the very fact of barack obama having been president. for eight years. kind of amazing. and i think and you people can argue this as digging for a silver lining -- unreasonably -- donald trump's election if enologist is e ratification that the country is changing demographically and socially this is the last gasp -- of the george wallace white populous anger or maybe -- it's it's a close to last gasp there might be some more but it's in the last three or four. [laughter] buzz the only way you can get such a ferocious reaction is if the evidence of the action were not so overwhelming. the strength of the backlash is an affirmation of the at mat p

i think that makes a lot of sense. i do see, personally, and i have not had the experience that rod had at this christian school. my students at hillsdale. i won't say that they come in fully formed because they are 18, but it's amazing. they dazzle me every year. i'm humbled by them every year. i find them impressive, now i am in a place that is probably weird and unusual. dr., if you are listening, this is pretty good. [laughter] i do think there is a hunger. i've seen a lot of great scholars, lauren hall, abby hall, alex salter. i can think of a number of people in their late 20's, early 30's right now who are doing fantastic things in political science, economics, and so forth. i think of somebody on foxnews like cap 10 who is doing really interesting things. but i think there is a lot of possibility. i think this decentralization, while it is always a problem, always has opportunities. as long as we can find someone to find a voice to give us one like reagan did, goldwater in between. i think there is always a poss

i attended i think one or two. i want to say it's meeting of the whole or something where the police commission came and had a meeting with the board of supervisors. >> supervisor safai: yes, committee of the whole, yeah. >> i watched numerous meetings on-line, just because of the nature of my work, it's he's year do that. [please stand by] . >> as a lawyer, i've been in private practice working for myself, essentially. the meet and confer, i've learned a lot about it. i think i would defer to people with more -- luckily, there's bob hirsch who's on the commission now who has a strong labor background who probably knows these issues in depth that i don't. but really how they arise in the context of the police commission, and they -- there's an issue with the -- i'm blanking -- with the use of force, there's an issue that's still in litigation surrounding meet and confer and whether or not that issue is a working condition that's subject to meet and confer, or i think the language is managery jag discretion or someth

i think vanilla is quite an old—fashioned flavour now. you see many more exotic combinations. e like salted caramel. i am not sure people would notice if vanilla disappeared for a bit. vanilla pods, i have it in the sugar that i use for cooking, it is a very delicious, gentle flavour, but it has been out didi gentle flavour, but it has been out did i think by things like salty caramel. still a fan of the vanilla, andi caramel. still a fan of the vanilla, and i am sure plenty were consumed over the weekend. this terrific picture in the time is just one of many. summing up the amazing hottest may date ever. extraordinary. many. summing up the amazing hottest may date ever. extraordinarylj many. summing up the amazing hottest may date ever. extraordinary. i love oui’ may date ever. extraordinary. i love our weather. we have wonderful weather because it constantly delights us. you wouldn't get a picture like this in california, because they weather is the same every day. it is glorious, we envy at, but we love it as it comes as a surprise. especially when you get a bank holiday. an

so i just think -- i do think it's a good thing that they're going to talk. but i hope what the president would do something that doesn't comport with his character, would be going on a listening tour. i think it would be very useful to get it straight from the horse's mouth, so to speak, from one of the family, you know, north korea's a family-owned country, exactly what they say they want in the -- what is it that would make them feel secure so they don't have to rely on nuclear weapons? that price might be very high. like withdrawing all u.s. forces from the peninsula, which of course not a good thing to do and not just for the peninsula, but it has huge regional implications. ms. wallace: lisa, why don't you pick this up and then introduce your analysis on what pulling out, unilaterally pulling out of the iran nuclear agreement, what impact if any you think that has on the conversations to be had in singapore in june. ms. monaco: the first thing i was going say, is just to buttress john's point about the shrewdness of kim jong un's positioning here. let's

i think that was --. ould like to hear milt's comment on this actually, since he was more directly involved in that sort of thing than i was. on the one hand, i think, although russia is more open, and in some senses, more vulnerable to what you might say cash incentives, to become a source for u.s. intelligence. the kremlin is a more difficult target than it used to be back in the 1990s. and, i think there are very specific reasons for that. but, putin being former kgb officer, is quite security conscious. from what i have read, he doesn't use a computer. he doesn't talk on the phone. so, that is a hard target. and, a lot of the senior officials in russia's government are patriotic. with the russians call --. people who believe very strongly in the guiding role, the importance of the russian state. those are not folks that are particularly vulnerable as the source of enticement that one might rely on for human recruitment. and, it is not an easy technical target to penetrate. that said, i think that putin

i think you nailed it. he got it right. the only thing i would add is i spent a lot of time with business. when i talk with ceos of global companies, i have had a number of them say they can't think back over the last 10, 15 years, when they have seen anything as attractive as they are looking at right now, because over parts that all parts of the world or most parts seem to be firing on all cylinders. and a so it is a terrifically positive environment. but the sorts of things i worry about, that then didn't mention, the did not ben mention are not just rising protectionism, but higher levels of government debt around the world. if and when -- when there is a downturn, because there will be a downturn, policymakers will not have as much macroeconomic flexibility in terms of lowering interest rates or fiscal stimulus. there is plenty of potential challenges. right now, it looks pretty darn good. >> eddie, how about your take on the global economy? edward: i certainly agree that we are in a good place right now. the one thing

i don't think that's the case. this is purely, well, a selfish economic desire on the part of the republic of ireland that they don't want their economy destroyed. the view from europe — i share your views on the short term — but i think on the long term, i would be surprised if ireland is reunited. the way that the berlin wall fell, it would be... i would be very surprised. do you think it is comparable? i am not saying that the history of germany and the history of ireland is the same, and just talking about the process of the people... the bill in ball was keeping people —— the berlin wall was keeping people in. i have the feeling, with brexit, that also, as well as globalisation, ireland is a country that has really changed in my lifetime. yes, but hang on, but a repressive communist regime built a wall and put machine guns... barbed wire to keep people in. do you think for a moment that if they comparison? i am not comparing the british army to the soviets, at all, but i'm just saying that i wouldn't be surpri

i think we're just betraying ourselves by going there. i would not want to give my life and ruin my future for a war i don't believe in, so i would support draft resistance. john: local draft board number five in denver, colorado. gary feltner, a worried young draft resistor, had been ordered to report this day to the induction center for his physical. instead, he has come here to turn in his draft card. >> i am turning in my card. i gave you all the information. so i will just hand it in. >> you know what that means, don't you? >> oh yeah. >> all right. john: turning in or burning a draft card has become a familiar act of civil disobedience. a finding of our survey, a surprising one, is that two thirds of all young people in and out of college say, civil disobedience is sometimes justified. two thirds of the young also believe that sit-in demonstrations and ultimatums to those in authority can be justified. but civil disobedience, especially among college students, is becoming increasingly uncivil. here in the single serious incident at t

i think it's absolutely more. ne of the issues when people tend to think of counterterrorism they think of the nuts and bolts pieces, the mechanics and law-enforcement peace in the military piece and those are all still there. we were actually talking in the back that a lot of that, we've been doing that for a while and it runs reasonably well, but as i think you've heard from the conversation, you're dealing with war fighting organizations and nonstate actors who can take the whole territory and govern territory for considerable amount of time. they were referencing some of the risk factors in terms of economic deprivation, lack of rule of law, foreign governance, things like that and the importance of diplomacy when dealing with nonstate actors and because of the nature of the threat, it's bigger and because i think not just the nature of the threat is bigger but there are more factors that we recognize today and the nature of ct has changed. that's not to say that the old pieces of counterterrorism no longer are

>> i think the individuals should bear conscience. they should think about the individuals who thought they were fighting to do what they thought they should do in germany. if they had acted on their consciousness, there would not be 6 million jews dead. john: for you as a citizen, are you obligated to serve your country regardless of your personal views? >> yeah. because nobody has to stay here. i feel if you want to stay here and enjoy the benefits of the american society, and the hardships, it is your choice. there is nobody making you stay in the least. and that it is sort of like a contract. it is a choice. and you can't have the cake and eat it too. >> i don't think that i could go to vietnam and defend something i did not really believe in. because i don't feel that it is my war. i don't feel as if the united states is in any danger there. i think we're just betraying ourselves by going there. i would not want to give my life and ruin my future for a war i wouldn't be in, so i would support draft resistance. john: local draft bo

so i wonder how barry thinks about the u.s. part of hedge and also the hedge from south korean side. what would be the situation after, if the summit goes well? i mean goes bad. thanks. >> the gentleman with the glasses. >> my name is daniel what from the national committee on north korea. the panel discussed kim jong-un's apparent interest in economy first policy and economic development. my question is do you think it's possible that kim might be willing to embark on more fundamental reforms of the economy in order to promote economic department, that he might pursue chinese or vietnamese style economic reforms? >> final. >> i am working intern at cmi. my question was for all the panelists about deployment. the declarations, -- [inaudible] i think after two summits whether they decide to deploy would not with the pressing issue room to side so i wonder the two summits outcomes would influence his decision to deploy and how? >> we have limited time available but i will start from the very end and come to the right side in answe

disciplined and international life should there be another instance of the use of chemical weapons i think just like last time and the time before that all options are on the table that there is way i see it as my duty and the purpose of my entire life to do everything for russia. also on the show tonight they rescued syrian migrants from drowning in the mediterranean and were charged with people smuggling today a court in greece ruled there was no cross. many times i've been helping coast guard because their boat couldn't rescue people those people in the water fooled a lot of people in the water and the way it was so big that i put my life in danger to rescue them. or we begin the day with putin four point zero today vladimir putin was sworn in as russian president for the fourth time barring any changes to the constitution this will be putin's final six years in power when he leaves the kremlin in twenty twenty four he will have been in effect the so ruler of russia in the twenty first century are his insurance and his staying power are analogous to that of china's she's in pain both of

well i do think that we're in a a very challenging phase there are definitely some people. who believe exactly what president sharon myers saying in terms of that being the attitude of this administration. and yet i certainly felt that during the visit by chancellor merkel she was really trying to make the case for being partners and if you think back to. last may when she returned from the united states she started using rhetoric about we can't rely on the united states or our traditional partners we need to take more responsibility europe needs to take more responsibility and i think this kind of rhetoric is certainly the kind of rhetoric that is that is driving us apart a little bit having said that if one thinks about some of the themes that were raised in the public opinion survey that that we carried out it seems as if there is agreement in the german public and in the american public that there could be closer cooperation in areas such as the fight against terrorism even in climate change which of course is a little bit contradictory given america's decision to pull o

so it's a difficult spot for pence to be in, but i don't think that -- i don't think this was a miss by george will. i think he analyzed something very on point about what's happening in washington today where republicans have decided that their principles that they advocated for decades don't matter, but making donald trump happy does. >> well, i mean, marc, what i think george will was talking about was not policy, as you're referring to, but style, okay? and so here is a montage of what has raised eyebrows in terms of what vice president mike pence has decided to say and do around donald trump. watch this. >> i'm deeply humbled as your vice president to be able to be here. because of your leadership, mr. president, and because of the strong support of the leadership in the congress of the united states, you're delivering on that middle class miracle. >> he's got broad shoulders. he's got high energy. i have faith in this president's broad shoulders and big heart and his vision. he's my friend. he's a man that loves his family, he loves this country. boundless energy and optimism,

>> i think it's a red herring. 't believe democratic senators are relitigating a debate that the american people had more than a decade ago. gina haspel did not put that interrogation program into place. it was legal when it was carried out by her and then we had a great debate about it and we decided to roll back some of those interrogation techniques. i think she was right to defend the cia officers who were carrying out their duty in a constitutional and legal fashion. >> paul: kate, you saw the hearing and there was some suggestion beforehand that it was going to be really worse than it went. it's going pretty well for haspel? >> i think it did. she addressed these allegations on enhanced interrogation in her opening statement and did so clearly and articulately and said i don't support bringing back such a program. it is against the law if congress were to try to change the law, i wouldn't support that either. she was very direct and clear and they were asking her to go back in time, and be claire i have want t

nadiem: yes, so i think when i was in business school, we had an independent study project. this idea that i always wanted to do, and so i did it first as a school project. and then in between the summers, i decided whatever, let's just try building a call center because at that time, we did not have money to build an app. so we built a call center, set up a few phones, recruited a few drivers, and i think that's how it all begin. i recruited the first 20 drivers of go-jek. then those 20 recruited the next hundred, 200 and so on. haslinda: it was slow going in the initial years though, right? for a very long time it didn't take off. nadiem: it was just a call center by phone. literally it took 30 minutes to get a go-jek because we had to call to order and then call the driver one by one to find the nearest driver, so it was a slow growth rate, but you know, it survived throughout those three years without any funding whatsoever. haslinda: is it true you started with six personal phones and basically you took calls from family and friends? nadiem: yeah, basically. yeah. we st

is really called i think it's realistic i mean think about it a cynical to be cynical is realisticnot invariably i mean you know what would cynical leaders dog like behavior i don't think i'm a dog is morality something in politics well that in political bristly linked and obviously equally obviously morality is something that must always open to question otherwise you get into borders noone in the trader's monism a single concept of morality which is antidemocratic. that speak about the free press this is constitutional or for democrats for their moccasins it's the journalist were pressured state broadcaster biased in government messages compared overlap with your parties in that what you call fair the freedom of press i would not call that but then that's only one opinion of how things are really hungry if you look at the entire picture of the media there's enormous diversity the trouble is you see that other than hunger is nobody in the area so they can't do a proper content analysis to what is actually over the country to understand if the standards of free press are given on n

eventually and i think professor said this. i would imagine there will have to be questions on the two presidents. in south korea also there is a real group of progressives who do believe that koreans won't have sovereignty until their troops are in south korea. there's a need for many of us that certainly china and possibly north korea will demand that there be no troops there so there is no question. it becomes a question within the united states. we have seen historically that has always been true. you remember jimmy carter wanted to remove the troop presence and also in the iraq afghanistan war they were very reset within washington to troop reduction. this is nothing new. i guessed the latest round has been triggered by a the trump administration saying that maybe the presence of the sma, we can think about scope and reducing or withdrawing troops. so that you know, there is history and discussion over all of that but the reality i think is that the public on both sides of the pacific support, very strongly support troop pr

i think that i personally and i think that probably the agency and there's been a lot of conversation about this over the past few, feels like, years, but i want to appreciate the leadership on the part of director and ms. rush and the bright line. everybody that's had the opportunity, they have been pushing the envelope. i don't think this would have come without their advocacy. i want to appreciate director hailey in his work. we met with him and have been talking about making sure that we're pushing the envelope on this as best as possible. i think it's really clear that we all have an interest in getting us to 0 emissions as quickly as possible. i want to make it clear the statistic that director reiskin mentioned about 50% of the emotions and most of those are coming from cars. from the director's point, the stuff you're spraying off, 3% is coming from you're vehicles, if that. the majority are coming from cars. i think that buses get a bad rap. the diesel and everything is a concern, but the biggest concern is keeping people out of cars or giving them real choices. i think that'

right peter well i think i think you overstated it a little bit i do give president moon a lot of credit but i think the main credit i never thought i would say that i know obviously belongs to donald trump i know you're going to say that. this this this this is this is the man who said he he wanted nothing more than to sit down and have a hamburger with kim jong un and looks like he's going to get his chance right now there are apparently still cia people liaison people behind in pyongyang at least according to the south korean media and people are hard at work and mr pump aoe is the guy that's been running this. formerly from his post as cia director but hopefully in a few days as secretary of state so i think i would agree the president deserves a lot of credit and certainly with a progressive government a lot of things are possible that weren't underpass can conservative regimes but i think we have to give president trump his do as well and i just i just hope things go ok it's a topsy topsy turvy world exactly and you know and i'm very happy that this process is going on let me go to

i think that's the way we need to think about this conceptually. i don'ton the congo, see -- maybe i have not looked into it enough -- i don't see as much direct russian and gauge meant in the congo as you see chinese were russia elsewhere in north africa. not to say that cannot change. it's a vacuum that can be exploited. it'sis one where i think such a tragedy in the congo. the toll on the population and the lack of opportunity, the lack of infrastructure, the lack of economy, it really creates for exploitation of resources but not much else and does not provide the kind of geopolitical influence that russia is usually looking for. a counter example is libya. we left libya msn russia immediately decided to see whether it can get a role in libya in order to have a place at the table. balkans, it's not really a balkans question, it's a sanctions question. the u.s. and the european union are fundamentally in agreement on the reason for a sanctions being in place, the type and the nature of those sanctions and the need to maintain those sanctions. san

i think he will be judged by history. think he's a decent man, but by choosing his agenda over integrity, both with devin nunes and with the president of the united states, i also think, and this is where christopher wray, the director is going to come into play. i think he's done a great job, rosenstein, and the attorney general will come in to play. they have got to defend the fbi rank and file. not just passively but get out over the next 2 1/2 years and continue to tell the president publicly from topeka to washington, the fbi officials, regardless of what they're involved in, are good people. stop talking about corruption in an organization that's been around for 110 years. >> yeah. the irony in all this is he's accusing the fbi of sending someone in his campaign to get information which is exactly what they're saying he did today in the meeting. he sent someone inside of a meeting to get information. it's all too rich. you can't write this stuff. all right, guys. see you next time. get some rest because we'll be back

they don't all look the same, which i think is fantastic. i like to think success is when a woman engineer or a woman ceo is normal. or a woman running for president or being president is normal. will that happen in our lifetime? melinda: yes. absolutely it will. and i completely agree with you. when you have women at the top, and the reason it is so important, is they role model. other little girls can look up and go, i can be like her who is president. i can be like that movie producer. i can be like that director. i can be like that person who is creating amazing content. and so those role models are important. but you are starting -- you are really seeing it happen. the sparks are all there. we need to help keep it going. emily: and a woman president too? do you think that will happen? melinda: in my lifetime, definitely, i think that will happen. emily: melinda gates, thank you for joining us on bloomberg "studio 1.0." it has been great to have you. ♪ mom you called? oh hi sweetie, i just want to show you something. xfinity mobile: find