almost one third of the chamber which would in effect take the executive order and put that into law butha also make other changes necessary to ensure we can have a sustainable policy with regards to children coming across the border. i believe we can have strong border security without separating families at the border. i believe we can enforce the nation's law and we should while remaining true to our values. children should be kept in a safe hearinsafe hearing impairmh their appearance while immigration officials quickly assessed each family's individual case. that'slt the best solution. beyond the argument for going the policy by the way the logistics of separating families is just not practical. let me talk about wha what curry happens with unaccompanied children we talked about two categories those that come with their parents but there's a bigger issue t with regards to those children in the sense of the number of children who are in the system and that is those who come on their own. as the chairman of the permanent subcommittee on investigations, i've been investigating over the p

when you think about congress watching this, they see the president hang a major moment, butha many arng a major moment. manu: president a chance.the nuclear war and what to see if there is an agreement. thpresident seems so eager. they made such a big deal about sitting down for a meeting. it is significant that they are sitting down but there are all of these thingssa -h sanders said there could be major commitments to denucleariz upfront before the meeting all of that has gone away and this is just a meet and greet. they have really lowered the bar. the president wants a deal so badly that he may rush into something not suitable to them. the thing they are pushing on both sides of the hill is any deal to be a treaty, which would mean that the senate would have to ratif that as a two thirds majority. ould require bipartisan support. it is a high hurdle to get to that point molly: the concern has always been the trump will give away the store. that heems like ancienttory. a couple weeks ago he did pull summi the to many concerned about the ssibility, that was a relief to a lot of republ

may re-offend in a greateray or harm themselves, they may get remanded until we have a new plan, buthas always the last. we may have placed them on a 5150.t them to a new program. i mean, we've done everything and we're well worried about their safety, we'll bring them back to stabilize. please stand by. and arenow helping other people get through the collaborative course. arey intral part of our am. it's amazing. each harts own personality but all the treatment courts are set up to meet them to be as successful as they want to be at that time. i just have a follow-up question. is the primary or preferred treatment modality to force someone to take medication? to deal with the psychiatric symptoms? >> the judge will never force someone to take medication. the judge and treatment team want no part of that. it feels very messy and not at all client focused. the judge does require that people stick to their treatment plan. that individual creates with their provider. so no, there will never be, you take meds or you are going to jail, or you take meds or you are out of this court. no. but t

butha we are seeing in the trump presidency is somebody who is behaving like nixon. somebody who is flirting with dismissing the very people who are investigating them. somebody like today, and it has been too normalized to suggest that he can pardon himself. that was not bill clinton's narrative. bill clinton's narrative was, i'm allowed certain civil defenses even though i am president of the united states. richard nixon was the constitution be damned. i'm the president and if i do it, it counts and itatters and it's legal. that's what donald trump is doing and why it is going down a road of impeachment. >> it's basically when we don't know what to do. i've said this about this president all along. the constitution wasn't written for a president like this. it was written for a moral man or woman. it was written for someone who had a sense of shame. it was written for parties and organizations and branches that didn't want to see their power usurped. everything in political science and history tells us congress is battling with the president to make sure that he doe