mr. montoya, i got a response from his attorney, and that question wasn't answered. so i'm concerned about that. the i.d. scanner would have been helpful, because we would know who's in the club, and that could have been after something happens. that could be a search warrant, we could do it that way. that's fine, but at least we have the means to go back and try to figure out what happened and who was actually there. that's huge, and when we look at the hours, that's a concern, too. 2:00, it was kind of unusual as far as it being a four alarm fire and all our resources over there, i'll give you that, by our swing watch goes -- they're off at 2:00, so they're going to be back doing paperwork, so we have the midnight watch. they're there, and so when they need help, you know, we have enough people, you know, for limited services to deal with that. you can see how quickly if something happens and we have to put personnel over, all the units or a lot of the units that responded that night were units from all over the city that were detailed into our district. so that's

mr. montoya has currently presented? >> just curious, what -- what times do you -- you said you do readings three times a night, what times do you do those readings? >> they're intervals, but any time between 11:00 to 12:00, 12:30 to 1:00, and 1:00 to 2:00. they're also time stamped by a phone next to the meter, and those get e-mailed every night we're opened. >> commissioner lee? >> back up a little. i want to rehear. so on the door that's still causing the noise problem, is that something that you're going to replace or is that something the landlord's replacing. >> yeah. the door they see he on the roof? >> yeah. >> through the process, the estimate has been done last week, and it is scheduled to be replaced by the property manageme management company. >> a new door or just fixing the old door? >> a new door, but even with that old door, we are still under the sound limits that we are supposed to be. >> no, just reading the memo from your property management saying you're responsible for the door. now if there's anoth

mr. montoya is referring, it's really important, if i may, to take a couple of minutes to talk about the history. he opened the club ten years ago. it was called atmosphere at the time. with no warnings from a.b.c., no findings, no problems. with four successive captains of the central district, four of them. in 2014, along comes captain david lozar, and what david lozar says to bennett, in front of others, your hip-hop music is bringing in, his words, blat of the 52 reports that were made to this commission and also to the a.b.c. board, the a.b.c. board had an evidentiary hearing over several days, and of the 52 complainted that the police department filed, they found only 4.5 of the 52 complaints that be substantiated. that's 8%. 92% of the complaints were unfounded. and what did they do? this is key, it's really important to know this. anything happened in the 400 block of broadway, a busy block with a dozen clubs including topless clubs, young people drinking, people coming out of all the clubs, and all about the same time, that essentially, they used the address where the police car

mr. montoya said about hison having this in public, given the fact that he got upt and did it at all, frankly i prefer he did it in plic rather than private so that we don't know about it. now we know what he said, why he said it and what the response was andetall out in the open. >> nawaz: as a former f.b.i. agent, the revelation of the f.b.i. source in reports seems to have spurred some of the president's tweets and this last directive for sure. testify confidential informants like t one reported on, give me a sense of how often they're used, whether the action detailed in that report was unusual because the president characterized it as by planted campaig is that your read on what happened? >> absolutely not. the use overinfmants is a common practice in all kinds of investigationswhether they're eyinal in nature or whether e national security and counterintelligence in nature. the fact of the matter is the allegations were mad. they weren't fabricated by anyone in the f.b.i. or the department of justice. the f.b.i. w using tools at its dispose also. thols it uses al time in these kinds of

mr. douglas' body still in the vehicle at that time? >> it was. >> next, montoyaime scene. >> i'm not find anything blood of any sort. >> a blood spatter expert named dr. john nordby. the car's interior should have been covered in blood if that was where russel douglas had been shot. >> the shooting seemed to me like it did not occur in this vehicle because there are empty spots where you would expect blood to be. >> permission to approach the witness, your honor? >> yes. >> on cross-examination prosecutor banks challenged the defense's only expert witness pointing out that in his written report on the case dr. nordby had cited the movie pulp fiction as the kind of example of the kind of blood spatter he would expect to see in russel douglas' car. >> the two characters in the film were facing in front and they actually got back spatter, the bullet went toward the backseat, but the spatter went through the front so that's the illustration i was meaning to convey. >> so you chose to rely on an illustration from a fictional movie produced in hollywood to help describ